Does anyone know any details on the underlying eclipse builder that sends jobs to the compiler and get its report? and how to tap to it? The level of abstraction that the builder extension offers is too high and the information insufficient. So I implemented an IResourceChangeListener and played with the ResourceDelta in order to get the messages from an IMarker. It works perfectly, however I realized the message is just returning a string. So my question is, how do I do in order to get the type/reference of the object where the error is, what type of error, what class it should belongs to and all available info.
Thanks.
Have you looked at the builder documentation?
And there is also This article by John.
I think between those two and looking at the code you will find everything you need to know.
Related
I'm trying to build grapheneos for pixel 6 with custom bootanimation.
I created the bootanimation.zip file according to instructions but can't figure out the location to put it in. Since the usual location, system/media/bootanimation.zip is giving me an Error:
offending entries: system/media/bootanimation.zip
besides this, the build also fails.
Can anyone help me to understand what I am doing wrong ?
Error message
If it is still relevant, I may have an answer for you.
There's a mechanism that prevents you from doing something to the system partition from the product makefile in some cases.
The solution to your specific situation might be different, and there are also suggested solutions in the link below.
If you have something that is a part of the system partition, and is not a product specific thing, you can also add it to:
build/make/target/product/generic_system.mk
instead of the product specific makefile
Here is a link explaining this mechanism
I get SOAP_EMPTY using gsoap, I have searched for a long time and had no answer,SOAP_EMPTY is newly added to gsoap,and it seems I'm the unlucky guy to meet this problem.
Here is where my code come from:https://github.com/miibotree/ONVIF/blob/master/main.c
Now soap_call___tds__GetCapabilities will return code SOAP_EMPTY,I'm now using gdb to track this problem it seems that I need to set a valid soap->id to avoid this problem,but I'm a fresh guy with onvif and don't know how to set a valid soap->id,and now I'm reading various docs about onvif and trying to solve it.
Hope any guys could help me, sinch searching so many docs makes my eyes pain and I still haven't found the answer,thanks.
SOAP_EMPTY is a validation failure. This error indicates than an element/attribute is empty but is supposed to have content. For example an integer value should not be an empty string. The old error generated by older gSOAP releases in this case was SOAP_TYPE which was less informative. In either case, validation fails. The best way to find out is to use soap_print_fault() and soap_print_fault_location()` where the latter call shows the location in XML where the problem is. Our ONVIF testing with gSOAP did not reveal such an issue.
I have an instance file register for a custom MultiDataObject in System FileSystem entry: Loaders/text/custom-mime-type/Factories.
My application creates this objects when I open a project and my LogicalView creates the nodes for files in that project.
I need to get a list of instances for those MultiDataObject type, but I've not found way to achieve this.
I try to get this using Lookups.forPath, but anything returned.
¿Any clue for this issue?
With some reflection magic you can get them from a DataObjectPool - package private class in Data Loaders module (see openide.loaders/src/org/openide/loaders/DataObjectPool.java in NetBeans sources). There is no official API of this kind. Intentionally.
I'd say there is something wrong if you need this information. Perhaps you would get better advice if you had explained better what you want to achieve. Asking at NetBeans forum / mailing list will increase your chances even higher.
On a linking error, I can raise appropriate diagnostic (say MyDSL.MY_APPROPRIATE_DIAGNOSTIC) and then write, in MyDSLQuickfixProvider, a quick fix for it by annotating it in this way:
#Fix(MyDSL.MY_APPROPRIATE_DIAGNOSTIC)
public void fixMyAppropriateDiagnostic(final Issue issue, final IssueResolutionAcceptor acceptor) {
...
}
What about if I wanted to automatically resolve a diagnostic, i.e. automatically execute an IModification without propose it to the user as quick fix (imagine the quick fix for the diagnostic is unique)?
Is there a way to associate a (immediate) handling code to a diagnostic in a similar manner to what happens for (user-proposed) quick fixes?
Thanks in advance,
Marco
There is no way to set a quick fix to be executed automatically. Your alternatives are:
Invoke the marker resolution code from somewhere else in your code. I.e. while marker resolutions are typically triggered explicitly on user request using the problems view, ruler buttons and similar UI, you could invoke them from anywhere. Be sure that you don't interfere with quickfixes, which are not from your plugin and make sure your users are not surprised by this non-eclipse workflow.
For some issues you may be able to instead create code completion rules or templates. Those are still not fully automatic as requested, but basically you can already "correct" partial user input that way and avoid flagging a violation for the complete input.
I'm working on a MVVM application, using MVVM Light and on the whole I'm finding it very nice to work with. I have a nagging issue however and hope someone can help.
I'm using sending instances of DialogMessage from VM to the View to display dialogs. The result is sent back to my VM via a callback, all good so far.
However the result of the dialog (OK, Yes, No, Cancel etc) is sent back as a member of the enum System.Windows.MessageBoxResult. This seems to go against the View/ViewModel separation to me, MessageBoxResult is clearly a type from the UI and so the VM shouldn't be dependent upon this or anything from the System.Windows namespace.
What I'm looking for is someway of using DialogMessage with an alternative callback eg Action<UserResult>; rather than Action<System.Windows.MessageBoxResult>;, where UserResult is a type defined by me to represent the users choice without dependency on MessageBoxResult.
Is this possible or am I being too strict in me desire to keep UI concepts out of the VM?
In regards to the second part of your question, when I started working with MVVM Light I too felt that receiving a MessageBoxResult back in the VM seems a little to UI-oriented.
On the other hand, if only the name was different - such as UserResult as you suggested - would that be sufficient for you?
If only the nameing of the class is a problem, I think you can let it slip. The result Ok, Yes, No, Cancel do not give an indication of whether a MessageBox was shown with buttons or whether it was some other kind of UI implementation (lets say a form with a combo box).
If it still bothers you, you can always create a wrapper for the DialogMessage which will raise the Dialog, get the MessageBoxResult and return a UserResult which can be an enum with the same values (think of it as a simple converter).
But as I said, I think it might be an overkill...