Access modifier visibility in objective c - iphone

There are 3 modifiers: #private, #protected (default) and #public. So if i define a instance variable as private then that should not be accessible from anywhere.
For E.g. -
#interface A {
#private
NSString *a;
}
#property(nonatomic, retain) NSString *a;
Now inside implementation of some other interface/class B-
-(void)getSomeValue {
A *object = [[A alloc] init];
NSString *value = object.a;
.........
}
Here i am able to access instance variable, although i defined that as private.
It is a bit confusing, although when i look into details of this statement, then it is clear that it is calling the getter of a, but then also it seems confusing and it is against the concept of OOPS.
Anyone having any thought on this?

It's not the instance variable you're accessing but the property you declared. Don't declare the property if you do not want the instance variable to be visible outside the class.

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#interface Visibility : NSObject {
#public
BOOL boolPublic;
#protected
BOOL boolProtected;
#private
BOOL boolPrivate;
}
#property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL boolPublic;
#property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL boolProtected;
#property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL boolPrivate;
#end
#implementation Visibility
#synthesize boolPublic;
#synthesize boolProtected;
#synthesize boolPrivate;
#end
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
NSAutoreleasePool *pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
Visibility *visibility = [[Visibility alloc] init];
visibility.boolPublic = YES;
visibility.boolProtected = YES;
visibility.boolPrivate = YES;
// Place following NSLog()'s here
[pool release];
}
Let's try this out
Using the methods you define with #property/#synthesize
NSLog(#"Accessors %d %d %d", visibility.boolPublic, visibility.boolProtected, visibility.boolPrivate);
=> 2012-01-08 17:46:40.226 Untitled[2592:707] Accessors 1 1 1
Accessing #public ivar directly
NSLog(#"Public %d", visibility->boolPublic);
=> 2012-01-08 17:46:40.228 Untitled[2592:707] Public 1
Accessing #protected ivar directly
NSLog(#"Protected %d", visibility->boolProtected);
=> error: instance variable 'boolProtected' is protected
=> NSLog(#"Protected %d", visibility->boolProtected);
=> ^
Accessing #private ivar directly
NSLog(#"Private %d", visibility->boolPrivate);
=> error: instance variable 'boolPrivate' is private
=> NSLog(#"Private %d", visibility->boolPrivate);
=> ^
When you are accessing using dot notation this:
visibility.boolPublic
is equivalent to:
[visibility boolPublic]; // <- This is a method call

Because you set it as a #property and you claim it in header file. The variable you set as a #property will auto generate getter and setter for this variable and they are both public method to get or set it(variable is still private). If you really want to make the property as an private method, you should claim it in .m file and it will become private. You can only use this variable in the .m file.
For example, in your .h file
#interface ClassWithPrivateProperty : NSObject {
#private
NSString* member;
}
- (void) trySettingPrivateProperty;
#end
in your .m file
#import "ClassWithPrivateProperty.h"
#interface ClassWithPrivateProperty ()
#property (nonatomic,retain) NSString* member;
#end
#implementation ClassWithPrivateProperty
#synthesize member;
- (void) trySettingPrivateProperty {
self.member = #"A Value";
NSLog(#"myClass.member = %#", self.member);
}
#end
You can check more detail in Private properties for iPhone Objective-C
Edit:
Thanks for Abizern and Paul's comment, but in fact I got nothing compile error for this program.
I think RIP's question is "Why I set the variable in #private but I can still modify the variable like instance.variable"
The answer is although he set the variable as #private, but claim #property for variable in .h file also provide public methods getter and setter. So he can still get the instance variable use instance.variable. For OOP design pattern you should not expose your internals publicly. So if you want to use a variable privately only in its class and no one know it. And you still want to use getter and setter to access this variable in its class. you should claim #property in .m file like I did above. I claim the #property in .m file, it's a #interface extension(unnamed category). So you can make it "like" private. Because you cannot access this variable from anywhere outside this class. So it's just like a "private #property" that I mention about.
Two useful articles for you Public Properties with Private Setters and Private properties for iPhone Objective-C

Related

Xcode 6 - No Visible interface for private members

I have declared private variables in implementation file of cycles.
myclass.m
#interface myclass()
#property (nonatomic) unsigned int number;
#end
Well, when I put in main.m something like this:
myclass * some = [[myclass alloc] init];
[some setNumber:10]; // no visible #interface for 'myclass' declares the selector 'setNumber'.
unsigned int a=[some getNumber]; //no visible #interface ...
Every answer on StackOverflow.com points the same as I do. What is the problem?
You can use readonly/readwrite property definitions to achieve this.
In MyClass.h
#interface MyClass : NSObject
#property (nonatomic, readonly) NSNumber *number;
#end
In MyClass.m
#interface MyClass ()
#property (nonatomic, readwrite) NSNumber *number;
#end
You can now read the number property outside of the class, and you will only be able to change it inside of MyClass.m. You can set it's value like so, self.number = 5 inside of MyClass.m.
Objective-C does not have the same type of private variables that a language like Java has. What is it that you are trying to accomplish with a private variable?
The problem is that the property number is a private property because you declared it in the interface section in your .m file. Declare it in your header myclass.h files interface block instead.. A private property, ivar, or method is one which can only be accessed from within an instance of your myClass object by using the self keyword (which is basically a pointer to the myClass instance within which you are currently executing).
Moving your property declaration to the header file will make the property accessible from outside the class instance. In other words, it makes it public.
If you want to restrict access to the data the property points to, define the property in the header file as a readonly property:
MyClass.h
#interface MyClass : NSObject
#property (nonatomic, readonly) unsigned int number;
#end
Then in your .m file create a private ivar manually and override the getter for the number property as follows:
MyClass.m
#implementation MyClass {
//Instance variable (ivar)
unsigned int _number;
}
unsigned int number()
{
return _number;
}
#end
That way a subclass (or anyone else for that matter) can't muck with the value of number. You can then access number in your main function as follows:
MyClass* myClass = [[MyClass alloc] init];
unsigned int newNumber = myClass.number; //There is no such selector called getNumber BTW, only number.

Instance variable with property & synthesize and one without them - ARC

You can declare a variable like this.
Case1:
#interface MyClass : NSObject
{
NSString *str;
}
#end
Also, if you want to set its property, you can do
Case2:
#interface MyClass : NSObject
{
NSString *str;
}
#property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *str;
#end
And in the .m,
#synthesize str;
My understanding with the difference between Case 1 and Case 2 is that synthesized and propertied variables in Case 2 can be accessed from another class when this another class instantiates this class.
What are other differences between Case 1 and 2? Say when these variables are just used only in its .m file. The fact that you are setting 'str' properties probably makes a difference, but how? If you don't set property, how are they going to be released with ARC?
The differences are fairly confusing in this case because of the way it is set up.
Also it is using what is now old practises.
The new suggested way of doing this (suggested by Apple) is to do this...
MyClass.h
#interface MyClass : NSObject
#property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *str;
#end
MyClass.m
#import "MyClass.h"
#implementation MyClass
#end
You no longer need the #synthesize as Xcode (since 4.5) will auto generate these for you.
Doing this sets up the property called str and an iVar called _str.
You now no longer need to worry about defining multiple ivars and properties etc... Just use the property and that's it done.
An example setter method for the property str would look like this...
- (void)setStr:(NSString*)str
{
_str = str;
}

nonatomic and readonly property in Objective-C

A few times already I wanted to make a property, which is nonatomic and readonly at the same time.
This has the advantage that I can override the getter and check if an instance has already been created or not. And if not I can simply create it.
At the same time I can protect it from being overwritten.
.h
#property (strong, readonly, nonatomic) Foo *bar;
.m
- (Foo *)bar {
if (!_bar) {
_bar = [[Foo alloc] init];
}
return _bar;
}
Whenever I do this, the compiler doesn't create an instance variable for me, so _bar doesn't exist.
Why? How can I create a readonly nonatomic property?
Your property declaration is correct. I believe the problem here is that, because your property was declared as readonly, the compiler didn't automatically synthesize an underlying instance variable. The solution in this case is to synthesize one yourself using...
#synthesize bar = _bar;
You could create a private setter:
#interface YourClass() // In the .m file
#property (strong, readwrite, nonatomic) Foo *bar;
#end
Then when assigning the variable:
self.bar = [[Foo alloc] init];
EDIT
Mark Adam's answer is also correct.
In the implementation add #synthesize bar = _bar.

Objective c: i want the automatic memory management of properties, but no access from other classes

I've kind of been confused about properties. Some people say to always use setters and getters for ivars, even within the ivar's class. So if "name" is an ivar, when referring to it, one should always use "self.name". Always. Even if you're in the same class that "name" is declared in.
First, is that correct advice?
Second, what if I wish to reap the automatic memory management that comes with declaring "name" as a property and synthesizing it, but I don't want to give other classes access to change "name"? I guess it would be sort of a private property?
Thanks!
Yes, you should always try to use the property accessors when possible. Using ARC alleviates these concerns somewhat, but it's still good style. As for your second question, you can declare the property as readonly in the public header file and redefine it in a class extension:
In MyClass.h:
#interface MyClass : NSObject
#property (strong, readonly, nonatomic) id foo;
#end
In MyClass.m:
#interface MyClass()
#property (strong, readwrite, nonatomic) id foo;
#end
#implementation MyClass
#synthesize foo = _foo;
// The rest of your code goes here.
#end
This will allow you to call [self setFoo:foo] all day inside of MyClass’s implementation, but not other classes.
For ivars which are accessed externally, I generally use properties to access the ivar from within the class, for ivars which are only used internally (usually BOOL, NSUInteger, NSInteger, etc), I use the ivar directly. I do however access an consistently within the class (i.e. if I'm using a property to access it, I always use a property).
For the second part of your question. You can create a readonly property in the class's interface definition and within the same file as the implementation create a category with the read-write property. For example:
MyClass.h
#interface MyClass : NSObject
{
NSString * name;
}
#property (nonatomic, readonly) NSString * name;
#end
MyClass.m
#interface MyClass()
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString * name;
#end
#implementation MyClass
#synthesize name;
-(void)dealloc
{
[name release];
[super dealloc];
return;
}
#end
Keep in mind, that although another class accessing the method -setName: may cause compile warnings or errors, another class may still call -(id)performSelector:withObject: with without an error.
For instance:
MyClass * test = [[MyClass alloc] init];
test.name = #"David";
is functionally the same as:
MyClass * test = [[MyClass alloc] init];
[test performSelector:#selector(setName:) withObject:#"David"];

What is the best way to declare a property?

We declare properties using the #property keyword and synthesize it in the implementation file. My question is,
What if I declare a property using the #property keyword and also declare a variable in the interface block with the same name? For example, consider the following code,
Interface:
#interface myClass : NSObject {
NSString *myClass_name; // LINE 1
}
#property(nonatomic, retain) NSString *myClass_name; // LINE 2
#end
Implementation:
#implementation myClass
#synthesize myClass_name // LINE 3
#end
Declaring myClass_name in LINE 1 will make any problem? Like any reference problem or any unnecessary memory consumption problem?
No, in fact, declaring properties like that expects it. You could replace your declaration to:
#interface MyClass : NSObject {
NSString *ivar;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *myClass_name;
#end
And then change your implementation to
#implementation MyClass
#synthesize myClass_name = ivar;
#end
(If you don't specify the = some_ivar, it will assume the ivar has the same name as the property.)
You always need to have the following lines:
Declaration of the property (Line 2)
Synthesization of the property (Line 3)
When you synthesize the property, if you do not specify which ivar to use (by using =ivar at the end), it will assume that there is an ivar with the same name as the property.
Declaring properties and synthesizing it will not create any reference problem in your case.
Doing this will create accessor and setter methods for your instance variable in your class.
If the variable names in the property and the one declared in the class, then the xcode will refer both as a single variable.
Line 3 and Line 4 are must. Line 1 is optiona
I got the following content from Apple's doc for Declared Properties. I am posting it here, so that it may be helpful for someone in future.
Runtime Difference
In general the behavior of properties is identical on all runtimes (see Runtime Versions and Platforms in Objective-C Runtime Programming Guide). There is one key difference: the modern runtime supports instance variable synthesis whereas the legacy runtime does not.
For #synthesize to work in the legacy runtime, you must either provide an instance variable with the same name and compatible type of the property or specify another existing instance variable in the #synthesize statement. With the modern runtime, if you do not provide an instance variable, the compiler adds one for you. For example, given the following class declaration and implementation:
#interface MyClass : NSObject {
float sameName;
float otherName;
}
#property float sameName;
#property float differentName;
#property float noDeclaredIvar;
#end
#implementation MyClass
#synthesize sameName;
#synthesize differentName=otherName;
#synthesize noDeclaredIvar;
#end
the compiler for the legacy runtime would generate an error at #synthesize noDeclaredIvar; whereas the compiler for the modern runtime would add an instance variable to represent noDeclaredIvar.
The following is the Object-oriented way:
DeclaringProperties.h
#interface DeclaringProperties : NSObject
// ivars and {} can be omitted
#property (nonatomic, readwrite, retain) NSString *normal;
#property (nonatomic, readwrite, retain) NSString *alias;
#property (nonatomic, readonly, retain) NSString *readonly;
- (id) initWithNormal:(NSString *)aNormal alias:(NSString *)alias;
#end
DeclaringProperties.m
#import "DeclaringProperties.h"
// private interface
#interface DeclaringProperties ()
#property (nonatomic, readwrite, retain) NSString *readonly; // readwrite for self
#property (nonatomic, readwrite, retain) NSString *private;
#property (nonatomic, readwrite, retain) NSString *retain;
#end
#pragma mark -
#implementation DeclaringProperties
#synthesize normal, alias = _alias, readonly, private, retain;
// You can not use "normal" here;
// But you can still use "alias", and it is highlighted in XCode!
- (id) initWithNormal:(NSString *)aNormal alias:(NSString *)alias {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
self.normal = aNormal;
self.alias = alias;
self.readonly = #"readonly";
self.private = #"private";
// allocated(copied) variable for retained(copied) property should be released or autoreleased
NSString *alloc = [[NSString alloc] init];
self.retain = alloc;
[alloc release];
// or
self.retain = [[NSString alloc] init];
[self.retain release];
// or
self.retain = [[[NSString alloc] init] autorelease];
// I don't like ;)
retain = [[NSString alloc] init];
}
return self;
}
- (void) dealloc {
self.normal = nil;
self.alias = nil;
self.readonly = nil;
self.private = nil;
self.retain = nil;
[super dealloc];
}
#end