I've been programming objective-C for a few months now and have done pretty well so far without having to post any questions. This would be my first. The problem is that I'm getting a memory leak warning from a data object in one of it's methods. I can see that the problem is that I'm sending an alloc to it without releasing it, but I don't know how else to get it to retain the object in memory. If I take the alloc out, the program crashes. If I leave it in, it leaks memory. Here is the method in question:
+ (id) featureWithID:(int)fID name:(NSString*)fName secure:(int)fSecure {
Feature *newFeature = [[self alloc] init];
newFeature.featureID = fID;
newFeature.featureName = fName;
newFeature.featureSecure = fSecure;
return [newFeature autorelease];
}
This method is called by another method in my view controller. This method is as follows:
+ (NSMutableArray*) createFeatureArray {
NSString *sqlString = #"select id, name, secure from features";
NSString *file = [[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:#"productname" ofType:#"db"];
sqlite3 *database = NULL;
NSMutableArray *returnArray = [NSMutableArray array];
if(sqlite3_open([file UTF8String], &database) == SQLITE_OK) {
const char *sqlStatement = [sqlString UTF8String];
sqlite3_stmt *compiledStatement;
if(sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, sqlStatement, -1, &compiledStatement, NULL) == SQLITE_OK) {
while(sqlite3_step(compiledStatement) == SQLITE_ROW) {
Feature *myFeature = [Feature featureWithID:sqlite3_column_int(compiledStatement,0)
name:[NSString stringWithUTF8String:(char *)sqlite3_column_text(compiledStatement, 1)]
secure:sqlite3_column_int(compiledStatement,2)];
[returnArray addObject:myFeature];
}
}
// Release the compiled statement from memory
sqlite3_finalize(compiledStatement);
}
sqlite3_close(database);
return returnArray;
}
I have tried several things, such as creating a featureWithFeature class method, which would allow me to alloc init the feature in the calling method, but that crashed the program also.
Please let me know if you need any clarification or any other parts of the code. Thank you in advance for your help.
UPDATE: 4/14/2011
After reading the first two responses I implemented the suggestion and found that the program is now crashing. I am at a complete loss as to how to track down the culprit. Hoping this helps, I am posting the calling method from the view controller as well:
- (void)setUpNavigationButtons {
// get array of features from feature data controller object
NSArray *featureArray = [FeatureController createFeatureArray];
int i = 0;
for (i = 0; i < [featureArray count]; i++) {
Feature *myFeature = [featureArray objectAtIndex:i];
CGRect buttonRect = [self makeFeatureButtonFrame:[featureArray count] withMember:i];
UIButton *aButton = [UIButton buttonWithType:UIButtonTypeRoundedRect];
[aButton setFrame:buttonRect];
[aButton addTarget:self action:#selector(buttonTouched:) forControlEvents:UIControlEventTouchUpInside];
[aButton setTitle:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%#",myFeature.featureName] forState:UIControlStateNormal];
aButton.tag = myFeature.featureID;
[self.view addSubview:aButton];
}
}
NOTE: These methods are posted in reverse of the order they are invoked. This last method calls the second method, which in turn, calls the first.
UPDATE: I've updated these functions to show what is in there now: Below, I will post the header files for the object - maybe that will help
#interface Feature : NSObject {
int featureID;
int featureSecure;
NSString *featureName;
}
#property (nonatomic, assign) int featureID;
#property (nonatomic, assign) int featureSecure;
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *featureName;
- (id) init;
- (void) dealloc;
+ (id) featureWithID:(int)fID name:(NSString*)fName secure:(int)fSecure;
#end
#interface FeatureController : NSObject {
}
- (id) init;
- (void) dealloc;
+ (NSMutableArray*) createFeatureArray;
+ (Feature*) getFeatureWithID:(int)fetchID;
#end
Convenience methods should follow the convention of returning autoreleased objects. Change this:
+ (id) featureWithID:(int)fID name:(NSString*)fName secure:(int)fSecure {
Feature *newFeature = [[self alloc] init];
...
return newFeature;
}
to:
+ (id) featureWithID:(int)fID name:(NSString*)fName secure:(int)fSecure {
Feature *newFeature = [[self alloc] init];
...
return [newFeature autorelease];
}
The name of your method - +featureWithID:name:secure: - indicates that it returns an object that the caller does not own. Instead, it is returning an object that has been retained, that the caller therefore owns and must release. To fix this (and your leak), simply replace return newFeature with return [newFeature autorelease].
There's nothing more you need to do, because your own code doesn't need a long-lasting ownership claim, and the array to which you're adding the object will manage its own ownership claim over it.
In +createFeatureArray, you’re over releasing the array:
+ (NSMutableArray*) createFeatureArray {
…
NSMutableArray *returnArray = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
…
return [returnArray autorelease];
}
In the first line, you used +alloc, so you own the array. Then you used -autorelease, so you do not own the array any more. This means that you shouldn’t send -release or -autorelease to it, which you are doing in the return line.
You can fix that by changing those lines to:
+ (NSMutableArray*) createFeatureArray {
…
NSMutableArray *returnArray = [NSMutableArray array];
…
return returnArray;
}
Also, unless it is relevant to callers that the array is mutable, you should change that method to return NSArray instead of NSMutableArray. You could keep your code as is, i.e., return a mutable array even though the method declaration states that the return type is NSArray.
As for your convenience constructor, there are essentially two choices depending on whether you want to return an owned or a non-owned object:
if you want to return an owned object, allocate it with +alloc or +new and return it without autoreleasing it. Your method name should contain new, e.g. +newFeatureWithId:…
if you want to return an object that’s not owned by the caller, allocate it with +alloc or new and autorelease it before/upon returning it to the caller. Your method name should not contain new, alloc, or copy.
In -setUpNavigationButtons, you obtain a non-owned array via +createFeatureArray, allocate a mutable array based on it, and release the mutable array without adding or removing elements from it. A mutable array makes sense when you need to add/remove elements. If you don’t have this need, you could change your method to:
- (void)setUpNavigationButtons {
// get array of features from feature data controller object
NSArray *featureArray = [FeatureController createFeatureArray];
…
// [featureArray release];
You’d remove that [featureArray release] since you do not own featureArray inside that method.
Edit: In -setUpNavigationButtons, you’re retaining the button you create and soon after you’re releasing it. In that particular method, those are idempotent operations — they aren’t wrong per se but are not necessary at all. You could replace that code with
UIButton *aButton = [UIButton buttonWithType:UIButtonTypeRoundedRect];
…
[self.view addSubview:aButton];
// [aButton release];
i.e., do not retain it and do not release it.
Related
How can i use a custom setter for the following property after I synthesized it ?
#property (nonatomic,retain) UIButton *but
#property (getter=yourGetter,setter=yourSetter:) UIButton *but;
#Sascha is almost right but his code has a tiny bug in it ;)
It would look like either :
A)
-(void)setBut:(UIButton *)value {
if (but != value) {
[but release];
but = [value retain];
}
}
or B)
-(void)setBut:(UIButton *)value {
[but autorelease];
but = [value retain];
}
(A) is (very) slightly more efficient, (B) is more readable.
Why do we need the if statement in option (A) instead of just the release & retain in #Sascha's answer?
What happens if you pass in the same object twice?
i.e.
// We set our button for the first time
UIButton *test = [UIButton alloc] init];
[self setBut:test];
[test release];
// Much later in the code, we set the button again
[self setBut:test];
If we didn't check that but wasn't a different object, the first thing we would do in our setter is release it. We would then try to retain an object that doesn't exist anymore, causing a crash.
NB We don't need the if statement in option (B) because autorelease won't immediately release the button so we have time to retain it again without it being dealloc'd.
A B+) alternative to deanWombourne solutions:
-(void)setBut:(UIButton *)value {
[value retain]
[but release];
but = value;
}
This solution will prevent issues where value is a sub-object of but.
An A+) alternative to deanWombourne solutions:
-(void)setBut:(UIButton *)value {
if (but != value) {
[value retain]
//insert here but's cancel, invalidate, delegate = nil, ...
[but release];
but = value;
}
}
This solution will prevent issues where value is a sub-object of but.
And it will allow you to add a cancel for an NSURLConnection, an invalidate an NSTimer or NSPort, a nil for a delegate, ...
Implement
- (void)setBut:(UIButton *)aButton;
It should probably look something like
- (void)setBut:(UIButton *)aButton {
[but release];
but = [aButton retain];
// whatever
}
I believe this is how the #synthesised setters do it, and it works in all situations, regardless of whether you assign the same object or not:
- (void)setBut: (UIButton*)aButton
{
id oldObject = but;
but = [aButton retain];
[oldObject release];
}
Cannot go wrong, as far as I can see.
I am using a Nib as a template for several buttons. It seemed to work fine, they each have their own independent state. However when I went to release the buttons I would crash in the dealloc. Here is the code...
mSoundBtns = new cSoundButton*[mNumSounds];
for(unsigned int i = 0 ; i < mNumSounds; ++i) {
mSoundBtns[i] = nil;
}
for(unsigned int s = 0; s < mNumSounds; ++s) {
[[NSBundle mainBundle] loadNibNamed:#"InstanceSoundButton" owner:self options:nil];
//Auto Loads via Outlet into 'soundNib'
mSoundBtns[s] = soundNib;
soundNib = nil;
uint32 count = mSoundBtns[s].retainCount;
NSLog(#"Last Count: %d", count);
}
for(unsigned int j = 0; j < mNumSounds; ++j) {
[mSoundBtns[j] release]; //**** Crash here on 7th (of 8) release
mSoundBtns[j] = nil;
}
Header:
#interface cLocationContext {
...
cSoundButton** mSoundBtns;
IBOutlet cSoundButton* soundNib;
}
#property (nonatomic, assign) IBOutlet cSoundButton* soundNib;
#end
The Nib is very simple, it just include a parent view and a child view of a custom view type.
cSoundButton simply keeps track of a name and a boolean state Mute or Not. Here is the dealloc
- (void)dealloc {
delete[] mSoundTag;
// Call the inherited implementation
[super dealloc]; //****Crashes in here
}
The crash is inside the call to super dealloc, in UIButton -> UIButtonContent dealloc. I assume I am doing something poor with my memory management like deallocing twice but I can't spot where.
Is what I am doing by loading the nib multiple times legal?
You have to retain the button as soon as you load it from the NIB. If you don't, you are not allowed to release it later, and you won't be able to access the button once your code returns control to the runloop (when the autorelease pool is drained).
PS: Wouldn't it be easier to use a Cocoa collection (NSMutableArray) to store the references to the buttons? Your code looks too complicated to me.
It will greatly simplify your memory management if you use your property and use an NSArray to store the button instances.
[[NSBundle mainBundle] loadNibNamed:#"InstanceSoundButton" owner:self options:nil];
//Auto Loads via Outlet into 'soundNib'
[mSoundBtns addObject:self.soundNib];
self.soundNib = nil;
Later, when it's time to release
[mSoundBtns release];
Keep in mind that when you're using properties you've got to reference them through self. The following two lines are exactly equivalent:
self.soundNib = something;
[self setSoundNib:something];
When you set soundNib = nil you are setting the variable soundNib to nothing, losing the reference to the button you loaded. If you hadn't added the pointer to an array and released it later you'd be leaking everything. Technically the way you're doing it might work... but don't do it that way. Using proper NSArrays and properties will make this whole process significantly easier and more maintainable.
I'm still relatively new to iPhone development but thought I understood the basic principals of memory management. I have a class method that returns an NSMutableArray, I'm calling alloc and init on the object therefore know I'm responsible for releasing it. However because I'm returning the array I assumed I was supposed to use autorelease when creating the object instead of releasing it.
+(NSMutableArray *)getStations:(int)stationType {
if(database == nil){
[self openDataBase];
}
// Create a temporary array to hold the returned objects
NSMutableArray *holder = [[[NSMutableArray alloc] init] autorelease];
// Check if the statement has been defined
if(select4 == nil) {
const char *sql = "SELECT station_id, station_name, AVG(test_percent) FROM stations LEFT JOIN tests USING (station_id) WHERE station_type = ? GROUP BY station_id ORDER BY station_name ASC";
if(sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, sql, -1, &select4, NULL) != SQLITE_OK){
NSLog(#"Error while creating detail view statement. '%s'", sqlite3_errmsg(database));
}
}
sqlite3_bind_int(select4, 1, stationType);
// Check if the statement executed correctly
while(sqlite3_step(select4) == SQLITE_ROW) {
NSInteger primaryKey = sqlite3_column_int(select4, 0);
Tests *station = [[Tests alloc] initWithPrimaryKey:primaryKey];
station.station_name = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:(char *)sqlite3_column_text(select4, 1)];
station.average_score = [NSNumber numberWithDouble:sqlite3_column_double(select4, 2)];
[holder addObject:station];
[station release];
}
// Reset the detail statement.
sqlite3_reset(select4);
// Return the holder array
return holder;
}
There's the basic code - XCode no longer indicates a potential memory leak but it crashes everytime that code executes saying message sent to deallocated instance. Any help would be appreciated I've spent ages googling and can't see what's wrong with the code. I did find this thread but it doesn't appear to be the answer to my question - crash happens when NSMutableArray is returned?
The code you've posted appears to be managing memory correctly – you've got a one-to-one relationship between retains and (auto)releases, and you're making a textbook use of autorelease – so the problem is probably that the code calling this method needs to retain the resulting array before the autorelease pool kicks in and yanks the rug out from under you.
If your code is assigning the NSMutableArray to an ivar you've declared with #property, that ivar needs to be declared as
#property (retain) NSMutableArray *myStations;
If you're doing something else to store the array, you may need to call [myStations retain]. Your table view code will also need to release the array, probably in its dealloc method.
If you want to use the returned NSMutableArray as a data source to fill in rows in a table view, then you're going to need to retain it in your UITableView class (or your UITableViewDataSource delegate class). It's going to be called repeatedly whenever the view is scrolled or otherwise needs updating.
Easiest thing to do is make it a retained property in that class.
#property (nonatomic, retain) Tests * stationArray;
Then, say, if you want to get your data in your viewDidLoad method:
self.stationArray = [self getStations: self.stationID]; // property retains
Access it in numberOfRowsInSection:
return self.stationArray.count;
Access it in cellForRowAtIndexPath:
Tests *station = [self.stationArray objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
And, of course, in dealloc...
[stationArray release];
The autorelease in the method is correct (not an init or copy method), but the class will need to retain it if it wants to use it later on, after the current event.
I want to have a NSDictionary that maps from UIViews to something else.
However, since UIViews do not implement the NSCopying protocol, I can't use them directly as dictionary keys.
You can use an NSValue holding the pointer to the UIView and use this as key. NSValues
are copyable. but, if the view is destroyed, the NSValue will hold a
junk pointer.
Here is the actual code (based on the answer by luvieere and further suggestion by Yar):
// create dictionary
NSMutableDictionary* dict = [NSMutableDictionary new];
// set value
UIView* view = [UILabel new];
dict[[NSValue valueWithNonretainedObject:view]] = #"foo";
// get value
NSString* foo = dict[[NSValue valueWithNonretainedObject:view]];
Although this isn't really what they're intended for, you could whip up a functional dictionary-like interface using Associative References:
static char associate_key;
void setValueForUIView(UIView * view, id val){
objc_setAssociatedObject(view, &associate_key, val, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN);
}
id valueForUIView(UIView * view){
return objc_getAssociatedObject(view, &associate_key);
}
You could even wrap this up in a class ThingWhatActsLikeADictionaryButWithKeysThatArentCopyable*; in that case you might want to retain the views that you use as keys.
Something like this (untested):
#import "ThingWhatActsLikeADictionaryButWithKeysThatArentCopyable.h"
#import <objc/runtime.h>
static char associate_key;
#implementation ThingWhatActsLikeADictionaryButWithKeysThatArentCopyable
- (void)setObject: (id)obj forKey: (id)key
{
// Remove association and release key if obj is nil but something was
// previously set
if( !obj ){
if( [self objectForKey:key] ){
objc_setAssociatedObject(key, &associate_key, nil, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN);
[key release];
}
return;
}
[key retain];
// retain/release for obj is handled by associated objects functions
objc_setAssociatedObject(key, &associate_key, obj, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN);
}
- (id)objectForKey: (id)key
{
return objc_getAssociatedObject(key, &associate_key);
}
#end
*The name may need some work.
Provided you don't need to support before iOS 6, NSMapTable (suggested by neilsbot) works well because it can provide an enumerator over the keys in the collection. That's handy for code common to all of the text fields, like setting the delegate or bi-directionally syncing the text values with an NSUserDefaults instance.
in viewDidLoad
self.userDefFromTextField = [NSMapTable weakToStrongObjectsMapTable];
[self.userDefFromTextField setObject:#"fooUserDefKey" forKey:self.textFieldFoo];
[self.userDefFromTextField setObject:#"barUserDefKey" forKey:self.textFieldBar];
// skipped for clarity: more text fields
NSEnumerator *textFieldEnumerator = [self.userDefFromTextField keyEnumerator];
UITextField *textField;
while (textField = [textFieldEnumerator nextObject]) {
textField.delegate = self;
}
in viewWillAppear:
NSEnumerator *keyEnumerator = [self.userDefFromTextField keyEnumerator];
UITextField *textField;
while (textField = [keyEnumerator nextObject]) {
textField.text = [self.userDefaults stringForKey:[self.textFields objectForKey:textField]];
}
in textField:shouldChangeCharactersInRange:replacementString:
NSString *resultingText = [textField.text stringByReplacingCharactersInRange:range withString:string];
if(resultingText.length == 0) return YES;
NSString *preferenceKey = [self.textFields objectForKey:textField];
if(preferenceKey) [self.userDefaults setString:resultingText forKey:preferenceKey];
return YES;
And now I will go cry, because I implemented all of this before realizing that my iOS 5.1-targeted app can't use it. NSMapTable was introduced in iOS 6.
Rather than store a pointer to the view and risk the garbage issue, just give the UIView a tag and store the tag's value in the dictionary. Much safer.
I'm using a simple solution under ARC provided by Objective-C++.
MyClass.mm:
#import <map>
#implementation MyClass
{
std::map<UIView* __weak, UIColor* __strong> viewMap;
}
- (void) someMethod
{
viewMap[self.someView] = [UIColor redColor];
}
In this example I am getting stronger type checking by making all the values have to be a UIColor* which is all I needed this for. But you could also use id as the value type if you want to allow any object as the value, ex: std::map<UIView* __weak, id __strong> viewMap; Likewise for keys: id __weak, id __strong> viewMap;
You can also vary the __strong and __weak attributes as needed. In my case, the views are already retained by the view controller that I use this in, so I saw no need to take a strong pointer to them.
a simple solution when you just want UIView as key occasionally,I use it to store UILabel and UIColor
NSArray<UIView *> *views = #[viewA,viewB,viewC,viewD];
NSArray *values = #[valueA,valueB,valueC,valueD];
for(int i = 0;i < 4;i++) {
UIView *key = views[i];
id value = values[i]
//do something
}
id value = values[[views indexOfObject:key]]
I get a null return when i try out my NSString function.
//Track.m
static NSString* trackUrl;
//static NSString* getTrackNumberUrl;
#implementation Track
- (NSString*)trackUrl {
return #"http://site.com/?a=";
}
- (NSString*)setTrackNumberUrl:(NSString*)trackNumberUrl {
if (trackUrl != trackNumberUrl) {
return [trackUrl stringByAppendingFormat:trackNumberUrl];
}
return #"Error no trackNumber";
}
- (NSString*)getTrackNumberUrl:(NSString*)trackNumber {
return [[[self alloc] setTrackNumberUrl:trackNumber] autorelease];
}
#end
MainView.m, just to show the return answer in NSlog
- (NSString *) trackNumber{
return [track getTrackNumberUrl:#"86147224549XX"];
}
- (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect {
NSLog(trackNumber);
}
I get a null return answer? Have i miss something? Thanks.
Edit some in Track.m
- (NSString*)setTrackNumberUrl:(NSString*)trackNumberUrl {
if (trackUrl != trackNumberUrl) {
return [trackUrl stringByAppendingString:trackNumberUrl];
}
return #"Error no trackNumber";
}
- (NSString*)getTrackNumberUrl:(NSString*)trackNumber {
return [[[Track alloc] setTrackNumberUrl:trackNumber] init];
}
This is how it should work.
getTrackNumberUrl --> setTrackNumberUrl --> trackUrl (return) --> setTrackNumberUrl + trackNumber --> getTrackNumberUrl (trackNumberUrl = trackUrl + trackNumber)
I have this code to set reference to Track
#class Track;
#interface MainView : UIView {
Track *track;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) IBOutlet Track *track;
Well if don't should use self alloc, what should i use?
You have a lot of problems with your code.
return [trackUrl stringByAppendingFormat:trackNumberUrl];
You should not use an arbitrary string as a format, because if it contains a format specifier like "%d" then the method will go looking for a variable that isn't there, and will likely crash. You should use stringByAppendingString: instead. However, that doesn't seem to be what you want here, since the method name is setTrackNumberUrl:. If you want to change the value of the trackUrl variable, you can't call stringByAppendingFormat:; all that does is return a new string and leave the original alone. I think you simply want something like
[trackUrl release];
trackUrl = [trackNumberUrl retain];
Another problem:
return [[[self alloc] setTrackNumberUrl:trackNumber] autorelease];
In this context, self is an instance of Track. An instance won't understand the alloc message, that must be sent to a class. It will return a new instance, to which you should send an init message. So you would do something like [[Track alloc] init].
NSLog(trackNumber);
The first parameter to NSLog is a format string, so for the same reasons as above you shouldn't use a variable, you should do something like this: NSLog(#"%#", trackNumber); That line of code prints the value of the variable, trackNumber. Considering that you have a method named trackNumber just above it, I wonder if what you really want to do is call the method and get the result. In that case, you need to write it as [self trackNumber] which will call the method and return an NSString.
Most probably track is nil in the trackNumber - have you set it to a correct reference to a Track object?
Also, this code
- (NSString*)getTrackNumberUrl:(NSString*)trackNumber {
return [[[self alloc] setTrackNumberUrl:trackNumber] autorelease];
}
is incorrect. Why are you using [self alloc]? You're allocating a new Track object (using a static method on an object reference, not on a class name, which is an error), setting it's track number URL, and returning an autoreleased NSString, but you're leaking the Track object you allocated.
return [trackUrl stringByAppendingFormat:trackNumberUrl];
I'm not sure bout this one,
try using it as a format for string.
return [trackUrl stringByAppendingFormat:#"%#",trackNumberUrl];