I know how to use the CoreML library to train a model and use it. However, I was wondering if it's possible to feed the model more than one image in order for it to identify it with better accuracy.
The reason for this is because i'm a trying to build an app that classifies histological slides, however, many of them look quite similar, so I thought maybe I could feed the model images at different magnifications in order to make the identification. Is it possible?
Thank you,
Mehdi
Yes, this is a common technique. You can give Core ML the images at different scales or use different crops from the same larger image.
A typical approach is to take 4 corner crops and 1 center crop, and also horizontally flip these, so you have 10 images total. Then feed these to Core ML as a batch. (Maybe in your case it makes sense to also vertically flip the crops.)
To get the final prediction, take the average of the predicted probabilities for all images.
Note that in order to use images at different sizes, the model must be configured to support "size flexibility". And it must also be trained on images of different sizes to get good results.
I have a set of roughly 2000 images to process, and have stumbled on a problem regarding my edges. The original images are CT Scans of a heart, which are then thresholded and sobel filtered to produce a binary image of parts of the tissue. Unfortunately the thresholding and filtering has resulted in certain images missing the 'edges' of the heart --> R&LHS you can see the gaps & further down Just a small one at the top hopefully this shows how annoying this is to do automatically
I've tried various inbuilt methods of edge detection, but the difference in size of the gaps makes it nearly impossible to do, without filling out the bits that are supposed to remain as gaps due to the sizes of the filters I use.
Is there a way of manually "connecting the dots" so to speak? It would take forever on the whole image set but seems to be my only option, or if you could suggest any other way of doing it would be cool!
I am trying to align an atlas on a brain section via shape similarity. I converted both images to grayscale and filled them in white like so:
Section:
Atlas:
I tried aligning them by similarity using imregtform. However I get the error "Registration failed because optimization diverged." Is there a value in the optimizer that needs to be changed?
Or is there an easier way to do this in MATLAB?
I do not actually have the Image Processing Toolbox, but you should take a look at some of the help files. For instance, Mathworks has many sections online discussing how you can do image processing, including alignment. This link is somewhat a top level discussion (http://www.mathworks.com/help/images/index.html#spatial-transformation-and-image-registration) and this seems like it might be a great tool for you to do image alignment using the control point alignment technique (http://www.mathworks.com/help/images/point-mapping.html).
I hope this helps point you in the right direction. With out having the toolbox, I can't try the suggested tools.
Unfortunatly, Matlabs image registration only offers linear (geometric) transformations atm. That is, only translation, rotation, scale, and shear is allowed. This is not enough for your images since you have local distortions.
What you need is a non-rigid (elastic) registration. You can find some codes for this in the file-exchange.
I have 42 variables and I have calculated the correlation matrix for them in Matlab. Now I would like to visualize it with a schemaball. Does anyone have any suggestions / experiences how this could be done in Matlab? The following pictures will explain my point better:
In the pictures each parabola between variables would mean the strength of correlation between them. The thicker the line is, the more correlation. I prefer the style of picture 1 more than the style in picture 2 where I have used different colors to highlight the strength of correlation.
Kinda finished I guess.. code can be found here at github.
Documentation is included in the file.
The yellow/magenta color (for positive/negative correlation) is configurable, as well as the fontsize of the labels and the angles at which the labels are plotted, so you can get fancy if you want and not distribute them evenly along the perimeter/group some/...
If you want to actually print these graphs or use them outside matlab, I suggest using vector formats (eg eps). It's also annoying that the text resizes when you zoom in/out, but I don't know of any way to fix that without hacking the zoom function :/
schemaball % demo
schemaball(arrayfun(#num2str,1:10,'uni',false), rand(10).^8,11,[0.1587 0.8750],[0.8333 1],2*pi*sin(linspace(0,pi/2-pi/20,10)))
schemaball(arrayfun(#num2str,1:50,'uni',false), rand(50).^50,9)
I finished and submitted my version to the FEX: schemaball and will update the link asap.
There are a some differences with Gunther Struyf's contribution:
You can return the handles to the graphic object for full manual customization
Labels are oriented to allow maximum left-to-rigth readability
The figure stretches to fit labels in, leaving the axes unchanged
Syntax requires only correlations matrix (but allows optional inputs)
Optimized for performance.
Follow examples of demo, custom labels and creative customization.
Note: the first figure was exported with saveas(), all others with export_fig.
schemaball
x = rand(10).^3;
x(:,3) = 1.3*mean(x,2);
schemaball(x, {'Hi','how','is','your','day?', 'Do','you','like','schemaballs?','NO!!'})
h = schemaball;
set(h.l(~isnan(h.l)), 'LineWidth',1.2)
set(h.s, 'MarkerEdgeColor','red','LineWidth',2,'SizeData',100)
set(h.t, 'EdgeColor','white','LineWidth',1)
The default colormap:
To improve on screen rendering you can launch MATLAB with the experimental -hgVersion 2 switch which produces anti/aliased graphics by default now (source: HG2 update | Undocumented Matlab). However, if you try to save the figure, the file will have the usual old anti-aliased rendering, so here's a printscreen image of Gunther's schemaball:
Important update:
You can do this in Matlab now with the FileExchange submission:
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/48576-circulargraph
There is an exmample by Matlab in here:
http://uk.mathworks.com/examples/matlab/3859-circular-graph-examples
Which gives this kind of beautiful plots:
Coincidentally, Cleve Moler (MathWorks Chief Mathematician) showed an example of just this sort of plot on his most recent blog post (not nearly as beautiful as the ones in your example, and the connecting lines are straight rather than parabolic, but it looks functional). Unfortunately he didn't include the code directly, but if you leave him a comment on the post he's usually very willing to share things.
What might be even nicer for you is that he also applies (and this time includes) code to permute the rows/columns of the array in order to maximize the spatial proximity of highly connected nodes, rather than randomly ordering them around the circumference. You end up with a 'crescent'-shaped envelope of connecting lines, with the thick bit of the crescent representing the most highly connected nodes.
Unfortunately however, I suspect that if you need to enhance his code to get the very narrow, high-resolution lines in your example plots, then MATLAB's currently non-anti-aliased graphics aren't quite up to it yet.
I've recently been experimenting with MATLAB data and the D3 visualization library for similar graphs - there are several related types of circular visualizations you may be interested in and many of them are interactive. Another helpful, well-baked, and freely available option is Circos which is probably responsible for most of the prettier versions of these graphs you've seen in popular press.
I would like to check whether an image has a lot of homogeneous areas. Therefore I would like to get some kind of value of an image that declares a ratio for images depending on the amount/size of homogeneous areas (e.g. that value could have a range from 0 to 5).
Instead of a value there could be some kind of classification as well.
[many homogeneous areas -> value/class 5 ; few homogeneous areas -> value/class 0]
I would like to do that in perl. Is there a package/function or something like that?
What you want seems to be an area of image processing research which I am not familiar with. However, GraphicsMagick's mogrify utility has a -segment option:
Use -segment to segment an image by analyzing the histograms of the color components and identifying units that are homogeneous with the fuzzy c-means technique. The scale-space filter analyzes the histograms of the three color components of the image and identifies a set of classes. The extents of each class is used to coarsely segment the image with thresholding. The color associated with each class is determined by the mean color of all pixels within the extents of a particular class. Finally, any unclassified pixels are assigned to the closest class with the fuzzy c-means technique.
I don't know if this is any use to you. You might have to hit the library on this one, and read some research. You do have access to this through PerlMagick as well. However, it does not look like it gives access to the internals, but just produces an image based on parameters.
In my tests (without really understanding what the parameters do), photos turned entirely black, whereas PNG images with large areas of similar colors were reduced to a sort of an average color. Whether you can use that fact to develop a measure is an open question I am not going to investigate ;-)