Joining-Table with Metadata Impairs Getters/Setters - Doctrine 2 - zend-framework

I'm writing a feature which calls for the records of my joining table to carry extra metadata (Joining-Table with Metadata). I've attempted to implement this in accordance with this section of the Doctrine documentation.
See below for example Entity definitions.
The challenge now is that getGroups and setGroups do not yield/set Group entities (& the same is true from the Group instance perspective), but they yield GroupUser entities.
This adds a substantial delay to process of managing this relationships, which so far have been extremely smooth - for example, I cannot simply add, remove, or check for the existence of a Group to the collection which getGroups yields.
Can anyone identity any errors in my implementation, or else recommend a more fluid way of implementing this concept?
Thanks in advance for any input.
EDIT:
My main concern is this: using this implementation, retrieving a collection of Users from a Group entity requires this Entity method's mediation:
public function getUsers() {
return $this->users->map(function($groupUser){
return $groupUser->getUser();
});
}
I'm concerned that this could imply a major performance hit down the road. Am I incorrect?
Furthermore, how does one re-implement the setUsers method?
Group entity:
<?php
/**
* #Entity
* #Table(name="group")
*/
class Group {
/**
* #Column(type="integer", nullable=false)
* #Id
*/
protected $id = null;
/**
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="GroupUser", mappedBy="group")
* #var \Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection
*/
protected $users;
}
User entity:
<?php
/**
* #Entity
* #Table(name="user")
*/
class User {
/**
* #Column(type="integer", nullable=false)
* #Id
*/
protected $id = null;
/**
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="GroupUser", mappedBy="user")
* #var \Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection
*/
protected $groups;
}
Joining entity:
<?php
/**
* #Entity
* #Table(name="group_user")
*/
class GroupUser {
/**
* #Id
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="groups")
* #JoinColumn(name="userId", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
protected $user;
/**
* #Id
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="Group", inversedBy="users")
* #JoinColumn(name="groupId", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
protected $group;
/**
* #Column(type="integer")
*/
protected $relationship;
}
Related -
Same goal, slightly different approach, which consistently produced errors once the resulting collections were manipulated: http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DDC-1323
Supports the approach, no technical details: Doctrine 2 join table + extra fields

I've found just two examples (see question) of entity definitions for this specific type of relationship, however no example code for how they're used. As such it was fairly unclear how fluid (or otherwise) the resulting setters & getters could be expected to be. Hopefully this code will help clear up the approach for anyone else making a similar attempt.
The ideal solution under the circumstances (thanks #doctrine # freenode) was to implement a custom repository - a more flexible & efficient place for creating & managing the association.
Example Custom Repository for Join-Table with Metadata Class - Solution accompanies code in original question
<?php
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository;
class GroupUserRepository extends EntityRepository {
/**
* #param \User $user
* #param \Group $group
* #param integer $type One of the integer class constants defined by GroupUser
* #param string $role Optional string defining user's role in the group.
* #return \GroupUser
*/
public function addUserToGroup(User $user, Group $group, $relationship, $role = '') {
$groupUser = $this->findOneBy(array('user' => $user->getId(), 'group' => $group->getId()));
if(!$groupUser) {
$groupUser = new GroupUser();
$groupUser->setGroup($group);
$groupUser->setUser($user);
$groupUser->setRole($role);
$groupUser->setRelationship($relationship);
$this->_em->persist($groupUser);
}
return $groupUser;
}
/**
* #param \User $user
* #param \Group $group
* #return null
*/
public function removeUserFromGroup(User $user, Group $group) {
$groupUser = $this->findOneBy(array('user' => $user->getId(), 'group' => $group->getId()));
if($groupUser)
$this->_em->remove($groupUser);
}
}
Then, from the join-table class, modify the Entity meta-data accordingly to specify the custom repository.
<?php
/**
* #Entity(repositoryClass="\Path\To\GroupUserRepository")
*/
class GroupUser {
// ...
}
This causes the custom repository to yield in place of the default one, making a proxy method from the Entity class simple.
<?php
/**
* #Entity
*/
class Group {
/**
* #param \User $user
* #param integer $relationship One of the integer class constants defined by GroupUser
* #param string $role Optional string defining user's role in the group.
* #return \GroupUser
*/
public function addUser(User $user, $relationship, $role = '') {
return $this->_em->getRepository('GroupUser')
->addUserToGroup($user, $this, $relationship, $role);
}
}
And things are about as manageable as they were before.

Related

Symfony 4 MongoDB ODM One to ONe relationship is not working

I am facing an error with symfony and mongoDB odm on one to one relationship
for example i have a user that has Work .
User Class:
/**
* #MongoDB\Document
* #MongoDBUnique(fields="email")
*/
class User implements UserInterface
{
/**
* #MongoDB\Id
*/
private $id;
/**
* #MongoDB\Field(type="string")
*/
private $firstName;
/**
* #MongoDB\Field(type="string")
*/
private $lastName;
/**
* #MongoDB\Field(type="string")
* #Assert\NotBlank()
* #Assert\Email()
*/
private $email;
/**
* #MongoDB\ReferenceOne(targetDocument=Work::class)
*/
private $work;
//getter setter
Work Class:
class Work
{
/**
* #MongoDB\Id()
*/
private $id;
/**
* #MongoDB\ReferenceOne(targetDocument=User::class)
*/
private $user;
//getter setter
}
Controller:
class TestingController extends AbstractController
{
/**
* #Route("/testing", name="testing")
* #param DocumentManager $documentManager
* #return Response
* #throws MongoDBException
*/
public function index(DocumentManager $documentManager)
{
$user = new User();
$user->setFirstName('test1');
$user->setLastName('test2');
$user->setEmail('test123#gmail.com');
$documentManager->persist($user);
$work= new Work();
$work->setUser($user);
$documentManager->persist($work);
$documentManager->flush();
return new Response("test");
}
/**
* #Route("/test", name="test")
* #param DocumentManager $documentManager
* #return Response
*/
public function test(DocumentManager $documentManager){
$user = $documentManager->getRepository(User::class)->findAll();
dump($user);
return new Response("test test");
}
}
So I created 2 classes one as user that has one work, I created the user , then I created a work and i assigned the user from the work class.
in MongoDB compass I got under Work collection a reference for the user.
now in the test method in the controller i try to find the users and dump the data.
The problem is whenever i want to find $user->getWork() i get a null value, while the user exists. but the inverse is working fine . whenever i try $work->getUser() i can find the user.
is there anything wrong in my code ? I want to use both methods : $user->getWork() and $work->getUser(),
I have tried adding to the ReferenceOne mappedBy and inversedBy but its always one of the two methods returns null value.
I think you forgot the mappedBy and inversedBy arguments in the annotation. See the documentation: https://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-mongodb-odm/en/2.1/reference/bidirectional-references.html#one-to-one

Rest API - Why is Postman sending me back empty curly brackets with GET

I'm working on a REST API. Hence I created my entities like for example this one musee.php
<?php
namespace AppBundle\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* Musee
*
* #ORM\Table(name="musee")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="AppBundle\Repository\MuseeRepository")
*/
class Musee
{
/**
* #var int
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\Column(type="integer")
* #ORM\GeneratedValue
*/
private $id;
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(type="string", nullable=false)
*/
private $nom;
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(type="string", nullable=false)
*/
private$adresse;
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=false)
*/
private $horaireOuverture;
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=false)
*/
private $horaireFermeture;
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="AppBundle\Entity\Bateau", mappedBy="musee")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(referencedColumnName="id")
*/
private $bateaux;
/**
* #return int
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->id;
}
/**
* #param int $id
*/
public function setId($id)
{
$this->id = $id;
}
/**
* #return string
*/
public function getNom()
{
return $this->nom;
}
/**
* #param string $nom
*/
public function setNom($nom)
{
$this->nom = $nom;
}
/**
* #return string
*/
public function getAdresse()
{
return $this->adresse;
}
/**
* #param string $adresse
*/
public function setAdresse($adresse)
{
$this->adresse = $adresse;
}
/**
* #return int
*/
public function getHoraireOuverture()
{
return $this->horaireOuverture;
}
/**
* #param int $horaireOuverture
*/
public function setHoraireOuverture($horaireOuverture)
{
$this->horaireOuverture = $horaireOuverture;
}
/**
* #return int
*/
public function getHoraireFermeture()
{
return $this->horaireFermeture;
}
/**
* #param int $horaireFermeture
*/
public function setHoraireFermeture($horaireFermeture)
{
$this->horaireFermeture = $horaireFermeture;
}
/**
* #return mixed
*/
public function getBateaux()
{
return $this->bateaux;
}
/**
* #param mixed $bateaux
*/
public function setBateaux($bateaux)
{
$this->bateaux = $bateaux;
}
}
My MuseeRepository also exists and in my config.yml I put (both were installed with composer) :
# Nelmio CORS
nelmio_cors:
defaults:
allow_credentials: false
allow_origin: ['*']
allow_headers: ['Content-Type']
allow_methods: ['POST', 'PATCH', 'GET', 'DELETE', 'OPTIONS']
max_age: 3600
paths:
'^/api':
# FosRest
fos_rest:
routing_loader:
include_format: false
view:
view_response_listener: true
format_listener:
rules:
- { path: '^/', priorities: ['json'], fallback_format: 'json' }
In my MuseeController here is what I put:
<?php
/**
* Created by PhpStorm.
* User: Fanny
* Date: 28/03/2018
* Time: 16:13
*/
namespace AppBundle\Controller;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Route;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
use FOS\RestBundle\Controller\Annotations as Rest;
use FOS\RestBundle\Controller\FOSRestController;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use FOS\RestBundle\View\View;
use AppBundle\Entity\Musee;
class MuseeController extends Controller
{
/**
* #Rest\View(serializerGroups={"musee"})
* #Rest\Get("/musee")
*/
// Fonction qui renvoie toutes all musee
public function findMusee()
{
$musee = $this->getDoctrine()
->getRepository('AppBundle:Musee')
->findAll();
return $musee;
}
}
I also used a serializer file, I wonder if my problem does not come from there... Though all this elements are in my database as I generated it with doctrine.
AppBundle\Entity\Musee:
attributes:
id:
groups: ['musee']
nom:
groups: ['musee']
adresse:
groups: ['musee']
horaire_ouverture:
groups: ['musee']
horaire_fermeture:
groups: ['musee']
bateaux:
groups: ['musee']
My problem is when I try to call my localhost:8000/musee, I get the good amount of brackets compared to what is inside my database, but they appear empty.
I think I might be missing a step but I'm not sure where to search. Where do you think I should look?
UPDATE:
The version of Symfony that I have is 3.4.
I enabled serializer in my config.yml and installed with composer : jms/serializer-bundle.
In my app Kernel I have :
new FOS\RestBundle\FOSRestBundle(),
new JMS\SerializerBundle\JMSSerializerBundle(),
new Nelmio\CorsBundle\NelmioCorsBundle(),
The problem is common to all my entities. I get the right amount of brackets but no content inside.
FOSRestBundle's docs cover the serialization here: Enable a Serializer
But CSS seems to be falling apart presently, so I'll quote it:
C) Enable a Serializer
This bundle needs a serializer to work correctly. In most cases, you'll need to enable a serializer or install one. This bundle tries the following (in the given order) to determine the serializer to use:
The one you configured using fos_rest.services.serializer (if you did).
The JMS serializer, if the JMSSerializerBundle is available (and registered).
The Symfony Serializer if it's enabled (or any service called serializer).
Questions:
Which version of Symfony do you use?
Have you enabled Serializer component?
Is the issue limited to Musee or all entities?
Please update the question with these and we can follow up.
Update:
Can't help but wonder if it has anything to do with all services becoming private in Symfony 3.4. Maybe FOSRestBundle cannot find the JMSSerializerBundle. Which version of FOSRestBundle you have installed?
I see that all released versions of FOSRestBundle specify the ^3.0 dependency requirement, but the above is specific to v3.4.
That happens because you are returning an array of entities instead of valid json response. I am working in REST/API too, but without FOSRest, so I cant be completely sure how serialization happens with FOSREST, but definitively is that.
A workaround could be returning a JSONResponse in your controller, with all of your entities serialized somehow instead of returning the array of entities as you are currently doing here
return $musee;
I recreated my project and this time didn't get an error... I'm not sure of what was the reason but I used the same Symfony versions and commands. So there was probably a problem somewhere even if I try to compare both and din't see any difference. I'll try to tell you if I find it.

Handle filesUpload in a single table Symfony

Thank you for your interest,
SHORT
I want to manage all my uploads (Image, PDF, Video etc...) in a single entity, so I use entity Inheritance to get various "types" and OneToOne relations to link parent entity with correct upload. I didn't found any bundle to do this and face problems:
Constraints use
Setting uploaded file and not upload entity
Get uploaded file and not upload entity (edition)
LONG
Instead of having 1 file management in each table (which is quiet verbose) I preferred to have only one table Uploads to handle every Uploads. Then I just have to do OneToOne relations to get my file, plus using inheritance I can apply various treatment depending on Image or PDF for example.
I have at least 4 entities that needs image, so I think that 1to1 relation is a good choice.
But I face problems doing things like this :
Constraints aren't taking into account
Edition of $file should set $file->file (it doesn't send the entity from Uploads/Image but the file to create this entity
The Uploaded file isn't loaded on entity edition and should be reuploaded each time I edit entity
Does anyone did this ? I can't find out how to achieve this correctly.
Looking at the assert problem I tried to:
Define asserts on Image (this doesn't work as expected as the form target the $file of WithImage)
Using annotation #Assert\Image()
Using loadValidatorMetadata
Using annotation #Assert\Callback()
Define assert on form field 'constraints' => array(new Assert\Image()), this works but need to be defined everywhere I use it...
Looking at the setter misused I found a workaround, but this is quiet ugly:
public function setFile($file = null)
{
if ($file instanceof \Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\File\UploadedFile) {
$tmpfile = new Image();
$tmpfile->setFile($file);
$file = $tmpfile;
}
$this->file = $file;
return $this;
}
(PS: I read about traits to avoid copy/paste of code, I have checked the SonataMediaBundle but this doesn't seems to apply to my case)
CODE
So I designed my classes as follow:
Entity\Uploads.php To handle all the life of a file from upload to remove (and access, move, edit, possibly thumbnail etc ...)
<?php
namespace Acme\CoreBundle\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\File\UploadedFile;
use Acme\CoreBundle\Utils\UUID;
/**
* Uploads
*
* #ORM\Table(name="uploads")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Acme\CoreBundle\Repository\UploadsRepository")
* #ORM\InheritanceType("SINGLE_TABLE")
* #ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="class", type="string")
* #ORM\DiscriminatorMap({"image" = "Image"})
* #ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
*/
abstract class Uploads
{
protected $file;
private $tempFileName;
/**
* #var int
*
* #ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer")
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="AUTO")
*/
private $id;
/**
* #var \DateTime
*
* #ORM\Column(name="date", type="datetime")
*/
private $date;
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(name="fileName", type="string", length=36, unique=true)
*/
private $fileName; // UUID
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(name="extension", type="string", length=4)
*/
private $extension;
/**
* Get id.
*
* #return int
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->id;
}
/**
* Set date.
*
* #param \DateTime $date
*
* #return uploads
*/
public function setDate($date)
{
$this->date = $date;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get date.
*
* #return \DateTime
*/
public function getDate()
{
return $this->date;
}
/**
* Set fileName.
*
* #param string $fileName
*
* #return uploads
*/
public function setFileName($fileName)
{
$this->fileName = $fileName;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get fileName.
*
* #return string
*/
public function getFileName()
{
return $this->fileName;
}
/**
* Set extension
*
* #param string $extension
*
* #return string
*/
public function setExtension($extension)
{
$this->extension = $extension;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get extension
*
* #return string
*/
public function getExtension()
{
return $this->extension;
}
public function getFileNameExt()
{
return $this->getFileName().'.'.$this->getExtension();
}
public function setFile(UploadedFile $file)
{
$this->file = $file;
if (null !== $this->getId()) {
$this->tempFileName = $this->getFileNameExt();
$this->fileName = null;
$this->extension = null;
}
}
public function getFile()
{
return $this->file;
}
/**
* #ORM\PrePersist()
* #ORM\PreUpdate()
*/
public function preUpload()
{
if (null === $this->file) {
return;
}
$this->extension = $this->file->guessExtension();
$this->fileName = UUID::v4();
$this->preUpdateFile();
}
protected function preUpdateFile(){} // To define if specific treatment
/**
* #ORM\PrePersist()
*/
public function prePersistDate()
{
$this->date = new \DateTime();
return $this;
}
/**
* #ORM\PostPersist()
* #ORM\PostUpdate()
*/
public function upload()
{
if (null === $this->file) {
return;
}
if (null !== $this->tempFileName) {
$oldFile = $this->getUploadRootDir().$this->tempFileName;
if (file_exists($oldFile)) {
unlink($oldFile);
}
}
$this->file = $this->file->move(
$this->getUploadRootDir(),
$this->getFileNameExt()
);
$this->postUpdateFile();
}
protected function postUpdateFile(){} // To define if specific treatment
/**
* #ORM\PreRemove()
*/
public function preRemoveUpload()
{
// On sauvegarde temporairement le nom du fichier
$this->tempFileName = $this->getFileNameExt();
$this->preRemoveFile();
}
protected function preRemoveFile(){} // To define if specific treatment
/**
* #ORM\PostRemove()
*/
public function removeUpload()
{
$oldFile = $this->getUploadRootDir().$this->tempFileName;
if (file_exists($oldFile)) {
unlink($oldFile);
}
$this->postRemoveFile();
}
protected function postRemoveFile(){} // To define if specific treatment
public function getFileUri()
{
return $this->getUploadDir().$this->getFileNameExt();
}
public function getUploadDir()
{
return 'uploads/';
}
protected function getUploadRootDir()
{
return __DIR__.'/../../../../web/'.$this->getUploadDir();
}
public function __toString() {
return $this->getFileNameExt();
}
}
Entity\Image.php A specific type of upload with its own constraints and file management
<?php
namespace Acme\CoreBundle\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* Image
*
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Acme\CoreBundle\Repository\ImageRepository")
*/
class Image extends Uploads
{
}
Entity\WithImage.php An entity which needs an Image
<?php
namespace Acme\CoreBundle\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* WithImage
*
* #ORM\Table(name="with_image")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Acme\CoreBundle\Repository\WithImageRepository")
*/
class WithImage
{
/**
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Acme\CoreBundle\Entity\Image", cascade={"persist", "remove"})
*/
protected $file;
}
Some thoughts come to my mind to help you achieve what you want.
First, you have to upload the files in a form, and the constraints should be in a property in an entity (unless you want to have the pain of writing your constraints in every form, which is not very mantainable). So, for every entity that's going to have files, define a file property (not ORM anotated) and write your constraints there. Also add the respective getters and setters.
/**
* #var UploadedFile
* #Assert\NotBlank(groups={"New"})
* #Assert\File(mimeTypes={"text/html", "text/markdown", "text/plain"})
*/
private $file;
Second, you might ask ¿but how do I save them to a different Entity? This is when I would recommend you to use a Doctrine Event Subscriber. Basically, is a service that is defined with a doctrine.event_subscriber tag which class implements the Doctrine\Common\EventSubscriber Interface. You can subscribe to events like preUpdate, postLoad, and the interesting for you: prePersist.
My take on this would be that you subscribe to the prePersist event. The event will pass you the entity (with that file non-orm property we created, that has the UploadedFile instance holding your file info).
Then, using the info for that file, create a new Upload entity, pass all the info you want, and then set that in the real file orm mapped property that holds your file relationship with your desired entity. For this to work you will have to enable persist cascade if I recall correctly.
The benefits of this:
1. You can define your constraints in your Entities.
2. You can have the Uploads Entity you desire.
The only major problem is that you will have to do all the retrieval, storing and updating of the Uploads entity through a listener. But's the only thing I can think of to help you.

Extend shopware database, creating relations

I'm trying to implement a plugin to add sales representative data to my shop and associate this data to users.
On this context (users and sales representative) I have:
sales_rep - Sales representative table
sales_rep_user - Relation between User and Sales Representative
1st For the swg_sales_rep and swg_sales_rep_user relation (OneToMany) I could create that without problems
SwgSalesRepresentative.php
...
**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="swg_sales_rep")
*/
class SwgSalesRepresentative extends ModelEntity
{
...
/**
* INVERSE SIDE
*
* #var \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection
*
* #ORM\OneToMany(
* targetEntity="Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentative",
* mappedBy="salesRepresentative",
* orphanRemoval=true
* )
*/
protected $salesRepresentativeUsers;
...
SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers.php
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="swg_sales_rep_users")
*/
class SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers extends ModelEntity
{
...
/**
*
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentative")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="sales_rep_id", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
protected $salesRepresentative;
/**
* #return mixed
*/
public function getSalesRepresentative()
{
return $this->salesRepresentative;
}
/**
* #param $salesRepresentative
* #return ModelEntity
*/
public function setSalesRepresentative($salesRepresentative)
{
return $this->setManyToOne(
$salesRepresentative,
'\Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentative',
'salesRepresentativeUsers'
);
}
And after install I get my tables with foreign key ok.
For the relation between swg_sales_rep_user and s_user (OneToOne) I have problems. My first idea was extend the User model and add the additional logic we need. But this implies to overwrite my users table, take the risk to lose data.
What I did was create a SwgUser model that extends User model, like
SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers.php
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="swg_sales_rep_users")
*/
class SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers extends ModelEntity
{
...
/**
* #var \Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgUser $user
*
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgUser", inversedBy="salesRepresentative")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="user_id", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
protected $user;
/**
* #return mixed
*/
public function getUser()
{
return $this->user;
}
/**
* #param $user
* #return ModelEntity
*/
public function setUser($user)
{
return $this->setOneToOne(
$user,
'\Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgUser',
'user',
'salesRepresentative'
);
}
...
SwgUser.php
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="s_user")
*/
class SwgUser extends User
{
/**
*
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers", mappedBy="user")
*/
protected $salesRepresentative;
...
And bootstrap.php install/uninstall looks like
/**
* Install method
*
* #return bool
*/
public function install()
{
$this->updateSchema();
return true;
}
/**
* Uninstall method
*
* #return bool
*/
public function uninstall()
{
$this->registerCustomModels();
$em = $this->Application()->Models();
$tool = new \Doctrine\ORM\Tools\SchemaTool($em);
$classes = array(
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentative'),
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgUser'),
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers')
);
$tool->dropSchema($classes);
return true;
}
/**
* Creates the database scheme from existing doctrine models.
*
* Will remove the table first, so handle with care.
*/
protected function updateSchema()
{
$this->registerCustomModels();
$em = $this->Application()->Models();
$tool = new \Doctrine\ORM\Tools\SchemaTool($em);
$classes = array(
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentative'),
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgUser'),
$em->getClassMetadata('Shopware\CustomModels\SwagUserSalesRepresentative\SwgSalesRepresentativeUsers')
);
try {
$tool->dropSchema($classes);
} catch (Exception $e) {
//ignore
}
$tool->createSchema($classes);
}
I tried to use the unidirectional association mapping and it creates the field but not the relation with s_user table (Foreign key).
So question is, how can I create relations with core tables on shopware without have to recreate (drop/create) the core tables?
Is it possible to alter tables programmatically? what is the best approach for these needs. Do you have an example that demonstrate this?
Thanks for helping.
there is no way to create bidirectional associations with shopware core tables yet. You can have unidirectional associations for sure, but you will not be able to add relational properties to core entities so far.
Except you intend to modify the shopware core itself which should be avoided at any time.
The only - and very tiny - possibility would be by trying to create a relation over a core entities attribute table which is quite "magic stuff" in shopware.

Doctrine 2 Modular App With Entity Replacement

I'm building an application using ZF2 and Doctrine2.
The ideia is to have a base app entity (lets call it UserEntity).
But in one Module A, I will have another UserEntity-like entity that will "upgrade" the base one, with new fields. And another Module B that will add more fields.
Ex:
BaseUserEntity {
protected $id;
// ...
}
ModuleAUserEntity extends BaseUserEntity {
protected moduleAId;
}
ModuleBUserEntity extends BaseUserEntity {
protected moduleBUserName;
}
Is it possible, somehow, to get a method so when I call UserEntity, it will return the full, upgraded-by-module, entity? Ex:
UserEntity {
protected $id;
// ...
protected moduleAId;
protected moduleBUserName;
}
Is there another way to achieve something like this? The possibility to "extension" of an entity?
I have 2 different approaches:
1.First one:
you should take a look at:
http://docs.doctrine-project.org/en/latest/reference/inheritance-mapping.html
thats the legitimate and recommend by doctrine way of doing this.
2. Second one
If you dont want doctrine to mess with the database, you can use a different aproach:
Create an interface that defines the common behavior of all classes
Write your base class, implementing that behavior.
write your child classes, implementing the interface, containing the new methods, and wrapping an instance of the base class
You implement the methods that are defined in the interface, but since they are already implemented in the parent class, you just bypass the call to the wrapped object.
So, you are using composition over inheritance to avoid doctrine (and probably you) to get crazy
In order to have a really clean behavior with doctrine, the database that i imagine is:
a table with the parent entity
a table with the child entity, containing
a foreign key with the id of the related parent entity (this is, the row in the parent table that contains the values asociated to this, since the child has to have the parent and the child fields)
all the extra columns
For instance:
Interface:
namespace DBAL\Entity;
interface IProfesional
{
public function setName($name);
public function getName();
public function getId();
}
Parent class:
namespace DBAL\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
use DBAL\Entity\User\IUserAware;
/**
* Profesional
*
* #ORM\Table(name="profesional")
* #ORM\Entity
*/
class Profesional implements IProfesional
{
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(name="name", type="string", length=45, nullable=true)
*/
private $name;
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer")
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="IDENTITY")
*/
private $id;
/**
* Set nombre
*
* #param string $nombre
* #return Profesional
*/
public function setName($nombre)
{
$this->name = $nombre;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get nombre
*
* #return string
*/
public function getNombre()
{
return $this->name;
}
/**
* Get id
*
* #return integer
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->id;
}
}
child class:
namespace DBAL\Entity;
use DBAL\Entity\User\IUserAware;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* Jugador
*
* #ORM\Table(name="jugador")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="DBAL\Repository\JugadorRepository")
*/
class Player implements IProfesional
{
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(name="profesional_id", type="integer")
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="IDENTITY")
*/
private $id;
/**
* #var \Profesional
*
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Profesional")
* #ORM\JoinColumns({
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="profesional_id", referencedColumnName="id", unique=true)
* })
*/
private $profesional;
/**
* Constructor: you create an empty Profesional,
so you are sure you will never use a reference to an in-existent object.
But anyways, if this is an entity loaded from the database by doctrine,
doctrine will fill that field whith an actual professional from the parent table,
based in the foreign key id
*/
public function __construct()
{
if(!isset($id)){
$this->profesional=new Profesional();
}
}
/**
* Set profesional
*
* #param \Profesional $profesional
* #return Jugador
*/
public function setProfesional( Profesional $profesional = null)
{
$this->profesional = $profesional;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get profesional
*
* #return \Profesional
*/
public function getProfesional()
{
return $this->profesional;
}
/**
* Get id
*
* #return integer
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->profesional->getId();
}
///New fields, for instance:
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(name="height", type="integer", nullable=true)
*/
private $height;
public function getHeight()
{
return $this->height;
}
public function setHeight($h)
{
$this->height=$h;
}
}