I was writing some Perl code in vim and accidentally typed a single quote character in a variable name and noticed that it highlighted it in a different color than normal single quoted strings.
I thought that was odd, so I wrote a small test program (shown above) and tried to run it to see how Perl would handle it and I got this error:
"my" variable $var::with::apostrophes can't be in a package
What exactly is going on here? Are there situations where single quotes in variable names are actually valid? If so, what meaning do single quotes have when used in this context?
The single quote is the namespace separator used in Perl 4, replaced by the double colon :: in Perl 5. Because Perl is mostly backwards compatible, this still works. It's great for golfing, but not much else.
Here's an article about it on perl.com that doesn't explain it.
Been stuck for a while, hoping someone with experience could help me a bit...
Right now I'm reading Ini like this three times but wish to do it dynamically to improve my codes in the long run.
IniRead, Alert_price_low, %TrackerFile%, Item, Alert_price_low
IniRead, Alert_price_high, %TrackerFile%, Item, Alert_price_high
IniRead, Alert_checkbox, %TrackerFile%, Item, Alert_checkbox
I made this function below trying to read it dynamically, but doesn't return anything...
FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, Alert_checkbox)
FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, x){
x := IniRead, %x%, TrackerFile, Item, %x%
return x
}
How my Ini file content looks like:
[Item]
Alert_price_low=777
Alert_price_high=999
Alert_checkbox=1
Thanks!
The problem here is pretty much just with the usage of the new expression syntax.
Seems you've been using only the deprecated legacy syntax, and functions are not apart of that.
So first problem is here
FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, Alert_checkbox)
Here you're not in legacy syntax, so to specify strings you quote them.
FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, "Alert_checkbox")
(And I'm assuming TrackerFile here is a variable that contains some iniFileNameOrPath.ini string)
Also, you're not storing the return value of this function anywhere.
Second problem is here
x := IniRead, %x%, TrackerFile, Item, %x%
Firstly, commands are legacy, they don't return values like that.
You can't use an := operator to get the return value.
They return values only by writing the output to the requested variable, which will be specified in the first parameter of the command.
You specified the output variable to be named whatever x contains. This is no good since you can't possibly know what the output variable is going to be during runtime (without some unnecessary extra tricks).
Also, be quite confusing to name the output to be the same as input key. Though, that would work.
So two problems there, := and the first %x%, and there's still some more to go which is right here:
, TrackerFile,
Commands are legacy, as mentioned above, they exclusively use the legacy syntax in every parameter (unless otherwise specified in the documentation).
So, you're passing in the literal text "TrackerFile", not whatever string should be stored inside the variable named TrackerFile.
In legacy syntax, you refer to the contents of a variable by wrapping it around in %%, as you've been doing before. Maybe you just forgot here.
But really, I'd recommend you try to get used to ditching the legacy syntax. So what you could/should do, is starting off the parameter with a single % followed up by a space. This makes ahk interpret an expression on that parameter, as opposed to using the legacy syntax. In the modern expression syntax you refer to a variable just by typing its name. No stupid %%s needed.
So here's the fixed script you should end up with. I made this example fully legacy syntax free as a demonstration:
TrackerFile := "test.ini"
returnValueOfThisFunction := FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, "Alert_price_low")
MsgBox, % "Yay, the function returned a value for us:`n" returnValueOfThisFunction
return
FindIniSettings(TrackerFile, key)
{
;even specified the string "Item" explicitly as a string
;this is not needed, but it just looks right to me
;I wouldn't want to specify a legacy parameter there
;in the middle of all this
IniRead, output, % TrackerFile, % "Item", % key
MsgBox, % "Now the variable named ""output"" contains the result of the above command (" output ").`nWe can now return it to the caller."
return output
}
So yeah, pretty much just problems understanding legacy syntax vs expression syntax.
You can give a read to a previous answer of mine here about usage of %% vs % .
And here's a good page on the AHK documentation about the scripting language and legacy vs. modern expression.
In MATLAB, how do you tell where in the code a variable is getting output?
I have about 10K lines of MATLAB code with about 4 people working on it. Somewhere, someone has dumped a variable in a MATLAB script in the typical way:
foo
Unfortunately, I do not know what variable is getting output. And the output is cluttering out other more important outputs.
Any ideas?
p.s. Anyone ever try overwriting Standard.out? Since MATLAB and Java integration is so tight, would that work? A trick I've used in Java when faced with this problem is to replace Standard.out with my own version.
Ooh, I hate this too. I wish Matlab had a "dbstop if display" to stop on exactly this.
The mlint traversal from weiyin is a good idea. Mlint can't see dynamic code, though, such as arguments to eval() or string-valued figure handle callbacks. I've run in to output like this in callbacks like this, where update_table() returns something in some conditions.
uicontrol('Style','pushbutton', 'Callback','update_table')
You can "duck-punch" a method in to built-in types to give you a hook for dbstop. In a directory on your Matlab path, create a new directory named "#double", and make a #double/display.m file like this.
function display(varargin)
builtin('display', varargin{:});
Then you can do
dbstop in double/display at 2
and run your code. Now you'll be dropped in to the debugger whenever display is implicitly called by the omitted semicolon, including from dynamic code. Doing it for #double seems to cover char and cells as well. If it's a different type being displayed, you may have to experiment.
You could probably override the built-in disp() the same way. I think this would be analagous to a custom replacement for Java's System.out stream.
Needless to say, adding methods to built-in types is nonstandard, unsupported, very error-prone, and something to be very wary of outside a debugging session.
This is a typical pattern that mLint will help you find:
So, look on the right hand side of the editor for the orange lines. This will help you find not only this optimization, but many, many more. Notice also that your variable name is highlighted.
If you have a line such as:
foo = 2
and there is no ";" on the end, then the output will be dumped to the screen with the variable name appearing first:
foo =
2
In this case, you should search the file for the string "foo =" and find the line missing a ";".
If you are seeing output with no variable name appearing, then the output is probably being dumped to the screen using either the DISP or FPRINTF function. Searching the file for "disp" or "fprintf" should help you find where the data is being displayed.
If you are seeing output with the variable name "ans" appearing, this is a case when a computation is being done, not being put in a variable, and is missing a ';' at the end of the line, such as:
size(foo)
In general, this is a bad practice for displaying what's going on in the code, since (as you have found out) it can be hard to find where these have been placed in a large piece of code. In this case, the easiest way to find the offending line is to use MLINT, as other answers have suggested.
I like the idea of "dbstop if display", however this is not a dbstop option that i know of.
If all else fails, there is still hope. Mlint is a good idea, but if there are many thousands of lines and many functions, then you may never find the offender. Worse, if this code has been sloppily written, there will be zillions of mlint flags that appear. How will you narrow it down?
A solution is to display your way there. I would overload the display function. Only temporarily, but this will work. If the output is being dumped to the command line as
ans =
stuff
or as
foo =
stuff
Then it has been written out with display. If it is coming out as just
stuff
then disp is the culprit. Why does it matter? Overload the offender. Create a new directory in some directory that is on top of your MATLAB search path, called #double (assuming that the output is a double variable. If it is character, then you will need an #char directory.) Do NOT put the #double directory itself on the MATLAB search path, just put it in some directory that is on your path.
Inside this directory, put a new m-file called disp.m or display.m, depending upon your determination of what has done the command line output. The contents of the m-file will be a call to the function builtin, which will allow you to then call the builtin version of disp or display on the input.
Now, set a debugging point inside the new function. Every time output is generated to the screen, this function will be called. If there are multiple events, you may need to use the debugger to allow processing to proceed until the offender has been trapped. Eventually, this process will trap the offensive line. Remember, you are in the debugger! Use the debugger to determine which function called disp, and where. You can step out of disp or display, or just look at the contents of dbstack to see what has happened.
When all is done and the problem repaired, delete this extra directory, and the disp/display function you put in it.
You could run mlint as a function and interpret the results.
>> I = mlint('filename','-struct');
>> isErrorMessage = arrayfun(#(S)strcmp(S.message,...
'Terminate statement with semicolon to suppress output (in functions).'),I);
>>I(isErrorMessage ).line
This will only find missing semicolons in that single file. So this would have to be run on a list of files (functions) that are called from some main function.
If you wanted to find calls to disp() or fprintf() you would need to read in the text of the file and use regular expresions to find the calls.
Note: If you are using a script instead of a function you will need to change the above message to read: 'Terminate statement with semicolon to suppress output (in scripts).'
Andrew Janke's overloading is a very useful tip
the only other thing is instead of using dbstop I find the following works better, for the simple reason that putting a stop in display.m will cause execution to pause, every time display.m is called, even if nothing is written.
This way, the stop will only be triggered when display is called to write a non null string, and you won't have to step through a potentially very large number of useless display calls
function display(varargin)
builtin('display', varargin{:});
if isempty(varargin{1})==0
keyboard
end
A foolproof way of locating such things is to iteratively step through the code in the debugger observing the output. This would proceed as follows:
Add a break point at the first line of the highest level script/function which produces the undesired output. Run the function/script.
step over the lines (not stepping in) until you see the undesired output.
When you find the line/function which produces the output, either fix it, if it's in this file, or open the subfunction/script which is producing the output. Remove the break point from the higher level function, and put a break point in the first line of the lower-level function. Repeat from step 1 until the line producing the output is located.
Although a pain, you will find the line relatively quickly this way unless you have huge functions/scripts, which is bad practice anyway. If the scripts are like this you could use a sort of partitioning approach to locate the line in the function in a similar manner. This would involve putting a break point at the start, then one half way though and noting which half of the function produces the output, then halving again and so on until the line is located.
I had this problem with much smaller code and it's a bugger, so even though the OP found their solution, I'll post a small cheat I learned.
1) In the Matlab command prompt, turn on 'more'.
more on
2) Resize the prompt-y/terminal-y part of the window to a mere line of text in height.
3) Run the code. It will stop wherever it needed to print, as there isn't the space to print it ( more is blocking on a [space] or [down] press ).
4) Press [ctrl]-[C] to kill your program at the spot where it couldn't print.
5) Return your prompt-y area to normal size. Starting at the top of trace, click on the clickable bits in the red text. These are your potential culprits. (Of course, you may need to have pressed [down], etc, to pass parts where the code was actually intended to print things.)
You'll need to traverse all your m-files (probably using a recursive function, or unix('find -type f -iname *.m') ). Call mlint on each filename:
r = mlint(filename);
r will be a (possibly empty) structure with a message field. Look for the message that starts with "Terminate statement with semicolon to suppress output".
I am trying to understand the perl commands below:
$my = << EOU;
This is an example.
Example too.
EOU
What is the name of this way? Could somebody can explain more about this "multi-line writing" command?
Essentially the syntax is allowing you to put anything unique as a marker so that it won't conflict with your contents. You can do this:
$my = <<ABCDEFG;
This is an example.
Example too.
BLAH
ABCDEFG
Everything between "This.." and "BLAH" will be assigned to the variable. Note that you shouldn't have a space after the << symbols otherwise you will get a syntax error. It helps avoid adding CR characters, or append (.) everywhere, and useful when passing data into another application (eg. ftp session). Here Documents is the correct term for this.
Everything between <<EOU and EOU is a multi-line, non-escapable, string. It's nothing fancy, think of them as start and end quote marks with nothing inside requiring escapes to be literally what you typed...
I am defining a variable in the beginning of my source code in MATLAB. Now I would like to know at which lines this variable effects something. In other words, I would like to see all lines in which that variable is read out. This wish does not only include all accesses in the current function, but also possible accesses in sub-functions that use this variable as an input argument. In this way, I can see in a quick way where my change of this variable takes any influence.
Is there any possibility to do so in MATLAB? A graphical marking of the corresponding lines would be nice but a command line output might be even more practical.
You may always use "Find Files" to search for a certain keyword or expression. In my R2012a/Windows version is in Edit > Find Files..., with the keyboard shortcut [CTRL] + [SHIFT] + [F].
The result will be a list of lines where the searched string is found, in all the files found in the specified folder. Please check out the options in the search dialog for more details and flexibility.
Later edit: thanks to #zinjaai, I noticed that #tc88 required that this tool should track the effect of the name of the variable inside the functions/subfunctions. I think this is:
very difficult to achieve. The problem of running trough all the possible values and branching on every possible conditional expression is... well is hard. I think is halting-problem-hard.
in 90% of the case the assumption that the output of a function is influenced by the input is true. But the input and the output are part of the same statement (assigning the result of a function) so looking for where the variable is used as argument should suffice to identify what output variables are affected..
There are perverse cases where functions will alter arguments that are handle-type (because the argument is not copied, but referenced). This side-effect will break the assumption 2, and is one of the main reasons why 1. Outlining the cases when these side effects take place is again, hard, and is better to assume that all of them are modified.
Some other cases are inherently undecidable, because they don't depend on the computer states, but on the state of the "outside world". Example: suppose one calls uigetfile. The function returns a char type when the user selects a file, and a double type for the case when the user chooses not to select a file. Obviously the two cases will be treated differently. How could you know which variables are created/modified before the user deciding?
In conclusion: I think that human intuition, plus the MATLAB Debugger (for run time), and the Find Files (for quick search where a variable is used) and depfun (for quick identification of function dependence) is way cheaper. But I would like to be wrong. :-)