currently i'am migrating a JBoss 4 project to JBoss 6. I do miss substitutes for the EJB3StandaloneDeployer and EJB3StandaloneBootstrap.
Are there any new sources which deliver the functionality of this two classes?
THX
My guess is that EJB3StandaloneDeployer and EJB3StandaloneBootstrap are replaced by the standard EJBContainer API. Here is an example:
// Instantiate an embeddable EJB container and search the
// JVM class path for eligible EJB modules or directories
EJBContainer ejbC = EJBContainer.createEJBContainer();
// Get a naming context for session bean lookups
Context ctx = ejbC.getNamingContext();
// Retrieve a reference to the AccountBean using a
// portable global JNDI name (more on this later!)
AccountBean ab = (AccountBean)
ctx.lookup("java:global/account/AccountBean");
// Test the account
Account a1 = ab.createAccount(1234);
...
// Shutdown the embeddable container
ejbC.close();
JBoss also started the Arquillian that you might find interesting.
See also
TOTD #128: EJBContainer.createEJBContainer: Embedded EJB using GlassFish v3
The Arquillian project
The Arquillian Community Space
Related
With a simple client app, make an object and object repository, connect to a Geode cluster, then run a #Bean ApplicationRunner to put some data to a remote region.
#ClientCacheApplication(name = "Web", locators = #Locator, logLevel = "debug", subscriptionEnabled = true)
#EnableClusterDefinedRegions
#EnableClusterConfiguration(useHttp = true)
#EnablePdx
public class MyCache {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyCache.class);
#Bean
ApplicationRunner StartedUp(MyRepository myRepo){
log.info("In StartedUp");
return args -> {
String guid = UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8).toUpperCase();
MyObject msg = new MyObject(guid, "Started");
myRepo.save(msg);
log.info("Out StartedUp");
};
}
The "save" put fails with
org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'gemfireClusterSchemaObjectInitializer'; nested exception is org.springframework.web.client.ResourceAccessException: I/O error on POST request for "https://localhost:7070/gemfire/v1/regions": Connection refused: connect; nested exception is java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
Problem creating region and persist region to disk Geode Gemfire Spring Boot helped. The problem is the #EnableClusterConfiguration(useHttp = true)
This annotation makes the remote cluster appear to be a localhost. If I remove it altogether then the put works.
If remove just the useHttp = true there is another error:
org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'gemfireClusterSchemaObjectInitializer'; nested exception is org.apache.geode.cache.client.ServerOperationException: remote server on #.#.#.#(Web:9408:loner)### The function is not registered for function id CreateRegionFunction
In a nutshell, the SDG #EnableClusterConfiguration annotation (details available here) enables configuration metadata defined and declared on the client (i.e. Spring [Boot] Data, GemFire/Geode application) to be pushed from the client-side to the cluster (of GemFire/Geode servers).
I say "enable" because it depends on the client-side configuration metadata (i.e. Spring bean definitions you have explicitly or implicitly defined/declared). Explicit configuration is configuration you defined with a bean definition (in XML, or JavaConfig with #Bean, etc). Implicit configuration is auto-configuration or using SDG annotations like #EnableEntityDefinedRegions or #EnableCachingDefinedRegions, etc.
By default, the #EnableClusterConfiguration annotation assumes the cluster of GemFire or Geode servers were configured and bootstrapped with Spring, and specifically using the SDG Annotation configuration model. When the GemFire or Geode servers are configured and bootstrapped with Spring, then SDG goes on to register some provided, canned GemFire Functions that the #EnableClusterConfiguration annotation calls (by default and...) as a fallback.
NOTE: See the appendix in the SBDG reference documentation on configuring and bootstrapping a GemFire or Geode server, or even a cluster of servers, with Spring. This certainly simplifies local development and debugging as opposed to using Gfsh. You can do all sorts of interesting combinations: Gfsh Locator with Spring servers, Spring [embedded|standalone] Locator with both Gfsh and Spring servers, etc.
Most of the time, users are using Spring on the client and Gfsh to (partially) configure and bootstrap their cluster (of servers). When this is the case, then Spring is generally not on the servers' classpath and the "provided, canned" Functions I referred to above are not present and automatically registered. In which case, you must rely on GemFire/Geodes internal, Management REST API (something I know a thing or 2 about, ;-) to send the configuration metadata from the client to the server/cluster. This is why the useHttp attribute on the #EnableClusterConfiguration annotation must be set to true.
This is why you saw the Exception...
org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'gemfireClusterSchemaObjectInitializer';
nested exception is org.apache.geode.cache.client.ServerOperationException: remote server on #.#.#.#(Web:9408:loner)###
The function is not registered for function id CreateRegionFunction
The CreateRegionFunction is the canned Function provided by SDG out of the box, but only when Spring is used to both configure and bootstrap the servers in the cluster.
This generally works well for CI/CD environments, and especially our own test infrastructure since we typically do not have a full installations of either Apache Geode or Pivotal GemFire available to test with in those environments. For 1, those artifacts must be resolvable from and artifact repository like Maven Central. The Apache Geode (and especially) Pivotal GemFire distributions are not. The JARs are, but the full distro isn't. Anyway...
Hopefully, all of this makes sense up to this point.
I do have a recommendation if I may.
Given your application class definition begins with...
#ClientCacheApplication(name = "Web", locators = #Locator,
logLevel = "debug", subscriptionEnabled = true)
#EnableClusterDefinedRegions
#EnableClusterConfiguration(useHttp = true)
#EnablePdx
public class MyCache { ... }
I would highly recommend simply using Spring Boot for Apache Geode (and Pivotal GemFire), i.e. SBDG, in place of SDG directly.
Your application class could then be simplified to:
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableClusterAware
#EnableClusterDefinedRegions
public class MyCache { ... }
You can then externalize some of the hard coded configuration settings using the Spring Boot application.properties file:
spring.application.name=Web
spring.data.gemfire.cache.log-level=debug
spring.data.gemfire.pool.subscription-enabled=true
NOTE: #EnableClusterAware is a much more robust and capable extension of #EnableClusterConfiguration. See additional details here.
Here are a few resources to get you going:
Project Overview
Getting Started Sample Guide
Use Case Driven Guides/Samples
Useful resources in the Appendix TOC.
Detailed information on SBDG provided Auto-configuration.
Detailed information on Declarative Configuration.
Detailed information on Externalized Configuration.
In general, SBDG, which is based on SDG, SSDG and STDG, is the preferred/recommended starting point for all things Spring for Apache Geode and Pivotal GemFire (or now, Pivotal Cloud Cache).
Hope this helps.
I'm trying to run an application using a Datasource on JBOSS EAP 6.4
In the standalone.xml file my data source is well defined.
When I try a :
Context context = new InitialContext();
NamingEnumeration<NameClassPair> list = context.list("");
while (list.hasMore())
{
String name = list.next().getName();
System.out.println(name);
}
I only get TransactionManager while I'm expecting as well my data source named in the standalone.xml as jndi-name="java:jboss/datasources/OracleDS".
Why my datasource is not defined in the jndi environnement? Am I missing some configuration?
The Context.list(Name) does not include subcontexts. In other words you cannot iterate through all the registered names using context.list(""). If you want to list the data sources you'd need to use context.list("java:jboss/datasources).
The reason you only get the /TransactionManager is because it's the only one defined under the root namespace.
I have a problem similar to the one described here.
I am using RESTEasy within a standalone Jetty application. When I start the application locally and call a service (e.g. localhost:16880/rest/user/login) bean validation works fine, i.e. I get validation errors like this:
[PARAMETER]
[UserService#login(arg0).appKey]
[app_key may not be null or empty]
[]
However, when I deploy my application to a remote host and call the same service (e.g. remotehost:16880/rest/user/login) bean validation is not invoked at all.
I am using the #ValidateRequest annotation for the service and #Valid annotation for the bean parameter.
My Resteasy version is 3.0.13.Final, though I have tried earlier versions as well. I have tried to write my custom validator, but that didn't work either.
I am puzzled why the validation works locally, but not on remote server. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Since you are using Jetty as standalone server, you have to define RESTEasy validation providers where you define ServletContextHandler. Note that in standalone server there is no container to scan for #Provider classes and to activate them, so you must do it manually.
I expect that you create and start your server app something like:
//create a server listening at some port
Server server= new Server(port);
//add server handlers
HandlerList handlers= new HandlerList();
initHandlers(handlers);
server.setHandler(handlers);
//start the server
server.start();
In initHandlers you must have defined your RESTEasy support:
public void initHandlers(List<HandlerList> handlers) {
//define root context handler
ServletContextHandler servletContextHandler= new ServletContextHandler(ServletContextHandler.SESSIONS);
servletContextHandler.setContextPath("/");
handlers.addHandler(servletContextHandler);
//define RESTEasy handler
ServletHolder restServlet= new ServletHolder(new HttpServlet30Dispatcher());
//since this is a standalone server, somewhere you have to define RESTful services and Singletons
restServlet.setInitParameter("javax.ws.rs.Application", "com.exampleapp.MyRestApplication");
restServlet.setInitParameter("resteasy.servlet.mapping.prefix", "rest");
servletContextHandler.addServlet(restServlet, "rest/*");
}
So what is left to do now is to add Validation provider as init parameter:
restServlet.setInitParameter("resteasy.providers", "org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.validation.ValidatorContextResolver,org.jboss.resteasy.api.validation.ResteasyViolationExceptionMapper");
On this link I tried to find the name of the validator providers: https://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.4.Final/userguide/html/Validation.html
RESTEasy obtains a bean validation implemenation by looking in the available META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs.Providers files for an implementation of ContextResolver
So it does not say what, but says where. Now open the "resteasy-hibernatevalidator-provider-3...*.jar (from Eclipse -> Maven dependencies or manually unzip) and look into META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs.ext.Providers It says:
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.validation.hibernate.ValidatorContextResolver
org.jboss.resteasy.api.validation.ResteasyViolationExceptionMapper
If you don't have this dependency, then add it to your pom file:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.resteasy</groupId>
<artifactId>resteasy-hibernatevalidator-provider</artifactId>
<version>${resteasy.version}</version>
</dependency>
One more note: that at the same place where you described validation providers, you also add other providers, if you happen to need them (such as JacksonJaxbJson, etc).
Although there already are quite some StackOverflow questions, blog entries, etc. on the web, I still cannot figure out a solution to the problem stated below.
Similar to this question (Injecting EJB within JAX-RS resource on JBoss7) I'd like to inject a EJB instance into a JAX-RS class. I tried with JBoss 5, JBoss 7, and WildFly 8. I either get no injection at all (field is null), or the server does not deploy (as soon as I try to combine all sorts of annotations).
Adding #Stateless to the JAX-RS makes the application server know both classes as beans. However, no injection takes place.
Is there a way to inject EJBs into a REST application? What kind of information (in addition to that contained in the question linked to above) could I provide to help?
EDIT: I created a Github project showing code that works (with Glassfish 4.0) and does not work (with JBoss 5).
https://github.com/C-Otto/beantest
Commit 4bf2f3d23f49d106a435f068ed9b30701bbedc9d works using Glassfish
4.0.
Commit 50d137674e55e1ceb512fe0029b9555ff7c2ec21 uses Jersey 1.8, which does not work.
Commit 86004b7fb6263d66bda7dd302f2d2a714ff3b939
uses Jersey 2.6, which also does not work.
EDIT2:
Running the Code which I tried on JBoss 5 on Glassfish 4.0 gives:
Exception while loading the app : CDI deployment failure:WELD-001408 Unsatisfied dependencies for type [Ref<ContainerRequest>] with qualifiers [#Default] at injection point [[BackedAnnotatedParameter] Parameter 1 of [BackedAnnotatedConstructor] #Inject org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.routing.UriRoutingContext(Ref<ContainerRequest>, ProcessingProviders)]
org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408 Unsatisfied dependencies for type [Ref<ContainerRequest>] with qualifiers [#Default] at injection point [[BackedAnnotatedParameter] Parameter 1 of [BackedAnnotatedConstructor] #Inject org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.routing.UriRoutingContext(Ref<ContainerRequest>, ProcessingProviders)]
at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateInjectionPointForDeploymentProblems(Validator.java:403)
EDIT3: The crucial information might be that I'd like a solution that works on JBoss 5
If you don't want to make your JAX-RS resource an EJB too (#Stateless) and then use #EJB or #Resource to inject it, you can always go with JNDI lookup (I tend to write a "ServiceLocator" class that gets a service via its class.
A nice resource to read about the topic:
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Remote+EJB+invocations+via+JNDI+-+EJB+client+API+or+remote-naming+project
A sample code:
try {
// 1. Retreive the Home Interface using a JNDI Lookup
// Retrieve the initial context for JNDI. // No properties needed when local
Context context = new InitialContext();
// Retrieve the home interface using a JNDI lookup using
// the java:comp/env bean environment variable // specified in web.xml
helloHome = (HelloLocalHome) context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/HelloBean");
//2. Narrow the returned object to be an HelloHome object. // Since the client is local, cast it to the correct object type.
//3. Create the local Hello bean instance, return the reference
hello = (HelloLocal)helloHome.create();
} catch(NamingException e) {
} catch(CreateException e) {
}
This is not "injecting" per-se, but you don't use "new" as-well, and you let the application server give you an instance which is managed.
I hope this was useful and I'm not telling you something you already know!
EDIT:
This is an excellent example: https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS72/EJB+invocations+from+a+remote+client+using+JNDI
EDIT 2:
As you stated in your comment, you'd like to inject it via annotations.
If the JNDI lookup is currently working for you without problems, and
If you're using Java EE 6+ (which I'm guessing you are), you can do the following:
#EJB(lookup = "jndi-lookup-string-here")
private RemoteInterface bean;
I already have a integration-test phase, when I ran the selenium tests. I also want to run some unit tests in this phase, because the app is too much complex and have a lot of dependencies between his modules (a hell), so, after a week fighting against OpenEJB and Arquillian, I believe that this would be easier.
The thing is: how do I made it work?
I have the instance already running, if I instantiate an InitialContext and try to lookup some bean, I got an exception telling me that I have not set the java.naming.initial.factory, and I don't know what to put in there.
I'm also complaining about the annotated beans.
Suppose a Bean like this:
#Stateless
public class ABeanImpl implements ABean {
#EJB
private BBean;
}
Will the container automatically get right the BBean?
Thanks in advance
How to connect to JBoss 7.1 remote JNDI:
Here is the code snippet that I use for JBoss 7.1:
Properties props = new Properties();
String JBOSS_CONTEXT = "org.jboss.naming.remote.client.InitialContextFactory";
props.put("jboss.naming.client.ejb.context", true);
props.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JBOSS_CONTEXT);
props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "remote://localhost:4447");
props.put(Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL, "jboss");
props.put(Context.SECURITY_CREDENTIALS, "jboss123");
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(props);
Resolution of ambiguous ejb references:
According to JBoss EJB 3 reference, if at any level of your EJB environment (EJB/EAR/Server) are duplicates in used interfaces, exception will be thrown during resolution of injected beans.
Based on above, if you have got a reference to EJB bean which interface:
has two implementations in your EJB module (JAR/WAR) - exception will be thrown
has two implementations in your application (other EJB JAR's in same EAR) - exception will be thrown
has two implementations, one in module with bean ABeanImpl, second somewhere else - implemetation from current module is used.