I want a regex which accepts only these two templates: a0a 0a0 and a0a0a0.
I have been trying the below format but it's not giving the desired result.
I need a single regex which is applicable for both the templates.
+ (BOOL)hasPostalCodeValidation:(NSString *)postalCode {
return [self hasPostalRegex:postalCode
withPattern:#"^[a-z]+[0-9]+[a-z]+(\\ |\\S[^a-z0-9])?[0-9]+[a-z]+[0-9]"
withTemplateString:#"A0A 0A0"];
}
If any one knows what should be the regex for these two templates please do give the solution.
Why not simply make the space optional? Also, you should remove the + quantifiers since they mean "one or more", and you seem to want "exactly one".
Also, you might need to include uppercase letters. Usually, regexes are case-sensitive.
withPattern:#"^[a-zA-Z][0-9][a-zA-Z]\\s?[0-9][a-zA-Z][0-9]"
Related
I haven't been able to find in Drools documentation, which characters (beyond alphabet letters) are allowed/disallowed in a rule name in Drools - does anyone know or have a reference?
The only relevant section of Drools doc I've found so far does not specify:
Each rule must have a unique name within the rule package. If you use the same rule name more than once in any DRL file in the package, the rules fail to compile. Always enclose rule names with double quotation marks (rule "rule name") to prevent possible compilation errors, especially if you use spaces in rule names.
I think I have discovered, anecdotally, that some "grouping" characters do not work in rule names (seems rules named with can't be found or aren't included) - or at least, in extension rules (the extended rule seems to work with grouping chars, but not its extension; example below): The grouping chars include parentheses "()", square brackets "[]", and "curly braces" "{}". Although less than & greater than "<>" work, so I'm so far replacing the former with the latter.
Or are there escape chars for the problematic grouping chars?
Example:
rule "(grouping chars, and commas, work here)"
when
// conditions LHS
then
end
// removing parentheses, or replacing with < >,
// from below line works
rule "(grouping chars DON'T work here)"
extends "(grouping chars, and commas, work here)"
when
then
// consequences RHS
I haven't discovered either way yet with all other characters (for example, other punctuation; except I have discovered commas "," work). But it would be nice to know ahead of time what characters are allowed.
Theoretically every identifier inside a string should work, but you might have empirically found some combination that is breaking the grammar somehow.
Thanks for the investigation, I've filled a Jira, please take a look at it
I want to search strings like "number 1" or "number 152" or "number 36985".
In all above strings "number " will be constant but digits will change and can have any length.
I tried Search option using wildcard but it doesn't seem to work.
basic regEx operators like + seem to not work.
I tried 'number*[1-9]*' and 'number*[1-9]+' but no luck.
This regular expression only selects upto one digit. e.g. If the string is 'number 12345' it only matches number 12345 (the part which is in bold).
Does anyone know how to do this?
Word doesn't use regular expressions in its search (Find) functionality. It has its own set of wildcard rules. These are very similar to RegEx, but not identical and not as powerful.
Using Word's wildcards, the search text below locates the examples given in the question. (Note that the semicolon separator in 1;100 may be soemthing else, depending on the list separator set in Windows (or on the Mac). My European locale uses a semicolon; the United States would use a comma, for example.
"number [0-9]{1;100}"
The 100 is an arbitrary number I chose for the maximum number of repeats of the search term just before it. Depending on how long you expect a number to be, this can be much smaller...
The logic of the search text is: number is a literal; the valid range of characters following the literal are 0 through 9; there may be one to one hundred of these characters - anything in that range is a match.
The only way RegEx can be used in Word is to extract a string and run the search on the string. But this dissociates the string from the document, meaning Word-specific content (formatting, fields, etc.) will be lost.
Try putting < and > on the ends of your search string to indicate the beginning and ending of the desired strings. This works for me: '<number [1-9]*>'. So does '<number [1-9]#>' which is probably what you want. Note that in Word wildcards the # is used where + is used in other RegEx systems.
How to rewrite the [a-zA-Z0-9!$* \t\r\n] pattern to match hyphen along with the existing characters ?
The hyphen is usually a normal character in regular expressions. Only if it’s in a character class and between two other characters does it take a special meaning.
Thus:
[-] matches a hyphen.
[abc-] matches a, b, c or a hyphen.
[-abc] matches a, b, c or a hyphen.
[ab-d] matches a, b, c or d (only here the hyphen denotes a character range).
Escape the hyphen.
[a-zA-Z0-9!$* \t\r\n\-]
UPDATE:
Never mind this answer - you can add the hyphen to the group but you don't have to escape it. See Konrad Rudolph's answer instead which does a much better job of answering and explains why.
It’s less confusing to always use an escaped hyphen, so that it doesn't have to be positionally dependent. That’s a \- inside the bracketed character class.
But there’s something else to consider. Some of those enumerated characters should possibly be written differently. In some circumstances, they definitely should.
This comparison of regex flavors says that C♯ can use some of the simpler Unicode properties. If you’re dealing with Unicode, you should probably use the general category \p{L} for all possible letters, and maybe \p{Nd} for decimal numbers. Also, if you want to accomodate all that dash punctuation, not just HYPHEN-MINUS, you should use the \p{Pd} property. You might also want to write that sequence of whitespace characters simply as \s, assuming that’s not too general for you.
All together, that works out to apattern of [\p{L}\p{Nd}\p{Pd}!$*] to match any one character from that set.
I’d likely use that anyway, even if I didn’t plan on dealing with the full Unicode set, because it’s a good habit to get into, and because these things often grow beyond their original parameters. Now when you lift it to use in other code, it will still work correctly. If you hard‐code all the characters, it won’t.
[-a-z0-9]+,[a-z0-9-]+,[a-z-0-9]+ and also [a-z-0-9]+ all are same.The hyphen between two ranges considered as a symbol.And also [a-z0-9-+()]+ this regex allow hyphen.
use "\p{Pd}" without quotes to match any type of hyphen. The '-' character is just one type of hyphen which also happens to be a special character in Regex.
Is this what you are after?
MatchCollection matches = Regex.Matches(mystring, "-");
I'm implementing a syntax highlighter in Apple's Swift language by parsing .tmlanguage files and applying styles to a NSMutableAttributtedString.
I'm testing with javascript code, a javascript.tmlanguage file, and the monokai.tmtheme theme (both last included in sublime text 3) to check that the syntax get highlighted correctly. By applying each rule (patterns) in the .tmlanguage file in the same order they come, the syntax is almost perfectly highlighted.
The problem I'm having right now is that I don't know how to know that a quote (") should be escaped when it has a backslash before it (\"). Am I missing something in the .tmlanguage file that specifies that?. Other problem is that I have no idea how to know that other rules should be ignored when inside others, for example:
I'm getting double slashes taken as comments when inside strings: "http://stackoverflow.com/" a url is recognised as comment after //
Also double or single quotes are taken as strings when inside comments: // press "Enter" to continue, the word "Enter" gets highlighted as string when should be same color as comments
So, I don't know if there is some priority for some rules over others in the convention, or if there is something in the files that I haven't noticed.
Help please!
Update:
Here is a better example of what I meant by escape quotes:
I'm getting this: while all the letters should be yellow except for the escaped sequence (/") which should be blue.
The question is. How do I know that /" should be escaped? The rule for that piece of code is:
Maybe I am late to answer this. You can apply the following method.
(Ugly) In your end regex, use ([^/])(") and in your endCaptures, it would be
1 = string.quote.double.js
2 = punctuation.definition.string.end.js
If the string must be single line, you can use match=(")(.*)("), captures=
1 = punctuation.definition.string.begin.js
2 = string.quote.double.js
3 = punctuation.definition.string.end.js
and use your patterns
You can try applyEndPatternLast and see if it is allowed. Set applyEndPatternLast=1 will do.
The priority is that earlier rules in the file are prioritized over later rules. As an example, in my Python Improved language definition, I have a scope that contains a series of all-caps constants used in Django, a popular Python web framework. I also have a generic constant.other.allcaps.python scope that recognizes (just about) anything in all caps. Since the Django constants rule is before the allcaps rule in the .tmLanguage file, I can color it with a theme using one color, while the later-occurring "highlight everything in all caps" only grabs identifiers that are NOT part of the first list.
Because of this, you should put your "comments" scope(s) as early in the file as possible, then write your parser in such a way that it obeys the rule I described above. However, it's slightly more complicated than that, as I believe items in the repository are prioritized based on where their include line is, not where the repository rule is defined in the file. You may want to do some testing to verify that, though.
Unfortunately I'm not sure what you mean about the escaped quotes - could you expand on that, and maybe add an example or two?
Hope this helps.
Assuming that / is the correct character for escaping a double quote mark, the following should work:
"str_double_quote": {
"begin": "\"",
"end": "\"",
"name": "string.quoted.double.swift",
"patterns": [
{
"name": "constant.character.escape.swift",
"match": "/[\"/]"
}
]
}
You can match an escaped double quote mark (/") and a literal forward slash (//) in the patterns to consume them before the end marker is used to handle them.
If the character for escaping is actually a backslash, then the tricky bit is that there are two levels of escaping, for the JSON encoding as well as the regular expression syntax. To match \", the regular expression requires you to escape the backslash (\\"). JSON requires you to escape backslashes and double quotes, resulting in \\\\\" in a TextMate JSON grammar file. The match expression would thus be \\\\[\"\\\\].
BRIEF: can the characters permitted in org-mode tags be extenced in any way?
E.g. to include -, dashes?
DETAIL:
I see
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Tags
Tags are normal words containing letters, numbers, ‘_’, and ‘#’. Tags
must be preceded and followed by a single colon, e.g., ‘:work:’.
I am somewhat surprised that this is not extensible. Is it, and I have missed it?
TODO keywords can include dashes. Occasionally I would like to treat TODOs as intermiscible wth tags - e.g. move a TODO to a tag, and vice versa - but this syntax difference gets in the way.
Before I start coding, does anyone know why dashes are not allowed? I conjecture confusion with timestamps.
Not certain, but it is likely because certain agenda search strings use "-" as an operator, and there is not yet a way to escape those using "-".
I have used hyphens for properties and spaces for todo kw with no problems for my purposes, but I have not tried them in searches.
The new exporter will be included in 8.0 and with it a detailed description of syntax. If you want to file a feature request to allow hyphens, perhaps by allowing escaping in search strings, now is the time to do it.