I've godaddy's 2048bit certificate for domain and 4 subdomains.
[www.site.com, mail.site.com, e.t.c.]
Standard Multiple Domain (UCC) SSL Up to 5 Domains - 1 year (annual)
That certificate works fine in Apache, ssl web checker says OK and browser shows green line in address string.
I've added this certificate to mail daemon, it has been accepted by Exim too.
When some client tries to send mail with SSL/TLS connection through mail server, mail program says "Certificate is BAD" though shows correct trusted info.
Client connects to hostname: mail.server.com, server's hostname is: ns1.server.com (not added to certificate), mail server says: 220 ns1.site.com ESMTP Exim 4.73
Mail clients tested: iPAD mail client, Mozilla Thunderbird, Mac mail client
Please help.
UPDATE:
Godaddy's ssl checker says: SSL Chain of Trust is Broken!
Here are a couple of things to check:
Is the hostname that the mail client uses in the TCP connect, listed in the server certificate as the Common Name (CN) of the subject distinguished name?
If not, is it listed using type "DNS:" in the Subject Alternative Name X509 v3 certificate extension?
If neither of the above, you might be getting "Remote Certificate Name Mismatch" (or similarly named error.)
If it is listed, then look for the Issuer of the certificate, and Issuer of the Issuer, etc., all the way to the root certificate of the chain. The root certificate should be installed on the client machine, in the "Trusted Root" certificate store for whatever client you are using (Windows, Mozilla, Java keystore, etc.)
If the root certificate is installed, then look at the intermediate certificates, if there are any in the chain (between root and server certificates). They have to either be installed locally, or arrive from the server alongside the server certificate -- either the server sends them each time or you've got the intermediate certificates already installed on the client end. Either way, they have got to be in hand to accept the server certificate.
Do the clients which reject the certificate have the appropriate root certificates in their cert store?
Related
I don't know if I am asking this in the right place.
I have an SSL cert for my website, and I am trying to setup a mail server (same domain) using the same cert.
I am using Postfix and Dovecot. When I try logging in from Evolution mail client, I get an error "Peer failed to perform TLS handshake". When I try an online service to verify I get "Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table."
I guess my actual question is, can I actually use the same SSL cert for my website and my email server?
What do I do to debug next?
You can use a certificate you have for the web server also for your mail server as long as it matches the hostname you use to access your mail server. Of course the certificate need to properly setup at the mail server, i.e. include the necessary intermediate certificates similar to how it is (hopefully) setup on the web server.
I am using Postfix and Dovecot.
This means you need to take care of multiple configurations, both for SMTP in Postfix and IMAP/POP3 (whatever you use) in Dovecot. And in all cases the certificates subject/SAN must match the hostname you use to connect to the server.
When I try logging in from Evolution mail client, I get an error "Peer failed to perform TLS handshake".
There are not enough information about this setup to find out what exactly is causing the TLS error. It is not even clear if the error is caused when retrieving mail (IMAP/POP3, i.e. Dovecot) or while sending (Postfix).
When I try an online service to verify I get "Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table."
This has nothing to do with TLS at all. The test server simply tried to use a recipient which your mail server (Postfix) will not accept.
What do I do to debug next?
The next steps would probably be to check if the certificate matches the names you use in the first place and to look into log files for error messages or warnings. Following steps depend on what the result of these steps is.
I have this weirdest problem. First off: I'm VERY new to this certificate thingy. I've done a fair amount of searches and reading up though.
The CA Cert that I install into the Trusted Root Certificate
Authorities store in my server automatically get removed/disappeared
as soon as a client web-browser try to connect to a web-site using an
SSL cert created with that CA cert.
DETAILS:
Windows Server 2008 R2 (development server).
I've created my own Certificate Authority Cert; which I use it to generate an SSL server cert (to install on my IIS 7 Server) and a client cert (for use at my local PC to connect to the WCF Webservice on the development server which is set to Require SSL and Require Client Cert).
I installed the CA Cert into the Trusted Root on both Server and local PC.
Installed the SSL server cert into the IIS7 for that particular site and did the https binding to port 443.
As soon as I launch my browser to access that site with HTTPS, the CA
cert in automatically removed on the server (from the Trusted Root
Certificate Authorities store). and my local PC browser will report
an error 403.
This is driving me nuts... anyone knows what is happening?
Apparently, after a lot of running around, it is due to too many of the same certs in many stores.
I open the MMC.exe > Add/Remove SnapIns > Certificates
Notice there are 3 types there (My User Account, Service Account & Computer Account).
Open up My User and Computer Account, go through all the stores for each one and DELETE all of the CA cert with the same name. Then add the CA cert in either My User Account or Computer Account, depending on how you access the certs (in the event of the cert being used programatically, install it in the Computer Account, [Trusted Root Certificate Authorities].
Just 1 place, then the problem will dissappear.
When I login to my bank account using https, it's only a server side SSL authentication before I enter my login info. My browser does the server authentication based on the certificate info from the server during SSL session. I did not have to do any manual import of server certificate as a trusted cert into my browser. It just happens at runtime during SSL exchange.
On the other hand, I have also seen applications where one has to manually import the certificate (using keytool for e.g.) when you look into their install guide.
Question is: If the certificate info is exchanged in the beginning of SSL session, each side has enough info to authenticate the other side. Why would some apps require manual import of certs from each other between client and server. Be it either or both side authentication.
ADDITIONAL INFO based on the responses below:
I was referring the scenario where I was installing a commercial software based on client-server model with client side SSL authentication turned ON. I installed the server on machine A and 2 clients on different machines all in my private network. During install, server generates a self-signed certificate locally. So do the 2 clients. Once installation is complete, I was asked to copy the clients' certs to server machine and manually import them as trusted certs. Also, copy the server cert to client machines and do the import into their trusted store. They provided a wrapper tool on top of java keytool to perform the cert import. Why is this manual import necessary here? The client and server will anyway exchange certificate info during SSL handshake and perform the authentication. Again, these are self-signed certs and CA involved here.
Note that a certificate is signed by a certificate authority so it depends on which certificate authorities your browser trusts. If the Web server sends a certificate signed by a certificate authority that’s trusted by the browser/application and the certificate is valid, you shouldn’t get any warnings whatsoever.
On the other hand, if the browser receives a certificate from the Web server and it doesn’t trust the certificate authority that signed that certificate, the browser will take some action — at the very least, it should warn you about this. When you import a certificate from a Web site, you’re essentially telling your browser that you have decided to trust that certificate independently of who signed it.
Edit: The same reasoning applies: The keystore keeps a list of trusted certificate authorities and their corresponding certificates. The whole concept of PKI is to have a hierarchy of trusted CAs that emit signed certificates for other parties. If a certificate is self-signed, there’s no valid trust chain — how will Java know that the certificate hasn’t been forged by an attacker?
You’re assuming that a connection between a client and a Web server is implicitly trusted just because certificates are exchanged during the SSL handshake. What if a man in the middle poses as the Web server and, instead of sending the server certificate, sends his own certificate instead? How would clients know that the certificate received by the man in the middle is not to be trusted? If the certificate is signed by a trusted CA, or if the certificate has been manually added to the keystore as a trusted certificate, the client can check whether it should trust the certificate or not.
An SSL server's certificate has to be "vouched for" by a certificate authority (CA). Your browser (or other program) contains a list of CAs it trusts. If you're using a site that is not certified by one of the standard CAs, then you'd have to import its CA in order for the verification to succeed.
No legitimate site (especially for online banking) should require you to use an "alternative" CA. Only do this for sites where you're not sending super-sensitive data.
Just got my Lync server deployed on Windows Server 2008 R2 and am trying to connect via Lync client on a different machine. When attempting to sign in, the client throws an error saying "Cannot sign in to Lync: There was a problem verifying the certificate from the server.".
Looking deeper, into the client box's event viewer, I see the following error "The certificate received from the remote serer was issued by an untrusted certificate authority. Because of this, none of the data contained in the certificate can be validated. The SSL connection request has failed. The attached data contains the server certificate. ....
My organization has an internal CA, which is in charge of issuing all required certificates to the Lync server. My client box has installed the internal CA (root) as a trusted CA provider. To me, this should cause any certificates that issues, including the Lync certificates, to be trusted.
I installed Lync client on the same box that Lync server is hoted, and am able to log in fine. My error only occurs when connecting from a different box.
Can anyone shed some light? Thanks!
I had same issue. To resolve: from client, hit url of CA Authority, some thing like http://CAservername/certsrv this provided option to download a CA Certificate Chain.
Put this into local computer trusted root certs and I was good to go.
As mentioned in the error message ("Cannot sign in to Lync: There was a problem verifying the certificate from the server"), this is clearly a certification error. If you work in a big company (where they have they own internal CA - (Certification Authority)) in most cases they would have used their internal certificate to establish trust relationship. If you just install/export the Root certificate of the CA under "Trusted Root Certificate Authorities” of “Local Computer” account, this error should be resolved.
If your company doesn't have own CA, then find our who issued the certificate for Lynch and install/export the root certificate of that CA to the same location as above, this issue should be resolved.
I have a few sites that have SSL Certificates installed. When an SSL request is made with my employer's iPhone, this error message is displayed:
Accept Website Certificate
The certificate for this website is invalid. Tap Accept to connect to this website anyway.
I've pulled up the same pages in other browsers, including Safari, and they do not show any issues with the certs.
These two URLs exhibit the problem:
https://www.powerlunchbunch.com/index.php?template=join&nav=20
https://www.councilonagingmartin.org/index.php?template=donate&nav=257
Additional Information:
Both SSL certs are issued by Network Solutions
The sites are hosted on Rackspace Cloud Sites
Update:
I now have an open ticket with Rackspace for this issue. I browsed the same sites in Firefox 4.0 Beta 7, and got this warning page, telling me that "The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.":
I think it's because you (or your hosting company) haven't configured the full certificate chain on your web server.
Take a look at a report from an ssl checker, such as this:
http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=www.councilonagingmartin.org
...
I can see from this report that you're using Apache2.2. Configuring 'intermediate certificates' on Apache2 goes something like this:
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/crt/yourDOMAINNAME.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/crt/private.key
SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/ssl/crt/chainCert.xxx
I don't know if you configured the certificate yourself, or your hosting company configured it, so you'll either need to contact your hosting company, or the certificate provider, who can provide the intermediate certificate(s).
Hope That Helps
Unfortunately, the Root CA for both those certificates, Network Solutions, L.L.C. is not a trusted certificate authority on the iPhone.
If you look at the certificate chain, it does end up at AddTrust, which is a trusted CA on the iPhone.
So you likely have one of the following problems:
1) Your certificate is not installed correctly on the web server
2) You need to work with Network Solutions (the SSL cert issuer) to get a cert that properly chains to AddTrust.