I tried to implement the lazy loading solution for UIScrollView with paging enabled, as in the PageControl example from Apple. It seems to work fine, the only problem is that as the user scrolls past the 50% of the page, there is this short hitch as the content of the next page is loaded (obviously because loading the next ViewController takes some time and it seems to happen on the main thread).
Is there some way to make the scrolling seem more smooth that would work no matter how fast the user scrolls ?
You need to make sure that anything which takes time happens asynchronously. The techniques for this will vary based on what kind of content you're loading or what sort of drawing you're doing that causes the delays. Try to load images in the background, do custom drawing in the background, use operations or gcd to break up large tasks into smaller chunks that can happen concurrently, etc.
You should be lazy loading the surrounding pages so that they're already loaded when the user scrolls.
So if the user scrolls to page 2, load pages 1 and 3 (if they aren't already)
Related
I'm developing an app which uses a UIScrollView to show a list of images based on search criteria. Using a button the user can load more images.
When testing on an iPhone 4 the ViewController receives a memory-warning at ~750 images. When testing on an iPod 2nd generation a memory warning is received at ~150 images.
My understanding is that when didReceiveMemoryWarning is called, one can free memory by releasing objects but recovery from low memory is not guaranteed.
I've implemented didReceiveMemoryWarning and release basically all objects. In instruments I see memory usage drop back to ~3MB. The first time the iPod reaches its memory limit all goes well, memory is released and the app resumes normal operation. The second time however, when didReceiveMemoryWarning is called, I can see the objects released, but the app crashes anyway.
So, how do I make my app crash proof? I want to make sure that all devices running the app can load as much images as memory allows but I also want to make sure that the app doesn't crash.
I would prefer the app never to reach didReceiveMemoryWarning and set a limit to the number of images that can be displayed, but how can I determine how many images each possible device should be able to load?
Furthermore, the size of the images is not guaranteed. While testing I come to this arbitrary number of 150 on an iPod, but what if the images on the server at some point in time are twice as big? Then the app would probably crash at 75 images.
Any sugestions?
First off, what you probably want to do is not display all your images all at once. You rather, probably only want to disable the images that are currently visible, plus a few that are off screen preloaded for when the user scrolls to that location.
This is much the same way as the photos app works, how UITableView is implemented. Basically it boils down to this:
You have your main scrollview, and inside it, you have individual cells. These cells are small views that are added as subviews to your scrollview at specific offsets. You then add your images to these cells.
When a user scrolls the scrollview, you first ask the scrollview to dequeue a new cell for you, much the same way you'd ask a table view to dequeue a cell for you to use. This saves the cost of an allocation, if one has been recycled. If you cannot dequeue one from a recycled set, then what you have to do is quite simple: allocate one as you are doing currently.
Furthermore, to implement this cell recycling, what you need to do is see which cells are visible on screen. If one or more cells go off screen, you add them to the recycled cells NSSet which you create. This set just holds cells for later recycling. There's some sample code Apple has which demonstrates this, and it's called PhotoScroller. It also is demonstrated in a WWDC10 video, session 104. I suggest you watch it. Ignore the parts about tiling, you don't need to know that for your purpose.
Once you have this in place, this will force you to set up your cells only when they're needed, which is also another key aspect of this behaviour.
Finally, when you do receive a memory warning, just drop the recycled cells set. If you ever get high enough that this matters, that is, you'll save a few megs of memory. :) (Do not forget to implement it though, ever, when you hold onto temporary data that you don't specifically need around...cells which are not visible on the screen are a good example of this, as are caches.)
You should lazy load your images and only load the images you need at that time. Your app can't show all those images on one screen anyways, so on your scrollview you should only load those images that can fit on the screen and maybe a few around that, and as the user scrolls to release the images it no longer needs.
I have a horizontally scrolling UIScrollview with paging enabled. Each page represents a data feed. Each data feed consumes a fairly large amount of memory including text and images displayed in a UITableView. Since the user can have an unlimited amount of data feeds, I need to lazy load them to prevent maxing out my memory usage. My thought is to keep up to 5 data feeds in memory at any given point, and release anything outside of that range. My initial take is to keep the page in the viewport in memory, and the 2 pages to either side of it. This way when the user scrolls, the next sequential page will always be in memory and will display quickly.
Here is my problem:
We also need to support a scenario where a user can skip to a specific data feed, possibly 10 or more pages to the right or left, which throws my entire lazy loading scheme out the window.
Might there be a better strategy to support this scenario?
Yes, what you can do is create an outer scroll view, which houses individual cells akin to a tableview. In this respect, the cells have a content view which you can place your data, let's just assume you know how to do that since it seems you do.
Once you have this architecture in your mind, it becomes fairly clear: You can, knowing the width of your cells, and the size of the screen, some simple math can tell you how many you have on screen, and you can add one to the left or right so you're preloading some data for when the user scrolls.
This will say, give you the ability to have in memory, at most 5 feeds, if 3 are visible, at the start or end of the content view in the scrollview, 4 feeds, regardless of whether or not you have a billion feeds.
One critical part of this is cell reuse. You maintain a couple NSSets, one for recycled cells, and one for visible cells. Add items that have gone off screen to the recycled cells, dequeue items from recycled cells when setting up the cell, as to save additional memory allocations, which can be expensive. Just remember, using this strategy, you are still subjective to the same caveats as a UITableView with respect to cell reuse.
I'm plugging some software I wrote here, so forgive me for that, but I'm doing so as an example of what I'm talking about if you get stuck implementing what I discussed here, it's available here for your perusal.
One final note. To support skipping of cells, it's just simple math again to adjust the point in the scrollview you are at. The action for this can be done with a gesture, though now we're talking a pan gesture recognizer, with some specific properties that will be specific to your application, as an example. Or you can use buttons if you really must. Just ensure you know how to calculate your offsets to your cells, and scroll to that point. You'll be fine.
It's hard to give accurate advice with the information provided in the question. So I will just present a few thoughts I got when reading the question.
Does it take long to download a feed? Would it be possible to just download a few item (a screenful) to get the first few items showing right away? Perhaps lazy load the images if possible.
Have you considered caching the feed data on disk? That way you can present some data right away and then update the feed as new data gets downloaded.
Since each page is a feed view, would the user just scroll past a feed without looking at it? Do you really need to load 2 views on each side or can you get away with just 1 view on each side.
I don't think your lazy loading scheme stops working just because the user can skip directly to any page. You would have to start loading the data for that page when it is selected but by using a disk cache or downloading a small sample could make the app feel faster. I also think that using some kind of animation to animate to the selected page could buy you a little time.
Here is my problem: We also need to support a scenario where a user can skip to a specific data feed, possibly 10 or more pages to the right or left, which throws my entire lazy loading scheme out the window.
Then you need to fix your data structure. I wrote pretty much exactly this (a UITableView-like paging scroll view) and it works fine (there are some reloading quirks, but hey...).
Keep track of which pages you've loaded. I used a ring-buffer-alike modulo 8 and spent a while getting the code right; it's probably a lot easier to just use an NSDictionary with NSNumber keys and UIView values. This means when you change from page 1 to 10, you can still tell that the loaded views are for pages 1, 2, and 3, and drop them.
Load the required pages in -layoutSubviews. I would load 1 or 3; 5 is probably too many (but you need to load at least 2 if you're between pages).
Load 3 (one to either side) in -scrollViewDidScroll:. This is so that when you scroll from page 1 to 2, it doesn't try to load page 4 (which hasn't been loaded yet).
Load 5 (two to either side) in –scrollViewDidEndDragging:willDecelerate: if willDecelerate is NO, –scrollViewDidEndDecelerating:, –scrollViewDidScrollToTop:, and –scrollViewDidEndScrollingAnimation:. The idea is that the animation's over, so you can load the extra views without the user perceiving lag.
Possibly load 5 in –scrollViewWillBeginDragging:, to make sure that page 3 is loaded if you're currently on page 1.
I decided to do "two pages either side" because when you flick from page 1 to page 2, it often shows a pixel-wide sliver of page 3 when it bounces. This can be avoided with scroll view insets, but we didn't think of that at the time (oops). There's otherwise not that much of a reason to choose 5 over 3.
It's a bit of work to get right, but otherwise seems to work flawlessly.
I've got an app I'm working on where we handle a LOT of images at once in a scrollview. (Here's how it looks, each blue block being in image on a scrollview expanding to the right: http://i.stack.imgur.com/o7lFx.png) So to be able to handle the large strain doing this puts on memory. So I've implemented a bunch of techniques such as reusing imageviews etc which have all worked quite successfully in keeping my memory usage down. Another thing I do is instead of keeping the actual image in memory (which I of course couldn't do for all of them because that would run out of memory very quickly) I only keep the image's filepath in memory and then read the image when the user scrolls to an area of the scroll view near that image. However, although this is memory efficient, it's causing a LOT of lag in the scrollview because of the fact that it has to constantly read images from the disk. I can't think of a good solution on how to fix this. Basically right now the app draws to the screen only the visible uiimageviews and while the user scrolls the app will look to see if it can dequeue another imageview so it doesn't have to allocate another one and at that point it reads the image into memory, but as I said it's causing the scrolling action to be very slow. Any ideas on a strategy to use to fix this? Does anyone know what the native photos app does to handle this kind of thing? Thanks so much!
I can suggest you a simple solution to balance both the memory and the computer processing. You only keep small images like thumbnails in memory and only keep about 20 of them. One project that I am doing, I keep 20 thumbnail images (100 x 100) recently accessed, which doesn't cost a lot of memory. I believe that it costs about 200 kb all the time but comparing to a general available memory. I think it is good enough.
It also depends on your use case : if user scroll really fast and you don't know when will they go. You can have even smaller images than the thumnail and when you show it on the UIImageView, you resize it to fit. When user stops scrolling for a while. You can start loading bigger images and then you have a nicer images. User may not even notice about the process
I don't think there is a solution that can be fast and using as less memory as possible. Because we have memory, maybe not big but have enough if we use it smartly.
Slow scrolling performance might mean that you're blocking the main thread while loading images. In that case, the scrolling animation won't continue until the images are loaded, which would indeed cause pretty choppy scrolling performance.
It would be better to lazily load requested images in the background, while the main thread continues to handle the scrolling animation. A library that provides this functionality (among other things) is the 'three20' library. See the Tidbits document, and scroll down to the bottom where the 'TTImageView' class is described.
I had a similar issue with a PDF viewer, The recommended way to do this is to have as low a res image as you can get away with and if you are allowing the user to blow the image up/zoom, then have two versions or three versions of that image increasing the res as you go.
Put as much code as you can get away with in the didDecelerate method (like loading in higher res images like vodkhang talks about), rather than processing loads in didScroll. Recycle Views out of scope as you have said. and beware of autoreleased Context based Image Creation functions.
Load images in on background threads intelligently (based on the scrollView Offset position and zoom level), and think about using CALayer/Tiled Layer drawing for larger images.
Three20 (an open source iOs lib) has a great Photo Viewer that can be subclassed, it has thumbnail navigation, large image paging, caching and gestures right out of the box.
i am developing a app which contains feature like default photo browser in iphone. I done some what similar to that. but after loading some(near about 10-15) images from remote server,i am receiving memory warning.My requirement is loading image one by one. For this, on scroll view i am putting an images and increasing the contentSize of scroll view. it will work fine. but due to memory warning app quite.
Guys, any have any idea to approach for this feature which work similar to photo app without problem?
thanks in advance .
You're running out of memory because you're keeping the data for 10 or more images in memory at one time. You need to have more logic in your code that not only preloads and increases the scroll view's content size, but also removes UIImageViews from the scrollview (and thus from memory) as the user scrolls to newer stuff. (You can also save "evicted" images to the cache area on disk so if the users scrolls back you don't have to go to the server again.)
If you use a UITableView, it will request the images only when needed, and will automatically purge off-screen cells to save memory. It may not fit into the aesthetic for your application, though.
I currently have a UIScrollView which has a content size equal to about 50 pages, each one the size of the application view.
I have implemented scrolling by using paging and at all time keep current, previous and next page in memory, while the rest are created when required, e.g. when one swipes forward, the old 'previous' view is released and a new 'next' view is loaded.
The new pages are loaded and old released when 'scrollViewDidEndDeaccelerate' is called.
The disadvantage with this is of course that the page needs to settle completely before a new page swipe may begin.
Is there a more efficient way of doing this with a different type of control? UITableView?
I am looking for solutions with other type of controls - not UIScrollView implementations with e.g. placeholder images and loading high res on demand.
Sounds like you are on the right track as predictive caching is about the only idea I can offer...which you are doing. Maybe checking available memory and loading to a certain percentage of that might help, with caveat that you monitor the low memory warning and dump items that are the farthest from the current view location.