I am developing an iphone application and I think that it's business logic requires a service to be always running in background.
The service needed is to get the acceleration of the device and notify or perform a certain action when that acceleration becomes a certain value.
Is that allowable in the Apple policies, or is there any idea about a solution?
What cydia development possibilities to help me ?
Dbramhall left out one important thing:
You can't guarantee that your app won't be killed, the OS can kill apps that are in the background at will if it requires more memory.
So if at all possible i wouldn't rely on making sure it can run its process in the background and before you ask "How can i stop this?". Well you shouldn't I've never tried it myself because i don't know the effects it has on the OS.
Also if you stop it from being killed in the Background, if it is going to be on the app store then it won't pass evaluation process, because it breaks the OS
Well, an application can run in the background and Apple perfectly accepts this however the user will obviously be be able to close the application (or should be able to) via the multi-tasking bar and this will end the application. Period.
Apple will not accept an application that runs constantly regardless of whether the user has is in background state as this drains the battery, heats the device etc. So an application can run in the background so long as the user can quit it when close it from the multi-tasking bar however it cannot continue to run after the user closed it via multi-tasking - if it does continue, Apple will reject the application.
Also, see 2.16 of the Apple Store review guidelines: https://developer.apple.com/appstore/resources/approval/guidelines.html#functionality
Related
While the device is powered on, is it possible for iOS to automatically terminate my app (calling applicationWillTerminate:) while it's in the background?
I'm also curious what happens in two other cases, three in total:
Device is powered on
Device is powered off
Device loses battery
I'm asking because I want to know how often applicationWillTerminate: is likely to get called. I want to know this because that's where I'm registering for remote notifications. And if there's a failure sending the device token to the server, I want to know how likely it is that that method will get called again (i.e., retry sending the device token to the server).
If your application supports multitasking (the default for anything linked against iOS 4.0+), this method will almost never be called. The documentation says it may be called in cases where the application is running in the background and the system wants to terminate. However, in my experience, I've only ever seen this actually called when running a music app that's actively playing music in the background and the system is jettisoning everything. In cases where I have background tasks running (not music, but short-term background tasks), I've seen the app terminated without this method being called.
I wouldn't ever rely on this being called and try and do all the clean-up you need to do in your delegate methods for transitioning into the background and your background task completion blocks (which do get executed for at least a few seconds before the app gets jettisoned).
Not only can iOS terminate your app automatically, but the user can kill it manually. In fact, the only time the user can kill your app is when it's in the background. Furthermore, when your app is "in the background" it's more likely to be suspended than actually running, so don't count on doing a lot of processing when you're not the foreground app.
As for how likely it is that you'll get -applicationWillTerminate:, that'll depend on the user and how they're using their device. You should handle it appropriately when you get it, and go about your business otherwise.
When memory is running low, iOS can shut down your app, calling applicationWillTerminate.
The docs say this about the method:
... However, this method may be called in situations where the application is running in the background (not suspended) and the system needs to terminate it for some reason.
Check out iOS Developer Library : iOS App Programming Guide : App Termination.
I have an app that will run in the background but there is one case where I do not want that to happen, can I achieve this programmatically?
I know I can opt out by changing this plist value but what about at run time?
Add the variable UIApplicationExitsOnSuspend (Application does not run in background) to your applications plist and assign the value YES.
You can close the app by calling exit(0) in applicationDidEnterBackground.
You can't use exit(0) b/c apple does not allow you to close the app without user knowing it.
From Technical Q&A QA1561 How do I programmatically quit my iPhone application?.
There is no API provided for gracefully terminating an iPhone
application. Under the iPhone OS, the
user presses the Home button to close
applications. Should your application
have conditions in which it cannot
provide its intended function, the
recommended approach is to display an
alert for the user that indicates the
nature of the problem and possible
actions the user could take - turning
on WiFi, enabling Location Services,
etc. Allow the user to terminate the
application at their own discretion.
Calling exit() is discouraged, and not informing the user that the app is going to terminate is also discouraged. So you need to get the OS to kill your app (as it normally would do over a long enough period of operation) while simultaneously informing the user. One way of doing this, while using only legal APIs, is to dirty absolutely as many memory pages as possible (malloc and bzero), then call Safari with a URL to a hoggish website explaining why the app is going to quit. Safari will require enough memory to display the website that your app will be terminated by the OS, just as the user is being properly informed.
Sleeping until the OS kill timer kills your app will also kill your app, but this non-responsive delay will lock up the UI, which isn't a good user experience.
I am trying to take advantage of iPhone 4 multitasking feature. I want to run app in background and frequently send http request to send/receive data, is it possible?
Surprisingly, there is actually very little time-slicing going on in the "multi-tasking" iOS 4.x. What goes on instead is really just application suspend / resume. When an application is sent to the background upon the user tapping the home button, it will stop getting execute cycles after a short while (*).
(*) There are a few exceptions. Applications which declare themselves as "VoIP providers", location-based apps, and music apps can get background execute cycles, presumably only though to perform those very specific operations in response to corresponding events (like a "significant change in location" occurring). Some apps apparently try to stretch the rules and find undocumented or not-strongly-documented techniques to continue getting background execute cycles.
And the "requested running time" that Undeadlegion mentioned is limited in duration.
The reality is that on iOS4, applications are not allowed to run continuously in the background.
#Undeadlegion has suggested a plausible way to achieve your goal. To be more clear, take a look at my previous answer to a similar question at SO, iphone - Connecting to server in background
It is possible to request running time while your app is backgrounded.
See Multitasking Developer's Guide
Although, depending on the intent of your http requests, push notifications may be a viable alternative.
This may be necessary because you aren't providing audio, voip, or location services, so your app can't run in the background indefinitely.
Ever since the first beta came out I’ve been trying to find out if “real” multitasking is possible — i.e. can you put a program in the background and have it hang on to a network connection indefinitely?
I’m thinking about IM or IRC apps, for example. I’ve compiled an app myself on iOS 4, and without changing a thing it appeared to stay running in the background, but for all I know it was just suspended to memory.
The docs say the best you can do is request up to 10 minutes, but in the developer presentation they showed off Skype sitting in the background and then notifying the user that a call was coming in. Does anyone know for sure how this all works?
It appears the answer is no. The API for Skype is a very special case, called the "voip" mode, and requires special behavior, such as marking the socket in use for VoIP.
You can receive alarm notifications in the background (such as time passed). The amount of time you are in the background running state is severely limited by the OS.
Android's background model is complete and in many ways much nicer.
Apple has a guide named "Supporting Multitasking In Your Applications" which you should be able to locate.
Apple's iOS 4 developer docs outline this all very clearly.
When your app is closed or switched away from, it is almost immediately "suspended", meaning the OS freezes the app's state. When the user switches back to your app, your code keeps running just where it kept off. You don't need to add any code to your app to do this, just compile it against OS 4.
The above is true in most cases. There are two reasons the "suspended" model may not apply:
1) If the device starts to run low on memory, the OS will start terminating suspended apps that haven't been switched to in a while, without warning. This is why it's in your best interest for your app to remember it's state as well, so if your app is terminated, then re-opened, the user doesn't really notice because it still returns to right where they left off.
2) Your app uses one of the "background" APIs. These are for audio playback, VoIP services, or location services. In this case, your app is allowed to continue running in the background but only has access to those APIs. Additionally, your app can designate certain long-running tasks as "background tasks" that need to be completed before the app is suspended or terminated, like uploading pictures to Flickr or rendering a video, etc.
The "background task" method doesn't cover pinging servers indefinitely, as there is a time limit for the task, after which it will be forcibly halted. Apps that need that sort of functionality are expected to implement push notifications, just as before.
That should clear this up. All in all I think it's a pretty elegant solution to multitasking on a mobile device.
iOS 4 applications can either be running or suspended. The operating system will try to keep as many requested applications as possible in memory, while all other applications are suspended.
Applications that run in the background can access features such as navigation, audio, and VOIP (but NOT instant messaging). So it looks like you might be out of luck.
-- PC World Multitasking on Apples iPhone 4
It is possible for apps to request background time. Read the docs. I would say it iOS is "controlled multitasking".
You can create a long running background task, I believe these can include networking features. Just have to set the background task flag on the work block.
https://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/documentation/iPhone/Conceptual/iPhoneOSProgrammingGuide/BackgroundExecution/BackgroundExecution.html
the OS can limit exactly how much time you get though... it will tell you when your time is up giving you a chance to cleanup nicely.
iOS 4 has "real" multitasking to some extend. There are two things to consider:
The UI event loop is single tasking. So only the front app executes on the UI event loop. Not a big deal: detach your main code form the UI event loop (maybe you need to redesign your app).
The OS "may" terminate your app if some criteria are met (e.g. low memory).
Currently one of these criteria is that execution time is limited to 10 minutes (real time not cpu time). However I expect this to change and see better criteria for background app termination (I hope to).
Apart from this you can have timers (event loops) in background.
There is no real multitasking in iOS 4.2 even. because apps will only be allowed to finish the task related to states..for small interval of time and then it will be in suspended state.. If you will set background task for long interval of time then... it will behave unexpectedly like no method will be called when you will try to run the app from anywhere..
You may be interested in this blog post that outlines how "multitasking" works in systems such as iPhone OS 4 and Android.
in fact u can do this, although it's not allowed by Apple. u gotta set up a toolchain in ur mac and use some unofficial SDK...
check http://code.google.com/p/iphone-backgrounder/ for more information
You should use the Push Notifications framework for the feature set you are creating!
I am trying to determine feasibility of certain features required in a (potential) project. I am not (yet) looking for a how-to, just a can-do. I apologize for any vagueness and ignorance: the former due to an NDA that makes Apple's NDA look like GPL, and the latter due to the fact that I have no iPhone or MAC experience.
I do have a solid understanding of objective-c and interface builder (going back to NextStep) and some PDA development experience, so I'll probably understand the answers, even if my questions are naive. I have done a bit of browsing, so I know some buzzwords.
I can't go into detail about the actual project, but I have come up with a lame analogy.
a large number of users in the same room are asked to complete task(s) in the app (say a puzzle)
they are under supervision, but the monitor cannot watch them all closely
they are not allowed to leave the application until done.
they cannot send/receive phone calls or messages during the task.
the monitor receives notification of various steps during the task
the monitor is notified when the task is completed, or the app is exited
the app sends a heartbeat, so the monitor also knows if signal is lost
Jailbreak is not an option.
The app should also work on iPod Touch.
So the things I need to do that seem dicey to me are
can I turn off (or require the user to turn off) phone and sms but still be able send http to my server
can I prevent an app from being switched out (even if, say an alarm app triggers or the phone rings).
failing prevention, can I at least detect any of these events and notify my server.
failing notification, can I record the event for the monitor to check later.
The user will be aware (and in fact welcome) these restrictions. It's a trust issue - the user must not seek help or use a helper app to solve the puzzle, and wants the monitor (and other contestants) to know that he did not. It's feasible for the user to click on an "OK, I understand and approve" screen at the beginning, but not for each communication to the server.
The app would only communicate with a central server (run by my company) - the monitor would not be able to buy the server software, and the url's of the server would not be user (or monitor) modifiable.
Hey! This looks like an app for taking exams. Not what I am doing, but that would be cool too!
EDIT --
I changed the title and am adding a few more parts to the question, based in part on mmc's answer. The App may run in an offline mode that would have to do the following:
So using the exam analogy, the user off line experience would be something like this
Launch App
App download test questions, registers start time, etc.
Turn off phone (if app can't do it by itself)
Disable any app that might interrupt my App (can app do this?)
Resume and Take Test
Indicate test done (or finish last problem).
Turn on phone (if app can't) and restart App (if needed).
App uploads test results and log of any interruptions.
So the question becomes
Am I sure that I at least get to log any interruption I can't prevent
can I know the cause of the interruption (phone answered, alarm launch, user initiated)?
can the user be prevented from modifying the log
can I know what other Apps are running when I start? (to guard against a daemon that occasionally displays a hint or something.
I would still like to run with real time uploads, so a few other ideas come to mind.
If I can reliably detect and record that the phone or another app was used, that might be almost as good as preventing it.
Can the user prevent the phone from ringing even if it's on (eg. call forward + ringer off)
Can my app know if the ringer is off
Same question for sms messaging
If I can't block it, can the user just ignore (silent) call or message and not leave my App. Would my app know that?
Sounds like you might be better off doing away with the phone, and making it exclusive to the iPod Touch.
You've nailed your trouble spots.
There is no way to disable phone functionality, and at the same time maintain network functionality of any type (3G, WiFi, or bluetooth) If you disable the phone operations with Airplane mode, all of them are disabled.
There is no way to prevent the Home button from returning you to Springboard
You can notify a server of a premature app interruption (there is an applicationWillTerminate: method on your app delegate) but is not reliable. If the operation takes too long, your app will be forcibly terminated.
You could write to the local file system that a premature interruption happened, and this would be far more reliable, as this operation would be much faster.