If I have a large amount of information that will be randomly used while the app is being used, what is the best way to store and access that data?
The app completely relies on the static text that I have and will need to grab certain parts and concatenate them depending on what the user selects within the app.
Is it best to load it into Core Data when the app loads the first time and then check if it is loaded every time after that? If so, how?
Core Data's primary focus is not persisting data but instead on managing a complex graph of objects that contain and manipulate data. The API is intended to create the entire model layer of a Model-View-Design application.
If you have a lot of chunks of text all that need separate logic or if your app will create those chunks out of a large body of text, then core data is a good choice.
If you just have something like a very basic text editor then probably not.
Core Data is completely inappropriate for your use case.
Store your text in a .strings file and use NSLocalizedString() to access it. This will provide a convenient way to lookup text by key and make localization simple.
Related
I want to provide an UITextfield with an autocomplete feature.
After a User types 5 letters a set of Phrases (200-9000 phrases) is searched for a match.
Since the App is already using core data should I store the upto 9000 phrases in core data or rather use just a text file as the datasource?
one remark. the words list is updateable. if the users enters a new word it is added to the autocomplete list daqasource
Using Core Data would definitely be more efficient from a memory/performance tradeoff (assuming you are using an sqlite store of course) as all phrases wouldnt have to be put into memory before searching begins. If you were to go the text file route, however, you would be loading all your phrases into memory before being able to search through them.
I would recommend you go the Core Data route. If this data is complete separate from the rest of the app's data, you may want to consider just making a new model for it altogether to keep things more organized.
I'm storing just one NSArray to NSUserDefaults, but this array may eventually have many objects inside.
Could it be a problem using NSUserDefaults?
I would say use Core Data just because you want to simplify your life when dealing with anything more than a hundred data objects within two or more categories or "entities".
Using Core Data means that you're not dumping the entire data set into memory when you load it. Instead, you're using what are called faults which fire when necessary to load additional relationships and associated data.
Migrating the data is also another big benefit of Core Data. When you need to change the data structure, you just create a simple migration and it's done automatically for you. If instead you had an NSArray or NSDictionary in the user defaults, you'd have to iterate over the entire thing and try to change the data structure or migrate an old key name to a new key name. Not an easy task.
Another benefit of Core Data is that it works seamlessly with UITableView and UICollectionView to intelligently search and load only relevant items within your data set which helps improve overall app performance. This is all done via NSFetchedResultsController.
Working with one type of NSArray such as People that only has a hundred people in it shouldn't be a big deal and you can use NSUserDefaults for that as long as the People array doesn't have a lot of associated data stored within it.
Honestly, every app I create that needs any kind of data storage other than basic user preferences uses Core Data now. I don't waste my time on Property Lists or user defaults anymore and I would recommend you not to either.
NSUserDefaults is named as it is for a reason. It's designed to store a handful of user preferences and settings for your app, not the bulk of its data. If you're storing anything that resembles a database, NSUserDefaults is not the way to implement it -- use Core Data, as per #iWasRobbed's answer.
NSUserDefaults only use to store limited amount of data.if you have large amount of data you should go with coreData.
I am really confused on what the Core Data actually is. Or I guess my question is, when dealing with a database, would you use Core Data? Like if I wanted access values from a database would I be using Core Data to access those values? How would I approach this problem?
Thank you so much for the help.
Core Data is an framework that does the work of "object persistence". In other words, it's code you can use that takes care of saving a collection of objects to disk and loading them again later. It does a lot of work to allow you to store lots of data and load only the objects you need at a time, and unload ones when memory is tight.
Core Data can use a database to accomplish this, but that's it's business, not yours. When you use Core Data, it is a black box. You tell it to save the data and then step out of the way.
If you want to interact with an existing database, such as a MySQL database on a web server, that's a completely different matter. You might use Core Data to store local copies of objects on your device, but in that case Core Data won't care that the objects are copies from some other database. It doesn't care.
It is a convenient, native means of storing data in your iOS applications. Don't think of it as sqlite although you can view the files it creates with various sqlite tools. Instead think of it as a tool for manipulating an object graph of information important to your app.
I've used it in two main ways. First to store a bunch of static data that is important to an app, in one case that was a large amount of location data for an indoor mapping application. What arrived as a massive CSV file of waypoints was converted to core data. Core Data was incredibly useful for this because it allowed preparing a sqlite file which was shipped with the application containing all the infomation. Updates from a web service arrive as more CSV that is added to the Core Data to keep information current. At runtime the location information object (the waypoint a user is at) is retrieved with a predicate (i.e. the point they tapped on) and that object, through its Core Data relationships, indicates where it is possible to go from that point. Core Data provided the information necessary to perform A* routing through the indoor map.
Second it is great when you have a bunch of objects arriving as JSON and you want to be able to store and access those objects later. Let's say you have a typical app where you have a User and some information about the User, let's call it Thing. Users have Things. When you want to know something about a User you retrieve the Core Data record using a predicate - typically "name" or similar - and you get all the information you stored about the User back. Again you can make use of relationships to explore the user's connections and make displaying information easy. Perhaps the User has many Things, then you can say "user.things" and you get a NSSet of NSManagedObjects representing those Things.
You use it like a database. Its utility is that it is easy to access from anywhere in your iOS code, it is easy to store and easy to retrieve information also. Faulting lets you retrieve one object and navigate to any object connected through relationships by following the relationships. Because you define the attributes and relationships yourself in the data model editor it is easily customized for what you need to store. To me it is one of the most used and most useful parts of iOS.
When you want to automate display of information from Core Data you can use a NSFetchedResultsController to initiate a fetch and to respond through delegate methods to changes to the underlying data. If you set up a UITableView to use a NSFetchedResultsController as data source, you can have the table automatically update whenever the objects displayed in the cells changed. Very useful for apps where you periodically update information and want what is displayed to be kept current.
When your object model changes it is possible to maintain all of your existing information and migrate it to the new model. Core Data manages automatic (lightweight migration) when it can, or if you have made more radical changes you can supply rules to handle the migration.
The limitation of Core Data is that it is not great for storing binaries. If you have images that you need to store, far better to store a path to the location of the image than trying to store the actual data.
Yes, if you want a local database on your device, Core Data is the appropriate technology. It probably makes sense to start your research with the Core Data Programming Guide.
You can alternatively use SQLite (which Core Data uses in the backend), but Core Data offers some material advantages and is the preferred database interface for iOS. If you decide to pursue SQLite for any reason, though, I'd suggest you contemplate using the FMDB Objective-C SQLite wrapper.
But Core Data is generally the way to go.
I planning on building an app whose main content are images. Basically, it is going to have multiple menus using UITableViews, whose cells are going to have only an image. When you click the cell, you'll be pushed to a simple view with that image and another one, wich has the rest of the detailed content.
This is all quite easy to do, my questions is about optimization. It's gonna have LOTs of content (Maybe 1k rows) and It's gonna display images in the UITableView, so Core Data is a must (given it's lazy loading and several other optimizations)
My question is: What's best, to store the image in the Core Data db (as NSData) or to just store the name of the image? What I'm imagining is if I store the name of the resource, For each row in the UITableView the device must go fetch that image, process it finally display it. When scrolling trough them (wich is expected to happen A LOT) we would have lots of fetching images. If I store them in Core Data, it would be as simple as taking that info and using it as if it where an image.
The benefits of storing the images in Core Data comes with the normal withdraws of storing blobs in a db. I don't know how much of a problem this would be in Core Data (My experience in dbs comes mainly from MySQL)
On the other hand, tough my "common sense" dictates saving just the name and fetching the images as they're needed its gonna take more time if they're requested more, I'm not sure how much of a performance hit would this be. Is there a "best way" to store them? Just the name and then call pathForResourse:ofType:or (if it's faster) pathForResourse:ofType:inDirectory: on the mainBundle, store the URI, or other form of pointing to it.
edit: The application will have static content shipped with the application and the user won't be able to modify this content in any way. (at least in version 1.0)
From the Core Data Release Notes for iOS v5.0:
Small data values like image thumbnails may be efficiently stored in a database, but large photos or other media are best handled directly by the file system. You can now specify that the value of a managed object attribute may be stored as an external record—see setAllowsExternalBinaryDataStorage:. When enabled, Core Data heuristically decides on a per-value basis if it should save the data directly in the database or store a URI to a separate file which it manages for you. You cannot query based on the contents of a binary data property if you use this option.
The setAllowsExternalBinaryDataStorage: essentially does what you described "...just store the name of the image..."
Also refer to these other questions:
CoreData : store images to DB or not?
Core data images from desktop to iphone
Provide example for why it is not advisable to store images in CoreData?
you will get a great optimization from just using the name of the file...
if you re-use a file ... you wont have to store it in the database twice, or alternately have a model object just to represent that file as a relationship.
You could do some profiling and check... but I assume that just a name would be ideal.
also you could do a little work to make something similar to -imageNamed that caches the images for you, and you will only have to make one UIImage for each file, wherever it exists in your program.
Don't save the images in core data. You can save the information pertaining the images in an organized matter in core data, but keep the images ordered in a supporting files section in your project. Or if you are downloading the images, you can cache them in your images section of the app and simply update the information for the images in core data.
I'm prototyping a simple sports sim game for iPhone which will use Core data.
One the biggest challenges I'm facing is how to get the data into Core data in the first place.
The second biggest challenge is whether I should use core data's persistent stores or use fixed files (JSON) for pre-fixed game data.
--
Concept
The general concept is that a player can start a new game or continue an existing one.
When they start new game they would use pre-fixed data. (IE. A database which is read-only.)
When they continue game they would use a different database (the game database).
I am not sure how to deliver such a feature.
--
Prototype
Currently, I am experimenting with this prototype:
PHP Web App -> 2. API -> 3. iPhone
A local PHP web app which acts as a CMS.
A basic API which lets me expose specific data in a JSON format.
Read the JSON into Core Data using TouchJSON/other tools.
I have no intention of making the API public/online (for various reasons), so the method I have described is a only meant to ever be a one-way process.
This will of course cause a problem because I need to make the data read-only.
--
In sports sim games you will often find them using fixed files (.txt, .csv, .dat, etc) and then they read this data into memory or a database.
Therefore, using this concept I could:
Save the JSON as fixed files and read them at run-time into memory/core data.
And then whenever the player starts a new game, the existing core data store will simply be wiped.
However, having said that I've heard that you can use persistent stores as a method to overcome this problem.
Therefore I was thinking of setting up 2 persistent stores;
1) A pre-fixed read-only persistent store
2) The actual game store (which gets overwritten if you start a new game).
But which is better?
Creating JSON fixed files for consumption, or using 2 persistent stores?
I apologize if my question/concept is overly complex; but would welcome better/simpler solutions where possible.
I think you can use Core Data for applications that is going to store data on it and the database is empty when it starts but if you needed you data store to be pre-populated with data it is better to load it from fixed data like sqlite or xml files.