Get eclipse CVS to forget about removed directory - eclipse

I'm looking for a way to convince Eclipse that a directory has indeed been removed from the CVS repository, permanently?
With regular command line CVS I would just edit CVS/Entries in the directory's former parent. With Eclipse, I've tried removing the directory from the Project Explorer view, removing the appropriate line in CVS/Entries, recreating the directory in PE so that it might be removed on update or synchronization, synchronize without recreating the directory, and probably other things that I've since forgotten, and nothing worked.
The directory has been entirely removed from the CVS repository, so I'm not talking about just pruning empty directories here. The error I am seeing is:
The server reported an error while performing the "cvs update" command.
Project: cvs update: cannot open directory /usr/local/cvsroot/one/two/three/removed_directory: No such file or directory
My project contains all of the contents from /usr/local/cvsroot/one/two. I do not get this error when I navigate to "three" and update from there. I only get it when I update from the project root.

One (quite imperfect) solution for this problem is, beside to check-out the project again, to remove CVS information stored by Eclipse.
Go in the right-menu under the project > Team > Disconnect, and check the radiobutton "Also delete the CVS meta information from the file system". Now your project is unshared and has no more CVS information into it. Then you just have to do Team > Share project, select the previous repository location, and you're done (CVS will detect by itself that the project is up-to-date and won't update nor commit anything, of course).
A folder that has been deleted in the cvs repository by hand won't then be proposed anymore by CVS under Eclipse to be commited.
Beware that on a big project with many files, depending on the speed of your network, the re-share may take some time.
Sometimes it may indeed be easier to delete the project and pull it off again from CVS.

I fought this same thing for several hours a couple of separate times. I just gave in and re-checked out the project. That seemed to work like a charm

Handling of directories in CVS is not perfect. This and many other reasons caused in creating more complete SCM tool subversion.
CVS can create directory, but can not remove it. From CVS point of view, to remove directory you need to remove (cvs rm) all files in directory. But directory is still present in CVS and there's no way to remove it. Hovewer, CVS propose a "hack" to hide such "deleted"/empty directories by executing "cvs up -P" (see here).
So, for CVS command line, I wouldn't mess with parent directory CVS/Entries file, but rather use "cvs up -P" described above.

The directory will be listed in the CVS/Entries file under the parent directory. Remove the entry in the Entres file and the directory. Eclipse should recognize the directory has been removed.
Refactoring directories in CVS is problematic. Due to the way CVS handles history one of the following usually applies:
The history of files moved to new locations appears to disappear. (It is located in the history of the old location.)
The history of files is retained, but files appear moved when checking out versions prior to the move. (Files were moved in the repository, rather than in a sandbox.)
Removing or moving directories in the repository generally creates problems for clients. It helps to retain directories and only move or remove files. Normal processing moves deleted files to an Attic sub-directory.

In the Eclipse CVS synchronization perspective, did you try the 'Override and update' option?

If the files/folders are already deleted on the repository, from the Eclipse project perspective, "replace with"->"latest from HEAD" on the folder containing deleted elements

Related

Red exclamation in Eclipse after build - on classes dir

First, there are no problems with my build path, and there's no problem in the "problems" window regarding this error. What happens is:
I check a project out of SVN
I then build that project
SVN "version" and link gets removed from classes and build directories (and red ! appears)
I can no longer commit project as a whole, as I get this error:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Working copy 'C:\Users\<me>\Documents\eclipseSDK\<project>\classes' is missing or not locked
It's NOT missing, it just was "refreshed" during build
I've also tried to delete the dir on the SVN side, but the red arrows still appear and committing throws an error - even though those dirs are no longer part of the checked resources.
Also, basically, any "Team" menu option will no longer work on those two dirs, if I try to Team>Add to Version Control, nothing shows up in the Resources window.
I don't even know if I care about the red exclamation as much as just getting those two dirs out of the SVN process. Like I said, I've deleted on the SVN side even, so they are no longer there.
Are your compiled classes file part of your Subversion repository? If so, GET RID OF THEM FROM SUBVERSION!.
Sorry about the screaming, but files that can be built (like classes and jar files) should not be stored in version control. It just doesn't make sense.
Source control allows you to see the history of changes. You can see who made what changes in the source, but you can't do that in class files or jars. Source control allows you to branch and merge changes. You can't do that with class files. And, they go stale very quickly. No one cares about class files that were built last month.
The biggest issue is sheer size. Binary files don't diff well (and many version control systems don't even try). Let's say you build 15 megabytes worth of class files each time you do a build. That's probably at least 12 megabytes added to your repository each and every time. With in a year, you could be adding, 1 gigabyte to your repository. You can easily end up with the vast majority (and I mean in the 90% range of your source repository being nothing more than compiled code. Compiled code that no one cares about. Compiled code that can't help you understand your development history. Compiled code that clogs up your repository.
Go to your classes directory, and do an revert from the Team menu on that directory. You'll lose all of your changes, but so what? They shouldn't be there. This will set things up, so you can at least commit your changes.
Then, delete that classes directory and all of its contents from Subversion and commit. Eclipse will create the directory when it does a build, and you can make the directory in Ant's build file before you compile the code. You should then set an svn:ignore property on the directory parent to prevent people from checking in the classes directory.
If you need to store jar files for other projects to use, use a release repository. In fact, use a Maven repository like Artifactory or Nexus. You don't have to use Maven. Ant can use Ivy to fetch the files from a Maven repository, or you can simply use URLs to download the files as needed via wget or the <get/> task in Ant.
OK, I deleted [build & classes] from local, and deleted from SVN. Made a minor edit to a file, just to be able to run Commit - which worked fine.
That's good.
Both local & SVN were in sync. build & classes are (and were) part of ANT build file, so ran build again. build & classes reappeared (with ? this time), and added to svn:ignore.
Any file that's not in the repository will show up with a question mark. Those question marks will disappear if you add the svn:ignore property to the parent directory with classes, sync, and build in it.
Made another file change, but now I cannot commit the entire project, as I'm getting more/different errors now (e.g. "out of date").
The out of date means that someone somewhere modified a file that was in the repository and committed it. It's very likely that the change is one of the *.class files that you removed. You will have to do an update before a commit. When you do the update, you will likely see a lot of conflicts where a class file was changed, but you had removed it. Resolve these changes, update, and commit again.
By the way, I have a pre-commit hook that is useful in this situation. First, it can prevent people from adding that classes directory to the repository (and any files under it). Second it can make sure that the svn:ignore is setup correctly.

Subclipse SVN first commit ignore certain directories

Decided to take the jump from CVS to SVN.
I setup a new repository in subclipse for my project. When I go to 'Finish' the setup it wants to do an initial commit and presents me with a flat list of files to select the files for version controlling.
The problem is I have thousands of generated binary files I dont want to commit.
So I click on cancel because it would take me all day to go through and unselect all the unwanted files. Annoyingly when I click on a parent category for the files I want to ignore it is not recursive!
So I click cancel then go to the eclipse directory structure for the project and manually set svn:ignore on all directories I want to ignore. Then I try and do a commit again and all the files are once again presented - ignore seems to have done nothing.
Can anybody point out what I might be doing wrong?
For the first commit, I recommend writing a small script to delete (of course you'll have a backup) all the files that are not meant to be committed.
Afterwards, if you find you accidentally committed a file, you can
svn delete file
Upon the first checkout, copy back (or better yet, regenerate) all the binary files. This will trigger svn to notice that your local repository is out-of-sync with the remote repository.
cd <Root of local repository>
svn status
You will see lots of "to be added" items. Go to the parent directory and add in svn:ignore properties for each of the generated items.
cd build
svn propedit svn:ignore .
which will open an editor (if it doesn't, you need to set the environmental variable SVN_EDITOR to a suitable editor). Then you can add in entries that svn will know are not tracked.
(in the ignore property editor)
target
build
image*
*.o
(and so on)
Save the file, and it will be staged for the next commit. Subsequent runs of svn status will no longer show these files as "needing to be added", but they will show the directory as "needing to be committed (it's a revision on the directory)"
Quick Aside
So I'm not entirely certain exactly which functionality of Subclipse you were using in order to create a repo and share a project to it, I'm assuming you created like a file based repo through the eclipse SVN repo view and tried to share and then commit to it. It looks like your problem got solved but I did want to add an answer on here because I ran across this post looking for the answer to this same problem of handling initial commits even just in general with SVN and wanted to offer help to anyone else looking for the help.
Intro
To start off I would recommend not working through an IDE extension like this just for the initial commit as they can miss a lot of the options for handling opening a repo in SVN. I personally really like the command line form of SVN to work with but TortoiseSVN is a good option for a GUI.
Whether you create a local file-based repo or are connecting to an SVN server and you want better control over your first commit in an previously unversioned project here is what I've found as the best general workflow for doing so.
Create the remote folder to save to.
On command line this will be:
$> svn mkdir your-url-scheme://your-site-address.domain/path/to/repo/example-directory
Or on TortoiseSVN open your repo for browsing, right click, and select "create new folder"
This will give you a location in the SVN repo to checkout from for our next step.
Checkout in to the already started project
Make sure to use the empty, newly created folder in your repo to checkout with. SVN does not actually require a folder being checked out to to be empty, which is an important part of what makes it actually very flexible and able to subsume parts of your directory into it fairly easily if used correctly.
Now you will checkout this empty folder into the root folder of your already started project. This will add your project to the working copy of this folder without any commit being made yet. The command is:
$> svn co your-url-scheme://your-site-address.domain/path/to/repo/example-directory /your/projects/root/
"co" standing for checkout. In Tortoise svn you can right click on or in the empty repo folder and select "checkout..." and then select the project root.
Set ignores and commit
Finally, you can easily set your ignores on certain files before adding any other files to the tree using the command:
$> svn propset svn:ignore file-or-directory-to-ignore
And to add all non-ignored directories and files:
$> svn add * --force
The force is technically unnecessary in this case but ensures full recursion. You can also now do all of this in your file explorer if using TortoiseSVN or you can even use your IDE extensions to do this at this point(make sure to ignore all files you need to before mass-adding files for commit), all that's left is to make sure to commit the newly added files to the repo and you're up and running with source control :)
Added this method here simply because this method allows you to avoid any unnecessary copying of those stinky binaries that no one wants to lug around with them.

Atlassian Sourcetree + GIT + Mac + Mountain Lion + Eclipse + Android project = failure mode

Using the combination of tools in the title, when I check out a branch, SourceTree/GIT will:
Definitely NOT delete folders from the previously checked-out branch, so if I have BRANCH-ALPHA with FOLDER1 and FOLDER2 and then I check out BRANCH-BETA which has FOLDER2 and FOLDER3 only and no FOLDER1, the resulting structure in FINDER will show that FOLDER1 is still there. Can reproduce this over and over.
Often will not even overwrite files from the previously checked-out branch, so that I'm still seeing BRANCH-ALPHA in Eclipse when I have checked-out BRANCH-BETA.
I close Eclipse before doing the checkout, and then open Eclipse, CLEAN and BUILD everything. It's really a problem with GIT.
The only "solution" is to delete all the folders and all the metadata and then check out the branch. This typically leads to a few hours of trying to "convince" Eclipse to open the project, creating a new workspace, new metadata, etc., and then fixing a lot of things like paths etc.
Any ideas on how to further research the cause and find a solution are very much appreciated.
Git only deletes empty folders when checking out a new commit. You might see apparently empty directories because there are hidden files stored in them. If you try to monitor the behavior by opening them in Finder, you're actually causing the problem since Finder creates hidden files to track the way the folders are displayed.
Does it really bother you that the folders are there? You could add a post-checkout hook that runs git clean -dxf after each checkout; this will remove all the files that are not known by git. Be careful that it will also delete compiled classes, so a new build will be required.
Another possibility is that something is locking files or directories, so git can't remove them while they're still opened/locked by the other program. This would also explain why some files aren't updated to the right version. Does git complain when you switch branches? It should if there's indeed a lock on the files.

SVN: Cannot commit 'x' and 'y' as they refer to the same URL?

I'm trying to do a commit on my project and am running into the following error. Pay close attention to the path:
Commit failed (details follow):
Cannot commit both
'C:\Development\Project\branches\nextver\project\bin\com\companyname\blah\Foo.java'
and
'C:\Development\Project\branches\nextver\project\src\com\companyname\blah\Foo.java'
as they refer to the same URL
How in the world did this happen? I never had my source files in the bin path in Eclipse! What can I do to fix it? Please tell me there's something better than checking it out again and replacing all of the files. I have 191 Java files alone, not to mention resources and Eclipse files.
I know it's over a year since you posted this, but this may help someone else. I've just gone through the same issue. I eventually traced it back to the project setup on Eclipse. In my case what happened is the build process within eclipse was "building"/copying ALL files in the source folder to the build folder. This caused the .svn directory from the source to be copied to the build folder and this is how Subversion gets mixed up. If you check the paths via RepoBrowser (I am using Tortoise in a Windows environment) the paths point to the correct directories (source and build), but if you run "svn info" from within the directory on your local machine you will find that the source and build directory point to the same URL (hence the message).
Once I realised the problem was within Eclipse and not specific to Subversion it was easy to search for a solution. You need to add "**/.svn/" to the source exclusions in the Java Build Path of the Source tab:
Project --> Properties --> Java Build Path.
Try this:
Go to C:\Development\Project\branches\nextver\project\bin\ and delete .svn if you see one. And then try committing.
I think somehow stuff in the src including the .svn got copied to bin making both of them seem like they are from the same url in the server. Of course you don't want that. You may want to correct your build settings.
The solution was to delete and ignore my bin dirs from my local copy. Again. Tortoise SVN seemed to forget that I had done that before and I didn't notice that the bin dirs had crept in, leading to this problem. After resolving several other problems it threw in my path (source trees in conflict, etc.), I managed to get it to commit.
I did first try deleting the .svn folder from the bin dirs, but all that did was cause it to complain that the bin dir was no longer under source control and halt.
In my case I had a config file that was shared between two projects but I had updated the file (with the same changes) in both projects.
SVN can't commit as it thinks there are two different sets of changes to be committed to the same file.
So I reverted one of the copies and then I was able to commit.

Eclipse, SVN trouble

A have copied a folder from one project, which is generated by system to another. Now I want to commit all stuff from the project, the folder was copied to.
What I get is (that copied folder is in folder /webapp):
org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Attempted to lock an already-locked dir
svn: Working copy '/home/user/webshop/webshop-impl/src/main/webapp' locked
Ok, I tried to Team->Cleanup and got:
org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Path is not a working copy directory
svn: '/home/user/webshop/webshop-impl/src/main/webapp/gwtmodules' is not a working copy directory
org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Path is not a working copy directory
svn: '/home/user/webshop/webshop-impl/src/main/webapp/gwtmodules' is not a working copy directory
This eclipse SVN client is messing with me long time with this darn tigris exceptions =)
Please, help with advice :) What am I doing wrong?
This had me baffled as well when I got this error. This happens if we have some pending sessions on committing our changes so we’ll need to do some clean up before we’ll have another try on a commit.
This is the fix:
In STS or eclipse, right click on the offending project, click Team and then select Refresh/Cleanup. SVN gets the offending .lock files and deletes them. You can also do this from the command line.
You should delete .svn folders which contains repo info after you copy a directory to another place.
You are probably seeing it because the copied directory has some svn file which points to some place that does not match to the new location.
I would do an svn export from the first project. This will give you a clean copy of the code without any of the associated svn metadata. You can then add the exported code into the second repository.
It is very likely that your folder is lack of svn info(my case). To fix it, you can copy svn info from other folders, and then modify the snv file(all-wcpropc,entries) to the correct one.
I am not sure it is the recommended way, but it works for me!