It appears to me these two class methods are not interchangeable. I have a subview of UIView with the following code in the touchesBegan method:
if (!highlightView) {
UIImageView *tempImageView = [[UIImageView alloc] initWithImage:[UIImage imageNamed:#"Highlight"]];
self.highlightView = tempImageView;
[tempImageView release];
[self addSubview:highlightView];
}
highlightView.alpha = 0.0;
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:nil];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:0.5];
highlightView.alpha = 1.0;
[UIView commitAnimations];
When I touch the Button, the highlight fades in, like you would expect. When I touch up immediately (before the animation is finished), my touchesEnded gets called. This is the behavior I want.
But now, I've become a big fan of blocks and try to use them wherever possible. So I replaced the UIView animation code with this:
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.2 animations:^{
highlightView.alpha = 1.0;
}];
Results: the highlight still fades in as expected, but if I touch up before the animation is finished, my touchesEnded does not get called. If I touch up after the animation is finished, my touchesEnded does get called. What's going on here?
The new animation blocks in iOS 4 by default disable user interaction. You can pass in an option to allow views to respond to touches during animation using bit flags in conjunction with the animateWithDuration:delay:options:animations:completion method of UIView as such:
UIViewAnimationOptions options = UIViewAnimationOptionCurveLinear | UIViewAnimationOptionAllowUserInteraction;
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.2 delay:0.0 options:options animations:^
{
highlightView.alpha = 1.0;
} completion:nil];
Documentation
One more thing is that Appple doesn't recommend to use [UIView beginAnimations:context:], you can find it in beginAnimations docs
Use of this method is discouraged in iOS 4.0 and later. You should use
the block-based animation methods to specify your animations instead.
Probably Apple can mark old methods as deprecated in the future releases and won't support them, so using block-based methods is really more preferable way for performing animation.
Related
I am new to iPhone development. I am using UIImageView to animate the images in an array. I am deciding that the animation is stopped through a property called isAnimating. But it always returns true.
I want to check that the animation is completed or there is some duration left to complete the animation.
Please let me know, how I can check it.
Make a property BOOL IsAnimating
then do this code
{
[UIView beginAnimations:#"Animation of ImageVIew Begins" context:nil];
IsAnimating =YES;
[UIView setAnimationDuration:0.4]; //you can put your time
NSLog(#" Animating");
[UIView setAnimationDelegate:self];
[UIView setAnimationDidStopSelector:#selector(AnimationComplete)];
// Your animation code here
[UIView commitAnimations];
}
- (void) AnimationComplete
{
isAnimating = NO;
}
Your BOOl variable will be YES till the animation is complete..then it will change to NO
Use a delegate based on the duration to trigger whatever method you want on the receiver.
you should be doing your animation inside animation blocks:
[UIView animateWithDuration:duration animations:^{
//animation code here
} completion:^(BOOL finished)
{
//this will be called when the animation is finished
}];
edit: this answer is wrong and probably shouldnt have been accepted, for anyone coming here looking for the right answer: this answers this question i think
There are two main documented methods of animating UIViews. One, is a deprecated process in which one makes multiple calls beginning with method beginAnimations:context: and the other, newer, suggested approach is block-based.
I have the following code in my application. However, only the older deprecated animation segment works. The newer, block-based approach works the first time, but every subsequent time skips directly to the end of the animation and shows me only the final frame immediately. Has anybody had any experienced with this?
-(void)updateImageViewSlider:(UIImage *)image {
mImageFeedSwipe.alpha = 0.0;
[mImageFeedSwipe setHidden:NO];
mImageFeedSwipe.frame = DEFAULT_IMAGEVIEW_RECT;
[mImageFeedSwipe setImage:image];
//
// The following animation code works fine.
//
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:nil];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:1.0];
mImageFeedSwipe.alpha = 1.0;
[mImageFeedSwipe setFrame:NEW_IMAGEVIEW_RECT];
[UIView commitAnimations];
//
// The following DOES NOT work except on the first run
//
int animationOptions = 0
| UIViewAnimationOptionCurveEaseInOut
| UIViewAnimationOptionBeginFromCurrentState
| UIViewAnimationOptionAllowUserInteraction;
[UIView animateWithDuration:1.0
delay:0
options:animationOptions
animations:^{
// Bring in the swiping image view...
mImageFeedSwipe.alpha = 1.0;
[mImageFeedSwipe setFrame:NEW_IMAGEVIEW_RECT];
}
completion:nil];
}
This is being run on the main thread via [self performSelectorOnMainThread...].
I was seeing this same problem until I realized that in between animations I was hiding the view and never changing view.hidden to NO again. Any chance that you are hiding your view or setting alpha to 0.0 in between animations?
I have a subView that I want to toggle between hidden and not hidden by a button. How do I fade in the subview and fade it out? For now it just appears immediately and disappear immediately when I toggle the button.
I am wondering what is the easiest way to do this animation.
Thanks
On iOS 4.0+ Apple recommends you use their new, block-based animation methods. Using these, the code would look something like this:
[UIView animateWithDuration:2.0
animations:^{myView.alpha = 0.0;}];
The properties you are animating go inside the block (the ^{...} part). Blocks are sort of like functions, so you can put multiple lines of code inside of them, if you want to animate multiple properties. For example:
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.2
animations:^{
view.alpha = 0.0;
view.backgroundColor = [UIColor redColor];
}];
If you need to perform an action after the animation is complete, use the +animateWithDuration:animations:completion: method (which also uses blocks), for example:
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.2
animations:^{view.alpha = 0.0;}
completion:^(BOOL finished){ [view removeFromSuperview]; }];
For more info, check out the UIView Class Reference 'Animations' section and 'Animating Views with Blocks' section.
This is the old pre-4.0 way:
http://objcolumnist.com/2009/07/18/simple-uiview-based-animations-on-the-iphone/
... which has the advantage of being conceptually simple and easy to implement.
float alpha = 1.0; // or 0.0 if it's already visible and you want to fade out
[UIView beginAnimations:#"" context:NULL];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:2.0]; // seconds, not ms. guess how i know?
[mySubView setAlpha:alpha];
[UIView commitAnimations];
I'm animating a bunch of buttons so they move to the left of the screen then they should magically move to the right of the screen. I do this by calling:
[NSTimer scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval:0.20 target:self selector:#selector(moveTheButtons) userInfo:nil repeats:YES];
in viewDidLoad.
They animate quite happily to the left, but then they animate back to the right. I just want them to disappear and reappear to the right-off-screen. Because I'm new I assumed that since it was after the commitAnimations call that it wouldn't animate. I think the problem is that the animations actually 'commit' after the moveTheButtons function returns, but I can't think of an elegant (or standard) way around this.
How do I move the UIButton off screen without animating it, preferably still in the moveTheButtons function?
As you can probably infer, I'm new to animations on the iPhone, so if you see any other mistakes I'm making feel free to give me some pointers.
-(void)moveTheButtons{
NSLog(#"moveTheButtons");
[UIView beginAnimations:#"mov-ey" context:cloudA];
[UIView setAnimationDuration: .20];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveLinear];
cloudA.center = CGPointMake(cloudA.center.x-pos.x,cloudA.center.y);
[UIView commitAnimations];
if(cloudA.center.x < -100){
//I don't want to animate this bit.
cloudA.center = CGPointMake(550,cloudA.center.y);
}
//NSLog(#"cloudA.center.x %f", cloudA.center.x);
}
You can temporarily turn off the implicit animations of properties within an animation block using the +[UIView setAnimationsEnabled:] method. This can be very useful in many use cases.
Do something like this:
-(void)moveTheButtons {
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:NULL];
[UIView setAnimationDuration: .20];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveLinear];
CGPoint center = CGPointMake(cloudA.center.x - pos.x, cloudA.center.y);
if (center.x < -100) {
[UIView setAnimationsEnabled:NO];
cloudA.center = CGPointMake(550, center.y);
[UIView setAnimationsEnabled:YES];
} else {
cloudA.center = center;
}
[UIView commitAnimations];
}
As a side note; there is no need to give the animation a name, or a context, unless you actually use a delegate that responds to delegate methods. Just pass nil, and NULL as I have done in this example.
Precalculate the point , invert the order and return before animating the block.
You are unconditionally committing an animation to the engine in all cases.
-(void)moveTheButtons{
NSLog(#"moveTheButtons");
CGPoint mypoint = CGPointMake(cloudA.center.x-pos.x,cloudA.center.y);
if(cloudA.center.x < -100){
//I don't want to animate this bit.
cloudA.center = CGPointMake(550,cloudA.center.y);
return;
}
[UIView beginAnimations:#"mov-ey" context:cloudA];
[UIView setAnimationDuration: .20];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveLinear];
cloudA.center = mypoint;
[UIView commitAnimations];
}
Theres a style point about using a return rather than if/else but you can form your own opinion.
Cheers
I am going to end up with an array of RSS feeds, and would like a label or some such to display them at the bottom of the view. I would like to animate through each feed in the array.
This is what i have so far to animate, which, works for the fade, but only animates the last item of the array.
feed = [[UILabel alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(0,380,320,43)];
[self.view addSubview:feed];
feed.alpha=1;
NSArray *feeds = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"1234567"],[NSString stringWithFormat:#"qwerty"],[NSString stringWithFormat:#"asdfgh"],nil];
for (NSString* f in feeds){
feed.text=f;
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:NULL];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveEaseIn];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:2.0f];
feed.alpha=0;
[UIView setAnimationDidStopSelector:#selector(animationDidStop:finished:context:)];
[UIView commitAnimations];
}
Im sure its simple.
Thanks
First off you should really consider a better naming convention. Calling a UILabel a feed isn't very helpful for the future when you have to come back and look at your code. I would name it feedLabel. Then when you iterate through your list of feeds, you can just for (NSString *feed in feeds) and it will make more sense. And so will feedLabel.text = feed;.
Anyhow, the issue I see with your code is that your are repeatedly setting the alpha to zero in your loop, but you never set it back to one. In other words, you're not making a change to the alpha value. It stays the same in every iteration.
So maybe you could clarify what you're trying to do. If you want to fade the text between changes in the text, you'll need a different animation and methodology. Instead of a loop, chain your animations such that when your didStopSelector, you set the text and start the next one. Something like:
- (void)performAnimation;
{
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:NULL];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveEaseIn];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:2.0f];
feed.alpha=0;
[UIView setAnimationDidStopSelector:#selector(animationDidStop:finished:)];
[UIView commitAnimations];
}
- (void)animationDidStop:(CAAnimation *)theAnimation finished:(BOOL)flag
{
feed.alpha = 1.0;
NSString *nextFeed = [self getNextFeed]; // Need to implement getNextFeed
if (nextFeed)
{
// Only continue if there is a next feed.
[feed setText:nextFeed];
[self performAnimation];
}
}
i tried your code, it fades out on first feed, but it doesn't enter the animationDidStop event. thats why it cant call performAnimation again. is there any set for animation (delegate or protocol etc..)