S3 allows you to post directly from browser to S3 bypassing your webserver (http://doc.s3.amazonaws.com/proposals/post.html). How can I upload files to a database in a similar fashion. I don't want to first stage the file in the webserver in a temporary file and then upload from there to the database. Thanks.
If I cannot avoid the webserver, then how do I just use the webserver for streaming and not actually land the file in the webserver before loading to the database.
Thanks.
A handful of DBMSes provide an HTTP connection design, but this is more the exception, not the rule.
That said, you can make the HTTP server a thin layer over a more traditional database, but this is probably a bad idea, because most databases assume that anything that can access them has full privilege to execute queries on them, and an application (read "web server") will act as a gatekeeper between the database and obnoxious or malicious clients.
Basically, You're going to do best using a database engine that does all of these things at a fine grained level, expressly designed for it. MongoDB mostly addresses this exact use case. Otherwise, you'll just have to write an application that sits between HTTP and the raw database connection.
Related
I'm currently planning a REST-style API. The problem I have is that the client will send one or more files, belonging to the same "document", but while the metadata is to be stored in a DB, the files are going to file storage (probably S3, in my case).
The way I see it, there are two ways of doing it:
Send the metadata to the API end-point, which responds with the location for storing the files. And then, in a separate request, store the files directly.
Send metadata and files, in the same request, to the API, which acts as a proxy and takes care of sending the various parts to their final destinations.
The good thing about 1. is that the API server will have less to deal with, so can be smaller, and bandwidth is only paid once (client -> storage). Giving a good UX is, on the other hand, likely to be harder, and there will be more state to keep track of.
With 2. it's easy to ensure the transaction is atomic, since the API server is the sole gatekeeper. However, the server will need to be more powerful, and bandwidth may be paid twice (client -> API -> storage).
So, what's the best way of dealing with this situation, and if going with 1. any problems to look out for?
Assuming you have external clients, I believe that #2 is the better bet. The way to catch and keep clients is to have the best possible UX, with a simple, easy to learn and use interface. As you said, you also get to keep atomic transactions, which will save you plenty of headaches. In my experience, server power is relatively cheap, and you can always send a 202 back to the client instead of a 201.
My app reads data from two sources, a local sqlite file and a remote server which is a clone of the local db but with lots of pictures. I do not write to the server database, but I do need multiple simultaneous fetch operations.
What DBMS should I use for storing information on the server?
It needs to be very easily used from an iPhone app, be reliable, etc.
Talking to a remote server should not be tied to any platform like iOS. If you have control over the remote db server, the best bet IMO is crafting a RESTful API which you express your queries in, the server processes it and sends you the pictures/records using proper content type. If you do NOT have such control over the remote db, you'll have to stick to the API the db hoster provides. There are plenty such "on the cloud" db hosters (including NoSQL solutions) that give you a web-services interface to your db. MongoLabs is one such provider for MongoDB(which is a NOSQL db - meaning no schemas, no bounds on the structure of a "table"). You can continue to stick to SQLite on the client side.
You seem to have two sources of data local storage and a remote server.
This question on SO might help you to decide approaches of storing data on the server.
Once you have downloaded data using something like NSURLConnection class the images could be stored in the filesystem using writeToFile or the likes.
- (BOOL)writeToFile:(NSString *)path atomically:(BOOL)flag method.
You might like to save the rest of the data in sqlite. We used sqlite and the CoreData framework to save data for one of our applications and it worked fine for us. CoreData allowed us to interact with the database without actual SQL queries.
The iPhone client resides on the phone while on the server side we might have a database and a webservice interacting with the db. Webservice itself might be implemented in python or php like scripting language. The client interacts with the webservice that might return data in formats like XML or JSON. Thus there is no direct communication between the client and db. However, the client does implement network communication code to communicate with the webservice.
This page shows how to consume an XML based web service.
I am trying to make the sync data application in which user have some value into the data base .And he have to send this data on to the server .With help http request how can i do that .
I need the
I am not using the php web server .
I am using the Normal HTTP web page .
ANd i have the some data in my iphone application and i want to Synchronization that data to server .
I it must check the Internet is available or not .If the Internet is ON than only he will Synchronization the data .that's my question .
Nothing else .You got my point or not .
I thing people will reply me soon please
Thanks
You have got to have some kind of server backend for synchronization of the local database. You can't do that using just the static HTML pages.
Your application and server have to have a way to talk to each other using a web service protocol, like SOAP or JSON/REST. Then your application has to translate the data from the database into such web service data objects.
Both your local database and the server (in case of more than one client) will have keep the records of at least the times of last synchronizations so both know what should be sent over the air in order to become in sync.
Also, in the usual case of more than one client, you have to solve the problem of conflicts resolution.
Web service versioning is important as well, as there will be very likely a need to improve the communication channel, maybe there will be changes in the database model to be synchronized.
As you can see, the idea of synchronizing local database to a server is not that simple, and if you think you can do it in a simple way, in time you'll realise that you're gradually reimplementing the aforementioned ideas.
Do a research on web service technologies, writing web services-aware apps, on synchronization with web services and on Reachability, for starters.
To check internet availability, check out the Reachability class from Apple. See this article.
To send data to a simple HTTP form via POST use NSURLConnection like in this article.
Cheers,
S
How do I go about doing this?
You shouldn't.
Instead, you should make a web service that securely exposes the data you need.
(Do not write an ExecuteSQL method!)
If you really want to connect directly to SQL Server from an iPhone, you'll need to write a TDS client; it will involve a lot of work.
By exposing the data through a web service, you add a layer of abstraction between the database and the client app, allowing you to change the database without breaking the app.
Also, exposing SQL Server directly to the internet is never a good idea.
Finally, remember that port 1433 might be blocked at a firewall.
I've been talking with someone about the possibility of a iPhone development contract gig. All I really know at this point is that there is a company that wants to make an iPhone app that will hit their internal database. I'm not sure what the database type is( Oracle, MySQL, etc...).
I've wanted to know if the database type was Oracle or MySQL if there is a big learning curve for connecting to one of these across the internet?
If it's a real pain I may do more research before accepting the conract.
I would advise against directly accessing the database from the iPhone application.
Usually, you would create a web service which accesses the database, and then you consume that web service from the iPhone application.
Create a web service. This allows you to make the iphone app more of a thin client. Let the application push commands to the web service for processing and interaction with the database returning only the data needed by the app.
This option is better for the app, the database, and the customer's security.
You can easily perform the connection over the internet, the same way you would locally, but you are opening the database up to attacks if it will accept communication from any remote IP address. Typically you will just connect via a socket open to the server's remote IP address over the open port, MySQL's default port is 3306.
I would recommend against this sort of system in general unless there is some critical reason they want their internal database exposed to the world's hacker community.
What I am doing is creating a web service using Sinatra to access the online database.
Those answers from 2009 are mostly obsolete now.
http://ODBCrouter.com/ipad (new) has XCode client-side ODBC libraries, header files and multi-threaded Objective C objects that let your apps send SQL to server-side ODBC drivers and get back binary results! This reduces the need to stop and separately maintain SOAP/REST servers that can get pretty frightening anyway after a while maintaining it.
The XML schemes were okay for transferring static configurations to mobile devices "every once in a while", but XML was meant for infrequent inter-company type transfers in a "server environment" (with power cords, wired networks and air conditioning) and is definitely not efficient for frequent database queries coming in from n-copies of a mobile app. There are third-party JSON libraries that help things, but even with JSON, everything has to be encoded (and decoded) from the binary representation in the database to text representation on the server (only fine if it's going to be shown to the user in a web browser anyway, but not fine if the mobile app is going to translate it right back into binary so that it can perform calculations "behind the scenes" to what is going on with the user). Aside from the higher network overhead and battery power the mobile CPU will draw with XML and JSON, it will also make you buy more RAM and CPU power on the back-end server faster than just using an ODBC connection to the database.