I'm making a Universal App using MonoTouch, and I'm adding my Default-Portrait.png file. That file alone (a 768x1004 .png file) is adding 711k to the size of the app. My app itself is only about 7 megs, so it's adding 10% just for the splash screen.
I could easily make this thing an 80k jpg file instead of a png, but the device doesn't seem to look for a .jpg file. Does anyone have tips for reducing the size of this launch art?
At this point, I'm thinking I might just leave the launch art out and load my own jpg and display it as soon as I have the ability to. That'll keep my app size down, but it's not as nice as having the launch art scale in immediately like most apps do.
Hmmm...given the screen of the iPad and the visual quality users are expecting, I'd just leave it like that.
But if you do want to reduce the disk space, try going to Project > Edit Project Settings > Build (tab at top), and searching for a parameter called "Compress PNG Files." Make sure that's checked. It'll run the pngcrush utility before loading the file onto disk (check the size of your IPA archive after to see if it had any effect).
pngcrush is nice as well, however that will not reduce the quality of you image. If reducing the quality of the image is an option for you, then you might try this tool: http://www.punypng.com/ - or just use an image editing tool to "optimize" the image ...
I recommend pngout if you want to really squeeze those PNGs down, and this won't cost you any quality. It simply removes unnecessary metadata (like pngcrush) and uses its own compression algorithm which is compatible with the regular decompressor used in PNG (zlib). It's really slow, though.
A simpler option is to try "Save for web" in your image manipulation program of choice. Exporting from Acorn (not just the regular save) sometimes gives me vastly smaller files. This is especially true for default images which have large, uniform areas in one colour (screenshots, a small logo in the middle of a black screen).
Is there any reason why you want to reduce the file size that badly? I don't think it matters in your case. I just checked 3 of my apps and the Default.png (of various portrait/landscape varieties) is between 29KB and 422KB, so whilst yours do seem a little heavy, your still way under the 3G download limit.
Are you positive it's adding that much to the size of the app? Did you compare a before and after?
Xcode uses pngcrush on the images for you. I know because I just tried to substitue jpegs for pngs and got the following result:
So, in short, there's not a lot to be done except simplify the image beforehand. Xcode will handle the rest.
Related
I am new with cocs2d. I have created an app using Cocos2d. The app is working fine but problem is that application size is too large 350MB. There are many images in this app. I have used png and where possible jpeg images. There are many png images that have larger than 1 mb.
Is there any way to reduce the application size. I've reduced the size whereever possible. Is there any other format that can be used in place of png? There are no many animations. The png are used only purpose of transparency.
Your images are way out of size. Even if you put them on server, and then download it will take time to download.
The best option is to reduce the image size. A couple of sites that can help you do that are:-
Reduce image size
Compress image size
You can keep the image content on your server and then download the image content asynchronously (which is more imp download it first). If there are levels then download initial levels first and download remaining on the background thread. You can always display a loader on launch and display some help kinda stuff meanwhile the data gets download and cached.
You can make use of SDWebImage and other libraries to get your images stuff async.
Hope it helps.
While your pictures are fairly large and you should try to reduce the number and size, you can make gains through packaging the .png into pvr.ccz files. There are multiple different programs available to do this. I like to use Texture Packer which is available here: http://www.codeandweb.com/texturepacker
You can find some tips in my post on reducing memory usage & bundle size.
Most importantly use texture atlases in .pvr.ccz format and where possible reduce image color depth to 16 bit. Avoid JPGs altogether because they're terribly slow to load in cocos2d.
There is no issue in using png files although your images are too large, You can reduce their size by 70 - 80% by using tinypng and it will not going to hurt your graphics.
https://tinypng.com/
I usually edit the image size now https://resizeimage.io , you try!
I am at a complete loss because my application icon simply will not register. I've tried just about everything and the icon still just will not register. I think it may have to do with the fact that I was trying to re-name my project something else, and perhaps the targets now do not match. Can anybody provide advice on why my icon simply will not show up on the phone?
Thanks
PNG compression is a little algorithm that the compiler performs to cut down on the space images take up in your app. Unfortunately, it has been the Bain of many a programmer's existence because it often doesn't de-compress the images once the binary is made and ran. Just set it to NO.
PNG compression also optimizes the PNG's for an iOS device like so:
Extra critical chunk (CgBI).
Byteswapped (RGBA –> BGRA) pixel data, presumably for high-speed >direct blitting to the framebuffer.
Zlib header, footer, and CRC removed from the IDAT chunk.
Premultiplied alpha (color′ = color * alpha / 255).
Xcode optimizes png images so they are loaded faster, but is this also recommended for other image resources that are not for buttons and UI (Photos for example)?
Or is it a standard to have UI images as png and "photos" as JPEG?
What is the best practice here?
The best practice is to use PNG files as often as possible when using images within your app. iOS and Xcode load and display PNGs quickest as opposed to any other type of format. If given a choice, go with PNG.
When you use any other file type (or if you load a non-optimized PNG files), your iPhone has to do the byte-swapping and alpha premultiplication at load-time (and possibly re-do the alpha multiplication at display time). Your application basically has to do the same processing that Xcode does, but it's doing it at run-time instead of at build-time. This is going to cost you both in terms of processor cycles and memory overhead. One of the reasons why Mobile Safari is the biggest memory hog of the built-in iPhone applications is because the images it has to load in order to display web-pages are all non-optimized images, mostly JPEGs. Since JPEG is a compressed format, it has the added extra step of having to decompress the image into memory before it can do the premultiplication and byte-swapping.
For what it's worth, Apple recommends using the PNG format for images. There's a lot more information on this topic in this Apple documentation.
I have an app that will display a bunch of images in a slideshow. Those images will be part of the bundle, thus distributed with the app.
All the images are photographs or photographic, etc.
I've read that it's preferred to use PNG as the image format, but seeing that the JPG version will be much smaller, I'd rather be using that.
Are there any guidelines which format to use and in which case?
PNG's are pixel perfect (non-lossy), and require very little extra CPU energy to display. However, large PNGs may take longer to read from storage than more compressed image formats, and thus be slower to display.
JPG's are smaller to store, but lossy (amount depends on compression level), and to display them requires a much more complicated decoding algorithm. But the typical compression and image quality is usually quite sufficient for photos.
Use JPG's for photos and for anything large, and PNG's for anything small and/or designed to be displayed "pixel perfect" (e.g. small icons) or as a part of a composited transparent overlay, etc.
Apple optimizes PNG images that are included in your iPhone app bundle. In fact, the iPhone uses a special encoding in which the color bytes are optimized for the hardware. XCode handles this special encoding for you when you build your project. So, you do see additional benefits to using PNG's on an iPhone other than their size consideration. For this reason it is definitely recommended to use PNG's for any images that appear as part of the interface (in a table view, labels, etc).
As for displaying a full screen image such as a photograph you may still reap benefits with PNG's since they are non-lossy and the visual quality should be better than a JPG not to mention resource usage with decoding the image. You may need to decrease the quality of your JPG's in order to see a real benefit in file size but then you are displaying non-optimal images.
File size is certainly a factor but there are other considerations at play as well when choosing an image format.
There is one important thing to think about with PNGs. If a PNG is included in your Xcode build it will be optimized for iOS. This is called PNG crush. If your PNG is downloaded at run time it will not be crushed. Crushed PNGs run about the same as 100% JPGs. Lower quality JPGs run better than higher quality JPGs. So from a performance standpoint from fastest to slowest it would go low quality JPG, high quality JPG, PNG Crushed, PNG.
If you need to download PNGs you should consider crushing the PNGs on the server before the download.
http://www.cocoanetics.com/2011/10/avoiding-image-decompression-sickness/
The Cocoanetics blog published a nice iOS performance benchmark of JPGs at various quality levels, and PNGs, with and without crushing.
From his conclusion:
If you absolutely need an alpha channel or have to go with PNGs then
it is advisable to install the pngcrush tool on your web server and
have it process all your PNGs. In almost all other cases high quality
JPEGs combine smaller file sizes (i.e. faster transmission) with
faster compression and rendering.
It turns out that PNGs are great for small images that you would use
for UI elements, but they are not reasonable to use for any full
screen applications like catalogues or magazines. There you would want
to choose a compression quality between 60 and 80% depending on your
source material.
In terms of getting it all to display you will want to hang onto
UIImage instances from which you have drawn once because those have a
cached uncompressed version of the file in them. And where you don’t
the visual pause for a large image to appear on screen you will have
to force decompression for a couple of images in advance. But bear in
mind that these will take large amounts of RAM and if you are
overdoing it that might cause your app to be terminated. NSCache is a
great place to place frequently used images because this automatically
takes care of evicting the images when RAM becomes scarce.
It is unfortunate that we don’t have any way to know whether or not an
image still needs decompressing or not. Also an image might have
evicted the uncompressed version without informing us as to this
effect. That might be a good Radar to raise at Apple’s bug reporting
site. But fortunately accessing the image as shown above takes no time
if the image is already decompressed. So you could just do that not
only “just in time” but also “just in case”.
Just thought I'd share a bit of decompression performance data...
I'm doing some prototyping of a 360 degree viewer - a carousel where the user can spin through a series of photos taken from different angles, to give the impression of being able to smoothly rotate an object.
I have loaded the image data into an array of NSData's to take file i/o out of the equation, but create NSImage's on the fly. Testing at near max frame rate (~25 fps) and watching in Instruments I see the app is clearly CPU-bound and there's an approximately 10% increase in CPU load showing ~275 kb png's vs. ~75 kb jpg's.
I can't say for sure but my guess is the CPU limit is just from general program execution and moving all the data around in memory, but that image decompression is done on the GPU. Either way and the JPG vs. PNG performance argument looks to favour JPG, especially when the smaller file sizes (and therefore smaller sizes of objects in memory at least in some parts of the chain) is taken into consideration.
Of course every situation is different, there's no substitute for testing...
I have found massive differences in animation performance when using jpegs vs png. For example placing three screen-sized jpegs side by side in a UIScrollView and scrolling horizontally on an iPhone4 results in lag and a thoroughly unpleasant jerky animation. With non-transparent pngs of the same dimensions the scrolling is smooth. I never use jpegs, even if the image is large.
I think if you want to use transparent, you have no choice except PNG. But, if your background is opaque already, then you may use JPG. That is the only difference I can see
'Use JPEG for photos' as mentioned in Human Interface Guidelines under section Produce artwork in the appropriate format.
When a PNG is added to an XCode iPhone project, the compiler optimizes it using pngcrush. Once on the device, the image's rendering performance is very fast.
My problem is that my application downloads its PNGs from an external source at runtime (from Picasa Web albums, using the Google Data APIs). Unfortunately, these images' performance is quite bad. When I do custom rendering on top of the image, it seems 100x slower than its internally stored counterparts. I strongly suspect this is because the downloaded images haven't been optimized.
Does anyone know how I can optimize an externally downloaded PNG at runtime on the iPhone? I'm hoping for a class that does this. I even considered adding pngcrush's source code to my app, which seems drastic. I haven't been able to find an decent answer myself. I'd be very grateful for any help.
Thanks!
Update:
Some folks have suggested that it may be due to the file's size, but it isn't. During my tests, I added a toggle button to switch between using the embedded version and the downloaded version of exactly the same PNG. The only difference is that the embedded one was optimized by 'pngcrush' during compilation. This does some byte-swapping (from RGBA to BRGA) and pre-multiplication of alpha. (http://iphonedevelopment.blogspot.com/2008/10/iphone-optimized-pngs.html)
Also, the performance I'm referring to isn't the downloading, but the rendering. I superimpose custom painting on top of the image (overriding the drawRect method of the UIView), and it's very choppy when the background is the downloaded version, and very smooth when it's the embedded (and therefore optimized) version. Again, it's exactly the same file. The only difference is the optimization, which I'm hoping I can perform on the image at runtime, on the device, after downloading it.
Thanks again for everyone's help!
That link you posted pretty much answers your question.
During the build process XCode pre-processes your png so it's in a format that's more friendly to the graphics chip in the iPhone.
Png's that have not been processed like this will likely use a slower rendering path, one that deals with the non-native format and the fact that the alpha must be computed separately for each color.
So you have two options;
Perform the same work that pngcrush does and swap ordering/pre-multiply alpha. The speed up may be due to one or both of these.
After you have loaded your image, you can "create" a new image from it. This new image should be in the iPhone's native format and so should perform faster. The downside is it could potentially take up a bit more memory.
E.g.
CGRect area = CGRectMake(0, 0, width, height);
CGSize size = area.size;
UIGraphicsBeginImageContext(size);
[oldImage drawInRect:area];
UIImage *newImage = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext();
UIGraphicsEndImageContext();
The fact that you say it "seems" 100x slower indicates that you have not performed any experimentation, but made a guess (it must be the PNG optimization), and are now going down a path based on a hunch.
You should spend time to confirm what the problem is before you try to solve it. My gut says that PNG optimization shouldn't be the issue: that mostly affects the loading of images, but once they are in memory it doesn't matter what file format they were originally in.
Anyway, you should try an A-B comparison, either get your code to load an optimized PNG from somewhere else and see how it compares, or make a test app that just does some drawing on the two PNG types. Once you've confirmed what the problem is, then you can figure out if you need to compile pngcrush into your app.
On the surface, it sounds like something else is at play here. Any additional image manipulation should only add time until it's displayed onscreen...
Would it be at all possible to get the server to gzip the images by sending the appropriate HTTP header? (If it even helps file size much, that is.)
Temporarily using the pngcrush source might be a good test as well, just to get some measurements.
Are you storing the png at the original downloaded size? If it's a large image it'll take significantly longer to render.
Well it seems that a good way to do it (since you can't run pngcrush on the iPhone and expect that to speed it up) would be to make your requests through a proxy that runs pngcrush. The proxy would have nice horse power to actually give you some gain over the 100x pain you feel.
try pincrush to trans the normal png file to the crushed png file
You say you are drawing on top of the image by overriding a UIView's drawRect: method. Are you trying to do some animation by repeatedly drawing the whole image with your custom stuff on top of it?
You might get better results if you put your custom stuff in a separate view or layer, and let the OS deal with compositing the result over the background. The OS will only update the parts of the screen that you actually change, and won't be repainting the entire image as often.