I have a problem with removing a subview, or more precisely with checking if it is still there after having deleted it.
My app first adds a subview to self.view.
[self.view addSubview:tabsClippedView];
Then it adds another subview to this subview (to which it adds several buttons as subviews, but I guess this is unimportant in this context):
[tabsClippedView addSubview:tabsView];
Finally, I have a method which allows the tabsView to be deleted and then created again. I need to do this so as to update the number of buttons in that tabsView (as the user can delete buttons). The method looks basically like this:
[self.tabsView removeFromSuperview];
After that I call a method called showTabs (which I already called in the very beginning of the app in order to add the subViews). This is where it all becomes problematic and where my app crashes (I get no error in the debug console, so I don't really know what the issue is...):
if ([tabsClippedView isDescendantOfView:self.view]) {
NSLog(#"There is already a tabsClippedView.");
} else {
NSLog(#"There is no tabsClippedView. I'll add one...");
[self initTabsClippedView];
}
This is where the app crashes: when trying to assess if tabsView isDescendantOfView (I don't get any of the following logs):
if ([tabsView isDescendantOfView:tabsClippedView]) {
NSLog(#"There is already a tabsView");
} else {
NSLog(#"There is no tabsView for the buttons. I'll add one including buttons.");
[self initTabs];
}
I'd be grateful for any suggestions where the problem could be.
EDIT:
These are the methods to set up my views:
-(void) initTabsClippedView { // sets up tabsClippedView
NSLog(#"initTabsClippedView method started...");
CGRect tabsClippedFrame = CGRectMake(258,30,70,81*6);
tabsClippedView = [[[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsClippedFrame] autorelease];
tabsClippedView.clipsToBounds = true;
[self.view addSubview:tabsClippedView];
NSLog(#"initTabsClippedView method ended.");
}
-(void) initTabs {
NSLog(#"initTabs started. Adding buttons to tabsClippedView...");
CGRect tabsFrame = CGRectMake(-30,0,50,480);
tabsView = [[[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsFrame] autorelease];
[tabsClippedView addSubview:tabsView];
// sets up buttons in tabsClippedView
And this is where I delete the tabsClippedView (triggered by a button found in tabsClippedView):
-(void)tabDelete:(id)sender
{
UIButton *button = (UIButton *)sender;
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.75
delay:0
options:UIViewAnimationOptionCurveEaseIn
animations:^{
button.transform = CGAffineTransformMakeTranslation(-30, 0);
}
completion:^(BOOL finished){
[UIView animateWithDuration:0
delay:0
options:UIViewAnimationOptionCurveEaseIn
animations:^{
[self.tabsView removeFromSuperview];
//...
}
completion:^(BOOL finished){
NSLog(#"tabsView removed from Superview. Objects Deleted.");
[self showTabs];
NSLog(#"TabDelete finished. Button removed and tabsView updated accordingly.");
}
];
}];
And this is the showTabs method which was already called when I started the app:
-(void)showTabs {
NSLog(#"showTabs started...");
currentView = #"Tabs";
if ([tabsClippedView isDescendantOfView:self.view]) {
NSLog(#"There is already a tabsClippedView.");
} else {
NSLog(#"There is no tabsClippedView. I'll add one...");
[self initTabsClippedView];
}
if ([tabsView isDescendantOfView:tabsClippedView]) {
NSLog(#"There is already a tabsView");
} else {
NSLog(#"There is no tabsView for the buttons. I'll add one including buttons.");
[self initTabs];
}
Is it possible that you are getting EXC_BAD_ACCESS? Is it possible that the app is crashing because tabsView is deallocated when you send isDescendantOfView: to it. If you run with breakpoints enabled it should tell you the reason for the crash. If it is an EXC_BAD_ACCESS problem you should try NSZombie.
To activate NSZombie do the following:
Get info of the executable.
Go to the arguments tab.
In the "Variables to be set in the environment:" section add:
Name: NSZombieEnabled
Value: YES
Then run your app as usual and when it crashes it should tell you which deallocated object received what message.
EDIT: Just saw your edit. I think I nailed it. You're autoreleasing the views when you create them, so when they are removed from their superviews they are no longer retained and thus deallocated. You're app crashes because you're trying to run methods on deallocated views.
EDIT 2: Thought I should tell you that there is a better solution than the one posted by Praveen S.
Change your code as follows:
[tabsClippedView release];
tabsClippedView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsClippedFrame];
and
[tabsView release];
tabsView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsFrame];
The above code does the same thing as the code posted by Praveen S, but without the autorelease. An autorelease is more expensive than a regular release and should only be used when needed and in this case it isn't.
Rather than releasing before you allocate a new view you probably want to release the view when you're done with it:
[tabsView removeFromSuperview];
[tabsView release];
tabsView = nil;
or simply
[tabsView removeFromSuperview];
self.tabsView = nil;
and then instead of:
if ([tabsView isDescendantOfView:tabsClippedView]) ...
you can use:
if (tabsView) ...
As you might have noticed, there really is no need for you to retain the view. You could just as well do the following:
tabsView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsFrame];
[tabsClippedView addSubview:tabsView]; // This retains tabsView
[tabsView release];
and then to remove the view you would use:
[tabsView removeFromSuperview]; // This will release the tabsView
tabsView = nil;
Also remember to set the views to nil in viewDidUnload.
EDIT 3: Why self made such a difference:
What you need to understand is how properties and reference counting works. There are books and such you could read about it. I'm sure Google can provide you with some good references as well.
The difference between
self.tabsView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:frame];
and
tabsView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:frame];
is that self.tabsView is accessing the properties setter, while tabsView is accessing the instance variable directly.
A nonatomic, retain property's implementation looks something like the following:
- (void)setTabsView:(UIView *)view
{
if (view != tabsView) {
[tabsView release];
tabsView = [view retain];
}
}
So the property is taking care of the memory management for you. In my solution I take care of the memory management myself and thus I don't need the property to do it for me, so I don't use it.
I hope this explains why self made such a difference.
Change your code as follows:
self.tabsClippedView = [[[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsClippedFrame] autorelease];
and
self.tabsView = [[[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:tabsFrame] autorelease];
Related
I have been working on an app for a couple of months now, but have finally run into an issue that I can't solve myself, and can't find anything on the internet to help.
I am using several normal UIAlertViews, in my app. Some have 2 buttons, some have 3 buttons, and a couple have 2 buttons and a text field. However all have the same issue. When you call [someAlertView show]; the alert view appears as normal, but then suddenly its graphics context seems to get corrupted as you can see from the screenshot.
This happens on both iPhone and iPad simulators (both 5.0 and 5.1), and happens on an iPad and iPhone4S device as well.
The image showing through is whatever happens to be behind the alertView.
The Alert still works, I can click the buttons, type in the text field, then when it dismisses the delegate methods are called correctly and everything goes back to normal. When the alertView appears again, the same thing happens.
The view behind the alert is a custom UIScrollView subclass with a content size of approximately 4000 pixels by 1000 with a UIImage as the background. The png file is mostly transparent, so is only about 80kB in memory size, and the phone is having no issues rendering it - the scroll view is still fully responsive and not slow.
It also has a CADisplayLink timer attached to it as part of the subclass. I have tried disabling this just before the alertView is shown, but it makes no difference so I am doubtful that is the issue.
This app is a partial rewrite of one I made for a university project, and that one could display UIAlertViews over the top of a scrollView of the same size and subclass without issue. The difference between this app and that one is that in my old app, I had subclassed UIAlertView to add extra things such as a pickerView, however I decided that I didn't like the way it looked so moved everything out of the alert and am just sticking with a standard UIAlertView.
This is how the alertView in the screenshot is called:
- (IBAction)loadSimulation:(id)sender {
importAlert = [[UIAlertView alloc] initWithTitle:#"Load Simulation" message:#"Enter Filename:" delegate:self cancelButtonTitle:#"Cancel" otherButtonTitles:#"Load", nil];
[importAlert setAlertViewStyle:UIAlertViewStylePlainTextInput];
[importAlert showPausingSimulation:self.simulationView]; //Calling [importAlert show]; makes no difference.
if ([[UIDevice currentDevice] userInterfaceIdiom] == UIUserInterfaceIdiomPhone) {
[self hideOrganiser]; //Not an issue as the problem occurs on iPad as well.
}
}
With this being the categorised AlertView to add the ability to stop the scrollViews CADisplay link.
#interface UIAlertView(pauseDisplayLink)
- (void)showPausingSimulation:(UILogicSimulatorView*)simulationView;
#end
#implementation UIAlertView(pauseDisplayLink)
- (void)showPausingSimulation:(UILogicSimulatorView *)simulationView {
[simulationView stopRunning];
[simulationView removeDisplayLink]; //displayLink needs to be removed from the run loop, otherwise it will keep going in the background and get corrupted.
[self show];
}
I get no memory warnings when this happens, so I am doubtful it is due to lack of resources.
Has anyone come across an issue like this before? If you need further information I can try to provide it, but I am limited in what code I can post. Any help would be appreciated, I've been trying to solve this for two weeks and can't figure it out.
Edit:
It appears that it is not the AlertView at all (or rather it is not just the alertView), as the problem goes away when I remove the scroll view behind it, so there must be some issue between the two. This is the code for my UIScrollView subclass:
.h file:
#import
#import
#class ECSimulatorController;
#interface UILogicSimulatorView : UIScrollView {
CADisplayLink *displayLink;
NSInteger _updateRate;
ECSimulatorController* _hostName;
}
#property (nonatomic) NSInteger updateRate;
#property (nonatomic, strong) ECSimulatorController* hostName;
- (void) removeDisplayLink;
- (void) reAddDisplayLink;
- (void) displayUpdated:(CADisplayLink*)timer;
- (void) startRunning;
- (void) stopRunning;
- (void) refreshRate:(NSInteger)rate;
- (void) setHost:(id)host;
- (void)setMinimumNumberOfTouches:(NSInteger)touches;
- (void)setMaximumNumberOfTouches:(NSInteger)touches;
#end
.m file:
#import "UILogicSimulatorView.h"
#import "ECSimulatorController.h"
#import <QuartzCore/QuartzCore.h>
#implementation UILogicSimulatorView
#synthesize updateRate = _updateRate;
#synthesize hostName = _hostName;
- (void)reAddDisplayLink {
[displayLink addToRunLoop:[NSRunLoop mainRunLoop] forMode:NSDefaultRunLoopMode]; //allows the display link to be re-added to the run loop after having been removed.
}
- (void)removeDisplayLink {
[displayLink removeFromRunLoop:[NSRunLoop mainRunLoop] forMode:NSDefaultRunLoopMode]; //allows the display link to be removed from the Run loop without deleting it. Removing it is essential to prevent corruption between the games and the simulator as both use CADisplay link, and only one can be in the run loop at a given moment.
}
- (void)startRunning {
[self refreshRate:self.updateRate];
[displayLink setPaused:NO];
}
- (void)refreshRate:(NSInteger)rate {
if (rate > 59) {
rate = 59; //prevent the rate from being set too an undefined value.
}
NSInteger frameInterval = 60 - rate; //rate is the number of frames to skip. There are 60FPS, so this converts to frame interval.
[displayLink setFrameInterval:frameInterval];
}
- (void)stopRunning {
[displayLink setPaused:YES];
}
- (void)displayUpdated:(CADisplayLink*)timer {
//call the function that the snakeController host needs to update
[self.hostName updateStates];
}
- (void)setHost:(ECSimulatorController*)host;
{
self.hostName = host; //Host allows the CADisplay link to call a selector in the object which created this one.
}
- (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame
{
//Locates the UIScrollView's gesture recogniser
if(self = [super initWithFrame:frame])
{
[self setMinimumNumberOfTouches:2];
displayLink = [CADisplayLink displayLinkWithTarget:self selector:#selector(displayUpdated:)]; //CADisplayLink will update the logic gate states.
self.updateRate = 1;
[displayLink setPaused:YES];
}
return self;
}
- (void)setMinimumNumberOfTouches:(NSInteger)touches{
for (UIGestureRecognizer *gestureRecognizer in [self gestureRecognizers])
{
if([gestureRecognizer isKindOfClass:[UIPanGestureRecognizer class]])
{
//Changes the minimum number of touches to 'touches'. This allows the UIPanGestureRecogniser in the object which created this one to work with one finger.
[(UIPanGestureRecognizer*)gestureRecognizer setMinimumNumberOfTouches:touches];
}
}
}
- (void)setMaximumNumberOfTouches:(NSInteger)touches{
for (UIGestureRecognizer *gestureRecognizer in [self gestureRecognizers])
{
if([gestureRecognizer isKindOfClass:[UIPanGestureRecognizer class]])
{
//Changes the maximum number of touches to 'touches'. This allows the UIPanGestureRecogniser in the object which created this one to work with one finger.
[(UIPanGestureRecognizer*)gestureRecognizer setMaximumNumberOfTouches:touches];
}
}
}
#end
Well, I have managed to come up a solution to this. Really it is probably just masking the issue rather than finding the route cause, but at this point I will take it.
First some code:
#interface UIView (ViewCapture)
- (UIImage*)captureView;
- (UIImage*)captureViewInRect:(CGRect)rect;
#end
#implementation UIView (ViewCapture)
- (UIImage*)captureView {
return [self captureViewInRect:self.frame];
}
- (UIImage*)captureViewInRect:(CGRect)rect
{
UIGraphicsBeginImageContext(rect.size);
CGContextRef context = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext();
[self.layer renderInContext:context];
UIImage *screenShot = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext();
UIGraphicsEndImageContext();
return screenShot;
}
#end
- (void)showPausingSimulation:(UILogicSimulatorView *)simulationView {
[simulationView stopRunning];
UIView* superView = simulationView.superview;
CGPoint oldOffset = simulationView.contentOffset;
for (UIView* subview in simulationView.subviews) {
//offset subviews so they appear when content offset is (0,0)
CGRect frame = subview.frame;
frame.origin.x -= oldOffset.x;
frame.origin.y -= oldOffset.y;
subview.frame = frame;
}
simulationView.contentOffset = CGPointZero; //set the offset to (0,0)
UIImage* image = [simulationView captureView]; //Capture the frame of the scrollview
simulationView.contentOffset = oldOffset; //restore the old offset
for (UIView* subview in simulationView.subviews) {
//Restore the original positions of the subviews
CGRect frame = subview.frame;
frame.origin.x += oldOffset.x;
frame.origin.y += oldOffset.y;
subview.frame = frame;
}
[simulationView setHidden:YES];
UIImageView* imageView = [[UIImageView alloc] initWithFrame:simulationView.frame];
[imageView setImage:image];
[imageView setTag:999];
[superView addSubview:imageView];
[imageView setHidden:NO];
superView = nil;
imageView = nil;
image = nil;
[self show];
}
- (void)dismissUnpausingSimulation:(UILogicSimulatorView *)simulationView {
UIView* superView = simulationView.superview;
UIImageView* imageView = (UIImageView*)[superView viewWithTag:999];
[imageView removeFromSuperview];
imageView = nil;
superView = nil;
[simulationView setHidden:NO];
[simulationView startRunning];
}
Then modifying the dismiss delegate method in my class to have this line:
- (void)alertView:(UIAlertView *)alertView didDismissWithButtonIndex:(NSInteger)buttonIndex {
[alertView dismissUnpausingSimulation:self.simulationView];
...
When the alert view is called, but before it is shown, I need to hide the simulator to prevent it corrupting the alert. However just hiding it is ugly as then all is visible behind is a empty view.
To fix this, I first make a UIImage from the simulator views graphics context. I then create a UIImageView with the same frame as the simulator and set the UIImage as its image.
I then hide the simulator view (curing the alert issue), and add my new UIImageView to the simulators superview. I also set the tag of the image view so I can find it later.
When the alert dismisses, the image view is then recovered based on its tag, and removed from its superview. The simulator is then unhidden.
The result is that the rendering issue is gone.
I know its too late for an answer to this question. Lately I had experianced this very same issue.
My Case:
Added couple of custom UIViews with background images and some controlls to the scroll view with shadow effect. I had also set the shadowOffset.
The Solution:
After some step by step analysis, I found out that setting the setShadowOpacity caused The rendering problem for me. When i commented that line of code, it cured the UIAlertView back to normal appearance.
More:
To make sure, I created a new project mimicing the original ui with shadowOpacity. But it didnt caused the rendering problem as i expected. So I am not sure about the root cause. For me it was setShadowOpacity.
first of all sorry for my English :-) not so good.
I have a strange memory leak with the following code (code after the explanation).
I have a class, FLWaitingView. It is a simple view with a waiting indicator (plus a view with background), used to say to the user "wait for the data to be loaded".
It has two simple methods: show and dismiss.
In the show method, I find the main Application Window and add the subviews (the waiting view and a background view, with different animations). In the dismiss method, I remove it from superview.
In every show, I verify that the view isn't already visible using a static bool var (is_visible).
The strange thing is this: In the dismiss method, I use:
[self.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.waitingView removeFromSuperview];
to remove the two views from the Window, to avoid them to be retained. They are correctly removed, I can verify this with NSLog (for cicle on each window subview). But, in INSTRUMENTS, using the "mark heap" function, I see that in every single reload (new instance of FLWaitingView, then show, then dismiss) the old instance remains in memory and continues to increase memory usage. Obviously is not a problem of the calling code, because I correctly release the object:
//CALLING CODE
//customWaitingView is a property retained
self.customWaitingView = [[[FLWaitingView alloc]init]autorelease];
[self.customWaitingView show];
Moreover, and I think that this is the most important information, if I move the view dismission in another method, called by a selector, the leak disappear!!!
Now I show the "wrong" code and, after, the "correction". I would like to understand why it happens.
- (void)show
{
if (!is_visible){
id appDelegate = [[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate];
UIWindow *window = [appDelegate window];
self.waitingLabel.text = #"Attendere";
self.view.alpha = 1.0;
self.waitingView.alpha = 1.0;
[window addSubview:self.view];
[window addSubview:self.waitingView];
[self.waitingIndicator startAnimating];
self.view.frame = window.frame;
self.waitingView.center = window.center;
// "Pop in" animation for alert
[self doPopInAnimationWithDelegate:self];
// "Fade in" animation for background
[self doFadeInAnimation];
is_visible = YES;
} else {
NSLog(#"FLWaitingView %# already visible, do nothing", self);
}
}
- (void)dismiss
{
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:nil];
self.view.alpha = 0.0;
self.waitingView.alpha = 0.0;
[UIView commitAnimations];
[self.waitingIndicator stopAnimating];
//here is the problem
[self.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.waitingView removeFromSuperview];
is_visible = NO;
}
the code above is the "wrong" one, but if I add
[self performSelector:#selector(alertDidFadeOut) withObject:nil afterDelay:0.5];
in the dismiss method and a new method (obviously removing the redundant code from dismiss method):
- (void)alertDidFadeOut
{
//here the memory is correctly released
[self.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.waitingView removeFromSuperview];
is_visible = NO;
}
the memory is correctly released.
Why??????
Thank you in advance
Fabio
Your view isn't getting released as you would be expecting because at the moment you're releasing it there are still animations linked to it. You can only properly release it after the animations are finished.
Your second method works because the animation lasts less than 0.5 seconds - the releasing code is called after view is freed of all the animations.
Proper way to animate the view would be to either create an animation and assign its delegate or maybe a bit more elegant soulution is to use block-based animation like this:
- (void)dismiss
{
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] beginIgnoringInteractionEvents];
[UIView animateWithDuration: 0.15
animations: ^{
self.view.alpha = 0.0;
self.waitingView.alpha = 0.0;
}
completion: ^(BOOL finished){
[self.waitingIndicator stopAnimating];
[self.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.waitingView removeFromSuperview];
is_visible = NO;
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] endIgnoringInteractionEvents];
}];
}
I can't make the static analyzer 'like' this code, but at the same time I cannot autorelease the object that gets stored into controller, so it is useless for the caller. With these 2 static methods I've tried to make it easier to display an activity controller over any view (without blocking tabs).
PZActivityOverlayController *view = [PZActivityOverlayController displayOverView:self.view];
// Later on, when complete
[PZActivityOverlayController remove:view];
Original code:
+ (PZActivityOverlayController *)displayOverView:(UIView *)aView {
PZActivityOverlayController *controller = [[PZActivityOverlayController alloc] initWithFrame:aView.superview.bounds labelText:#"Loading"];
[controller viewWillAppear:YES];
[aView.superview insertSubview:controller.view aboveSubview:aView];
return controller; // Potential leak of object stored into controller
}
+ (void)remove:(PZActivityOverlayController *)display {
[display viewWillDisappear:YES];
[display.view removeFromSuperview];
[display release]; // However it won't leak because it gets released here
}
Perhaps I have the chain of responsibility wrong here, but it's only for convenience. The alternative would be writing what's in the body of these methods everywhere (which violates DRY too much for me).
There's a rule (say, convention) - nonautoreleased objects are returned by methods alloc&init..., new, retain, copy. All the rest methods are HAVE TO return autoreleased object.
In your case I'd rewrite the code above:
....
return [controller autorelease];
}
+ (void)remove:(PZActivityOverlayController *)display {
[display viewWillDisappear:YES];
[display.view removeFromSuperview];
}
...
PZActivityOverlayController *view = [[PZActivityOverlayController displayOverView:self.view] retain];
// Later on, when complete
[PZActivityOverlayController remove:view];
[view release];
I have implemented an app that shows a map with a lot of pins on it.
If you push one pin you get on a second view that shows the data behind the pin.
A button takes you back to the map.
My problem is that by the third touch on a pin the program crashes with a EXC_BAD_ACCESS in this method:
- (void) switchViews {
if(self.details == nil){
Kundendetails *detailAnsicht = [[Kundendetails alloc] initWithNibName:#"ViewList" bundle:nil];
detailAnsicht.rootViewController = self;
self.details = detailAnsicht;
detailAnsicht.map = self.map;
}
if(self.details.view.superview == nil) {
[map.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.view addSubview:details.view];
[details viewDidLoad];
} else {
[details.view removeFromSuperview];
[details release];
[self.view addSubview:map.view];
}
}
How do I isolate which line of code causes the crash? Why would it always crash only on the third touch?
I hope you could help me.
Put NSLog statements in each branch of the ifs. You will almost assuredly see that this statement causes the problem:
[details viewDidLoad];
This is because at some point you execute this:
[details release];
effectively making details inaccessible. By the way you should also almost NEVER call viwewDidLoad directly.
I am totally stumped, here's the situation:
My app uses the Core Location framework to get the current location of the user and then pings my server at TrailBehind for interesting places nearby and displays them as a list. No problems.
To conserve batteries, I turn off the GPS service after I get my data from the server. If the user moves around while using the app and wants a new list he clicks "Refresh" on the navigation controller and the CLLocation service is again activated, a new batch of data is retrieved from the server and the table is redrawn.
While the app is grabbing data from my server I load a loading screen with a spinning globe that says "Loading, please wait" and I hide the navigation bar so they don't hit "back".
So, the initial data grab from the server goes flawlessly.
The FIRST time I hit refresh all the code executes to get a new location, ping the server again for a new list of data and updates the cells. However, instead of loading the table view as it should it restores the navigation controller bar for the table view but still shows my loading view in the main window. This is only true on the device, everything works totally fine in the simulator.
The SECOND time I hit refresh the function works normally.
The THIRD time I hit refresh it fails as above.
The FOURTH time I hit refresh it works normally.
The FIFTH time I hit refresh it fails as above.
etc etc, even refreshes succeed and odd refreshes fail. I stepped over all my code line by line and everything seems to be executing normally. I actually continued stepping over the core instructions and after a huge amount of clicking "step over" I found that the table view DOES actually display on the screen at some point in CFRunLoopRunSpecific, but I then clicked "continue" and my loading view took over the screen.
I am absolutely baffled. Please help!! Many thanks in advance for your insight.
Video of the strange behavior:
Relevant Code:
RootViewControllerMethods (This is the base view for this TableView project)
- (void)viewDidLoad {
//Start the Current Location controller as soon as the program starts. The Controller calls delegate methods
//that will update the list and refresh
[MyCLController sharedInstance].delegate = self;
[[MyCLController sharedInstance].locationManager startUpdatingLocation];
lv = [[LoadingViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"Loading" bundle:nil];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:lv animated:YES];
[super viewDidLoad];
}
- (void)updateClicked {
//When the location is successfully updated the UpdateCells method will stop the CL manager from updating, so when we want to update the location
//all we have to do is start it up again. I hope.
[[MyCLController sharedInstance].locationManager startUpdatingLocation];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:lv animated:YES];
//LV is a class object which is of type UIViewController and contains my spinning globe/loading view.
}
-(void)updateCells {
//When the Core Location controller has updated its location it calls this metod. The method sends a request for a JSON dictionary
//to trailbehind and stores the response in the class variable jsonArray. reloadData is then called which causes the table to
//re-initialize the table with the new data in jsonArray and display it on the screen.
[[MyCLController sharedInstance].locationManager stopUpdatingLocation];
if(self.navigationController.visibleViewController != self) {
self.urlString = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"http://www.trailbehind.com/iphone/nodes/%#/%#/2/10",self.lat,self.lon];
NSURL *jsonURL = [NSURL URLWithString:self.urlString];
NSString *jsonData = [[NSString alloc] initWithContentsOfURL:jsonURL];
NSLog(#"JsonData = %# \n", jsonURL);
self.jsonArray = [jsonData JSONValue];
[self.tableView reloadData];
[self.navigationController popToRootViewControllerAnimated:YES];
[jsonData release];
}
}
CLController Methods: Basically just sends all the data straight back to the RootViewController
// Called when the location is updated
- (void)locationManager:(CLLocationManager *)manager
didUpdateToLocation:(CLLocation *)newLocation
fromLocation:(CLLocation *)oldLocation
{
NSLog(#"New Location: %# \n", newLocation);
NSLog(#"Old Location: %# \n", oldLocation);
#synchronized(self) {
NSNumber *lat = [[[NSNumber alloc] init] autorelease];
NSNumber *lon = [[[NSNumber alloc] init] autorelease];
lat = [NSNumber numberWithFloat:newLocation.coordinate.latitude];
lon = [NSNumber numberWithFloat:newLocation.coordinate.longitude];
[self.delegate noteLat:lat];
[self.delegate noteLon:lon];
[self.delegate noteNewLocation:newLocation];
[self.delegate updateCells];
}
}
The first thought is that you may not want to send startUpdatingLocation to the CLLocationManager until after you've pushed your loading view. Often the first -locationManager:didUpdateToLocation:fromLocation: message will appear instantly with cached GPS data. This only matters if you're acting on every message and not filtering the GPS data as shown in your sample code here. However, this would not cause the situation you've described - it would cause the loading screen to get stuck.
I've experienced similarly weird behavior like this in a different situation where I was trying to pop to the root view controller when switching to a different tab and the call wasn't being made in the correct place. I believe the popToRootViewController was being called twice for me. My suspicion is that your loading view is either being pushed twice or popped twice.
I recommend implementing -viewWillAppear:, -viewDidAppear:, -viewWillDisappear: and -viewDidDisappear: with minimal logging in your LoadingViewController.
- (void)viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated {
NSLog(#"[%# viewWillAppear:%d]", [self class], animated);
[super viewWillAppear:animated];
}
- (void)viewDidAppear:(BOOL)animated {
NSLog(#"[%# viewDidAppear:%d]", [self class], animated);
[super viewDidAppear:animated];
}
- (void)viewWillDisappear:(BOOL)animated {
NSLog(#"[%# viewWillDisappear:%d]", [self class], animated);
[super viewWillDisappear:animated];
}
- (void)viewDidDisappear:(BOOL)animated {
NSLog(#"[%# viewDidDisappear:%d]", [self class], animated);
[super viewDidDisappear:animated];
}
Then, run a test on your device to see if they are always being sent to your view controller and how often. You might add some logging to -updateClicked to reveal double-taps.
Another thought, while your #synchronized block is a good idea, it will only hold off other threads from executing those statements until the first thread exits the block. I suggest moving the -stopUpdatingLocation message to be the first statement inside that #synchronized block. That way, once you decide to act on some new GPS data you immediately tell CLLocationManager to stop sending new data.
Can you try and debug your application to see where the control goes when calling updateCells? Doesn't seem to be anything apparently wrong with the app.
Make sure that there are no memory warnings while you are in the LoadingViewController class. If there is a memory warning and your RootViewController's view is being released, then the viewDidLoad will be called again when you do a pop to RootViewController.
Keep breakpoints in viewDidLoad and updateCells. Are you sure you are not calling LoadingViewController anywhere else?
So, I never did get this to work. I observe this behavior on the device only every time I call popViewController programatically instead of allowing the default back button on the navigation controller to do the popping.
My workaround was to build a custom loading view, and flip the screen to that view every time there would be a delay due to accessing the internet. My method takes a boolean variable of yes or no - yes switches to the loading screen and no switches back to the normal view. Here's the code:
- (void)switchViewsToLoading:(BOOL)loading {
// Start the Animation Block
CGContextRef context = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext();
[UIView beginAnimations:nil context:context];
[UIView setAnimationTransition: UIViewAnimationTransitionFlipFromLeft forView:self.tableView cache:YES];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveEaseInOut];
[UIView setAnimationDuration:.75];
// Animations
if(loading) {
if (lv == nil) { lv = [[LoadingViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"Loading" bundle:nil]; }
[self.view addSubview:lv.view];
[self.view sendSubviewToBack:self.tableView];
self.title = #"TrailBehind";
}
else {
[lv.view removeFromSuperview];
}
// Commit Animation Block
[UIView commitAnimations];
//It looks kind of dumb to animate the nav bar buttons, so set those here
if(loading) {
self.navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = nil;
self.navigationItem.leftBarButtonItem = nil;
self.title = #"TrailBehind";
}
else {
UIBarButtonItem *feedback = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:#"Feedback" style:UIBarButtonItemStylePlain target:self action:#selector(feedbackClicked)];
self.navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = feedback;
UIBarButtonItem *update = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:#"Move Me" style:UIBarButtonItemStylePlain target:self action:#selector(updateClicked)];
self.navigationItem.leftBarButtonItem = update;
[feedback release];
[update release];
}
}
Looking at your original code, I suspect this block very much:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
...
lv = [[LoadingViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"Loading" bundle:nil];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:lv animated:YES];
[super viewDidLoad];
}
viewDidLoad is called every time the NIB is loaded, which can happen multiple times, especially if you run low on memory (something that seems likely given your remark that it only happens on device). I recommend that you implement -didReciveMemoryWarning, and after calling super, at the very least print a log so you can see whether it's happening to you.
The thing that bothers me about the code above is that you're almost certainly leaking lv, meaning that there may be an increasing number of LoadingViewControllers running around. You say it's a class variable. Do you really mean it's an instance variable? ivars should always use accessors (self.lv or [self lv] rather than lv). Do not directly assign to them; you will almost always do it wrong (as you are likely dong here).
I came across this while searching for the exact same issue, so while I'm sure you've already solved your problem by now, I figured I'd post my solution in case someone else runs across it...
This error seems to be caused when you assign two IBActions to the same UIButton in interface builder. It turned out that the button I used to push the view controller onto the stack was assigned to two IBActions, and each one was pushing a different controller onto the navigationController's stack (although you'll only end up seeing one of them - perhaps the last one to be called). So anyway, pressing the back button on the topmost view doesn't really dismiss it (or maybe it's dismissing the 2nd, unseen controller), and you have to press twice to get back.
Anyway, check your buttons and be sure they're only assigned to a single IBAction. That fixed it for me.