I'm building a portal where user and companies can join. Users can either be independent or working under a company. There is some basic access which is available to all users regardless of their type (independent or associated with a company). There is some more features which are available to independent users, but if a user is under the company, the company manager will be able to allow/disallow their access to specific features. How can I manage this using Zend_Acl?
You're ACL's can have conditions.
In the file where I declare my ACLs (a plugin by the way), I have the following declaration. The Acl_AdminCanAccessUsers is a Zend_Acl_Assert_Interface and will either return TRUE or FALSE. Here I am also passing the Request Object to the constructor.
// Complex function to see if the current user can create/edit the desired user account.
$acl->allow('client', 'user', array('edit','create'), new Acl_AdminCanAccessUsers($this->_request));
Now let's take a look at Acl_AdminCanAccessUsers
<?php
class Acl_AdminCanAccessUsers implements Zend_Acl_Assert_Interface
{
public function __construct($request) {
$this->request = $request;
}
public function assert(Zend_Acl $acl,
Zend_Acl_Role_Interface $role = null,
Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface $resource = null,
$privilege = null)
{
/**
* Can only test when trying to edit a user account
*/
if ("edit" != $privilege) {
return TRUE;
}
$identity = Zend_Auth::getInstance()->getIdentity();
/**
* Get the id from the URL request
*/
$id = $this->request->getParam('id');
/**
* Get user account from DB
*/
$user = Doctrine_Core::getTable('User')->find($id);
// Are they editing their own account? Give them a pass
if ($identity->user_id == $user->user_id) {
return TRUE;
}
// If they don't have the isAdmin flag set to yes on their account
// Then we'll just deny them immediately
if ($identity->isAdmin) {
return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
}
As you can see here we are checking the db for the user record and comparing it to a parameter that is requested or checking if they have isAdmin flag set in their Zend_Auth identity. You can do lots of conditional checking for your ACLs if there is more to access than just a role, resource, and privilege.
Happy Coding!
Related
I need some kind of #preFilter (or, if it isnot possible than #postFilter) to filter the results of my REST API. I can not use the preFilteranotation, because I need to consider the user role. I have three different roles:
user the normal user, who shold only access data which he owns
teamleader this role should access all data of his team
admin who can access all data.
Because our database structure is really complex, it will be necessary, to access some other data, before I can decide if the user can access the requested data or parts of the requested data.
The snippet works only for the roles user and admin. For teamleader it will be more complex, then there will be a bunch of masterDataId which have to be connect with or.
Here is some pseudocode, hopefully its not to confusing:
public class RoleFilter {
DimensionAttributeValueRepository dimensionAttributeValueRepository;
public void doFilter(Collection<AllDatas> data) {
if (user.getRole() != "admin") {
Authentication auth = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
DimensionAttributeValue tmpValue = dimensionAttributeValueRepository.findByChrValue(auth.getUsername());
MasterData masterData = tmpValue.getMasterData();
data.filter(data.masterDataId == masterData.getMasterDataID());
}
}
}
Update: Example
Lets say I have two users, user A is a normal user with the role "user". User B is an admin with the role "admin".
There is a Database table, in which the userData are stored. The table looks like the following.
| ID | username | name | email |
Both of them are sending a simple authenticated GET request to /userData.
Now my backend detects based on the authentication header the users and add the roles.
Nwo depending on the role, the user A should only get an answere which contains his personal data, user B should get all data which are accessible though /userData.
Response for user A:
{
"res":[
{
"id":1,
"username":"userA",
"name":"A",
"email":"userA#mail.com"
}
]
}
Response for user B:
{
"res":[
{
"id":1,
"username":"userA",
"name":"A",
"email":"userA#mail.com"
},
{
"id":2,
"username":"userB",
"name":"B",
"email":"userB#mail.com"
},
{
"id":3,
"username":"userC",
"name":"C",
"email":"userC#mail.com"
}
]
}
For your usecase I would recommend to use a custom filter and integrate it into the spring-security filter chain. Here is a tutorial, explaining it in general. You could configure your custom filter so that it checks your complex roles against the database and then overwrite the current users authentication object with a new one.
Example implementation:
public class CustomFilter extends GenericFilterBean {
#Override
public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain)
throws IOException, ServletException {
// HERE GOES YOUR CODE
// Depending on the extracted authentication details of the current user, you can now overwrite the users GrantedAuthorities
Collection<SimpleGrantedAuthority> oldAuthorities = (Collection<SimpleGrantedAuthority>)SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getAuthorities();
SimpleGrantedAuthority authority = new SimpleGrantedAuthority("ROLE_TEAMLEADER");
List<SimpleGrantedAuthority> updatedAuthorities = new ArrayList<SimpleGrantedAuthority>();
updatedAuthorities.add(authority);
updatedAuthorities.addAll(oldAuthorities);
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().setAuthentication(new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getPrincipal(),
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getCredentials(),
updatedAuthorities));
chain.doFilter(request, response);
}
}
Afterwards you can check for your roles with this statement: #PreAuthorize("hasRole('ROLE_TEAMLEADER')")
Then you can just access the users roles with the help of the spring-security-context object: SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getAuthorities()
Based on its results you can now customize your answer upon the roles that are stored in this object. You could for example implement a RestCall on /userData like this:
#GetMapping("/userData")
public List<Object> getUserData() {
List<SimpleGrantedAuthority> roles = (List<SimpleGrantedAuthority>) SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getAuthorities();
SimpleGrantedAuthority authorityTeamLeader = new SimpleGrantedAuthority("ROLE_TEAMLEADER");
List<Object> result = new ArrayList<>();
if (roles.contains(authorityTeamLeader)) {
result = getAllUsers();
} else {
result = getPersonalUser(roles);
}
return result;
}
I am using Identity Server 3. I have couple applications ie. Client configured and have few users configured. How do i establish the relationship between User and a Client and also view all applications that the selected User has access to.
Update 1
I am sorry if question was confusing. On IdSvr3 home page, there is a link to revoke application permissions. I am guessing in order to revoke the permission you have to first establish the relationship between user and application.
and i wanted to know how to establish that permission when i add new user?
There's no direct way to limit one or multiple users to a certain client. This is where you should think about implementing your own custom validation. Fortunately, the IdentityServer provides an extensibility point for this kind of requirement.
ICustomRequestValidator
You should implement this interface to further validate users to see if they belong to certain clients and filter them out. You can look into the user details by looking at ValidatedAuthorizeRequest.Subject. This custom validator will start after validating optional parameters such as nonce, prompt, arc_values ( AuthenticationContextReference ), login_hint, and etc. The endpoint is AuthorizeEndPointController and the default implementation of the interface for the tailored job is AuthorizeRequestValidator and its RunValidationAsync. You should take a look at the controller and the class.
Implementation tip
By the time the custom request validation begins, a Client reference will be presented in ValidatedAuthorizeRequest. So all you need to do would be matching the client id or some other identifiers you think you need to verify the client. Probably, you might want to add a Claim key-value pair to your client which you want to allow a few users.
Maybe something like this.
new InMemoryUser{Subject = "870805", Username = "damon", Password = "damon",
Claims = new Claim[]
{
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Name, "Damon Jeong"),
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Email, "dmjeong#email.com"),
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.EmailVerified, "true", ClaimValueTypes.Boolean)
}
}
Assume you have above user, then add the subject id to the claim of a client like below.
new Client
{
ClientName = "WPF WebView Client Sample",
ClientId = "wpf.webview.client",
Flow = Flows.Implicit,
.
.
.
// Add claim for limiting this client to certain users.
// Since a claim only accepts type and value as string,
// You can add a list of subject id by comma separated values
// eg ( new Claim("BelongsToThisUser", "870805, 870806, 870807") )
Claims = new List<Claim>
{
new Claim("BelongsToThisUser", "870805")
}
},
And then just implement the ICustomRequestValidator and try to match the Claim value with the given user in its ValidateAuthorizeRequestAsync.
public class UserRequestLimitor : ICustomRequestValidator
{
public Task<AuthorizeRequestValidationResult> ValidateAuthorizeRequestAsync(ValidatedAuthorizeRequest request)
{
var clientClaim = request.Client.claims.Where(x => x.Type == "BelongsToThisUser").FirstOrDefault();
// Check is this client has "BelongsToThisUser" claim.
if(clientClaim != null)
{
var subClaim = request.Subject.Claims.Where(x => x.Type == "sub").FirstOrDefault() ?? new Claim(string.Empty, string.Empty);
if(clientClaim.Value == userClaim.Value)
{
return Task.FromResult<AuthorizeRequestValidationResult>(new AuthorizeRequestValidationResult
{
IsError = false
});
}
else
{
return Task.FromResult<AuthorizeRequestValidationResult>(new AuthorizeRequestValidationResult
{
ErrorDescription = "This client doesn't have an authorization to request a token for this user.",
IsError = true
});
}
}
// This client has no access controls over users.
else
{
return Task.FromResult<AuthorizeRequestValidationResult>(new AuthorizeRequestValidationResult
{
IsError = false
});
}
}
public Task<TokenRequestValidationResult> ValidateTokenRequestAsync(ValidatedTokenRequest request)
{
// your implementation
}
}
Time to DI
You need to inject your own dependency when you configure up your IdentityServer. The authorization server uses IdentityServerServiceFactory for registering dependencies.
var factory = new IdentityServerServiceFactory();
factory.Register(new Registration<ICustomRequestValidator>(resolver => new UserRequestLimitor()));
Then Autofac; the IoC container in IdentityServer will do the rest of the DI jobs for you.
In servicestack OAuth implementation I only saw possibility to automatically login with eg. facebook account.
But is there abbility to support registration process with facebook login. What I wanted is to let users login to facebook app, and then load their Name, Surname and email and prefill needed text boxes for real registration on my site (since I also have to have mobile phone verification etc.) I don't want user to be authorized and authenticated when he logs in with facebook. Only credentials login should be valid one for full site access.
Edit: I found a solution.
In FacebookProvider.cs
public override bool IsAuthorized(IAuthSession session, IOAuthTokens tokens, Auth request = null)
{
if (request != null)
{
if (!LoginMatchesSession(session, request.UserName)) return false;
}
return tokens != null && session.UserName!=null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(tokens.AccessTokenSecret);
}
The catch was the && session.UserName!=null part. So we can check if user is logged in using credentials, this will be !=null and user can use all services. If not, this will be ==null and he can only get facebook info from session.
The SocialBootstrap API project shows an example of handling the callback after a successful Authentication by overriding the OnAuthenticated() hook of its custom user session:
I've pulled out, rewrote some and highlighted some of the important bits:
public class CustomUserSession : AuthUserSession
{
public override void OnAuthenticated(IServiceBase authService,
IAuthSession session,
IOAuthTokens tokens,
Dictionary<string, string> authInfo)
{
base.OnAuthenticated(authService, session, tokens, authInfo);
//Populate matching fields from this session into your own MyUserTable
var user = session.TranslateTo<MyUserTable>();
user.Id = int.Parse(session.UserAuthId);
user.GravatarImageUrl64 = CreateGravatarUrl(session.Email, 64);
foreach (var authToken in session.ProviderOAuthAccess)
{
if (authToken.Provider == FacebookAuthProvider.Name)
{
user.FacebookName = authToken.DisplayName;
user.FacebookFirstName = authToken.FirstName;
user.FacebookLastName = authToken.LastName;
user.FacebookEmail = authToken.Email;
}
else if (authToken.Provider == TwitterAuthProvider.Name)
{
user.TwitterName = authToken.DisplayName;
}
}
//Resolve the DbFactory from the IOC and persist the user info
using (var db = authService.TryResolve<IDbConnectionFactory>().Open())
{
//Update (if exists) or insert populated data into 'MyUserTable'
db.Save(user);
}
}
//Change `IsAuthorized` to only verify users authenticated with Credentials
public override bool IsAuthorized(string provider)
{
if (provider != AuthService.CredentialsProvider) return false;
return base.IsAuthorized(provider);
}
}
Basically this user-defined custom logic (which gets fired after every successful authentication) extracts data from the UserSession and stores it in a custom 'MyUserTable'.
We've also overridden the meaning of IsAuthorized to only accept users that have authenticated with CredentialsAuth.
You can use this data to complete the rest of the registration.
Other possible customizations
ServiceStack's built-in Auth persists the AuthData and populates the Session automatically for you. If you want to add extra validation assertions you can simply use your own custom [Authentication] attribute instead containing additional custom logic. Look at the implementation of the built-in AuthenticateAttribute as a guide.
I have a Drupal site and a Zend application. The main thing is the Drupal site, where the users are stored & everything.
I want my users to be automatically logged in to the Zend app when they log in on Drupal. The problem is that Drupal changes the session cookie to SESS* where * is some random (EDIT: not random, but based on protocol and domain) string.
Is there any way I can tell Zend to use this cookie as a session identifier and to log the user automatically?
You have to write your own authentication adapter:
class YourApp_Auth_Adapter_DrupalBridge implements Zend_Auth_Adapter_Interface
{
/**
* #return Zend_Auth_Result
*/
public function authenticate()
{
// Check if the Drupal session is set by reading the cookie.
// ...
// Read the current user's login into $username.
// ...
// Create the authentication result object.
// Failure
if (null === $username) {
return new Zend_Auth_Result(Zend_Auth_Result::FAILURE_IDENTITY_NOT_FOUND, null);
}
// Success
return new Zend_Auth_Result(Zend_Auth_Result::SUCCESS, $username);
}
}
Then process your authentication:
$adapter = new YourApp_Auth_Adapter_DrupalBridge();
$result = Zend_Auth::getInstance()->authenticate($adapter);
if ($result->isValid()) {
// User is logged in
}
there is a custom login form that should give users access to certain contents on the same page. That works so far with Users stored as Members in the SS database and I was checking after Login if the user has permissions like this in the Page Class:
function isAllowed() {
if (Member::currentUser()) {
$PresseGroup = DataObject::get_one('Group', "Code = 'presse'");
$AdminGroup = DataObject::get_one('Group', "Code = 'administrators'");
if (Member::currentUser()->inGroup($PresseGroup->ID) || Member::currentUser()->inGroup($AdminGroup->ID)) {
return true;
}
}
}
in the Template I just did this:
<% if isAllowed %>
SecretContent
<% end_if %>
OK so far, but now the users will not be stored in the silverstripe database - they are stored on a another server.
On that external server is running a little php script accepting the username and password. The script just returns user has permission: true or false.
I´m calling that script via cURL.
I planned to overwrite the dologin Function of MemberLoginForm. Now I just wonder how to check after Login that the User got the permission and display the contents... I tried to set a variable in the controller of the Page or should I set a session Variable? Thats my attempt (CustomLoginForm extends MemberLoginForm):
public function dologin($data) {
if(userHasPermission("user1", "pw")==true){
$this->controller->Test("test");
}
$link = $this->controller->Link();
$this->performLogin($data);
$this->controller->redirect($link);
}
I hope someone can help me with that - I know very specific - problem.
Many thanx,
Florian
In SilverStripe you can create a custom authenticator, which means users can log in on your website with accounts that are stored somewhere else, or even just a hard coded user and password.
You can check out the OpenID Authentication Module for example code on how to do it
But for your task this might even be to complex of a solution, how about after login just do something like Session::set('isAllowed', true); and to check if the user is allowed to view:
function isAllowed() {
if (Member::currentUser()) {
$PresseGroup = DataObject::get_one('Group', "Code = 'presse'");
$AdminGroup = DataObject::get_one('Group', "Code = 'administrators'");
if (Member::currentUser()->inGroup($PresseGroup->ID) || Member::currentUser()->inGroup($AdminGroup->ID)) {
return true;
}
}
// if Member::currentUser() is not allowed to view,
// return the session, which is either set to true or it returns null if not set
return Session::get('isAllowed');
}