I am creating a Universal iOs application as part of an assignment (iPad and iPhone :) ).
Naturally, they have a UI which I have been accustomed to create through the NIB files, using the fancy drag and drop schemes. This obviously seems like a great strategy when you are making a dedicated iOS device application.
However, with the universal application, I notice that this strategy can be a challenge since the 2 UIs differ and human error can promote a lack of consistency in the two UI's + double the work!!!
I noticed the solution to the assignment I am doing has the UI created through the AppDelegate file, I have never really done this, and from this stems the questions:
What is the appDelegate files for anyways?
Is it the way to create the UI for the Universal application through the App delegate? Or do you people still create the UI's through the NIB files meticulously for both iPhone and iPad?
P.S: Side question: This assignment requires me to create a Windows based application vs a View based application which is what I have naturally learnt to do. I understand a Windows based App can grow into a view based application and vice versa. However, I do not understand when you should choose to create a Windows based application?
The AppDelegate in Cocoa is your central Singleton that controls the app workflow. It's used by the underlying Framework to start the application, signal runtime envrionment changes and terminate the app. Being a singleton, it's always there and easy to reference ([UIApplication applicationDelegate]) and it loads up your first view controller.
It's generally common to let the application delegate keep refernces to model and controller objects. But what you describe, the whole UI programmed through the appDelegate, is bad style.
No matter if you use NIB's or you code your UI by manually adding UIElements to the view in code, you should do so in ViewController. Generally, the appDelegate will call the first view controller and that viewcontroller will call all view controller afterwards.
Related
I have a question about universal app. My app will not have storyboards or xib file. There is possibility to write universal iPhone/iPad application without it? I found some tutorial how to create universal app with storyboard, but i don't want (i can't) use this feature in my project.
If it is possible What should i do? If i have to made changes only in ViewControllers? I'm start to do this, i'm not changing old project so i can do anythng - what should i learn/what should i remember?
I'm targeting to iOS 5.
EDIT:
I have a screen information in resource file and my rootViewController or any other ViewController will be created in compile time, so i can't have xib file for that, i can't put button on xib with Interface Builder becouse i don't even know how many buttons i will have there. I don't know how many screens i've got till i hit run in my project.
Not only can you write any type of iOS app without Interface Builder, it is actually much more testable and pliable. Some auto layout tricks are difficult (not possible?) in IB style projects, as well.
There is an incredibly impressive library called Masonry that wraps the NSLayoutContraint syntax. This makes it quite pleasurable to subclass views while not having to use ugly VFL or incredibly verbose NSLayoutContraint syntax (not even going to address frame setting...blech!). IB style apps also promote bad software development practices and anti-patterns (just dumping everything in a view controller presentation-wise. No Separation of Concerns!). Also, it is more difficult to work on larger teams (IMHO even small teams) while utilizing Nibs, Xibs, and Storyboards due to merge issues.
On top of all of that, you gain a much deeper understanding of the classes you are working with (UIView, UIResponder, etc.) when writing code in this manner (once again IMHO). There is an interesting article outlining some of these issues in more detail: http://doing-it-wrong.mikeweller.com/2013/06/ios-app-architecture-and-tdd-1.html This is by no means the only article that discusses this problem. Also, this will help for your app delegate: creating a universal window-based iphone app without generated xib file
This is certainly possible, I have only used storyborads once in the many apps I have published. As for not using XIBs, I am not sure why you would want to do that. You can lay out your views at runtime in the init method, but I feel like that is just making things unduly hard on yourself. You can set a XIB up for the iPad and one for the iPhone so you can tailor the UI specifically to each device.
Perhaps if you go into a bit more detail about why you are imposing this requirement on yourself we can discuss if it si worth the effort to go down that road.
Good Luck.
Can someone explain in simple words the difference between .xib and .storyboard?
Apple introduced the concept of "storyboarding" in iOS5 SDK to simplify and better manage screens in your app. You can still use the .xib way of development.
Pre-storyboard, each UIViewController had an associated .xib with it. Storyboard achieves two things:
.storyboard is essentially one single file for all your screens in the app and it shows the flow of the screens. You can add segues/transitions between screens, this way. So, this minimizes the boilerplate code required to manage multiple screens.
Minimizes the overall number of files in an app.
You can avoid using Storyboard while creating a new project by leaving the "Use Storyboard" option unchecked.
You could refer this tutorial to get started.
Yes, you can still create a Window-based application for iOS 5. If you use the "empty project" template, you will see that a window is created for you in the app delegate. From there you can add XIB files as normal, or a new storyboard.
I'm assuming you mean "storyboards" rather than "timeline". Storyboards allow you to map out, visually, all of the views in your applications and how they interrelate. If you are just starting out with storyboards, there's an introduction to storyboards in the WWDC 2011 videos here. The 2011 Stanford iOS course on iTunes-U is also iOS 5-specific and covers storyboards and more.
A storyboard is like a canvas where you put all your .xib files. You no longer have any .xibs, you just have View Controllers directly on your canvas.
storyboard is a new feature available since the release of Xcode 4.2.
It offers a complete new way for iOS developer to create and design
user interface. Before the introduction of Storyboard, it’s especially
hard for beginner to create navigation (and tab) interface. Every
interface is stored in a separate xib file. On top of it, you have to
write code to link all interfaces together and describe how the
navigation works.
With Storyboards, all screens are stored in a single file. This gives
you a conceptual overview of the visual representation for the app and
shows you how the screens are connected. Xcode provides a built-in
editor to layout the Storyboards. You can define the transition (known
as segues) between various screens simply using point and click. This
doesn’t mean you do not need to write code for the user interface. But
Storyboards significantly reduce the amount of code you need to write.
Source: http://www.appcoda.com/use-storyboards-to-build-navigation-controller-and-table-view/
XIB:
Xib files are used with a single UIView.
2)It's very difficult to implement complex auto-layouts in xib.
3)It's utilizes more memory as compared to storyboard and quiet slow.
It is compatible from iOS5 and onwards
You can do localizations for different languages and countries using
different XIBs .
It's difficult to use same Xib to support multiple devices.
Storyboard
1)You can layout all your Scenes like View Controllers, Nav Controllers, TabBar Controllers, etc in a single storyboard.
2)You can use Auto Layout easily that defines mathematical relationships between elements defining their position and sizing.
3)Usually fast and allocates less memory.
4)It's not compatible prior to iOS 5 .
5)"Dynamic" and "Prototype" cells can be used easily.
6)Storyboards best to use for the apps with a small to medium amount of screens.
The best Answer I have seen : Xib Vs Storyboard in iOS
XIB and Storyboard are used for creating interfaces for users.
One important point is,xibs are used for creating a single view(it has single file owner at the top of the xib file), but in-case for viewcontroller, multiple screens can be added and its flow can also be monitored(it has separate file owners).
I'm new to iphone development. There's a lot of books on this topic available. But most of the beginner's guides are mostly concerned with Interface Builder usage and lack the information about existing built in XCode code templates or something that could help me in understanding MVC implementation in code. I found that it is possible to write working iOS program without ViewController at all. Well, it seems to me like that after working with the sample code called ViewTransitions.
So, the question is - why is that possible to avoid ViewController implementation in a program that has an interface with a button? If the answer is going to be too long, could you please recommend kind of tutorial or manual covering this topic.
Thanks in advance.
#user697562's answer is essentially correct: in the case of ViewTransitions, the role of the controller is played by the app delegate. The app does next to nothing -- it just switches betweeen two views to demonstrate several possible transition effects -- so a UIViewController isn't really needed there.
Notice that there's also nothing in ViewTransitions that you could really call a model object. If you're looking for a strong example of MVC, ViewTransitions isn't the best project to look at. Other sample projects, such as TheElements, give a better demonstration of MVC in action.
There is a concept called delegation. A concept which helps maintain MVC. It helps to keep the model separate from controllers. For eg: - UITableView/UICollectionView , which knows how to display the data and other ui stuff.
But it does not know which cell to display or what data to display at a particular index. And this is where delegation and the delegate object comes into place. UICollectionView handles all the view part whereas all the non view part is handled by the delgate object, which gives the required data for the view. This way a delegate(usually a separate view controller) acts as a data source and UICollectionView as a ui renderer.
in ViewTransitions, there IS an App Delegate, which is kind of your sole "controller". Even ViewTransitions has:
transition.delegate = self;
IOS is a bit different from some frameworks in that you aren't as "in control" of what is going on. It often uses a delegation model where you set your code as the delegate, but it (IOS) is in control. Still, you can write in MVC style, it's just your "C" isn't fully in charge.
This is Cocoa Touch (et al), iPhone, XCode only.
After completing my first commercial iPhone app, I'm struggling a bit to find a way to start and expand an app from scratch which gives the most linear development (i.e., the least scrapping, re-write or re-organization of code, classes and resources) as app specs change and I learn more (mostly about what Cocoa Touch and other classes and components are designed to be capable of and the limitation of their customization).
So. File, New Project. Blank window based app? Create the controllers I need, with .xib if necessary, so I can localize them and do changes requested by the customer in IB? And then always subclass each class except those extremely unlikely to be customized? (I mean framework classes such as UIButton, CLLocation etc here.)
The question is a generic 'approach' type question, so I'll be happy to listen to handy dev practices you've found paid off. Do you have any tips for which 're-usable components' you've found have become very useful in subsequent projects?
Clients often describe programs in terms of 'first, this screen appears, and then you can click this button and on the new screen you can select... (and so on)' terms. Are there any good guides to go from there to vital early-stage app construction choices, i.e. 'functions-features-visuals description to open-ended-app-architecture'?
For example, in my app I went from NavBar, to Toolbar with items, to Toolbar with two custom subviews in order to accommodate the functions-features-visuals description. Maybe you have also done such a thing and have some advice to offer?
I'm also looking for open-ended approaches to sharing large ("loaded data") objects, or even simple booleans, between controllers and invoking methods in another controller, specifically starting processes such as animation and loading (example: trigger a load from a URL in the second tab viewcontroller after making sure an animation has been started in the first tab viewcontroller), as these two features apply to the app architecture building approach you advocate.
Any handy pointers appreciated. Thanks guys.
Closing this up as there's no single correct answer and was more suitable for the other forum, had I known it existed when I asked :)
If you want to know the method I ended up with, it's basically this:
Window-based blank app
Navigation Controller controls all, whether I need to or not (hide when not used)
Tab Bar Controller if necessary
Connect everything <-- unhelpful, I know.
Set up and check autorotation, it might get added to some view later.
Add one viewcontroller with xib for each view, you never know when they want an extra button somewhere. It's easier to copy code than make the max ultra superdynamic adjustable tableviewcontroller that does all list-navigation, etc.
Re-use a viewcontroller only when just the content differs in it, such as a detail viewcontroller.
Minimize code in each viewcontroller by writing functions and methods and shove them in a shared .m
Everything that's shared ends up in the App delegate, except subclassed stuff.
Modal viewcontrollers are always dynamically created and never have an xib.
I'm new to xcode and the iphone sdk. I've been working with the view-based application for quite a while, and I was wondering if a utility application and a view based application involved the same type of coding. Can someone point out the difference for me?
Thanks
The both use the same frameworks, the only difference is how they are set up by default. The unity template provides a two view application (by default) and the view based only one.
It seems that Utility application in Cocoa-Touch is just a simple application template for application with 2 views.
This is apparently good for simple apps which have primary screen and configuration screen.
Have a look at Understanding view controllers in Cocoa Touch which has some explanation.
It depends from what point you looking at differences. You still use cocoa-touch for your application. The difference is that simple view based application is a simple template for one screen application, you can extend it as you like. Utility application is simple template for an application with 2 views but you can extend it as you like.