Basically, at least for proof of concept, I want a function where I can run:
SELECT res('table_name'); and this will give me the results of SELECT * FROM table_name;.
The issue I am having is schema...in the declaration of the function I have:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION res(table_name TEXT) RETURNS SETOF THISISTHEPROBLEM AS
The problem is that I do not know how to declare my return, as it wants me to specify a table or a schema, and I won't have that until the function is actually run.
Any ideas?
You can do this, but as mentioned before you have to add a column definiton list in the SELECT query.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION res(table_name TEXT) RETURNS SETOF record AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY EXECUTE 'SELECT * FROM ' || table_name;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
SELECT * FROM res('sometable') sometable (col1 INTEGER, col2 INTEGER, col3 SMALLINT, col4 TEXT);
Why for any real practical purpose would you just want to pass in table and select * from it? For fun maybe?
You can't do it without defining some kind of known output like jack and rudi show. Or doing it like depesz does here using output parameters http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2008/05/03/waiting-for-84-return-query-execute-and-cursor_tuple_fraction/.
A few hack around the wall approachs are to issue raise notices in a loop and print out a result set one row at a time. Or you could create a function called get_rows_TABLENAME that has a definition for every table you want to return. Just use code to generate the procedures creations. But again not sure how much value doing a select * from a table, especially with no constraints is other than for fun or making the DBA's blood boil.
Now in SQL Server you can have a stored procedure return a dynamic result set. This is both a blessing and curse as you can't be certain what comes back without looking up the definition. For me I look at PostgreSQL's implementation to be the more sound way to go about it.
Even if you manage to do this (see rudi-moore's answer for a way if you have 8.4 or above), You will have to expand the type explicitly in the select - eg:
SELECT res('table_name') as foo(id int,...)
Related
I'm having issues with the exception handling of postgresql, and I'm looking for some tips/advice how to tackle this.
Say I want to do the following:
SELECT col1 / col2
FROM table
The first problem that arises is that if at some point a value in col2 = 0, the query throws an exception. A solution to this is to add a NULLIF() in the denominator.
In our case, users can make their own formulas, which have to be parsed by the database, so we do not have the knowledge about the division in advance. We could make a fancy formula parser that adds NULLIF() in the right places, but then don't get me started on taking square root of negative numbers..
So I'm wondering if there is a better solution to the problem. Does something like this exist?
SELECT col1 / col2
exception
return null
FROM table
Or do I need to make use of the 'function' feature of postgresql? Is it possible to combine two columns like this?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION somefunction(col1, col2) RETURNS real AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN col1 / col2;
exception when division_by_zero then
return null;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
SELECT somefunction(col1, col2, ..)
FROM table;
So keep in mind that we do not know the formula in advance!
Thanks!
In PostgreSQL you can define your own operators. Given your function, you could
CREATE OPERATOR public./ (
LEFTARG = real,
RIGHTARG = real
FUNCTION = public.somefunction
);
SET search_path = public, pg_catalog;
This would use your custom function for every division.
Allowing your users to run SQL statements is a bad idea. SQL is so powerful that they can do anything - they can change the search_path, and they can easily bring your database server to its knees.
As I am newbie to plpgSQL,
I stuck while migrating a Oracle query into PostgreSQL.
Oracle query:
create or replace FUNCTION employee_all_case(
p_ugr_id IN integer,
p_case_type_id IN integer
)
RETURN number_tab_t PIPELINED
-- LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
-- COST 100
-- VOLATILE
-- AS $$
-- DECLARE
is
l_user_id NUMBER;
l_account_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
l_user_id := p_ugr_id;
l_account_id := p_case_type_id;
FOR cases IN
(SELECT ccase.case_id, ccase.employee_id
FROM ct_case ccase
INNER JOIN ct_case_type ctype
ON (ccase.case_type_id=ctype.case_type_id)
WHERE ccase.employee_id = l_user_id)
LOOP
IF cases.employee_id IS NOT NULL THEN
PIPE ROW (cases.case_id);
END IF;
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
--$$
When I execute this function then I get the following result
select * from table(select employee_all_case(14533,1190) from dual)
My question here is: I really do not understand the pipelined function and how can I obtain the same result in PostgreSQL as Oracle query ?
Please help.
Thank you guys, your solution was very helpful.
I found the desire result:
-- select * from employee_all_case(14533,1190);
-- drop function employee_all_case
create or replace FUNCTION employee_all_case(p_ugr_id IN integer ,p_case_type_id IN integer)
returns table (case_id double precision)
-- PIPELINED
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
COST 100
VOLATILE
AS $$
DECLARE
-- is
l_user_id integer;
l_account_id integer;
BEGIN
l_user_id := cp_lookup$get_user_id_from_ugr_id(p_ugr_id);
l_account_id := cp_lookup$acctid_from_ugr(p_ugr_id);
RETURN QUERY SELECT ccase.case_id
FROM ct_case ccase
INNER JOIN ct_case_type ctype ON ccase.case_type_id = ctype.case_type_id
WHERE ccase.employee_id = p_ugr_id
and ccase.employee_id IS NOT NULL;
--return NEXT;
END;
$$
You would rewrite that to a set returning function:
Change the return type to
RETURNS SETOF integer
and do away with the PIPELINED.
Change the PIPE ROW statement to
RETURN NEXT cases.case_id;
Of course, you will have to do the obvious syntactic changes, like using integer instead of NUMBER and putting the IN before the parameter name.
But actually, it is quite unnecessary to write a function for that. Doing it in a single SELECT statement would be both simpler and faster.
Pipelined functions are best translated to a simple SQL function returning a table.
Something like this:
create or replace function employee_all_case(p_ugr_id integer, p_case_type_IN integer)
returns table (case_id integer)
as
$$
SELECT ccase.case_id
FROM ct_case ccase
INNER JOIN ct_case_type ctype ON ccase.case_type_id = ctype.case_type_id
WHERE ccase.employee_id = p_ugr_id
and cases.employee_id IS NOT NULL;
$$
language sql;
Note that your sample code did not use the second parameter p_case_type_id.
Usage is also more straightforward:
select *
from employee_all_case(14533,1190);
Before diving into the solution, I will provide some information which will help you to understand better.
So basically PIPELINED came into picture for improving memory allocation at run time.
As you all know collections will occupy space when ever they got created. So the more you use, the more memory will get allocated.
Pipelining negates the need to build huge collections by piping rows out of the function.
saving memory and allowing subsequent processing to start before all the rows are generated.
Pipelined table functions include the PIPELINED clause and use the PIPE ROW call to push rows out of the function as soon as they are created, rather than building up a table collection.
By using Pipelined how memory usage will be optimized?
Well, it's very simple. instead of storing data into an array, just process the data by using pipe row(desired type). This actually returns the row and process the next row.
coming to solution in plpgsql
simple but not preferred while storing large data.
Remove PIPELINED from return declaration and return an array of desired type. something like RETURNS typrec2[].
Where ever you are using pipe row(), add that entry to array and finally return that array.
create a temp table like
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE temp_table (required fields) ON COMMIT DROP;
and insert data into it. Replace pipe row with insert statement and finally return statement like
return query select * from temp_table
**The best link for understanding PIPELINED in oracle [https://oracle-base.com/articles/misc/pipelined-table-functions]
pretty ordinary for postgres reference [http://manojadinesh.blogspot.com/2011/11/pipelined-in-oracle-as-well-in.html]
Hope this helps some one conceptually.
I need to call a FUNCTION in postgreSQL before a SELECT is done on a table. My first thought was to use a TRIGGER but it appears you cannot trigger on select.
Thus, to work around this I created a VIEW that runs a select on the table and the function all at once. I.e.:
CREATE VIEW people_view AS
SELECT get_department(), name, title, department
FROM people_table
So, in a nutshell... the get_department() function would update the department column from external data (this is all using foreign data tables and wrappers).
The problem is, the function executes after name, title, department are selected and not before. So if I run it once it doesn't work. If I run it twice it does (because it updated after the first run).
Sorry if this doesn't make much sense. I don't typically do DB work. What I'd like to do is get "get_department()" to execute first in the SELECT. I tried to put the function call in a sub-query, but it still did not execute first. The only thought I have left is perhaps an explicit join to force the order? I have no idea :-(.
Basically, I just want to execute a function before a SELECT transparently for the person running the query... and I guess you can't do that with triggers. If there's a better workaround, I'd be more than happy to give it a go.
Thanks,
Isekal
with t(x) as (
select get_department()) -- Function executes here
select
t.x, ...
from
t, people_table -- You does not provide any relation between your function and table...
Also check LATERAL feature.
May be you construct a function that returns your table, and includes call to your function before selecting data.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION people_table()
RETURNS TABLE(name character varying, title character varying, department character varying) AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
-- do function call
SELECT get_department();
RETURN QUERY
SELECT people_table.* FROM people_table;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE
COST 100
ROWS 1000;
-- then, later in your code, use table selecting on the new function
SELECT * from people_table();
-- notice the use of parenthesis.
-- you may also
SELECT name FROM people_table() ORDER BY department DESC;
-- and use the function as if it were the table itself.
Hope it helps.
I have a table with common word values to match against brands - so when someone types in "coke" I want to match any possible brand names associated with it as well as the original term.
CREATE TABLE word_association ( commonterm TEXT, assocterm TEXT);
INSERT INTO word_association ('coke', 'coca-cola'), ('coke', 'cocacola'), ('coke', 'coca-cola');
I have a function to create a list of these values in a pipe-delim string for pattern matching:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION usp_get_search_terms(userterm text)
RETURNS text AS
$BODY$DECLARE
returnstr TEXT DEFAULT '';
BEGIN
SET DATESTYLE TO DMY;
returnstr := userterm;
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM word_association WHERE LOWER(commonterm) = LOWER(userterm)) THEN
SELECT returnstr || '|' || string_agg(assocterm, '|') INTO returnstr
FROM word_association
WHERE commonterm = userterm;
END IF;
RETURN returnstr;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE
COST 100;
ALTER FUNCTION usp_get_search_terms(text)
OWNER TO customer_role;
If you call SELECT * FROM usp_get_search_terms('coke') you end up with
coke|coca-cola|cocacola|coca cola
EDIT: this function runs <100ms so it works fine.
I want to run a query with this text inserted e.g.
SELECT X.article_number, X.online_description
FROM articles X
WHERE LOWER(X.online_description) % usp_get_search_terms ('coke');
This takes approx 56s to run against my table of ~500K records.
If I get the raw text and use it in the query it takes ~300ms e.g.
SELECT X.article_number, X.online_description
FROM articles X
WHERE X.online_description % '(coke|coca-cola|cocacola|coca cola)';
The result sets are identical.
I've tried modifying what the output string from the function to e.g. enclose it in quotes and parentheses but it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Can someone please advise why there is a difference here? Is it the data type or something about calling functions inside queries? Thanks.
Your function might take 100ms, but it's not calling your function once; it's calling it 500,000 times.
It's because your function is declared VOLATILE. This tells Postgres that either the function returns different values when called multiple times within a query (like clock_timestamp() or random()), or that it alters the state of the database in some way (for example, by inserting records).
If your function contains only SELECTs, with no INSERTs, calls to other VOLATILE functions, or other side-effects, then you can declare it STABLE instead. This tells the planner that it can call the function just once and reuse the result without affecting the outcome of the query.
But your function does have side-effects, due to the SET DATESTYLE statement, which takes effect for the rest of the session. I doubt this was the intention, however. You may be able to remove it, as it doesn't look like date formatting is relevant to anything in there. But if it is necessary, the correct approach is to use the SET clause of the CREATE FUNCTION statement to change it only for the duration of the function call:
...
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql STABLE
SET DATESTYLE TO DMY
COST 100;
The other issue with the slow version of the query is the call to LOWER(X.online_description), which will prevent the query from utilising the index (since online_description is indexed, but LOWER(online_description) is not).
With these changes, the performance of both queries is the same; see this SQLFiddle.
So the answer came to me about dawn this morning - CTEs to the rescue!
Particularly as this is the "simple" version of a very large query, it helps to get this defined once in isolation, then do the matching against it. The alternative (given I'm calling this from a NodeJS platform) is to have one request retrieve the string of terms, then make another request to pass the string back. Not elegant.
WITH matches AS
( SELECT * FROM usp_get_search_terms('coke') )
, main AS
( SELECT X.article_number, X.online_description
FROM articles X
JOIN matches M ON X.online_description % M.usp_get_search_terms )
SELECT * FROM main
Execution time is somewhere around 300-500ms depending on term searched and articles returned.
Thanks for all your input guys - I've learned a few things about PostGres that my MS-SQL background didn't necessarily prepare me for :)
Have you tried removing the IF EXISTS() and simply using:
SELECT returnstr || '|' || string_agg(assocterm, '|') INTO returnstr
FROM word_association
WHERE LOWER(commonterm) = LOWER(userterm)
In instead of calling the function for each row call it once:
select x.article_number, x.online_description
from
woolworths.articles x
cross join
woolworths.usp_get_search_terms ('coke') c (s)
where lower(x.online_description) % s
I would love to exploit the SQL output formatting of PostgreSQL inside my PL/pgSQL functions, but I'm starting to feel I have to give up the idea.
I have my PL/pgSQL function query_result:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION query_result(
this_query text
) RETURNS SETOF record AS
$$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY EXECUTE this_query;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
..merrily returning a SETOF records from an input text query, and which I can use for my SQL scripting with dynamic queries:
mydb=# SELECT * FROM query_result('SELECT ' || :MYVAR || ' FROM Alice') AS t (id int);
id
----
1
2
3
So my hope was to find a way to deliver this same nicely formatted output from inside a PL/pgSQL function instead, but RAISE does not support SETOF types, and there's no magic predefined cast from SETOF records to text (I know I could create my own CAST..)
If I create a dummy print_result function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION print_result(
this_query text
) RETURNS void AS
$$
BEGIN
SELECT query_result(this_query);
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
..I cannot print the formatted output:
mydb=# SELECT print_result('SELECT ' || :MYVAR || ' FROM Alice');
ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
...
Thanks for any suggestion (which preferably works with PostgreSQL 8.4).
Ok, to do anything with your result set in print_result you'll have to loop over it. That'll look something like this -
Here result_record is defined as a record variable. For the sake of explanation, we'll also assume that you have a formatted_results variable that is defined as text and defaulted to a blank string to hold the formatted results.
FOR result_record IN SELECT * FROM query_result(this_query) AS t (id int) LOOP
-- With all this, you can do something like this
formatted_results := formatted_results ||','|| result_record.id;
END LOOP;
RETURN formatted_results;
So, if you change print_results to return text, declare the variables as I've described and add this in, your function will return a comma-separated list of all your results (with an extra comma at the end, I'm sure you can make use of PostgreSQL's string functions to trim that). I'm not sure this is exactly what you want, but this should give you a good idea about how to manipulate your result set. You can get more information here about control structures, which should let you do pretty much whatever you want.
EDIT TO ANSWER THE REAL QUESTION:
The ability to format data tuples as readable text is a feature of the psql client, not the PostgreSQL server. To make this feature available in the server would require extracting relevant code or modules from the psql utility and recompiling them as a database function. This seems possible (and it is also possible that someone has already done this), but I am not familiar enough with the process to provide a good description of how to do that. Most likely, the best solution for formatting query results as text will be to make use of PostgreSQL's string formatting functions to implement the features you need for your application.