All,
Is there a way to have a minimum time to keep a stream open before it closes? For some reason, my stream is closing prematurely which is causing errors elsewhere. I need to keep it open to make sure ALL of the data is gathered, and then it can run the other code.
Thanks,
James
In the case that someone falls upon this question later, I ended up creating nested if statements to pull it off.
Basically, there is one statement that checks if the end tag is not found (for my code, the END of the ENTIRE data that I should be receiving is </SessionData> - So, I did if([outputString rangeOfString:#"</SessionData>"].location == NSNotFound). I created a string called totalOutput that would have the outputString added onto the end of totalOutput until the </SessionData> is found.
If anyone ever needs help, just go ahead and comment on here and I can give more information.
Related
I am trying to make a patch that plays audio when a bang is pressed. I have put a symbol so that I don't need to keep reimporting the file. However it works sometimes but not all the time.
A warning in the Pd console reads: Start requested with no prior open
However I have imported an audio file
Is there something that I have done wrong?
Use [trigger] to get the order-of-execution correct.
One problem is, that whenever you send a [1( to [readsf~] you must have sent an [open ...( message directly beforehand.
Even if you have just successfully opened a file, but then stopped it (with [0() or played it through (so it has been closed automatically), you have to send the filename again.
The real problem is, that your messages are out of order: you should never have a fan-out (that is: connecting a message outlet to multiple inlets), as this will create undefined behavior.
Use [trigger] to get the order-of-execution correct.
(Mastering [trigger] is probably the single most important step in learning to program Pd)
I am using aggridOptions.api.addItems to add array of data to my grid. the function adds my data from the end to the start.
if my array is [1,2,3,4,5] I see it in my grid after the insert as [5,4,3,2,1]. How can I fix it?
Thanks,
It looks like this is a bug in the implementation - we've fixed it and it'll be available in the next scheduled release (to be released tomorrow).
You can either wait for the next release or manually insert the items one by one.
Given the fix will be released tomorrow however I'd just wait for it and this issue will go away for you.
I need to log trace events during boot so I configure an AutoLogger with all the required providers. But when my service/process starts I want to switch to real-time mode so that the file doesn't explode.
I'm using TraceEvent and I can't figure out how to do this move correctly and atomically.
The first thing I tried:
const int timeToWait = 5000;
using (var tes = new TraceEventSession("TEMPSESSIONNAME", #"c:\temp\TEMPSESSIONNAME.etl") { StopOnDispose = false })
{
tes.EnableProvider(ProviderExtensions.ProviderName<MicrosoftWindowsKernelProcess>());
Thread.Sleep(timeToWait);
}
using (var tes = new TraceEventSession("TEMPSESSIONNAME", TraceEventSessionOptions.Attach))
{
Thread.Sleep(timeToWait);
tes.SetFileName(null);
Thread.Sleep(timeToWait);
Console.WriteLine("Done");
}
Here I wanted to make that I can transfer the session to real-time mode. But instead, the file I got contained events from a 15s period instead of just 10s.
The same happens if I use new TraceEventSession("TEMPSESSIONNAME", #"c:\temp\TEMPSESSIONNAME.etl", TraceEventSessionOptions.Create) instead.
It seems that the following will cause the file to stop being written to:
using (var tes = new TraceEventSession("TEMPSESSIONNAME"))
{
tes.EnableProvider(ProviderExtensions.ProviderName<MicrosoftWindowsKernelProcess>());
Thread.Sleep(timeToWait);
}
But here I must reenable all the providers and according to the documentation "if the session already existed it is closed and reopened (thus orphans are cleaned up on next use)". I don't understand the last part about orphans. Obviously some events might occur in the time between closing, opening and subscribing on the events. Does this mean I will lose these events or will I get the later?
I also found the following in the documentation of the library:
In real time mode, events are buffered and there is at least a second or so delay (typically 3 sec) between the firing of the event and the reception by the session (to allow events to be delivered in efficient clumps of many events)
Does this make the above code alright (well, unless the improbable happens and for some reason my thread is delayed for more than a second between creating the real-time session and starting processing the events)?
I could close the session and create a new different one but then I think I'd miss some events. Or I could open a new session and then close the file-based one but then I might get duplicate events.
I couldn't find online any examples of moving from a file-based trace to a real-time trace.
I managed to contact the author of TraceEvent and this is the answer I got:
Re the exception of the 'auto-closing and restarting' feature, it is really questions about the OS (TraceEvent simply calls the underlying OS API). Just FYI, the deal about orphans is that it is EASY for your process to exit but leave a session going. This MAY be what you want, but often it is not, and so to make the common case 'just work' if you do Create (which is the default), it will close a session if it already existed (since you asked for a new one).
Experimentation of course is the touchstone of 'truth' but I would frankly expecting unusual combinations to just work is generally NOT true.
My recommendation is to keep it simple. You need to open a new session and close the original one. Yes, you will end up with duplicates, but you CAN filter them out (after all they are IDENTICAL timestamps).
The other possibility is use SetFileName in its intended way (from one file to another). This certainly solves your problem of file size growth, and often is a good way to deal with other scenarios (after all you can start up you processing and start deleting files even as new files are being generated).
When I create a new quote from Epicor I would like to add an item from the parts form automatically.
I am trying to do this using the following ABL code which runs when 'GetNewQuoteHed' is called:
run Update.
run GetNewQuoteDtl.
run ChangePartNumMaster("Rod Tube").
ttQuoteDtl.OrderQty = 5.
run Update.
I am getting the error:
Index -1 is either negative or above rows count.
This error occurs for each line in my ABL code.
What am I doing wrong?
That's not the proper format for a 4GL error message (nor is it at all familiar) so I'd say it is an Epicor application message. Epicor support is probably your best bet. However... Just guessing but it sounds like you might need to somehow initialize the thing that you're updating.
Agree with #Tom, but i would also say try and isolate the error and see where the error is raised as soon as you find the point the error is actually raised it is normally much easier to figure out exactly what is going wrong and how to solve it.
Working between a 0 based and a 1 based system there can be issues with the 1st or last entry depending on which way you moving. As the index for 0 based systems starts at 0 and ends at n-1 where 1 based systems start at 1 and end at n.
I am trying to stream sensor data from the iRobot Create. I get tuple out of range errors when I try
bot.stream_sensors(somenumber) and bot.poll_sensors(somenumbers). Whenever I input bot.sensors, I just get an empty array {}. I have even tried sending bot.sensors while pushing in on the bump sensor, still getting an empty array. I am connected to the bot through the Serial port with a serial-to-usb converter on my side. The only code before trying to get the sensor data is
import openinterface
bot = openinterface.CreateBot(com_port="/dev/ttyUSB0", mode="full")
Does anyone have an idea of how to solve this issue? Everywhere else just uses stream_sensors(6) and it seems to work fine.
P.S. I posted a question similar to this topic not too long ago, but no one responded. Not trying to spam, but now I have a more clear question and what the apparent-problem is so I thought I would try again.
I downloaded openinterface.py from this site: which included some sample programs. I'd suggest you take a step back, try the sample code, try to find other, more sophisticated, sample code and play with that first before moving on to your real code. You may be missing a step somewhere.
I may be a bit late to answer this, but for reference purposes. Directly controlling the iRobot is simplified greatly by using
Pyrobot.