How could I reimplement Tie::File in Scala? - perl

Question

I really like Tie::File, which allows you to tie an array to a file's lines. You can modify the array in any way, and when you're done with it, you untie it, and the file's content modifies accordingly.
I'd like to reimplement such behaviour in Scala, and this is what I have so far:
class TiedBuffer(val file:File) extends ArrayBuffer[String] {
tieFile
def untie = {
val writer = new PrintStream(new FileOutputStream(file))
this.foreach(e => writer.println(e))
writer.close
this
}
private def tieFile = this ++= scala.io.Source.fromFile(file).getLines()
}
However, the "operators" defined on the ArrayBuffer return various classes, different than my own, for example:
println((new TiedBuffer(somefile) +: "line0").getClass)
gives me a immutable.Vector. I could limit the class to a very small set of predefined methods, but I thought it would be nice if I could offer all of them ( foreach/map/... ).
What should I inherit from, or how should I approach this problem so that I have a fluid array-like interface, which allows me to modify a file's contents?
BOUNTY: to win the bounty, can you show a working example that makes use of CanBuildFrom to accomplish this task?

Answer 1

The methods ending with colon are right associative so in your example you are calling +: of String with a TiedBuffer as parameter. If you want to test +: from ArrayBuffer you can do:
println((new TiedBuffer(somefile).+:("line0")).getClass)
or
println(("line0" +: new TiedBuffer(somefile)).getClass)
EDIT
I missed the point in your question, see John's answer to return TiedBuffer objects instead of ArrayBuffer.
EDIT2
Here is an example with CanBuildFrom. You will have to call tie manually though to prevent the file to be tied every time the builder create a new TiedBuffer instance. There is still a lot of room for improvement, for instance ++ will not work but it should get you started.
import collection.generic.CanBuildFrom
import collection.mutable._
import java.io.{PrintStream, FileOutputStream, File}
class TiedBuffer(val file: File) extends ArrayBuffer[String]
with BufferLike[String, TiedBuffer]
with IndexedSeqOptimized[String, TiedBuffer] {
def tie = {
clear
this ++= scala.io.Source.fromFile(file).getLines()
}
def untie = {
val writer = new PrintStream(new FileOutputStream(file))
this.foreach(e => writer.println(e))
writer.close
this
}
override def newBuilder: Builder[String, TiedBuffer] =
new ArrayBuffer mapResult {
x: Seq[String] => (new TiedBuffer(file) ++= x)
}
}
object TiedBuffer {
implicit def canBuildFrom: CanBuildFrom[TiedBuffer, String, TiedBuffer] =
new CanBuildFrom[TiedBuffer, String, TiedBuffer] {
def apply(): Builder[String, TiedBuffer] =
throw new RuntimeException("Cannot create a new TiedBuffer from scratch")
def apply(from: TiedBuffer): Builder[String, TiedBuffer] = from.newBuilder
}
}

Answer 2

Extending existing collection requires defining a builder in a companion object such as
object TiedBuffer {
implict def canBuildFrom[T] = new CanBuildFrom[TiedBuffer[T],T,TiedBuffer[T]] { ... }
}
This is fully explained here:
http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/collections-api/collections-impl.html
As noted by Marx Jayxcela, the reason you are getting a Vector is that you are using a right associative operators, otherwise an implicit builder would be selected and you would get an ArrayBuffer