I have a entity called StockDetails using Entity Framework, see picture below
I want to fetch a list IEnumerable<StockDetail>, summarized by Reels, Qtyton, average date from Days (datetime) and grouping by the rest of the properties.
I'm building a datalayer (WCF Services) with Entity Framework as ORM, some of the services are old SQL queries I'm trying to convert to linq/lamdba expression. But I'm pretty new to how to write and want some help.
This is how I started the query in lambda, but I got stuck on the groupby/sum/average part.
public IEnumerable<StockDetail> ListStockDetailByCustomerNumber(int customerNumber)
{
var CustNo = customerNumber.ToString();
return _entities.StockDetails
.Where(x => x.Custno == CustNo)
.GroupBy(
x =>
new
{
x.Millcd,
x.Matercd,
x.Proddesc,
x.Grammage,
x.Reelwidth,
x.Ordercode,
x.Buyordno,
x.Whsedesc,
x.Co,
x.Finished,
x.Pm,
x.PurchaseOrder,
x.Diameter,
x.Rtadate,
x.Custno,
x.Reels,
x.Days,
x.Qtyton
})
.ToList();
}
Question solved:
public IEnumerable<StockDetail> ListStockDetailByCustomerNumber(int customerNumber)
{
var stockDetailsList = new List<StockDetail>();
var custNo = customerNumber.ToString();
var list = _entities.StockDetails
.Where(x => x.Custno == custNo )
.GroupBy(
x =>
new
{
x.Millcd,
x.Matercd,
x.Proddesc,
x.Grammage,
x.Reelwidth,
x.Ordercode,
x.Buyordno,
x.Whsedesc,
x.Co,
x.Finished,
x.Pm,
x.PurchaseOrder,
x.Diameter,
x.Rtadate,
x.Custno,
x.UpdDte
})
.Select(x => new
{
x.Key.Millcd,
x.Key.Matercd,
x.Key.Proddesc,
x.Key.Grammage,
x.Key.Reelwidth,
x.Key.Ordercode,
x.Key.Buyordno,
Reels = x.Sum(p => p.Reels),
Qtyton = x.Sum(p => p.Qtyton),
Day = x.Max(p => p.Days),
//Day = x.Average(p => p.Days.Ticks), // Want to calculate average datetime of date but linq dosn't support datetime.ticks
x.Key.Whsedesc,
x.Key.Co,
x.Key.Finished,
x.Key.Pm,
x.Key.PurchaseOrder,
x.Key.Diameter,
x.Key.Rtadate,
x.Key.Custno,
x.Key.UpdDte
});
foreach (var s in list)
{
stockDetailsList.Add(new StockDetail
{
Millcd = GetFriendlyNameForKey(s.Millcd),
Matercd = s.Matercd,
Proddesc = s.Proddesc,
Grammage = s.Grammage,
Reelwidth = s.Reelwidth,
Ordercode = s.Ordercode,
Buyordno = s.Buyordno,
Reels = s.Reels,
Qtyton = s.Qtyton,
Days = s.Day,
Whsedesc = s.Whsedesc,
Co = s.Co,
Finished = s.Finished,
Pm = s.Pm,
PurchaseOrder = s.PurchaseOrder,
Diameter = s.Diameter,
Rtadate = s.Rtadate,
Custno = s.Custno,
UpdDte = s.UpdDte
});
}
return stockDetailsList;
}
This is how the query looks in T-SQL
SELECT
Millcd, Matercd,
Proddesc, Grammage,
Reelwidth, Ordercode,
Buyordno,
SUM(Reels) as Reels,
SUM(Qtyton) as Qtyton,
Whsedesc, Co,
(cast(FLOOR(avg(cast(DateProd as float))) as datetime)) As Days,
Finished, Pm,
PurchaseOrder,
Diameter, Rtadate,
Custno, UpdDte
FROM StockDetail
WHERE custno = #custcode
GROUP BY Millcd, Matercd, Proddesc, Grammage, Reelwidth, Ordercode, Buyordno,
Whsedesc, Co, Finished, Pm, PurchaseOrder, Diameter, Rtadate, Custno, UpdDte
not sure if this will help you but you can add
Reels = (_entities.StockDetails
.Where(x => x.Custno == CustNo).Sum(x=>x.Reels))
instead of x.Reels in your select , and do the same with Qtyton
For your average use the average extension
your select will look something like .Select(x=>new {...}) after your where statement then the group by
Related
Trying to split one row into many based on string in two cells. it is similar to the question
LINQ to separate column value of a row to different rows in .net
but i need to split based on Product & Cost Columns rather than product column only
SNo.
Product
Cost
1
colgate,closeup,pepsodent
50,100,150
2
rin,surf
100
into
SNo.
Product
Cost
1
colgate
50
1
closeup
100
1
pepsodent
150
2
rin
100
2
surf
100
I'm using Linq to Object with Entity Framework
Try the following. Since you have not presented any model it can be inaccurate in names.
var loaded = ctx.Products.ToList();
var query =
from p in loaded
from sp in p.Product.Split(',').Zip(p.Cost.Split(','), (p, c) => (p, c))
select new
{
Sno = p.Sno,
Product = sp.p,
Cost = sp.c
};
var splitted = query.ToList();
Using #SvyatoslavDanyliv naming, here is an answer:
var loaded = ctx.Products.ToList();
var query =
from p in loaded
from sp in p.Product.Split(',').Zip(p.Cost.Split(','), (p, c) => (p, c))
select new
{
Sno = p.Sno,
Product = sp.p,
Cost = sp.c
};
var splitted = query.ToList();
It feels a bit complicated to me. I would prefer using an extension method to create a variant of Zip that repeats the last element of a shorter sequence to match the longer sequence:
public static class EnumerableExt {
public static IEnumerable<(T1 First,T2 Second)> ZipExtend<T1,T2>(this IEnumerable<T1> s1, IEnumerable<T2> s2) {
var s1e = s1.GetEnumerator();
var s2e = s2.GetEnumerator();
T1 s1eLast = default;
T2 s2eLast = default;
bool has_s2 = false;
if (s1e.MoveNext()) {
do {
s1eLast = s1e.Current;
if (s2e.MoveNext()) {
s2eLast = s2e.Current;
has_s2 = true;
}
else if (!has_s2)
yield break;
yield return (s1eLast, s2eLast);
} while (s1e.MoveNext());
if (has_s2)
while (s2e.MoveNext())
yield return (s1eLast, s2e.Current);
}
yield break;
}
}
Then the answer is:
var query =
from p in loaded
from pr in p.Product.Split(',').ZipExtend(p.Cost.Split(','))
select new
{
Sno = p.Sno,
Product = pr.First,
Cost = pr.Second
};
var splitted = query.ToList();
Hi I have tried below query to get the distinct record but I am not able to get the distinct record from below query.
var query = (from sr in db.StudentRequests
join r in db.Registrations on sr.RegistrationId equals r.RegistrationId
join cc in db.Campus on r.CampusId equals cc.CampusId
join c in db.Classes on sr.ClassId equals c.ClassId
from tc in db.TutorClasses.Where(t => t.ClassId == sr.ClassId).DefaultIfEmpty()
from srt in db.StudentRequestTimings.Where(s => s.StudentRequestId == sr.StudentRequestId).DefaultIfEmpty()
from tsr in db.TutorStudentRequests.Where(t => t.StudentRequestId == srt.StudentRequestId && t.TutorId == registrationid).DefaultIfEmpty()
where tc.RegistrationId == registrationid
select new
{
StudentRequestId = sr.StudentRequestId,
RegistrationId = sr.RegistrationId,
Location = sr.Location,
PaymentMethod = sr.PaymentMethod,
CreatedOn = sr.CreatedOn,
ClassName = c.ClassName,
CampusName = cc.CampusName,
StatusId = tsr.StatusId == null ? 1 : tsr.StatusId,
Time = db.StudentRequestTimings.Where(p => p.StudentRequestId == sr.StudentRequestId)
.Select(p => p.FromTime.ToString().Replace("AM", "").Replace("PM", "") + "-" + p.ToTime)
}).Distinct().ToList().ToPagedList(page ?? 1, 3);
But I am getting error as
The 'Distinct' operation cannot be applied to the collection
ResultType of the specified argument.\r\nParameter name: argument
So I had removed the .Distinct() from the above query and below that code I had written code as
query = query.Distinct().ToList();
But still the duplicate record was showing
So I had tried Group by clause to get distinct record but over there also I am facing the issue.Please Review below code
query = query.ToList().GroupBy(x => new { x.StudentRequestId, x.StatusId, x.Location, x.RegistrationId, x.PaymentMethod, x.CreatedOn, x.ClassName, x.CampusName})
.Select(group => new
{
StudentRequestId = group.Key.StudentRequestId,
StatusId = group.Key.StatusId,
Location = group.Key.Location,
RegistrationId = group.Key.RegistrationId,
PaymentMethod = group.Key.PaymentMethod,
CreatedOn = group.Key.CreatedOn,
ClassName = group.Key.ClassName,
CampusName = group.Key.CampusName,
Time1 = group.Key.Time
});
But I am getting error for time as
How can I get the distinct Value?
Also make in concern that I am using ToPagedList in the query
The actual issue is coming from Time column, If I remove that column all things are working fine.
I had added Group by clause at the end of the query as suggested by #Rajaji and that worked for me.
var query = (from sr in db.StudentRequests
join r in db.Registrations on sr.RegistrationId equals r.RegistrationId
join cc in db.Campus on r.CampusId equals cc.CampusId
join c in db.Classes on sr.ClassId equals c.ClassId
from tc in db.TutorClasses.Where(t => t.ClassId == sr.ClassId).DefaultIfEmpty()
from srt in db.StudentRequestTimings.Where(s => s.StudentRequestId == sr.StudentRequestId).DefaultIfEmpty()
from tsr in db.TutorStudentRequests.Where(t => t.StudentRequestId == srt.StudentRequestId && t.TutorId == registrationid).DefaultIfEmpty()
where tc.RegistrationId == registrationid
select new
{
StudentRequestId = sr.StudentRequestId,
RegistrationId = sr.RegistrationId,
Location = sr.Location,
PaymentMethod = sr.PaymentMethod,
CreatedOn = sr.CreatedOn,
ClassName = c.ClassName,
CampusName = cc.CampusName,
StatusId = tsr.StatusId == null ? 1 : tsr.StatusId,
Time = db.StudentRequestTimings.Where(p => p.StudentRequestId == sr.StudentRequestId).Select(p => p.FromTime.ToString().Replace("AM", "").Replace("PM", "") + "-" + p.ToTime)
}).ToList().GroupBy(p => new { p.StudentRequestId }).Select(g => g.First()).ToList();
I am doing a asp.net-mvc with entity-framework App.
I have a select instruction, where I need to have a dymanic where condition.
It is a common case where you have a filter composed by a string like "aaaa bbbb cccc". I need to bring all data that contains all the filter string or part of it.
I doing part ot it witt Split function, but it is difficult to get all posible combinations.
I Would rather use a Store Procedure. But the porpose of it, is to use Entity Framework.
As far I did this.
public IEnumerable<UploadSearch> GetUploadsBySearch(string search)
{
IEnumerable<UploadSearch> viewModel = (from uploads in _db.Uploads
.Where(p => p.ProcessState_id == Security.APPROVED && p.Finder.Contains(search))
.OrderByDescending(p => p.UploadDate)
select new UploadSearch
{
User_id = uploads.User_id,
UserName = uploads.Users.Name,
UserLastName = uploads.Users.LastName,
});
And I Add a for instruction to loop throu the string,
string[] param = search.Replace(" "," ").Split(' ');
string _param = "";
int large = param.Length;
for (int i=0;i<large-1;i++)
{
_param +=param[i] ' ' + param[i + 1];
IEnumerable<UploadSearch> _viewModel = (from uploads in _db.Uploads
.Where(p => p.ProcessState_id == Security.APPROVED && p.Finder.Contains(_param))
.OrderByDescending(p => p.UploadDate)
select new UploadSearch
{
User_id = uploads.User_id,
UserName = uploads.Users.Name,
UserLastName = uploads.Users.LastName,
});
viewModel = viewModel.Union(_viewModel);
}
And I use a Union clause.
But There has to be another way to do it.
Any Ideas?
You should use LinqKit, it has a PredicateBuilder class that allows you to dynamically build queries
https://github.com/scottksmith95/LINQKit#predicatebuilder
IQueryable<Product> SearchProducts (params string[] keywords)
{
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.New<Product>();
foreach (string keyword in keywords)
{
string temp = keyword;
predicate = predicate.Or (p => p.Description.Contains (temp));
}
return dataContext.Products.Where (predicate);
}
I have two contexts. In one of them i have two views of which i get cods related to an entity from the another context. This query is taking too long time. How to improve it?
var negociacoes = _db.Negociacoes.Include(o=> o.User).ToArray();
var produtos = _oriDb.Vw_Produtos.ToArray();
var clientesVendedor = _oriDb.Vw_ClientesVendedores.ToArray();
var query = from n in negociacoes
join p in produtos on n.ProdutoId equals p.ProdutoId
join c in clientesVendedor on n.ClienteId equals c.codigo_entidade
select new NegociacaoView
{
NegociacaoId = n.NegociacaoId,
ProdutoId = n.ProdutoId,
Produto = p.descricao,
ClienteId = n.ClienteId,
Cliente = c.razao_social,
Rca = n.Rca,
Quantidade = n.Quantidade,
Preco = n.Preco,
Situacao = n.Situacao,
UserId = n.User.UserName,
Atendente = n.Atendente,
CondicaoId = n.CondicaoId,
DataCriacao = n.DataCriacao,
DataLiberacao = n.DataLiberacao,
Observacao = n.Observacao,
User = n.User
};
return query.ToList();
There are a couple of ways to speed this up:
It helps to run the smallest most efficient query first, then use those results to constrain the following queries.
Defining a select list so the database doesn't have to materialize every column will speed things up and use less memory.
Unfortunately, no matter how you do it in LINQ, you will end up with sql that uses large IN statements. A sproc would give you access to temp tables and joins that would be even better.
var negociacoes = _db.Negociacoes.Include(o=> o.User).ToArray();
//Use results of first query to constrain the second two. You could maybe combine the second two into one query.
var clientIds = negociacoes.Select(x => x.ClienteId);
var productIds = negociacoes.Select(x => x.ProdutoId);
var produtos = _oriDb.Vw_Produtos
.Where(x => productIds.Contains(x.ProdutoId))
//add a select. You're only using two columns from this table.
//.Select(x => new { })
.ToArray();
var clientesVendedor = _oriDb.Vw_ClientesVendedores
.Where(x => clientIds.Contains(x.codigo_entidade))
//add a select. You're only using two columns from this table.
//.Select(x => new { })
.ToArray();
var query = from n in negociacoes
join p in produtos on n.ProdutoId equals p.ProdutoId
join c in clientesVendedor on n.ClienteId equals c.codigo_entidade
select new NegociacaoView
{
NegociacaoId = n.NegociacaoId,
ProdutoId = n.ProdutoId,
Produto = p.descricao,
ClienteId = n.ClienteId,
Cliente = c.razao_social,
Rca = n.Rca,
Quantidade = n.Quantidade,
Preco = n.Preco,
Situacao = n.Situacao,
UserId = n.User.UserName,
Atendente = n.Atendente,
CondicaoId = n.CondicaoId,
DataCriacao = n.DataCriacao,
DataLiberacao = n.DataLiberacao,
Observacao = n.Observacao,
User = n.User
};
return query.ToList();
I'm trying to achieve dynamic filtering on a table. My UI has filters that can be enabled or disabled on demand, and as you can imagine, my query should be able to know when to add filters to the query.
What I have so far is that I check if the filter object has a value, and if it does it adds a where clause to it. Example:
var q1 = DBContext.Table1
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filterModel.SubjectContains))
q1 = q1.Where(i => i.Subject.Contains(filterModel.SubjectContains));
if (filterModel.EnvironmentId != null)
q1 = q1.Where(i => i.EnvironmentId == filterModel.EnvironmentId);
if (filterModel.CreatedBy != null)
q1 = q1.Where(i => i.CreatedByUserId == filterModel.CreatedBy);
var final = q1.Select(i => new
{
IssuesId = i.IssuesId,
Subject = i.Subject,
EnvironmentId = i.EnvironmentId,
CreatedBy = i.CreatedByUser.FullName,
});
return final.ToList();
The code above generates T-SQL that contains a WHERE clause for each field that uses AND to combine the conditions. This is fine, and will work for most cases.
Something like:
Select
IssueId, Subject, EnvironmentId, CreatedById
From
Table1
Where
(Subject like '%stackoverflow%')
and (EnvironmentId = 1)
and (CreatedById = 123)
But then I have a filter that explicitly needs an IssueId. I'm trying to figure out how the EF Where clause can generate an OR for me. I'm looking something that should generate a Tsql that looks like this:
Select
IssueId, Subject, EnvironmentId, CreatedById
From
Table1
Where
(Subject like '%stackoverflow%')
and (EnvironmentId = 1)
and (CreatedById = 123)
or (IssueId = 10001)
Found a solution for this that doesn't have to do multiple database call and works for me.
//filterModel.StaticIssueIds is of type List<Int32>
if (filterModel.StaticIssueIds != null)
{
//Get all ids declared in filterModel.StaticIssueIds
var qStaticIssues = DBContext.Table1.Where(i => filterModel.StaticIssueIds.Contains(i.IssuesId));
//Let's get all Issues that isn't declared in filterModel.StaticIssueIds from the original IQueryable
//we have to do this to ensure that there isn't any duplicate records.
q1 = q1.Where(i => !filterModel.StaticIssueIds.Contains(i.IssuesId));
//We then concatenate q1 and the qStaticIssues.
q1 = q1.Concat(qStaticIssues);
}
var final = q1.Select(i => new
{
IssuesId = i.IssuesId,
Subject = i.Subject,
EnvironmentId = i.EnvironmentId,
CreatedBy = i.CreatedByUser.FullName,
});
return final.ToList();