Let's say I have the following code in my configure.zcml file. I want my class to be implemented for another interface too, let's say Interface2
<browser:page
for="Interface1"
class="plone.app.content.browser.reviewlist.FullReviewListView"
name="full_review_list"
template="document_full_review_list.pt"
permission="cmf.ReviewPortalContent" />
How do I declare this in my zcml file?
So long I tried the folowing:
<browser:page
for="Interface1 Interface2"
class="plone.app.content.browser.reviewlist.FullReviewListView"
name="full_review_list"
template="document_full_review_list.pt"
permission="cmf.ReviewPortalContent" />
and
<browser:page
for="Interface1"
allowed_interface="Interface2"
class="plone.app.content.browser.reviewlist.FullReviewListView"
name="full_review_list"
template="document_full_review_list.pt"
permission="cmf.ReviewPortalContent" />
You will have to register it twice, once for each interface.
The name can be the same, without getting a ConfigurationConflictError, since a browserview is a named multi-adapter that adapts both an object providing a specific interface (i.e Interface1 or Interface2) and the request.
So if the interface that the object is supposed to provide is different for each browserview registration, then there is no conflict.
<browser:page
for="Interface1"
class="plone.app.content.browser.reviewlist.FullReviewListView"
name="full_review_list"
template="document_full_review_list.pt"
permission="cmf.ReviewPortalContent" />
<browser:page
for="Interface2"
class="plone.app.content.browser.reviewlist.FullReviewListView"
name="full_review_list"
template="document_full_review_list.pt"
permission="cmf.ReviewPortalContent" />
Conversely, you can have two browserview registrations, for the same object interface (and with the same name), but with the discerning criteria being an interface provided by the request. That's what the layer attribute is for.
Related
In newer versions of Unity you can serialize the backing fields of properties via this pattern:
[field: SerializeField]
public Sprite Sprite { get; private set; }
Is there any way to specifically match on properties that have field targeted attributes in the File Layout settings of Rider? I've tried a few different things but none of them seem to result in a match:
<Entry DisplayName="Serialized Properties" Priority="150">
<Entry.Match>
<And>
<unity:SerializedField/>
<Kind Is="Autoproperty" />
</And>
</Entry.Match>
</Entry>
<Entry DisplayName="Serialized Properties" Priority="150">
<Entry.Match>
<And>
<HasAttribute Name="SerializeField"/>
<Kind Is="Autoproperty" />
</And>
</Entry.Match>
</Entry>
<Entry DisplayName="Serialized Properties" Priority="150">
<Entry.Match>
<And>
<HasAttribute Name="field: SerializeField"/>
<Kind Is="Autoproperty" />
</And>
</Entry.Match>
</Entry>
As of Rider 2022.1, the File Layout settings don't have a way of matching an auto property with a field: targeted attribute - the HasAttribute element will only match attributes that target the property itself. Here's an issue you can vote for and track: RSRP-488346.
I have a custom stored procedure with in parameters that return fields of different tables how I can map this custom stored to an entity? I only want to use like a read only values for a report I don't want to save or something like that I try to add the extra fields to the most similar entity but when I execute the method in code the extra fields are null
Solution 1: Using a view
A view allows to aggregate data from different entities.
<Article>
<Id />
<Name />
<Lines typeName="LineCollection" />
<cf:method name="LoadArticlesByCommand" body="load(string commandName) from ArticleByCommand where CommandName = #commandName" />
<cf:view name="ArticleByCommand" autoLightweight="true">
<ArticleName expression="Name"/>
<ArticleQty expression="Lines.Quantity" />
<CommandName expression="Lines.Command.Name" />
</cf:view>
</Article>
<Command>
<Id />
<Name />
<Lines typeName="LineCollection" />
</Command>
<Line setType="List">
<Article typeName="Article" key="true" />
<Command typeName="Command" key="true" />
<Quantity typeName="int" />
</Line>
http://blog.codefluententities.com/2014/04/22/views-auto-lightweight-and-the-modeler/
https://www.softfluent.com/documentation/Views_PersistentViews.html
Solution 2: Using a lightweight entity
Instead of creating a view, you can can create a lightweight entity that contains only the properties used by the stored procedure.
<cf:entity name="Person" lightweight="true">
<cf:property name="FirstName" typeName="string" />
<cf:property name="lastName" typeName="string" />
<cf:method name="ComputeBalance"
body="load () raw"
rawBody="SELECT 'John' AS FirstName, 'Doe' AS LastName" />
</cf:entity>
Solution 3: Custom mapping
For more specific values or types, a custom method can be provided to map the database values to .NET types. This custom method will be called with a DataReader as parameter, meaning that a developer could do whatever he wants.
<cf:entity name="Sample">
<cf:method name="LoadPair" body="raw" rawBody="SELECT 1234,5678"
returnTypeName="CodeFluent.Runtime.Utilities.Pair<System.Int32,System.Int32>"
cfom:methodName="On{0}" />
<cf:snippet>
private static CodeFluent.Runtime.Utilities.Pair<int,int> OnLoadPair(System.Data.IDataReader reader)
{
return new Pair<int, int>(reader.GetInt32(0), reader.GetInt32(1));
}
</cf:snippet>
</cf:entity>
You can also use OnAfterReadRecord or OnBeforeReadRecord rules
If it is not essential that you map the results of the custom stored procedure to an entity than another option is to use the built in support for DataSets.
http://blog.codefluententities.com/2011/06/22/dataset-support-in-codefluent-entities/
<cf:method name="LoadAllCities" body="raw" returnTypeName="System.Data.DataSet">
SELECT $Address::City$ FROM $Address$
</cf:method>
.
DataSet ds = Address.LoadAllCities();
foreach (DataTable table in ds.Tables)
{
foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows)
{
Console.WriteLine("City: " + row[0]);
}
}
Upon re-reading you're question I am providing another answer.
In response to the part where you said "I try to add the extra fields to the most similar entity but when I execute the method in code the extra fields are null". The following steps should be able to solve that problem.
Execute one of the automatically created stored procedure in SQL Management Studio.
Execute the stored procedure you manually created.
Verify that the fieldnames returned by both stored procedures match.
I think the above will solve your immediate problem but I still don't like the solution. The reason is that you said you picked the most similar entity. I think that is going to cause problems in the future especially if the stored procedure is not being mapped to all of the entities properties.
I would recommend either lightweight entity, view or DataSet.
I have a problem with internationalization. I'm trying to implement support two languages in my GWT application. Unfortunately I never found a complete example how to do it with the help of UiBinder. That is what I did:
My module I18nexample.gwt.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<module rename-to='i18nexample'>
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.user.User" />
<inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.theme.clean.Clean' />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.i18n.I18N" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.i18n.CldrLocales" />
<entry-point class='com.myexample.i18nexample.client.ExampleI18N' />
<servlet path="/start" class="com.myexample.i18nexample.server.StartServiceImpl" />
<extend-property name="locale" values="en, fr" />
<set-property-fallback name="locale" value="en" />
</module>
My interface Message.java:
package com.myexample.i18nexample.client;
import com.google.gwt.i18n.client.Constants;
public interface Message extends Constants {
String greeting();
}
The same package com.myexample.i18nexample.client has three properties file:
Message.properties:
greeting = hello
Message_en.properties:
greeting = hello
Message_fr.properties:
greeting = bonjour
My UiBinder file Greeting.ui.xml:
<!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM "http://dl.google.com/gwt/DTD/xhtml.ent">
<ui:UiBinder
xmlns:ui="urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder"
xmlns:g="urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui"
ui:generateFormat="com.google.gwt.i18n.rebind.format.PropertiesFormat"
ui:generateKeys="com.google.gwt.i18n.rebind.keygen.MD5KeyGenerator"
ui:generateLocales="default" >
<ui:with type="com.myexample.i18nexample.client.Message" field="string" />
<g:HTMLPanel>
<ui:msg key="greeting" description="greeting">Default greeting</ui:msg>
</g:HTMLPanel>
</ui:UiBinder>
When the application starts, I always get the output in the browser:
Default greeting
Why? What am I doing wrong?
I tried to run the application from different URL:
http://127.0.0.1:8888/i18nexample.html?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997
http://127.0.0.1:8888/i18nexample.html?locale=en&gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997
http://127.0.0.1:8888/i18nexample.html?locale=fr&gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997
The result does not change. Although I expected in last case a message bonjour.
If for example I use a g:Buttton instead of the message ui:msg:
<g:HTMLPanel>
<g:Button text="{string.greeting}" />
</g:HTMLPanel>
Then I get as a result of the button with text "hello"
And if I enter the URL:
http://127.0.0.1:8888/i18nexample.html?locale=fr&gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997
The text on the button changes to "bonjour". Here everything works as expected. But why internationalization is not working in my first case?
And whether there is a difference between the following:
<ui:msg description="greeting">Default greeting</ui:msg>
<ui:msg description="greeting">hello</ui:msg>
<ui:msg description="greeting"></ui:msg>
Should there be different results in these cases? How to write properly?
Please explain to me the principles of internationalization in GWT and why my example does not work.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
First, the files should be named Message_fr.properties (resp. Message_en.properties), not Message.properties_fr (resp. Message.properties_en).
Then ui:msg et al. in UiBinder will generate an interface (extending com.google.gwt.i18n.client.Messages)), not use one that you defined. For that, you have to use {string.greeting} (where string is the ui:field you gave to your ui:with). The UiBinder generator will do a GWT.create() on the type class of your ui:with, which is what you'd have done in Java code:
Message string = GWT.create(Message.class);
String localizedGreeting = string.greeting();
In the implicit Messages interface (generated by UiBinder), the various ui:generateXxx attributes on the ui:UiBinder will be transformed into annotations on the interface (properties of the #Generate annotation, or the value of the #GenerateKeys annotation).
Then, one method will be generated for each ui:msg, where the attributes generate equivalent annotations (#Key, #Description) and the content of the ui:msg element is the value of the #DefaultMessage annotation. When you have or widgets inside the content, they'll be turned into arguments to the method and placeholders in the #DefaultMessage text (the values will be filled by UiBinder).
I'd suggest you make something working without UiBinder first, and understand how it works; then try the ui:msg in UiBinder, using -gen in DevMode or the compiler so you can see exactly what code does UiBinder generate (yes, it really only generates code that you could have written yourself by hand).
Also, you should add a <set-property name="locale" value="en, fr" /> or you'll still have the default locale around, despite the set-property-fallback (it'd just never be used)).
I'm working on a SOAP webservice which features many inputfields using enumeration restrictions.
These enumerations are much like an HTML select/option setup; I expect a certain value to be returned but the label of that value should be exposed using the WSDL as well.
An example: the client wishes to add an insurance policy regarding his/her house and thus needs to specify the type of building involved.
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="00001" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00002" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00003" />
</xsd:restriction>
However, the client does not yet understand what these values 1, 2 and 3 are. So, something like this:
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="00001" label="Brick and mortar" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00002" label="Straw" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00003" label="Aircastle" />
</xsd:restriction>
would be great for the client to be used to display these labels to the consumer.
Is there any standard WSDL annotation/syntax for this construction?
Is there any standard WSDL annotation/syntax for this construction?
I'm afraid not. The XML Schema enumeration is used to constrain a value to be within a specified set of possible values. When your client sends you the request, the element with the restriction type will only be allowed to have (in your case) a value of 00001, 00002 or 00003 or it won't be valid.
The restriction only specifies the values, you can't add labels. You could at best add an <annotation> but that would be just documentation. In the client UI, it would be the responsibility of each client to say that 00001 is actually "Brick and mortar" and that 00002 is "Straw" etc.
If you don't want to do that, and instead want to also return labels, then you need a slightly more complex object, maybe something like this:
<option>
<key>00001</key>
<label>Brick and mortar</label>
</option>
You provide a label and you restrict the key with a schema like:
<xsd:simpleType name="ValuesType">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="00001" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00002" />
<xsd:enumeration value="00003" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:complexType name="OptionType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="key" type="ValuesType" />
<xsd:element name="label" type="xsd:string" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
You can return a list of options to the clients and they can present it in the interface with key as value and label as the text of options in <select> inputs, while on the request you will get back the selected value (i.e. the selected key).
I am having trouble understanding the Phing documentation regarding multiple conditions for a given <if> tag. It implies you cannot have multiple conditions unless you use the <and> tag, but there are no examples of how to use it. Consequently I nested two <if> tags, however I feel silly doing this when I know there is a better way. Does anyone know how I can use the <and> tag to accomplish the following:
<if><equals arg1="${deployment.host.type}" arg2="unrestricted" /><then>
<if><equals arg1="${db.adapter}" arg2="PDO_MYSQL"/><then>
<!-- Code Here -->
</then></if>
</then></if>
I find it very surprising that no one has had any experience with this. Phing is an implementation of the 'ANT' build tool in PHP instead of Java. It is very useful for PHP developers who feel a lack of a simple and powerful deployment tool. Java's ability to package self contained web projects into a single file or package multiple web project files into a yet bigger file is an amazing capability. ANT or Phing does not get PHP to that point, but its a definite step in the right direction and leaps and bounds easier to understand and use than GNU Make ever was or will be.
According to the Phing documentation:
The <or> element doesn't have any attributes and accepts an arbitrary number of conditions as nested elements. This condition is true if at least one of its contained conditions is, conditions will be evaluated in the order they have been specified in the build file.
It may sound confusing at first, especially with no handy examples available, but the keywords to note are, "accepts an arbitrary number of conditions as nested elements." If you try the following build snippet out, you should easily realize how to use <or> and <and> conditions:
<if>
<or>
<equals arg1="foo" arg2="bar" />
<equals arg1="baz" arg2="baz" />
</or>
<then>
<echo message="Foo equals bar, OR baz equals baz!" />
</then>
</if>
<if>
<or>
<equals arg1="foo" arg2="bar" />
<equals arg1="baz" arg2="bam" />
</or>
<then>
<echo message="Foo equals bar, OR baz equals baz!" />
</then>
<else>
<echo message="No match to OR found." />
</else>
</if>
<fail />