I am looking for a SMTP server that we can use for outgoing mail that permits a high volume (1,000+ per hour) without getting blocked. It could be downloaded on our machine or run online, but cannot cost over $25. Isn't there a good open source solution? I haven't been able to find one yet. Thanks.
Well, there are even free SMTP servers that can send a high volume of e-mail.
The problem is not in sending them, the problem is in delivering. You see, SMTP is a best-effort store-and-forward protocol - the e-mails are passed from one SMTP server to another in hope that it gets closer to the adressee's mail server (and usually it works). However, this also means that your message can be rejected or dropped anywhere in this chain of servers - or by the recipient. Once the e-mail leaves your network, there's not much you can do about it. In other words, it's not your server blocking the e-mails, but the servers it will be passing the mails to.
This question may be a useful reference for your problem; see also this article for some tips that will help your e-mail get delivered.
For that ammount of email, probably any server will do just fine. The problem is not to be blacklisted as a spammer. Jeff Atwood has a good blog post on the subject.
I personnaly would recommend Postfix or qmail, but that just me ...
Related
I'm aware this may not be the right place to ask this, but I don't know where else and others may encounter the same issue.
I'd like to have an aggregated view (or an alert) when some recipients in my contact list don't receive any of the emails my app sents. Is this possible?
I checked on the alert thing in the docs but it doesn't seem to do what I need. Although this seems like a pretty common need and there may not be necessary to setup webhooks and own app logic to handle this, wouldn't it?
Thanks
I have also faced same issue with cPanel and many other providers like Mailchimp. This usually happens due to Empty Subject due to which Cross-Server Contacts may not happen. Also, if you are using PHPmail() or sendmail function instead of SMTP, You need to be using TLS1.2 or TLS1.3 though 1.0 is also supported but many of my E-mails were not delivered so I upgraded to TLS 1.3 . Also, Check if your mail goes to Spam Folder. In that case, increase your Website and Domain Score and Try to rank in Google Safe Browsing. Also, this also happens due to misleading Hosting Provider whose SMTP servers are not setup correctly or Provider send many spam messages due to which, you domain score may got low. I currently use interserver_smtp and cloudmate_smtp collectively for all my clients as interserver deliverablility in India is low and cloudmate works in both texas and india correctly. Try cPanel or Plesk as it has the best deliverability. One More thing, This could also be an issue of DNS. Check your DNS settings if MX records are pointed to MailJet Servers.
We currently have POP3 mail accounts where I am and try as I might to convince my manager that we should be using hosted IMAP or Exchange he won't budge because of the cost. The staff are mostly out of office so there is no domain server here, however, we do have a dedicated server and I wondered whether I could use this to collect the mail and distribute it from there in some way.
Effectively what I'm trying to do is ensure mail is stored somewhere other than the end users machine because backups are user dependant at the moment. With hosted Exchange or Exchange on this server would be simple but my manager won't shell out for it. I have seen free mail servers called MailEnable and Axigen but unsure if they will do the job. Sorry if this seems like an easy or stupid question but never needed to do this before.
I am assuming due to the reference to Exchange that you are on Windows.
If you have an old box lying around that works, you could install linux on it and then choose from a number of different imap servers. Dovecot and Courier are both good choices and I have worked with them before.
You could use fetchmail to then pick up the mailboxes and then deliver to the imap boxes or get them deliver directly.
Setting up such a linux server for email was one of the first things I ever did on Linux. While initially daunting, once you get the hang of it, it is pretty straightforward and there are plenty of resources out there to help.
Ubuntu is probably the easiest to get used to. CentOs is also a reasonable choice.
You shouldn't be running your own server if you aren't willing to administer your own server, and they are not easy to configure if you don't know what you are doing (e.g., you mess up and you are exploited for spamming).
Look into a service like mailgun. In my application we are using them for forwarding to REST endpoints as well as onto another SMTP server.
Competitors that wound up not meeting my needs but may meet yours include Dyn, email yak, Sendgrid, etc. etc.
Why not just setup the mail clients to store their mail files on a standard network drive or share? I follow that this situation is pretty silly in your view - 100% because of the ridiculous constraints that you are being asked to work within: I would similarly find the solution I am suggesting ridiculous generally; but under the circumstances, it seems like a simple answer to your problem - replacing distributed mail storage and backup with centralized storage and backup.
Don't POP3 email clients have the option keep a copy on the server? Mine certainly does. See second tick box on the pic.
You can then periodically take a back up of all the emails from the server to stop it getting clogged up.
I'm looking to start using an SMTP or mail relay service. I've found quite a few out there, but I'm not sure if there are advantages to one vs another. The only requirements I have are:
can send "from" more than 1 domain (possibly >20 for all the different sites I work on)
can pay for a higher limit (I may need to send as many as 15000 in 1 day, although the average is <500)
can send from PHP (although I doubt this will be a problem as most are compatible with any language)
I'm okay with an SMTP service, mail relay service or a site that uses a custom API, although an API would make the conversion more difficult.
Reasons for wanting to do this:
I don't want to host any mail services my self as they just cause head aches
I don't have to worry about being blacklisted. If they are blacklisted they will know about it and have the knowledge to get it fixed.
Reporting on if emails have gone through would be nice.
I'm not sure why you would need this. If you read the proper RFCs (822, 2822, 823, 2823), you should be able to connect to any given site directly using SMTP. You need to be a little careful with Line Endings (should always be CRLF), and should probably add mail.add_x_header = OFF to your php.ini.
However, if you need a relay, I recommend using a spam filtering provider, as then you have protection from being blacklisted due to spammers abusing email-generating forms. I would recommend Red Condor for this task, but that is only because I work there, and know that we can handle it.
I've started using Mandrill and found it to be a great, reliable service provided by MailChimp that includes enough for most sites to use for free. Easy to setup, but also has a lot more functionality available.
We run a large online community in the Netherlands. Because of that we send a lot of mail to the hotmail email addresses of our members.
Recently we have noticed that not all mail is reaching our members, because we have hit a certain limit or so it seems.
Google doesn't give a solution (yet) but we see a lot of others having the same problem.
Note, We have added (since long) SPF records for our domain, in TXT and SPF types.
What else can we do to tackle this problem?
// Ryan
To add to what bzlm said, hotmail probably isn't rejecting your mails, so much as trying to use rate-limiting to prevent spam. That said, there are a few potential solutions you could use here. You could contact hotmail and see about getting your mailserver exemption status from their rate-limiting. Depending on the size of your community, they may or may not respond to you or be willing to work with you. I suggest this only as the "diplomatic" solution.
Or, you could set up two mail servers; one for hotmail users, and one for everybody else. I know from some of the sites that I run that a lot of people register with hotmail accounts, mostly because everybody has one which they use as a "spam dump" for online services where they don't want to use their real email address. So, as you no doubt realize, the number of hotmail users in your database represents a fairly substantial percentage. Therefore, when you need to send an email, you could determine whether to send it to your normal SMTP server, or your hotmail-designated one. On the hotmail SMTP service, you'd need to add some type of waiting mechanism to sleep a certain amount of time after receiving a 421 response.
The problem with this idea is that the number of hotmail users you have, plus the delay you'll encounter in sending, means that the queue length might very well exceed the number of mails you must send. You could alleviate this problem by setting up secondary/tertiary servers, preferably on other networks... but I'm getting ahead of myself here. At any rate, I did a bit of googling around (as you probably have, too), and this isn't such an uncommon problem, but there is no obvious solution to it.
So likely, you'll either have to create some type of slightly-unorthodox network workaround, or try the "diplomatic" route and contact an organization unlikely to care about your problem. I'd suggest doing both in parallel. :)
421 means that the service is not currently available, and that the client should try again. This could be for any number of reasons, including trying to discourage you from too frequent mailing if Hotmail thinks you might be a spambot.
Why not simply let your outbound smtpd queue the mails and try again?
Why is "not all mail reaching your members"? Don't you try again if you get a 421 response?
EDIT: Do what sqook says.
The only real way to "get around" this is to become a good e-mail citizen. Make it easy for people to unsubscribe from your notifications, establish complaint feedback loops with the major mail providers, remove bouncing e-mails from your list automatically, don't send people e-mails they don't want to receive. Failing to adhere to these simple requirements makes you look like a spammer, and providers like Hotmail will treat you like one.
The mail server IP connecting to Outlook.com server has exceeded the rate limit allowed. Reason for rate limitation is related to IP/domain reputation. If you are not an email/network admin please contact your Email/Internet Service Provider for help.
https://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx
I advise you too wait some times
I'm implementing a email newsletter sender service using .NET and Windows Server technologies. Are there comprehensive guidelines which could help avoiding emails being trapped by spam filters and other mechanisms?
They should cover all aspects of (legal) bulk mail sending: SMTP configuration, DNS, HTML content, images, links within content etc. A simple example: is it better to embed images or load them from a server?
It would be great if you could provide some empirical data to show the efficiency of some measures taken.
Although I don't have a definitive answer, I think this is a very important question.
Here are few tidbits I know about it
Choose a clean hosting/smtp server. IP addresses of spamming SMTP servers are often black-listed by other ISPs.
Send a simple introductory email to every subscriber, asking them to add your sender address to their safe list.
Be very prudent in sending to only those people who are actually expecting it. You wouldn't want pattern recognizers of spam filters learning the smell of your content.
If you don't know your smtp servers in advance, its a good practice to provide configuration options in your application for controlling batch sizes and delay between batches. Some servers don't like large batches or continuous activity.
Unless you have a very specific reason to host the newsletter yourself, I think you'd be much better off using a third party service. There are lots out there, and some are very cheaply priced.
It'll save you on development work
(no point in re-inventing the
wheel).
Their system will handle all
the unsubscribe link stuff that you
need to include in email newsletters
to comply with CAN SPAM laws or
whatever.
They handle the spam
reports that you will inevitably get
if you have a list of any non-trivial size.
They keep records of who signed up,
how they signed up, and their IP
address, and can present those on
receipt of a spam report to prove
that their service wasn't sending
out spam.
You can use double-opt in
(or confirmed opt in), for extra
evidence to prove that the people
you're sending emails to actually
signed up to receive them.
If you really do need to host it yourself I'd suggest you search the web for "email deliverability". Things that are known to help include properly set up SPF records, DomainKeys/DKIM, correct DNS settings (reverse DNS especially - best to just use an online service to check your DNS settings). You can test a lot of these things by sending an email to check-auth#verifier.port25.com.
It's best to avoid using spammy words in your email - always a bit of guesswork this but you some words can trip filters.
But I'd guess that by far the most important thing is to be sending your email from a trusted server that maintains good relationships with ISPs (i.e. ensuring that ISPs don't think that the server is sending out spam). This is a big reason why it's much much easier to get a third party to handle everything for you.