I'm wondering if I will have compatibility issues with OS4.0 if my app is built with the 4.1 SDK, or is this a non-issue?
The short answer to your question is: Use a Base SDK Version of at least 4.0 for your application and a Deployment Target Version of exactly 4.0.
I've downvoted both answers because they are wrong or at least incomplete.
When building applications there are two settings that you should be aware of:
There is the Base SDK Version which defines against which version of the SDK your application will be compiled.
There is also the Deployment Target Version which defines the lowest version of the iOS that your application requires. You can set this to as low as 2.2.1 in Xcode but the App Store will not accept versions lower then 3.1.3 at the moment.
The Base SDK Version can be higher then the Deployment Target Version. This simply means that your application is backward compatible with older version of the iOS. This also means that your app needs to make decisions at runtime to be sure not to use newer functionality when running on an older version.
For example, the MFMessageComposeViewController was introduced in 4.0 so if your app has been configured to also run on 3.1.3 then you should use NSClassFromString() to find if that specific class is actually available before you use it.
There are many questions here on Stack Overflow on how to discover available functionality so I will not repeat those techniques here.
And a somewhat important note:
Behaviour does change across OS releases. There were a pile of changes in 3.0 (we had issues with UITableView/UITableViewCell):
Some changes happened on old apps (e.g. compiled for 2.2.1). I forget what these were.
Some of them were in the toolchain (I think they changed how nibs were compiled with ibtool; it was something like setting both an image and a custom view for a UITableViewCell). This happened when we upgraded the SDK on the build server, even if we didn't touch "Base SDK"
Some of them happen only when you compiled with a Base SDK of 3.0 (UIKit automagically detects which version you've linked against and has backwards-compatability modes for some things)
Additionally, there were some runtime/C++ changes in GCC 4.2, which meant a GCC 4.2 app running on OS 2.2.1 crashed when casting unsigned int/long to float/double or using std::ostringstream. I've since added a check for GCC version.
So no, compiling with a newer SDK can result in issues — you might not want to risk it if there are time constraints (you don't have time to implement multitasking support, or you don't have time to do a complete re-test and fix all the bugs, or so). Or maybe you still want to support 2.2.1 for some strange reason (4.0 dropped 2.x "device support", which effectively made it impossible to debug apps on 2.x devices).
Usually nothing breaks across minor OS releases (discounting 3.1/3.2). I'd recommend upgrading SDKs as soon as you have the time; don't shy away from new features just because old OSes don't have them.
Depending on the APIs you will be using. Let's say you want to implemented in-app texting (MFMessageComposeViewController) and want ALL of your end-users (will be defined as EUs) to access that feature then you'll have to compile against iOS 4.0. But let's say you want the in-app texting to be optional and a "plus" for your EUs, you'll just compile your app against iOS 3.0 (let's say).
Hope I answered your question :-)
Related
I was wondering if it's possible to downgrade an app from the app store (ARM binary) to a lower version. For example if the app requires iOS 5.0 or 4.3 or later getting it to run on iOS 4.2 or 4.0.
I understand that the requirements are important as the newer version contains API linked calls only exposed on the newer iOS platform. However, I've many apps that are cabable of running on lower versions are needlessly compiled on newer versions of xcode (just a minor update supports a huge jump on iOS supported version, like iOs 4.0 -> iOs 5.0)
What I would like to do is maybe downgrade an iOS 5.0 app to iOS 4.3 app by verifying that there are no new linked functions apis and thereby adjusting the plist files to the lower vesion? Can otool or class-dump help with this?
Yes, it's possible. Submit a binary with a different "iOS Deployment Target" (in Project > Info and Targets > Deployment Target), even if it is lower than the one you currently have.
You'll need to do extensive testing to make sure your code runs on the various compatible iOS, since a lot has changed with the release of iOS 5 (and subsequently, 6), meaning a lot of functions and methods will not be recognized in those iOS versions.
Regarding finding which API's may not work, here's a small discussion of [Finding unsupported API's with OS version][1]
[1]: finding unsupported apis with os version "Finding unsupported API's with OS version".
Should I be developing my app for 4.2?
Always use the latest SDK. Apple won't approve any apps built against 3.x anymore.
Edit:
There's a difference between the base SDK and the iOS you plan to support. You need to use the latest SDK as I stated before, however you may still create an app that runs on older versions of iOS by not using classes and methods that have been introduced in newer releases and setting the target OS appropriately.
Unless you have the need to support older iOS devices with older iOS versions, you should develop using 4.2 as it has a lot of features that are missing in 3.x. Most importantly: 3.x doesn't support multitasking.
Also, it's important to understand the relationship between Base SDK version and deployment target. In a nutshell: you can (and should) compile against the latest SDK version but if done correctly, you can still run the app on older iOS versions.
The base SDK should always be the latest version available (4.2 as of right now). Then you can use the deployment target to specify the minimum OS that your application will support, so a good rule of the thumb would be to use 3.0 for that.
Personally, I use some of new iOS 4.0 stuff (ie. GCD) a lot in my applications. I've heard that 90% of ios users are on 4.x. That should be a good middle ground.
I am getting a fat binary when I go to upload, and I want to make sure that my application can run across 3.0, well even 2.0. Is there a specific way to make sure that this will show when I go to upload. I am not using any specific iOS 4 features, and I only have iOS 4 in my xCode. How can I test different iOS version?
The only way as I could think of is test your app on real old OS version devices. Since Apple prefers its users to upgrade to new OS version as soon as possible, they don't actually provide an official way for developers to test such backward compatibility.
Another relevant questions would be, "can I downgrade my device OS version to an old one, so that I can test my app on them?" I once did a research on SO and other Apple forums, and the result I got was NO, we developers don't have a way to "officially" downgrade our device OS version. Yes there are exceptions, you can try jail-breaking and then downgrading.
For jail-breaking / downgrading your OS version, check this post, A TimeMachine taking my iDevice back to 3.1.2? .
Edited: It's actually pretty easy to make sure that users with old OS versions can downloaded and install your app. All you need to do is set the Deployment Target in Xcode to the lowest OS version you want (iOS 3.0 would be the lowest in Xcode 3.2.5).
However, you need to bear in mind that such Deployment Target only ensures that your app can be downloaded and installed on such old version OS devices. They don't ensure compatibility during runtime. You still need to test your app on real old OS devices to ensure compatibility.
I dont think u need to worry about app version 3.0 below because it is not supported anymore. but how to test on different version, make sure change the iOS deployment target as Thomas refered.
There is no currently supported way to do this.
No current Simulator or Xcode tool will ensure that an app is completely compatible with an OS version older than the SDK used. The 2.0 SDK is not compatible with the current development tools. There is no officially supported way to downgrade a device.
Furthermore, Apple no longer even accepts app submissions that have a deployment target lower than 3.0.
Even most old 1st gen devices, if you can find one on eBay, have been upgraded to iOS 3.1.3. But if you have access to an old device running iOS 3.1.3, you can use that for testing. Many developers keep an old used iPod Touch around for just his purpose.
People with devices running something older than 3.1.3 are not only a really tiny percentage of the installed base, but are very unlikely to be still buying apps for that device. Even large developers with staff and legacy hardware available for this testing rarely waste the time on this market.
Look into Project -> Edit Project Settings -> iOS Deployment Target: 3.13. And then build?
Edit according to comment: You still need to ENSURE your code is within the runtime scope, i.e. do checks like 'respondstoselector' before calling methods in question.
I know that parts of this question was asked in several variation but I want to make sure I got it right.
Here are my assumptions and understandings which I want to know if they are correct before submitting.
My application assumes features supported by all OS, and so I should:
Set the Active SDK to be the latest (currently SDK 3.0).
Set the Deployment Target to be the lower I want to be supported - iPhone 2.0 and higher?
What exactly is the Base SDK for? should I ignore it if I chose Active SDK to be different and where do I see the Active SDK in the Projects settings?
One final question - is apple allowing to choose iPhone OS 2.0 as the Deployment Target?
Thanks in advance,
BTW - one of my main reason for this question is because when compiling with earlier SDKs apple seems to have a problem releasing the memory for UIImageView animation array when this animation was saved for multiple time usage. This is a known problem that was fixed with SDK 3.0 (by simply setting the UIImageView animation array to nil)
The difference between the Base and Active SDK is that the former is the default SDK set for the project and the latter is the SDK you are currently building against. So it is possible for your Active SDK to be the Base SDK, at which point XCode will use the SDK you specified for the project.
In order to build your app for the widest set of devices possible, you are correct:
Set the Base SDK to the lastest SDK possible (3.0, 3.0.1)
Set the Deployment Target to the earliest SDK possible (2.0)
Apple does allow you to specify iPhone 2.0 as the Deployment Target, but keep in mind any API or framework released after iPhone 2.0 you will not have available to you for use by default. There are techniques to use features from later SDKs, however they are nontrivial.
You should set the Base SDK build setting to the latest SDK that contains all of the features that you intend to use (usually, the latest available SDK), and set the "iPhone Deployment Target" build setting to the earliest version of the OS on which you want to run.
You then need to make sure that you check, at runtime, for any features that may not exist on the earlier OSes.
"Base SDK" is the Maximum SDK you application can support. There's a hard limit here - you can't select a future, unreleased SDK.
"Deployment Target" is the Minimum SDK you are willing to support. It how far back in time you are willing to go.
Xcode appear to create a spurious dependency on "Deployment Target." For example, I can't develop on my iOS 5.1.1 iPod with Xcode 4.5.2 (Xcode 4.5.2 is paired with iOS 6.0), even though the 4.3, 5.0, and 5.1 APIs and Simulators are installed on this installation. I need to use the simulator or jack in my iOS 6.0 iPhone.
The games Apple is playing appears to be causing problems with apps, too. My purchased copy of Elements will not sync via iTunes to the iPod because Elements needs a newer version of iOS to run (it syncs and runs fine on my iOS 6.0 iPhone).
I've got two iPads and one is 4.3. I shudder to think what a mess it will cause.
In general;
Set the BASE SDK to the very latest SDK you are willing to support and test.
Set the Deployment Target to the lowest version of iOS you are willing to support and test.
If you happen to use Base SDK features not available on the deployment target SDK, the app will crash at runtime on older devices, so testing is vital.
An alternative / complementary process would be to use Deploymate http://www.deploymateapp.com/ which does static code analysis to identify problems.
If you are from the android world the analogies are such;
TargetSDK -> Base SDK
MinSDK -> Deployment Target
Lint -> Deploymate
I have released an app with the 2.2.1 SDK, to realize that I'm pointlessly losing a big percentage of customers still on firmware 2.2 (See this article: http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/03/app-store-lessons-firmware-followup.ars) So I'm thinking of updating the app to the previous SDK, 2.2.
I was wondering if anyone has run into any problem doing this? Is this safe for customers who have already installed the previous version, to install my "downgrading" update?
The rule of thumb is to build and test your app for the lowest version SDK you can (based on features required).
I have changed an app store app from 2.2.1 to 2.2, and I did not encounter any problems when switching.
I know of no reason this would be a problem. Especially with 2.2.1 to 2.2—it was really a very minor bugfix release.
Iphone os version 2.2.1 introduced no new APIs so you should have no problem to downgrading it to 2.2.
In terms of the other SDK versions (i.e 2.0 and 2.1) apple introduced new/updated APIs. If your app takes advantage of these new/updated APIs you should compile it against the lowest version of the iPhone OS that will successfully run your program.
Compiling against the lowest version possible of the iPhone OS will ensure that your app will be able to be run by the max number of people possible.