i m making an iphone app in which when same person calls you and u dont pick the phone then the a sound will be played when same user calls u more than 4 times ,now when a call is incoming i am storing its callid in a string or whatever but my problem is i cant find logic to check that the same user has called four times or more??
Use an NSDictionary (a form of hash database). If the current callers name isn't there as the key, add it, and set the value to be count of 1. If the callers name exists as a key in the dictionary, increment the count value by 1. After that, read the count value and do whatever you want depending on the comparison against 4.
But getting the callers name may require some sort of non-stock OS on an iPhone.
Hm.
Loop through an array of received calls.
Instead of storing the callerId in a string, store it in an array called receievedCalls.
During each incoming call, loop through the array (foreach loop?), looking for the callerId of the current caller.
foreach (receivedCalls as $key => $value) {
if ($value == $callerId) {
count++;
}
if (count >= 4) {
(play sound)
}
}
Probably flawed logic but meh. Again, I haven't worked with iPhone apps before so I don't know what kind of language it uses.
No API for that, Sorry.
Related
I'm trying to retrieve the serial number from a drive using the MC_BR_GetHardwareInfo function block. Since the documentation lacks any kind of example code on this topic I'm getting nowhere.
Which information should I provide to the function block in order to get the desired serial number?
Below sample will crash in the PLC, probably because the function block requires certain pointers to be addressed:
MC_HARDWARE_INFO_REF hwinfo;
MC_BR_GetHardwareInfo(&hwinfo);
You are probably getting a page fault, because you provide the MC_BR_GetHardwareInfo function block (FUB) a wrong type, which leads to random behavior.
A function block is basically a function which requires a reference to a specific type as parameter. This type contains the actual in- and outputs which are used, internal state variables, etc. We need this, because of the synchronous execution of the code. This means unlike a function, you need to call a FUB until it is done.
Let's take a look to the help of the FUB:
Guid: 056444ea-2a15-4af6-a5ae-0675894b17d3
So the FUB needs a reference to the Axis object of which you want to know the HW info and an Execute command. It will give you some status bits, an error code and the actual data you want to have within the structure HardwareInfo of the type MC_HARDWARE_INFO_REF.
First we need to instantiate the FUB by create a variable of its type. We do this in the local *.var file of the task:
VAR
fbGetHwInfo : MC_BR_GetHardwareInfo := (0);
END_VAR
Then we call set the parameters of the FUB and call it, which might look like this:
void _CYCLIC ProgramCyclic(void)
{
//should be set by the application or in watch/monitor; now it only
//executes once
fbGetHwInfo.Execute = 1;
//reference to your axis object; when using a wizard the first axis
//will be gAxis01 on default
fbGetHwInfo.Axis = (UDINT)&gAxis01;
//call the FUB
MC_BR_GetHardwareInfo(&fbGetHwInfo);
if(fbGetHwInfo.Error == 1)
{
//TODO: errorhandling
}
else if(fbGetHwInfo.Done == 1)
{
//TODO use output
//fbGetHwInfo.HardwareInfo
}
}
typically you would do this in some statemachine. Also you probably have to wait until the network to the drive is initialized. You could check this with the MC_BR_ReadDriveStatus FUB. Just for testing it should be enough to wait for some seconds after reboot and set the Execute flag in monitor mode.
I'm getting the above layout from Parse. What I want is vid 1, 2, and 3 to be in the same row; associated with same object ID. How can I do this? My ultimate goal is to easily retrieve 10 video dictionary's per user on a table view. Will any of this make a difference? I'm saving like this.....
videoDict = ["id":videoId, "title":vidTitleText, "description":vidDescription, "image":vidIMG]
let videoSave = PFObject(className:"UserVideos")
videoSave["user"] = PFUser.currentUser()!.username
videoSave["userObjectId"] = PFUser.currentUser()!.objectId
videoSave["vid\(saveValueLBL.text!)"] = videoDict
videoSave.saveInBackgroundWithBlock { (success, error ) -> Void in
if success == true
{
print("Succesfull")
}
}
Where you have let videoSave = PFObject(className:"UserVideos") you are creating a new videoSave object each time. you need to move that outside of your loop so that you're accessing the same object each time instead of making a new one. However, the way you currently have your code set up you'll run into problems, because each object can only have one synchronous action called on it (in this case, your save), so the second, third, maybe even all the way to the 10th save may not occur because it needs the first one to finish before the next one can be called. You need to create your object outside your loop, run the loop, then call the save at the end to make sure it isn't saving until all of the data is updated.
If this isn't all inside of a loop, you need to get the videoSave object back each time, perhaps by storing it onto your user, and then fetching it from the user object.
Put everything outside the loop and keep just the code below inside the loop:
videoDict = ["id":videoId, "title":vidTitleText, "description":vidDescription, "image":vidIMG]
videoSave["vid\(saveValueLBL.text!)"] = videoDict
From what I understand although I saved information in Parse as a Dictionary this is in fact an invalid data type. That's why I'm having trouble retrieving because Parse doesn't recognize the info.
Before I reload a table I want to know that all of the tasks that were saving in the background are done saving. I have 5 different saveInBackground functions that must complete before I make a new PFQuery. My thought right now is to say:
object.saveInBackgroundWithBlock({ (Success: true, error) -> Void in
count ++
})
Then, once the count gets to a certain number to perform the query. I don't want to use if because if the network is taking too long to process the save request. Would a while statement work? Such as:
while count < 0 {
continue
} else if count == 5 {
self.fetchSecondaryObjects()
}
Ideally I would be using a real-time data engine to power my application but I'm having trouble locating one that I can use as I only write in Swift. If this exists out there and you know of it, I'd love to know about it.
Just do the check each time you increment. It's really very low overhead, only five comparisons.
object.saveInBackgroundWithBlock({ (Success: true, error) -> Void in
count ++;
if count == 5 {
self.fetchSecondaryObjects()
}
})
Unless I'm missing some reason you can't do that, it seems like the simplest solution. Better than running an infinite loop.
Generally I try not to use while in such cases because one can easily get stuck in them if you're somehow of in your logic. Why don't you just use something like that:
if count >= xyz
I have not been able to find this information anywhere. How long can a string be send with the TTL version of the redpark cable?
The following delegate method is called twice when I print something thorough serial from my Arduino, an example of a string is this: 144;480,42;532,40;20e
- (void) readBytesAvailable:(UInt32)length{
When I use the new function methods of retrieving available data [getStringFromBytesAvailable] I will only get 144;480,42;532,40; and then the whole function is called again and the string now contains the rest of the string: 20e
The following method is working for appending the two strings, but only if the rate of data transmission is 'slow' (1 time a second, I would prefer minimum 10 times a second).
-
(void) readBytesAvailable:(UInt32)length{
if(string && [string rangeOfString:#"e"].location == NSNotFound){
string = [string stringByAppendingString:[rscMgr getStringFromBytesAvailable]];
NSLog(string);
finishedReading = YES;
}
else{
string = [rscMgr getStringFromBytesAvailable];
}
if (finishedReading == YES)
{
//do stuff
}
finishedReading = NO;
string = nil;
}
}
But can you tell my why the methods is called twice if I write a "long" string, and how to avoid this issue?
Since your program fragment runs faster then the time it takes to send a string, you need to capture the bytes and append them to a string.
If the serial data is terminated with a carriage return you can test for it to know when you have received the entire string.
Then you can allow your Arduino to send 10 times a second.
That is just how serial ports work. You can't and don't need to avoid those issues. There is no attempt at any level of the SW/HW to keep your serial data stream intact, so making any assumptions about that in your code is just wrong. Serial data is just a stream of bytes, with no concept of packetization. So you have to deal with the fact that you might have to read partial data and read the rest later.
The serialPortConfig within the redparkSerial header file provided by RedPark does, in fact, give you more configuration control than you may realize. The readBytesAvailable:length method is abstracted, and is only called when one of two conditions is met: rxForwardingTimeout value is exceeded with data in the primary buffer (default set to 100 ms) or rxForwardCount is reached (default set to 16 characters).
So, in your case it looks like you've still got data in your buffer after your initial read, which means that the readBytesAvailable:length method will be called again (from the main run loop) to retrieve the remaining data. I would propose playing around with the rxForwardingTimeout and rxForwardCount until it performs as you'd expect.
As already mentioned, though, I'd recommend adding a flag (doesn't have to be carriage return) to at least the end of your packet, for identification.
Also, some good advice here: How do you design a serial command protocol for an embedded system?
Good luck!
Good morning,
I am retrieving a stream of bytes from a serial device that connects to the iPad. Once connected the supplied SDK will call a delegate method with the bytes that have been forwarded.
The readings forwarded by the serial device via the SDK are in the following format:
!X1:000.0;
Once connected to the serial device the delegated methods will start receiving data immediately - this could be in various states of completion i.e.
:000.00;
What I need to do is establish a concrete way of splitting the readings returned from the serial device so that I can manipulate the data.
Some of the tried options are:
Simply concatenate the received strings for a fixed period and then split the NSString on the ";" character. This is a little inefficient though and does not allow me to manipulate the data dynamically
-(void)receivingDelegateMethod:(NSString *)aString {
if(counter < 60){
[self.PropertyString stringByAppendingString:aString];
}else{
NSArray *readings = [self.PropertyString componentsSeparatedByString: #";"];
}
}
Determine a starting point by looking for the "!" character and then appending the resulting substring to a NSString property. All previous calls to the delegated method will append to this property and then remove the first 10 characters.
I know there are further options such as NSScanners and RegEx but I wanted to get the opinion of the community before wasting more time of different methods.
Thanks
Make a BOOL flag that indicates that the stream has been initialized, and set it to false. When you receive the next chunk of data, check the flag first. If it is not set, skip all characters until you see an exclamation point '!'. Once you see it, discard everything in front of it, and copy the rest of the string into the buffer. If the "is initialized" flag is set, append the entire string to the buffer without skipping characters.
Once you finish the append, scan the buffer for ! and ; delimited sections. For each occurrence of that pattern, call a designated method with a complete portion of the pattern. You can get fancy, and define your own "secondary" delegate for processing pre-validated strings.
You may need to detect disconnections, and set the "is initialized" flag back to NO.