I have the following scenario:
Users send email messages to the special mail addresses (each address is associated with a user).
When the message arrives to the server I need to extract a certain information from the message body and store it in the database.
I am looking for a mail server (or client) that matches following conditions:
Free/open-source
Users/inboxes can be created/deleted via some API on the fly
Works in unix/mac environment (Ubuntu/MacOS X in my case)
Allows me to set up hooks on message queue (via API or receive the data via some I/O channel)
Has good performance and/or scalability potential
Does not have a dependency on Java or other heavy framework.
Note that I do not need a full-fledged mail server i.e. all I need is messages processing.
Finally, I decided to use http://mailgun.net/ service which provides exactly what I need
Related
I'm wondering how (official) GTalk clients manage to show all messages received - even if it was originally consumed by another client. For example: I'm logged into GTalk on gmail.com on my laptop and, at the same time, via the official GTalk app on my Android device. A friend sends me a message, which is displayed on both the gmail.com client and the Android client. (I think it's originally only forwarded to one of either clients, but the second client fetches the message later on)
I recently found out that there's a very similar XMPP feature, called Carbons. However, after a quick service discovery request Google's servers didn't advertise this feature. XEP-0313 and XEP-0136 look good too, but the servers don't advertise them either.
Possibly related question: Deliver Google Talk message to all logged in clients using XMPPPY
When you initiate a new chat then you should send the first message to the users bare Jid. This is what most clients are doing. When the GTalk server retrieves a chat message to a bare Jid it routes the message to all available resources. For all following messages in this conversation the clients normally pick up the Resource and send them to full Jids. The messages should not be replicated then.
Many other servers don't route message to bare Jids to all resources, but to the most available resource which is the client with the highest priority.
Here is a quote form the RFC:
If there is more than one resource with a non-negative presence priority then the
server MUST either
(a) deliver the message to the "most available" resource or
resources (according to the server's implementation-specific algorithm, e.g., treating
the resource or resources with the highest presence priority as "most available") or
(b) deliver the message to all of the non-negative resources.
XEP-0280 defines this. As I understand, it defines the mechanism to notify all the resources from same user when one of them sends a message to anyone. I mean, Alice/pda sends a message to Bob, so Alice/mobile and Alice/PC will receive a copy of the message sent be Alice/pda.
Hope it helps. I am currently looking for a server that implements this, and also for a client library. If not, I will implement it by myself in both jabberd2 and gloox xmpp library.
Cheers,
I am working with Perl and using Net::POP3...
My code is able to get all the mails however I could not find any method in the documentation that can distinguish between read and unread messages.
IMAP does that, so I wanted to know if the same applies to POP3?
PS:: ping() method in Net::POP3 is not listed as capability of Net::POP3
With POP3 it is not possible to distinguish between read or unread. It can only fetch and delete messages. All messages that have not been fetched by the client (which remembers that itself) are regarded as not new by the client if it fetches new messages. The server doesn't care about the state of a message. It just gives you all the messages it has.
From Wikipedia:
POP supports simple download-and-delete requirements for access to
remote mailboxes (termed maildrop in the POP RFC's).[3] Although most
POP clients have an option to leave mail on server after download,
e-mail clients using POP generally connect, retrieve all messages,
store them on the user's PC as new messages, delete them from the
server, and then disconnect. Other protocols, notably IMAP, (Internet
Message Access Protocol) provide more complete and complex remote
access to typical mailbox operations.
Let's suppose I have created an IMAP client and I want to create a filter that, say, deletes messages that have certain characteristics.
I can make this a startup task that happens whenever the client is opened, but the problen is that a user might view the inbox in a different client and the filter won't get rid of the unwanted messages before the inbox is viewed.
Is there some way to tell the server to call my service every time it receives a message so the unwanted messages can go away once the server receives them instead of once a client is opened? Is this even possible with IMAP? If not, is there a different well supported e-mail technology that allows this sort of interaction?
You can do server-side email filtering with the Sieve Email Filtering Language and the ManageSieve Protocol. There is good support in open-source software. However, I am only aware of a few major email providers, that support it. If it is supported, it is usually accessible on the IMAP host and with the IMAP account credentials, i.e. you can test it by connecting to TCP port 2000 and 4190.
See the following three links for more information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_%28mail_filtering_language%29
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5228 (Sieve: An Email Filtering Language)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5804 (ManageSieve Protocol)
Sieve also supports a few notifications types. If the filtering language is not powerful enough to for your purposes, you can send notifications for all incoming emails, wake up the IMAP client, and let the client to the filtering.
I am basically writing a XMPP client to automatically reply to "specific" chat messages.
My setup is like this:
I have pidgin running on my machine configured to run with an account x#xyz.com.
I have my own jabber client configured to run with the same account x#xyz.com.
There could be other XMPP clients .
Here is my requirement:
I am trying to automate certain kind of messages that I receive on gtalk. So whenever I receive a specific message eg: "How are you" , my own XMPP client should reply automatically with say "fine". How are you". All messages sent (before and after my client replies) to x#xyz.com but should be received by all clients (my own client does not have a UI and can only respond to specific messages.).
Now I have already coded my client to reply automatically. This works fine. But the problem I am facing is that as soon as I reply (I use the smack library), all subsequent messages that are sent to x#xyz.com are received only by my XMPP client. This is obviously a problem as my own client is quite dump and does not have a UI, so I don't get to see the rest of the messages sent to me, thereby making me "lose" messages.
I have observed the same behavior with other XMPP clients as well. Now the question is, is this is a requirement of XMPP (I am sorry but I haven't read XMPP protocol too well). Is it possible to code an XMPP client to send a reply to a user and still be able to receive all subsequent messages in all clients currently listening for messages? Making my client a full fledged XMPP client is a solution, but I don't want to go that route.
I hope my question is clear.
You may have to set a negative presence priority for your bot..
First thing to know is that in XMPP protocol every client is supposed to have a full JID. This is a bare JID - in your case x#xyz.com with a resource in the end e.g. x#xyz.com/pidgin or x#xyz.com/home (where /pidgin and /home are the resource). This is a part of how routing messages to different clients is supposed to be achieved.
Then there are the presence stanzas. When going online a client usually sends a presence stanza to the server. This informs about e.g. if the client is available for chat or away for lunch. Along with this information can be sent a priority. When there are more than one clients connected the one with the highest priority will receive the messages sent to the bare JID (e.g. ClientA(prio=50) and ClientB(prio=60) -> ClientB receives the messages sent to x#xyz.com). But there are also negative priorities. A priority less than 0 states that this client should never be sent any messages. Such a stanza might look like this
<presence from="x#xyz.com/bot">
<priority>-1</priority>
</presence>
This may fit your case. Please keep in mind it also depends on the XMPP server where your account is located, which may or may have not fully implemented this part of the protocol.
So to summarize: I recommend you to look through the Smack API how to set a presence and set the priority to <0 for your bot client right after it connected.
I am trying to have a kind of observer pattern in ColdFusion
We want to listen to the incoming Email messages and act on them. Scenario is something like this :
Application sends email to the helpdesk system
Helpdesk system automatically generates a ticket and responds with an email to the email address of the application
The application's email is configured in the Lotus notes
Now the application should listen to this incoming email message, decode that and update the coressponding ticketid
I see there is a possibility with Event Gateways, but I am unable to realize the whole picture.
Thoughts or suggestions?
One way is to setup an email server with IMAP support, and use some sort of polling (every minute, good enough?) in CF using <cfimap> to get the emails.
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/9.0/CFMLRef/WS371453EC-36D5-44ce-BF1E-750E3016BBD6.html
We have a system like this.
We have a postfix server configured to handle mail for a domain. A small script (Perl) on the postfix server places each email on an ActiveMQ queue.
We have a cluster of CF boxes with the ActiveMQ event gateway listener that takes the messages off the queue and processes them using Java Mail.
The delay between postfix receiving the email and a CF server processing it is generally under 1s.
We needed to do it this way for a number of reasons, processing delay being one of them, dealing with a large cluster of CF which made the POP/IMAP solution complicated, and CF's mail handling not being quite what we wanted were others.
It works great.
I've created similar applications in the past using cfpop to interogate a mailbox on a scheduled basis.
It was pretty easy to write, but usually gets thrown for a loop when "users" start being "helpful" with the email content.
The other thing is that this isn't instantaneous, but is the process really time critical to the second?