I'm writing an application [a Pidgin plugin, actually], which inserts an image embedded into a GtkTextBuffer. Currently, I add it using:
gtk_text_buffer_insert_pixbuf(textBuffer, &iter, pixbuf);
However, this just puts the image "inline" with the text. What I'm looking for for is something similar to HTML's "float". For example, assuming my image is about twice the size of a line of text, I current get this [where X is the image]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam gravida
XXXX
XXXX ante in massa dignissim aliquam. Nullam tempus quam luctus eros volutpat laoreet.
XXXX
XXXX sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Mauris semper, nunc quis gravida molestie,
leo neque imperdiet nulla, vel consectetur nisi nisl non metus. Maecenas pharetra
magna nec magna mattis faucibus convallis nibh
Ideally, I'd like to have:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam gravida
XXXX ante in massa dignissim aliquam. Nullam tempus quam luctus eros volutpat laoreet.
XXXX
XXXX sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
XXXX Mauris semper, nunc quis gravida molestie,
leo neque imperdiet nulla, vel consectetur nisi nisl non metus. Maecenas pharetra
magna nec magna mattis faucibus convallis nibh
Note that there are four paragraphs, where the second and third have an image in the beginning.
Is this possible?
The short answer is no; images in TextView are just treated as a character (which may be a lot bigger than a usual character). There isn't any layout engine in the HTML sense. (Layout is limited to what PangoLayout can do.)
You could probably hack something together, using an approach such as:
leave a margin the size of the image on your paragraph
add an expose event handler to paint the image to the window (see the "border windows" examples which are I think in gtk-demo or the docs somewhere, but draw to the main window not border windows)
Some amount of work, but it would probably get the job done.
Related
Can't seem to wrap my head around the proper regex!
MY GOAL
add 2 spaces to each line of a selected block of text
MY CONTEXT
some markdown tools I used need 2 spaces at the end of each line to properly manage lists, etc.
if a file is edited multiple times, I do not want to end up with lines ending with 4+ spaces
a block of text can be a line, a paragraph, the whole file content as shown in the editor
I have some kind of macro in Notepad++ that does the trick but I want to do the same with Autohotkey to be editor-independant
MY EXAMPLE
----
# 2020-03-17
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu.
In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Cras dapibus. Vivamus elementum semper nisi. Aenean vulputate eleifend tellus. Aenean leo ligula, porttitor eu, consequat vitae, eleifend ac, enim. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a,
MY SNIPPET SO FAR
; CTL+SHIFT+F12
^+F12::
Clipboard = ; Empty the clipboard so that ClipWait has something to detect
SendInput, ^c ; Copy selected text
ClipWait
OutputText := ""
Loop, parse, Clipboard, `n, `r
{
OutputText .= RegExReplace(A_LoopField,"m)^(.*) *$","$1 `r`n")
}
SendRaw % OutputText
return
MY PROBLEM
Between the character ignored when looping, what I am trying to match and what I try to replace the group with, I end up with far more lines and spaces than needed.
CURRENT OUTPUT
----
# 2020-03-17
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu.
In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Cras dapibus. Vivamus elementum semper nisi. Aenean vulputate eleifend tellus. Aenean leo ligula, porttitor eu, consequat vitae, eleifend ac, enim. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a,
DESIRED OUTPUT
----
# 2020-03-17
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu.
In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Cras dapibus. Vivamus elementum semper nisi. Aenean vulputate eleifend tellus. Aenean leo ligula, porttitor eu, consequat vitae, eleifend ac, enim. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a,
You're getting too many lines in the output because the send command is messing up due to the carriage returns, which aren't needed in there anyway. I don't really know why that is happening, and I can't be bothered to find out why since the approach isn't good anyway.
And also your indentation is getting messed up because your text editor automatically adds indentation based on the previous line.
But anyway, sending such (long) input is never a good idea.
Make use of the clipboard and just send a ctrl+v to instantly and reliably paste in the text.
Here's an example of that along another way to add the spaces at the end:
inp := "
(
----
# 2020-03-17
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu.
In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Cras dapibus. Vivamus elementum semper nisi. Aenean vulputate eleifend tellus. Aenean leo ligula, porttitor eu, consequat vitae, eleifend ac, enim. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a,
)"
Loop, Parse, inp, `n, `r
OutputText .= (A_LoopField = "" ? "" : RTrim(A_LoopField) " ") "`n"
Clipboard := OutputText
SendInput, ^v
The ternary A_LoopField = "" ? "" : RTrim(A_LoopField) " " returns true if the line was empty and then the two spaces aren't added at the end.
I think that's the behavior you were doing for.
And RTrim is used to trim any trailing spaces (or tabs) off the end, so we're sure to end up with just the two we want.
And, of course, at the end of any line we add one line feed `n.
Also, your Regex approach was just fine as well at first it just seemed off to me, but well, here's another way. And I guess this would be more efficient, though you'd have to work with seriously large inputs and/or slow hardware for that to make any meaningful difference haha.
I often run across a situation where I've constructed an Element or Form and wish to crop the view down to a given area (i.e. for scrolling within a smaller rectangle) though I haven't been able to find any methods for this within their respective modules.
Is it possible to do this using Elm's std library? If not, are there any 3rd-party libraries capable of doing this?
Otherwise, perhaps there is a better way of achieving this?
Any help or suggestions appreciated!
No scollbars (using the std library)
I can't find a way to crop but have scrollbars with the current Graphics.Element. What is possible is to crop without having scrollbars, either through a container that's smaller than it's contents or by resizing an element with size. I think the container way is more robust, as resizing an image will actually warp the image.
Here's an example:
import Graphics.Element exposing (..)
import Text
string = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec a diam lectus. Sed sit amet ipsum mauris. Maecenas congue ligula ac quam viverra nec consectetur ante hendrerit. Donec et mollis dolor. Praesent et diam eget libero egestas mattis sit amet vitae augue. Nam tincidunt congue enim, ut porta lorem lacinia consectetur. Donec ut libero sed arcu vehicula ultricies a non tortor. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean ut gravida lorem. Ut turpis felis, pulvinar a semper sed, adipiscing id dolor. Pellentesque auctor nisi id magna consequat sagittis. Curabitur dapibus enim sit amet elit pharetra tincidunt feugiat nisl imperdiet. Ut convallis libero in urna ultrices accumsan. Donec sed odio eros. Donec viverra mi quis quam pulvinar at malesuada arcu rhoncus. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. In rutrum accumsan ultricies. Mauris vitae nisi at sem facilisis semper ac in est."
main : Element
main =
let element =
leftAligned (Text.fromString string)
|> container 400 300 topLeft
in container 205 200 topLeft element
Scrollbars (via "3rd party" library)
If you want scrollbars, you'll probably need at least a little bit of html from elm-html. Note that the author of the library is also the author of Elm, so it's not quite 3rd party :P . You can keep it minimal by using conversions to html and from html and wrapping it in a div with style attributes that define the smaller size and the right overflow property. As long as that div has a known size, it should be easy to convert back to an Element.
I seek the preferred way to structure the contents of a doxygen module group. For example I want to structure the #details text in the following module group in different sections. Especially each of the sections should appear in the bookmarks of the generated PDF (as child elements of the module group):
#defgroup lorem
#{
#brief
Lorem ipsum
#details
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum
ut, placerat ac, adipiscing vitae, felis. Curabitur dictum gravida mauris. Nam arcu
libero, nonummy eget, consectetuer id, vulputate a, magna. Donec vehicula augue eu
neque.
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis
egestas. Mauris ut leo. Cras viverra metus rhoncus sem. Nulla et lectus vestibulum
urna fringilla ultrices. Phasellus eu tellus sit amet tortor gravida placerat.
Integer sapien est, iaculis in, pretium quis, viverra ac, nunc.
Praesent eget sem vel leo ultrices bibendum. Aenean faucibus. Morbi dolor nulla,
malesuada eu, pulvinar at, mollis ac, nulla. Curabitur auctor semper nulla.
Donec varius orci eget risus. Duis nibh mi, congue eu, accumsan eleifend,
sagittis quis, diam. Duis eget orci sit amet orci dignissim rutrum.
#}
A way could be using #section #subsection etc, but the doxygen manual says:
Warning:
This command only works inside related page documentation
and not in other documentation blocks!
Is it possible to use #section or are there other (better) ways to do this?
Edit:
The behavior using #section seems indeed odd, for example I tried something like this:
#defgroup lorem
#{
#brief
Lorem ipsum
#section sec0 Lorem ipsum
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum
ut, placerat ac, adipiscing vitae, felis. Curabitur dictum gravida mauris. Nam arcu
libero, nonummy eget, consectetuer id, vulputate a, magna. Donec vehicula augue eu
neque.
#section sec1 Pellentesque
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis
egestas. Mauris ut leo. Cras viverra metus rhoncus sem. Nulla et lectus vestibulum
urna fringilla ultrices. Phasellus eu tellus sit amet tortor gravida placerat.
#section sec2 Integer sapien est
Integer sapien est, iaculis in, pretium quis, viverra ac, nunc.
Praesent eget sem vel leo ultrices bibendum. Aenean faucibus. Morbi dolor nulla,
malesuada eu, pulvinar at, mollis ac, nulla. Curabitur auctor semper nulla.
Donec varius orci eget risus.
Duis nibh mi, congue eu, accumsan eleifend,
sagittis quis, diam. Duis eget orci sit amet orci dignissim rutrum.
#}
The result looks fine and has in this case the following structure in the PDF:
4.1 lorem
4.1.1 Lorem ipsum
4.1.2 Pellentesque
4.1.3 Integer sapien est
Now if a add #file a #details section containing no text appears in the output I can't get rid of. It looks like this (I also tested adding another group containing a #file - same result):
4.1 lorem
4.1.1 Detailed Description
4.1.2 Lorem ipsum
4.1.3 Pellentesque
4.1.4 Integer sapien est
Then I tried to move the sections and make them subsections of the "Detailed Description" -which would be logically okay. But when I change them to #subsection 's they completely disappear. Doxygen warns in this case it has found a subsection out of section context so obviously it doesn't realize it generated this mysterious empty #details section.
Next idea was to use the Markdown support to do it. In this case sections aren't put into the PDF bookmarks so it looks okay - but in latex code they are still on same level as the #details section. And subsections in Markdown disappear as well. I've no idea what is going on, but I can't be the first person trying to structure things in a module group.
I tried your example myself and if you put the #file between your #{ ... #} like this,
/**
#defgroup lorem
#{
...
#file
#}
*/
then the standard Doxygen Layout is created.
If you move the #file outside, then your like this, then it should work.
/**
#defgroup lorem
#{
...
#}
#file
*/
However, if you really need the #file within your #defgroup lorem #{ ... #}, there are two ways to achive it.
FIRST:
/**
#defgroup file
#{
#file
#defgroup lorem
#{
...
#}
#}
*/
SECOND:
Change the standard doxygen layout.
To do this, follow the manuals description here, beginning at: Changing the layout of pages, by creating your custom DoxygenLayout.xml.
Now, edit the DoxygenLayout.xml and search for the <group> tag.
There will find <detaileddescription title=""/> tag, change it to <detaileddescription visible="no" title=""/>and the `Detailed Description" bugging you should vanish.
If you simply want to structure the sections within a group description then I'd simply use HTML and insert <h1>Section name here<\h1> etc.
Alternatively Markdown ## section marking may work.
I don't know how well these percolate to LaTex and PDF as I've never used that output route. However, I'm confident that using HTML will give more reliable results than using #section which, as the manual warns, is simply not designed for use here, but, instead, as part of the #page / #section / #subsection hierarchy for bulk prose. These command sets do not mix well in Doxygen.
Locating #file in exotic positions (as per aldr's suggestion) is prone to cause very strange results. It's simply the description block for the physical file, and is best used as just that.
How does Kentico calculate the length of inputted content in a text area on a form and how much value does it give to a line break? A line break is 2 characters according to my JavaScript calculation but seems like Kentico calculates it as being more than 2 characters.
Summary of problem:
I have a maximum length of 2500 set on a text area input on a form on my Kentico site.
I have entered some text into a this text area and with my JavaScript calculations (used to show how many characters the user has left) the character length is exactly 2500 (including line breaks and spaces) and so should therefore validate and send. However Kentico is failing my input saying that my max length has been exceeded. See below:
If I remove the line break and type some extra characters to bring my character calculation back up to 2500, the form sends without failing.
Test used that fails:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae
augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id metus. Suspendisse purus
justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus
vulputate scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem
placerat dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae
felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus.
Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed
porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at
scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus. Lorem ipsum
dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae augue ac
enim molestie scelerisque a id metus. Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis
quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus vulputate
scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem placerat
dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis.
Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus
lectus.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Quisque vitae augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id metus.
Suspendisse purus jus
to, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus
vulputate scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem
placerat dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae
felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus.
Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed
porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at
scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus. Lorem ipsum
dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae augue ac
enim molestie scelerisque a id metus. Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis
quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus vulputate
scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem placerat
dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis.
Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus
lectus.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Quisque vitae augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id metus.
Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae maur d
Test used that passes: Notice that the line break has been removed and 2 extra characters added to the end to bring it back up to 2500 characters
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae
augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id metus. Suspendisse purus
justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus
vulputate scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem
placerat dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae
felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus.
Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed
porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at
scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus lectus. Lorem ipsum
dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae augue ac
enim molestie scelerisque a id metus. Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis
quis accumsan ut, congue vitae mauris. Nunc luctus vulputate
scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta elit, sed ornare lorem placerat
dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis sagittis nec vitae felis.
Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere, neque dui sollicitudin
sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim. Donec at metus
lectus.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Quisque vitae augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id metus.
Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae
mauris. Nunc luctus vulputate scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta
elit, sed ornare lorem placerat dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh
convallis sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat
posuere, neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis
enim. Donec at metus lectus. Sed quis enim quis nibh convallis
sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat posuere,
neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis enim.
Donec at metus lectus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id
metus. Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae
mauris. Nunc luctus vulputate scelerisque. Nullam ullamcorper porta
elit, sed ornare lorem placerat dictum. Sed quis enim quis nibh
convallis sagittis nec vitae felis. Sed porttitor, nibh et volutpat
posuere, neque dui sollicitudin sapien, at scelerisque lacus elit quis
enim. Donec at metus lectus.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit. Quisque vitae augue ac enim molestie scelerisque a id
metus. Suspendisse purus justo, iaculis quis accumsan ut, congue vitae
maur dee
The problem lay in the fact that my calculation in my JavaScript gave a length of 1 to a line break whereby Kentico's calculation gives a length of 2 to a line break. So they weren't matching up. Hence my character counter said that the length of the entered text was ok but Kentico's check deemed it over the max length.
This is what I had previously:
enteredText = textareaVariableName.val();
characterCount = enteredText.length; //one line break entered returned 1
This is what I have changed it to:
enteredText = textareaVariableName.val();
enteredTextEncoded = escape(enteredText);
//next I match any line break characters - %0A - after encoding the text area text
linebreaks = enteredTextEncoded.match(/%0A/g);
(linebreaks != null) ? linebreaksLength = linebreaks.length : linebreaksLength = 0;
characterCount = enteredText.length + linebreaksLength; //one line break entered now returns 2
Is there a better way I could check for line breaks in the text, rather than to encode the text and then check for the substring %0A ?
EDIT/UPDATE: I believe the following is a better solution as opposed to what I was doing above.
var limit = 2500; //for example
enteredText = textareaVariableName.val();
numberOfLineBreaks = (enteredText.match(/\n/g)||[]).length;
left = limit - enteredText.length - numberOfLineBreaks;
if (left < 0) {
//character count over code here
} else {
//character count within limits code here
}
This is basically JavaScript problem related to browser. In Firefox or Chrome or any other WebKit based browser textareaVariableName.val().length will count only 1 character for new line (\n). Same for jQuery implementation. But in IE document.getElementById('textareaVariableName').value.length will count 2 for new line (\r\n)
In Kentico, the text is validated to the actual count of characters and therefore the validation is failing.
Quick fix for this is simple regular expression for counting the actual length:
function getTextLength(elementId){
if (elementId) {
var elem = document.getElementById(elementId);
if (elem) {
var str = elem.value;
if (str) {
str = str.replace(/(\r\n|\r|\n)/g, '\r\n');
return str.length;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
This should help you to count characters correctly independently of the browser used by the customer.
I have read so much and still no real answer. How can I get iFrames to work on the iPhone and iPad? Especially now you can't 2 finger scroll. I just want to have an iFrame scroll or something that functions like one. I feel like this should be so simple!
Here is a sample page:
http://olbrichdesigns.com/ffff/characters/test.html
Thanks!
jenny
Mobile safari supports them but generally they're not great.
Using a DIV with overflow-y: scroll would probably be better for you
<div style="overflow-y: scroll; height: 100px;">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam at laoreet augue. Pellentesque felis arcu, convallis eu luctus vitae, imperdiet ut est. Nulla rhoncus varius odio, non facilisis felis imperdiet pellentesque. Aliquam in luctus orci. Ut convallis felis sodales diam ultricies in elementum ligula ultricies. Vivamus consequat convallis mauris, sed ullamcorper ante fermentum a. Quisque at velit eu velit venenatis faucibus id vel velit. Integer eget nisi elit. Ut blandit eros lorem, sed feugiat nunc. Sed lacus nisi, placerat sit amet blandit feugiat, accumsan ut urna. Proin risus sapien, porttitor sed euismod quis, adipiscing vitae nulla. Vestibulum at ipsum vel tortor fermentum tristique. Fusce laoreet magna vitae tellus accumsan eget adipiscing velit ullamcorper. Proin tempus volutpat fringilla. Etiam eu magna sit amet mi commodo volutpat sit amet eget lacus. Nullam euismod tellus id odio tempus id tincidunt felis mollis.
</div>