I've been tasked to develop a fairly simple reservation console for a hotel. It features two <form>s which have corresponding tabs, the active tab applies to the default form and the inactive tab applies to the hidden form. The tabs are clickable and would enable/disable their respective forms.
So far what I am planning is having embedded style and script elements below my main HTML.
Question 1.1: For the HTML, can I just go ahead and straight up do what I want, or am I restricted? Do I have to use any facebook specific elements for plain old stuff like forms?
Here's an example of a snippet I would use:
<ul>
<li id="tab">text</li>
<li id="tab2">text</li>
</ul>
<form id="hidden">blah</form>
<script>
(function() {
var tab = document.getElementById('tab'),
tab2 = document.getElementById('tab2');
tab2.onclick = function() {
document.getElementById('hidden').style.display='';
return false;
}
})();
</script>
<style> #hidden { display:none; }</style>
Question 1.2: Are there pitfalls with this code? Is it bad to rely on private namespacing / anonymous functions because of the way Facebook converts the markup and js? Should I be using inline event handlers such as onclick for event based behavior because it would be easier for the Facebook "converter" to parse it and "recompile" it?
Other background info:
This widget does not have any sort of
share buttons, login, pictures. It
pretty much will consist of an
arrival/departure textfield, dropdowns
for adults/kids, and an submit button.
This goes for both forms.
The main thing to know about FBML is that Facebook has deprecated FBML pages in favor of iframe pages. The good thing about using the new iframe pages is that you are pretty much able to do whatever you want on your page in terms of css, html, and javascript. There were a lot of gotchas as you were asking about with FBML but a majority of those have gone away.
Related
I am using CKEditor in DIV mode, as compared to an IFRAME and I am attempting to assign a class to the editor itself. I have found where to add it to things within the editor, but not the editor itself. And, I would prefer to not wrap the editor within another DIV to get the effect I want.
I am also using version 4 of CKEditor.
Edit: The following was my questions to Reinmar after he suggested the Shared Space plugin, which at least for now I have chosen not to use.
Edit: In response to Reinmar I have begun using the Shared Space plugin, and do see the potential benefits of using it over a DIV.
With that said I have the following code:
<div id="topSpace"></div>
<textarea name="data[ArchiveQuarter][description]" class="userContent" id="editor1" cols="30" rows="6"></textarea>
At the bottom of the page I have:
<script type="text/javascript">
CKEDITOR.disableAutoInline = true;
CKEDITOR.replace( 'editor1', {
extraPlugins: 'sharedspace',
sharedSpaces: {
top: 'topSpace',
}
});
</script>
It currently creates the toolbar within the top space, and has the textarea, but both of them are disabled. I probably just messed up some of the configuration, but I'm not sure what.
I would greatly prefer it to use the textarea configuration as it is part of a form instead of extracting the data from inline.
You might be interested in using Shared space plugin:
addon page,
sample.
I'm proposing this instead of using div, because I've got mixed feelings regarding divarea plugin. Your original container is wrapped with editor's structure what changes the real context. IMO it's better to use real inline editing + the shared spaces feature to place toolbar and bottom bar where you need them.
Update:
When you're using inline editor, you don't need textarea. Textarea is only a data container which framed or div based editors replace with themselves.
Inline editing is all about editing real existing elements. So this can be your HTML:
<div id="topSpace"></div>
<div class="userContent" id="editor1"><h1>My page</h1><p>Fooo!</p></div>
And JS:
<script type="text/javascript">
CKEDITOR.disableAutoInline = true;
CKEDITOR.inline( 'editor1', {
extraPlugins: 'sharedspace',
sharedSpaces: {
top: 'topSpace',
}
} );
</script>
Note that I used CKEDITOR.inline not CKEDITOR.replace.
And the huge advantage of inline editing is that that <div> is a real element on your page - it is not wrapped (as in div based editor) and its contents is not moved to the frame (as in framed editor). So your content will inherit styles of your page.
The downside is that you need to implement custom data saving, because there's no form. The simplest way is to add a "save" button which clicked will send editor.getData() via AJAX to your server.
BTW. You probably was confused by the fact that in the shared spaces sample 2 editors are framed and 2 are inline. All of them reuses one top space and one bottom space.
BTW2. To make use of inline editing you don't need shared spaces in fact. Then the "floating toolbar" will be used as in here: http://ckeditor.com/demo#inline
Right now I am developing PhoneGap app all functionality are successfully done which what client need but in my PhoneGap app I am using multiple html pages on click of one button index.html it will naviagte to another html but client need silder look when naviagte one page to another page..
Code is:
<li><a onclick="callFestvialinfo()"><img src="images/festival_info_button.png" width="123" height="123" alt="" /></a></li>
function callFestvialinfo()
{
window.location = "festival_info.html";
}
it will navigate festival_info.html normally but client need silder look from index to festival_info.html and festival_info.html to index when onclick back.
You can check this out. A very light weight solution to page transitions.
http://www.fasw.ws/faswwp/non-jquery-page-transitions-lightweight/
I'm building an offline tablet/phone app in HTML5 to collect data remotely in the field where there are no cell towers. It uses the offline application cache manifest to save the pages into the browser. I'm attempting to get it to work in Safari and Android.
Currently there are a multiple separate web pages for my site (index.html, load.html and sync.html). I want to be able to load each page in and run different javascript when each page has loaded.
Originally I had a main index page (which acted as the bootstrap for the application) and was using jQuery's .load() function to load the different page files (only snippets of html) into the main display div when a menu button was clicked. This worked pretty well with the iPhone. However when trying it on Android and the site was already cached and the device was in flight mode so it can't connect to the server, the page would fail silently to load in the HTML from the external page for some reason so I'd get a blank screen. I narrowed it down to jQuery's .load() function failing in Android when loading pages from the cache.
So then I tried keeping the individual pages separate and having all the HTML, JavaScript, CSS includes and header code mirrored on each page (not very efficient). So each page could run standalone by itself. This worked ok in Android and iPhone in the web browser when following a simple href link to load the other pages. However when I go into app mode on the iPhone (i.e. you save the webpage to the home screen so it appears as an actual app icon then you run it from there it appears almost fullscreen apart from the status bar) then click on a menu icon to load sync.html for example it opens the page in Safari instead of staying within the fullscreen 'app' mode.
Is there a way to open separate web pages that should be cached within the fullscreen 'app' mode on iPhone? I don't want the other pages loading up Safari as there's less screen size.
The only other method I can think of is having all the html snippets hidden in divs on the main index page, then showing and hiding the divs depending on which menu button is clicked. This may look cleaner and be faster but just wondering if there's a better way to do it?
For now the cleanest solution I could come up with was this:
HTML:
<section id="pageContent">
<div id="homePage" class="hidden">
<?php include_once 'home.html'; ?>
</div>
<div id="loadPage" class="hidden">
<?php include_once 'load.html'; ?>
</div>
<div id="syncPage" class="hidden">
<?php include_once 'sync.html'; ?>
</div>
</section>
CSS:
.hidden {
display: none;
}
This lets you keep your content pages in separate files. And because the html in those files is all included into the index page on page load all the html gets cached as well. Simply a matter of hiding and showing the various pages now.
Then I used some simple jQuery to show and hide each page and set up some simple JavaScript functions to show each individual page. E.g.
function showSyncPage()
{
$('#pageContent').children().hide(); // Hide all the other divs (other pages)
$('#syncPage').show(); // Show the sync page
}
Then also add those function calls into onclick handlers on your buttons/links to open each page. E.g.
<a class="button" onclick="showSyncPage()">Sync</a>
Now you've got a working navigation system that loads all the pages in iPhone/Android and even in iPhone 'app' mode without loading Safari.
I've been desperately seeking a way to disable the facebook social text right next to the "Recommend" button. Is it possible, to simply render a "Recommend" button, without anything else (no counter, no text, JUST the button)?
The problem is, CSS wont be applied since all the elements are inside the iframe, so I cant just hide the element itself using CSS (which in this case would be a td).
Also, I cant just put everything in a div and give it overflow:hidden and a fix width, since the pop up which appears when actually clicking the "Recommend" Button would then not be fully visible.
My current implementation comes via AddThis:
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:size="small" fb:like:layout="none" fb:like:action="recommend" fb:like:width="10"></a>
Any ideas?
Thanks
Alex
Facebook polcy IV 4 d:
You must not obscure or cover elements of our social plugins, such as the Like button or Like box plugin.
So if you can't do it by using their like button creation tool you shouldn't do it.
Using the Add This Facebook Like button you can avoid the count using this attribute
fb:like:layout="button"
So in your case you would have
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:size="small" fb:like:layout="button" fb:like:action="recommend" ></a>
"Recommend" with a counter comes closest to your request. I too don't like the social text (e.g. "57 people like this. Be the first of your friends"), yet I do like the naked counter. The code that I use is:
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count" fb:like:action="recommend" fb:like:width="135"></a>
See AddThis own documentation here.
I am building a web page and I have included Facebook's Like button. Works great in all browsers but not in Firefox. When clicked in Firefox, it creates an endless loop of opening and closing a facebook login window. This is a known issue that Facebook isn't looking like it will correct anytime soon.
Can anyone tell me what code I might write to hide the like button (or a div containing the like button) from Firefox only? I've never written code to detect a browser and then have my site function a certain way. Not a javascript guru here. Thanks!
You can do this using the navigator javascript object, but it sounds like you have deeper problems if the facebook like button is causing an endless loop of window loads. You most probably have other errors in your code. The button should work fine in firefox.
Here's how to text for firefox using the navigator object,
if (/Firefox[\/\s](\d+\.\d+)/.test(navigator.userAgent)){
// user using firefox
}
This code parses the userAgent string, the string that defines the user's browser, of the navigator object. It looks for a string of the format Firefox/x.x or Firefox x.x.
This should work for you
<div id="likeDiv">
my div
</div>
<script>
if (navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Firefox")!=-1)
{
// Remove the element from the dom
var Node1 = document.getElementById('likeDiv');
Node1.removeChild(Node1.childNodes[0]);
}
</script>
Hope this helps