I'm trying to come up with a sed script to take all lines containing a pattern and move them to the end of the output. This is an exercise in learning hold vs pattern space and I'm struggling to come up with it (though I feel close).
I'm here:
$ echo -e "hi\nfoo1\nbar\nsomething\nfoo2\nyo" | sed -E '/foo/H; //d; $G'
hi
bar
something
yo
foo1
foo2
But I want the output to be:
hi
bar
something
yo
foo1
foo2
I understand why this is happening. It is because the first time we find foo the hold space is empty so the H appends \n to the blank hold space and then the first foo, which I suppose is fine. But then the $G does it again, namely another append which appends \n plus what is in the hold space to the pattern space.
I tried a final delete command with /^$/d but that didn't remove the blank line (I think this is because this pattern is being matched not against the last line, but against the, now, multiline pattern space which has a \n\n in it.
I'm sure the sed gurus have a fix for me.
This might work for you (GNU sed):
sed '/foo/H;//!p;$!d;x;//s/.//p;d' file
If the line contains the required string append it to the hold space (HS) otherwise print it as normal. If it is not the last line delete it otherwise swap the HS for the pattern space (PS). If the required string(s) is now in the PS (what was the HS); since all such patterns were appended, the first character will be a newline, delete the first character and print. Delete whatever is left.
An alternative, using the -n flag:
sed -n '/foo/H;//!p;$!b;x;//s/.//p' file
N.B. When the d or b (without a parameter) command is performed no further sed commands are, a new line is read into the PS and the sed script begins with the first command i.e. the sed commands do not resume following the previous d command.
Why? Stuff like this is absolutely trivial in awk, awk is available everywhere that sed is, and the resulting awk script will be simpler, more portable, faster and better in almost every other way than a sed script to do the same task. All that hold space stuff was necessary in sed before the mid-1970s when awk was invented but there's absolutely no use for it now other than as a mental exercise.
$ echo -e "hi\nfoo1\nbar\nsomething\nfoo2\nyo" |
awk '/foo/{buf = buf $0 RS;next} {print} END{printf "%s",buf}'
hi
bar
something
yo
foo1
foo2
The above will work as-is in every awk on every UNIX installation and I bet you can figure out how it works very easily.
This feels like a hack and I think it should be possible to handle this situation more gracefully. The following works on GNU sed:
echo -e "hi\nfoo1\nbar\nsomething\nfoo2\nyo" | sed -r '/foo/{H;d;}; $G; s/\n\n/\n/g'
However, on OSX/BSD sed, results in this odd output:
hi
bar
something
yonfoo1
foo2
Note the 2 consecutive newlines was replaced with the literal character n
The OSX/BSD vs GNU sed is explained in this article. And the following works (in GNU SED as well):
echo -e "hi\nfoo1\nbar\nsomething\nfoo2\nyo" | sed '/foo/{H;d;}; $G; s/\n\n/\'$'\n''/'
TL;DR; in BSD sed, it does not accept escaped characters in the RHS of the replacement expression and so you either have to put a true LF/newline in there at the command line, or do the above where you split the sed script string where you need the newline on the RHS and put a dollar sign in front of '\n' so the shell interprets it as a line feed.
I'm very much a junior when it comes to the sed command, and my Bruce Barnett guide sits right next to me, but one thing has been troubling me. With a file, can you filter it using sed to select only specific items? For example, in the following file:
alpha|november
bravo|october
charlie|papa
alpha|quebec
bravo|romeo
charlie|sahara
Would it be possible to set a command to return only the bravos, like:
bravo|october
bravo|romeo
With sed:
sed '/^bravo|/!d' filename
Alternatively, with grep (because it's sort of made for this stuff):
grep '^bravo|' filename
or with awk, which works nicely for tabular data,
awk -F '|' '$1 == "bravo"' filename
The first two use a regular expression, selecting those lines that match it. In ^bravo|, ^ matches the beginning of the line and bravo| the literal string bravo|, so this selects all lines that begin with bravo|.
The awk way splits the line across the field separator | and selects those lines whose first field is bravo.
You could also use a regex with awk:
awk '/^bravo|/' filename
...but I don't think this plays to awk's strengths in this case.
Another solution with sed:
sed -n '/^bravo|/p' filename
-n option => no printing by default.
If line begins with bravo|, print it (p)
2 way (at least) with sed
removing unwanted line
sed '/^bravo\|/ !d' YourFile
Printing only wanted lines
sed -n '/^bravo\|/ p' YourFile
if no other constraint or action occur, both are the same and a grep is better.
If there will be some action after, it could change the performance where a d cycle directly to the next line and a p will print then continue the following action.
Note the escape of pipe is needed for GNU sed, not on posix version
I want to match some text including line feeds. The command below almost works, but it does not match the first line
(echo foo; echo foo; echo bar) | sed '1!N; s/foo.*bar/zap\nbaz/'
foo
zap
baz
Same problem here:
(echo foo; echo bar; echo bar) | sed '1!N; s/foo.*bar/zap\nbaz/'
foo
bar
bar
I have found a much more complex sed command which works correctly in both cases but I would rather fix the simple one (if possible), or at least understand why it does not work.
(echo foo; echo bar; echo bar) | sed -n '1h;1!H;${g;s/foo.*bar/zap\nbaz/p}'
zap
baz
sed is very simply just not the right tool for anything involving multiple lines because it is line-oriented and as such is designed to handle one line at a time. All of sed's language constructs for handling multi-line input became obsolete in the mid-1970s when awk was invented because awk is record-oriented instead of line-oriented and so trivially handles newlines within records just like any other character. For example:
$ (echo foo; echo bar; echo bar) |
awk -v RS= '{sub(/foo.*bar/,"zap\nbaz"); print}'
zap
baz
Any time you find yourself using more than s, g, and p (with -n) in sed or talking about "spaces" you have the wrong approach.
Your simple approach can hold at most two lines of the text in the pattern space at once, so it can't match a three-line pattern.
In particular:
(echo foo; echo foo; echo bar) | sed '1!N; s/foo.*bar/zap\nbaz/'
foo
zap
baz
It reads the first line (foo), finds no match, and prints foo. Then it reads the second (foo), appends the next (bar), finds a match and performs the replacement, and prints zap\nbaz.
In the second run:
(echo foo; echo bar; echo bar) | sed '1!N; s/foo.*bar/zap\nbaz/'
foo
bar
bar
It reads the first line (foo), finds no match, and prints foo. Then it reads the second (bar), appends the next (bar), finds no match and prints bar\nbar.
Here's a workaround
sed 's/$/\\n/' | tr -d '\n' | sed 's/foo.*bar/zap\\nbar/g' | sed 's/\\n/\n/g'
This might work for you (GNU sed):
sed '/foo/{:a;N;/foo.*bar/!ba;s//zap\nbaz/}' file
If the current line contains foo then append a newline and the next line and look for foo followed by bar (any number of characters apart including newlines). If this pattern is found replace it by zap\nbaz and print out the result. If not loop back to :a and repeat until it is found or the end-of-file (in which case the entire string in the pattern space will be printed out without any changes).
N.B. the N command will not allow you to read pass the end-of-file and will bail out it you try. The command s//zap\nbaz/ substitutes the current regexp with zap\nbaz where the current regexp is the last /.../ in this case /foo.*baz/.
An alternative without braces:
sed '/foo/!b;:a;N;/foo.*bar/!ba;s//zap\nbaz/' file
How can I replace a newline ("\n") with a space ("") using the sed command?
I unsuccessfully tried:
sed 's#\n# #g' file
sed 's#^$# #g' file
How do I fix it?
sed is intended to be used on line-based input. Although it can do what you need.
A better option here is to use the tr command as follows:
tr '\n' ' ' < input_filename
or remove the newline characters entirely:
tr -d '\n' < input.txt > output.txt
or if you have the GNU version (with its long options)
tr --delete '\n' < input.txt > output.txt
Use this solution with GNU sed:
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g' file
This will read the whole file in a loop (':a;N;$!ba), then replaces the newline(s) with a space (s/\n/ /g). Additional substitutions can be simply appended if needed.
Explanation:
sed starts by reading the first line excluding the newline into the pattern space.
Create a label via :a.
Append a newline and next line to the pattern space via N.
If we are before the last line, branch to the created label $!ba ($! means not to do it on the last line. This is necessary to avoid executing N again, which would terminate the script if there is no more input!).
Finally the substitution replaces every newline with a space on the pattern space (which is the whole file).
Here is cross-platform compatible syntax which works with BSD and OS X's sed (as per #Benjie comment):
sed -e ':a' -e 'N' -e '$!ba' -e 's/\n/ /g' file
As you can see, using sed for this otherwise simple problem is problematic. For a simpler and adequate solution see this answer.
Fast answer
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g' file
:a create a label 'a'
N append the next line to the pattern space
$! if not the last line, ba branch (go to) label 'a'
s substitute, /\n/ regex for new line, / / by a space, /g global match (as many times as it can)
sed will loop through step 1 to 3 until it reach the last line, getting all lines fit in the pattern space where sed will substitute all \n characters
Alternatives
All alternatives, unlike sed will not need to reach the last line to begin the process
with bash, slow
while read line; do printf "%s" "$line "; done < file
with perl, sed-like speed
perl -p -e 's/\n/ /' file
with tr, faster than sed, can replace by one character only
tr '\n' ' ' < file
with paste, tr-like speed, can replace by one character only
paste -s -d ' ' file
with awk, tr-like speed
awk 1 ORS=' ' file
Other alternative like "echo $(< file)" is slow, works only on small files and needs to process the whole file to begin the process.
Long answer from the sed FAQ 5.10
5.10. Why can't I match or delete a newline using the \n escape
sequence? Why can't I match 2 or more lines using \n?
The \n will never match the newline at the end-of-line because the
newline is always stripped off before the line is placed into the
pattern space. To get 2 or more lines into the pattern space, use
the 'N' command or something similar (such as 'H;...;g;').
Sed works like this: sed reads one line at a time, chops off the
terminating newline, puts what is left into the pattern space where
the sed script can address or change it, and when the pattern space
is printed, appends a newline to stdout (or to a file). If the
pattern space is entirely or partially deleted with 'd' or 'D', the
newline is not added in such cases. Thus, scripts like
sed 's/\n//' file # to delete newlines from each line
sed 's/\n/foo\n/' file # to add a word to the end of each line
will NEVER work, because the trailing newline is removed before
the line is put into the pattern space. To perform the above tasks,
use one of these scripts instead:
tr -d '\n' < file # use tr to delete newlines
sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n//g' file # GNU sed to delete newlines
sed 's/$/ foo/' file # add "foo" to end of each line
Since versions of sed other than GNU sed have limits to the size of
the pattern buffer, the Unix 'tr' utility is to be preferred here.
If the last line of the file contains a newline, GNU sed will add
that newline to the output but delete all others, whereas tr will
delete all newlines.
To match a block of two or more lines, there are 3 basic choices:
(1) use the 'N' command to add the Next line to the pattern space;
(2) use the 'H' command at least twice to append the current line
to the Hold space, and then retrieve the lines from the hold space
with x, g, or G; or (3) use address ranges (see section 3.3, above)
to match lines between two specified addresses.
Choices (1) and (2) will put an \n into the pattern space, where it
can be addressed as desired ('s/ABC\nXYZ/alphabet/g'). One example
of using 'N' to delete a block of lines appears in section 4.13
("How do I delete a block of specific consecutive lines?"). This
example can be modified by changing the delete command to something
else, like 'p' (print), 'i' (insert), 'c' (change), 'a' (append),
or 's' (substitute).
Choice (3) will not put an \n into the pattern space, but it does
match a block of consecutive lines, so it may be that you don't
even need the \n to find what you're looking for. Since GNU sed
version 3.02.80 now supports this syntax:
sed '/start/,+4d' # to delete "start" plus the next 4 lines,
in addition to the traditional '/from here/,/to there/{...}' range
addresses, it may be possible to avoid the use of \n entirely.
A shorter awk alternative:
awk 1 ORS=' '
Explanation
An awk program is built up of rules which consist of conditional code-blocks, i.e.:
condition { code-block }
If the code-block is omitted, the default is used: { print $0 }. Thus, the 1 is interpreted as a true condition and print $0 is executed for each line.
When awk reads the input it splits it into records based on the value of RS (Record Separator), which by default is a newline, thus awk will by default parse the input line-wise. The splitting also involves stripping off RS from the input record.
Now, when printing a record, ORS (Output Record Separator) is appended to it, default is again a newline. So by changing ORS to a space all newlines are changed to spaces.
GNU sed has an option, -z, for null-separated records (lines). You can just call:
sed -z 's/\n/ /g'
The Perl version works the way you expected.
perl -i -p -e 's/\n//' file
As pointed out in the comments, it's worth noting that this edits in place. -i.bak will give you a backup of the original file before the replacement in case your regular expression isn't as smart as you thought.
Who needs sed? Here is the bash way:
cat test.txt | while read line; do echo -n "$line "; done
In order to replace all newlines with spaces using awk, without reading the whole file into memory:
awk '{printf "%s ", $0}' inputfile
If you want a final newline:
awk '{printf "%s ", $0} END {printf "\n"}' inputfile
You can use a character other than space:
awk '{printf "%s|", $0} END {printf "\n"}' inputfile
tr '\n' ' '
is the command.
Simple and easy to use.
Three things.
tr (or cat, etc.) is absolutely not needed. (GNU) sed and (GNU) awk, when combined, can do 99.9% of any text processing you need.
stream != line based. ed is a line-based editor. sed is not. See sed lecture for more information on the difference. Most people confuse sed to be line-based because it is, by default, not very greedy in its pattern matching for SIMPLE matches - for instance, when doing pattern searching and replacing by one or two characters, it by default only replaces on the first match it finds (unless specified otherwise by the global command). There would not even be a global command if it were line-based rather than STREAM-based, because it would evaluate only lines at a time. Try running ed; you'll notice the difference. ed is pretty useful if you want to iterate over specific lines (such as in a for-loop), but most of the times you'll just want sed.
That being said,
sed -e '{:q;N;s/\n/ /g;t q}' file
works just fine in GNU sed version 4.2.1. The above command will replace all newlines with spaces. It's ugly and a bit cumbersome to type in, but it works just fine. The {}'s can be left out, as they're only included for sanity reasons.
Why didn't I find a simple solution with awk?
awk '{printf $0}' file
printf will print the every line without newlines, if you want to separate the original lines with a space or other:
awk '{printf $0 " "}' file
The answer with the :a label ...
How can I replace a newline (\n) using sed?
... does not work in freebsd 7.2 on the command line:
( echo foo ; echo bar ) | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g'
sed: 1: ":a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g": unused label 'a;N;$!ba;s/\n/ /g'
foo
bar
But does if you put the sed script in a file or use -e to "build" the sed script...
> (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -e :a -e N -e '$!ba' -e 's/\n/ /g'
foo bar
or ...
> cat > x.sed << eof
:a
N
$!ba
s/\n/ /g
eof
> (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -f x.sed
foo bar
Maybe the sed in OS X is similar.
Easy-to-understand Solution
I had this problem. The kicker was that I needed the solution to work on BSD's (Mac OS X) and GNU's (Linux and Cygwin) sed and tr:
$ echo 'foo
bar
baz
foo2
bar2
baz2' \
| tr '\n' '\000' \
| sed 's:\x00\x00.*:\n:g' \
| tr '\000' '\n'
Output:
foo
bar
baz
(has trailing newline)
It works on Linux, OS X, and BSD - even without UTF-8 support or with a crappy terminal.
Use tr to swap the newline with another character.
NULL (\000 or \x00) is nice because it doesn't need UTF-8 support and it's not likely to be used.
Use sed to match the NULL
Use tr to swap back extra newlines if you need them
You can use xargs:
seq 10 | xargs
or
seq 10 | xargs echo -n
cat file | xargs
for the sake of completeness
If you are unfortunate enough to have to deal with Windows line endings, you need to remove the \r and the \n:
tr '\r\n' ' ' < $input > $output
I'm not an expert, but I guess in sed you'd first need to append the next line into the pattern space, bij using "N". From the section "Multiline Pattern Space" in "Advanced sed Commands" of the book sed & awk (Dale Dougherty and Arnold Robbins; O'Reilly 1997; page 107 in the preview):
The multiline Next (N) command creates a multiline pattern space by reading a new line of input and appending it to the contents of the pattern space. The original contents of pattern space and the new input line are separated by a newline. The embedded newline character can be matched in patterns by the escape sequence "\n". In a multiline pattern space, the metacharacter "^" matches the very first character of the pattern space, and not the character(s) following any embedded newline(s). Similarly, "$" matches only the final newline in the pattern space, and not any embedded newline(s). After the Next command is executed, control is then passed to subsequent commands in the script.
From man sed:
[2addr]N
Append the next line of input to the pattern space, using an embedded newline character to separate the appended material from the original contents. Note that the current line number changes.
I've used this to search (multiple) badly formatted log files, in which the search string may be found on an "orphaned" next line.
In response to the "tr" solution above, on Windows (probably using the Gnuwin32 version of tr), the proposed solution:
tr '\n' ' ' < input
was not working for me, it'd either error or actually replace the \n w/ '' for some reason.
Using another feature of tr, the "delete" option -d did work though:
tr -d '\n' < input
or '\r\n' instead of '\n'
I used a hybrid approach to get around the newline thing by using tr to replace newlines with tabs, then replacing tabs with whatever I want. In this case, " " since I'm trying to generate HTML breaks.
echo -e "a\nb\nc\n" |tr '\n' '\t' | sed 's/\t/ <br> /g'`
You can also use this method:
sed 'x;G;1!h;s/\n/ /g;$!d'
Explanation
x - which is used to exchange the data from both space (pattern and hold).
G - which is used to append the data from hold space to pattern space.
h - which is used to copy the pattern space to hold space.
1!h - During first line won't copy pattern space to hold space due to \n is
available in pattern space.
$!d - Clear the pattern space every time before getting the next line until the
the last line.
Flow
When the first line get from the input, an exchange is made, so 1 goes to hold space and \n comes to pattern space, appending the hold space to pattern space, and a substitution is performed and deletes the pattern space.
During the second line, an exchange is made, 2 goes to hold space and 1 comes to the pattern space, G append the hold space into the pattern space, h copy the pattern to it, the substitution is made and deleted. This operation is continued until EOF is reached and prints the exact result.
Bullet-proof solution. Binary-data-safe and POSIX-compliant, but slow.
POSIX sed
requires input according to the
POSIX text file
and
POSIX line
definitions, so NULL-bytes and too long lines are not allowed and each line must end with a newline (including the last line). This makes it hard to use sed for processing arbitrary input data.
The following solution avoids sed and instead converts the input bytes to octal codes and then to bytes again, but intercepts octal code 012 (newline) and outputs the replacement string in place of it. As far as I can tell the solution is POSIX-compliant, so it should work on a wide variety of platforms.
od -A n -t o1 -v | tr ' \t' '\n\n' | grep . |
while read x; do [ "0$x" -eq 012 ] && printf '<br>\n' || printf "\\$x"; done
POSIX reference documentation:
sh,
shell command language,
od,
tr,
grep,
read,
[,
printf.
Both read, [, and printf are built-ins in at least bash, but that is probably not guaranteed by POSIX, so on some platforms it could be that each input byte will start one or more new processes, which will slow things down. Even in bash this solution only reaches about 50 kB/s, so it's not suited for large files.
Tested on Ubuntu (bash, dash, and busybox), FreeBSD, and OpenBSD.
In some situations maybe you can change RS to some other string or character. This way, \n is available for sub/gsub:
$ gawk 'BEGIN {RS="dn" } {gsub("\n"," ") ;print $0 }' file
The power of shell scripting is that if you do not know how to do it in one way you can do it in another way. And many times you have more things to take into account than make a complex solution on a simple problem.
Regarding the thing that gawk is slow... and reads the file into memory, I do not know this, but to me gawk seems to work with one line at the time and is very very fast (not that fast as some of the others, but the time to write and test also counts).
I process MB and even GB of data, and the only limit I found is line size.
Finds and replaces using allowing \n
sed -ie -z 's/Marker\n/# Marker Comment\nMarker\n/g' myfile.txt
Marker
Becomes
# Marker Comment
Marker
You could use xargs — it will replace \n with a space by default.
However, it would have problems if your input has any case of an unterminated quote, e.g. if the quote signs on a given line don't match.
On Mac OS X (using FreeBSD sed):
# replace each newline with a space
printf "a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf" | sed -E -e :a -e '$!N; s/\n/ /g; ta'
printf "a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf" | sed -E -e :a -e '$!N; s/\n/ /g' -e ta
To remove empty lines:
sed -n "s/^$//;t;p;"
Using Awk:
awk "BEGIN { o=\"\" } { o=o \" \" \$0 } END { print o; }"
A solution I particularly like is to append all the file in the hold space and replace all newlines at the end of file:
$ (echo foo; echo bar) | sed -n 'H;${x;s/\n//g;p;}'
foobar
However, someone said me the hold space can be finite in some sed implementations.
Replace newlines with any string, and replace the last newline too
The pure tr solutions can only replace with a single character, and the pure sed solutions don't replace the last newline of the input. The following solution fixes these problems, and seems to be safe for binary data (even with a UTF-8 locale):
printf '1\n2\n3\n' |
sed 's/%/%p/g;s/#/%a/g' | tr '\n' # | sed 's/#/<br>/g;s/%a/#/g;s/%p/%/g'
Result:
1<br>2<br>3<br>
It is sed that introduces the new-lines after "normal" substitution. First, it trims the new-line char, then it processes according to your instructions, then it introduces a new-line.
Using sed you can replace "the end" of a line (not the new-line char) after being trimmed, with a string of your choice, for each input line; but, sed will output different lines. For example, suppose you wanted to replace the "end of line" with "===" (more general than a replacing with a single space):
PROMPT~$ cat <<EOF |sed 's/$/===/g'
first line
second line
3rd line
EOF
first line===
second line===
3rd line===
PROMPT~$
To replace the new-line char with the string, you can, inefficiently though, use tr , as pointed before, to replace the newline-chars with a "special char" and then use sed to replace that special char with the string you want.
For example:
PROMPT~$ cat <<EOF | tr '\n' $'\x01'|sed -e 's/\x01/===/g'
first line
second line
3rd line
EOF
first line===second line===3rd line===PROMPT~$