I'm looking to build a wordpress site with multiple authors that will each be posting content that viewers can then "like".
What I am trying to figure out is if it would be possible to somehow keep a track on the number of likes each author is getting in total.
Would the best way to do this be too just have multiple Apps with different ID's and somehow generate the like code dynamically based on the Author or is there a smarter way to do it ?
Once I have this in place how hard would it be to pull the counts into an HTML widget to display a kind of league table of most liked authors ?
I think you can try to achieve this with the JavaScript SDK and the Like callback.
http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/FB.Event.subscribe/
But you will have to record those likes into your database and pull count from there.
Use the ref parameter of the like plugin if you don't have easy access to do what Alexander recommended (If you can store the data yourself it's better as you can really make your own data analysis). But here's the out-of-the-box way Facebook provides for tracking where a like came from.
From: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like/
ref - a label for tracking referrals; must be less than 50 characters and can contain alphanumeric characters and some
punctuation (currently +/=-.:_). The ref attribute causes two
parameters to be added to the referrer URL when a user clicks a link
from a stream story about a Like action:
fb_ref - the ref parameter
fb_source - the stream type ('home', 'profile', 'search', 'ticker', 'tickerdialog' or 'other') in which the click occurred and
the story type ('oneline' or 'multiline'), concatenated with an
underscore.
Related
I currently developed a solution for custom uploading videos for specific customers.
One of my customers need the ability to specify "interests" for a video he upload.
From the API documentation, interests are:
interests
list
One or more IDs of pages to target fans of pages.Use type of page to get possible IDs as find Targeting Options and use the returned id to specify.
There is some mis-documentation regarding this feature: "find Targeting Options" does not talks about type=page.
But, still, I can search for page, using the "search" endpoint: /2.5/search?q=gsw&type=page and get the ID of the page.
As to my understanding, I can specify a page, for example "Golden State Warriors" fan page, specify its id, and then every user which follows this page will be considered as interested in my post.
So, I think my flow should be:
1) Search for the requested page using the "search" api. Get the page's IDS.
2) When creating the video, specify the ID in the "interests" parameter list.
Now, I need to know how to specify the ID in the interests list - The documentation says it list, but the page ID as a number string...
So in conclusion, I would like some help in verifying that all that I have written is correct and make sense, and also to know how to get the int32 id of a page - is it just mistake in the documentaion?
Thanks!
I have a form on the home page of quotedjobs.com that I would like to persist the field values of across pages.
For example: A user enters some values in fields, such as job title (textbox), job type (list) and job description (text field). Underneath that I ask users to register on the site, but they have the option to click a link to allow them to login if they are already members.
What I would like to be able to do, is to redirect users to another form that is a copy, but allows them to login instead of register, but keep hold of the values that they entered in the title, type and description form of the previous page so they aren't losing their work.
I have seen the ninja_forms_processing variable in the docs, but I'm not clear on how to use that.
TL;DR - You can't.
As it was slim pickings here, I sent an email over to support. Got this response:
Hello,
At this time this use case is not possible in Ninja Forms. The plugin is currently unable to transfer data from field to field or between forms.
I’m sorry that we do not have a better solution for you at this time.
Thank you,
So just going through GOogle Webmaster to clean out some 404's and check overall site health, and I've only just discovered about 200 posts that have been flagged as having Duplicate Title Tags.
So here's one common example. Post seems to have two versions, one with out the date format and one with. There isn't two versions of the post in the database, so it's just the one post but I guess has been indexed twice. I do believe I played with changing Permalink format a while back, to remove the date, so pretty sure this would be the few posts that slipped through.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i2kono8jba0m6m0/Screenshot%202014-03-10%2014.41.53.jpg
Alternative NFL Team Logo Designs by Justin Halpern
/alternative-nfl-team-logo-designs-by-justin-halpern/2012/02/02
/alternative-nfl-team-logo-designs-by-justin-halpern
Wondering the easiest way to simply ignore/fix/noindex/redirect the 'non date' version (last line) for all these few 100 posts.
To clarify my permalink structure is:
imjustcreative.com/example-post/2012/02/02
I did think I could use Yoasts Canonical Link feature in each 'edit post' and set the canonical link appropriately, but not sure if that's possible as each post is viewable in it's own formate, ie I can view each of the post versions without any automatic URL structure change.
So kind, :)
Graham
I'm trying to integrate the Facebook comments left on our site in a way in which the content can be crawled by search engines and also for people (although I highly doubt there will be many) who don't have Javascript enabled on their browser.
Currently our Facebook comments are displayed via the use of the Facebook comment social plugin (using the <fb:comments href="MY_URL" num_posts="50" width="665"></fb:comments> tag). This ends up rendering an iFrame (which are mostly ignored by search engine crawlers) so the plan is to render this information and format it with basic HTML. To do this, the comments are pulled using the Graph API - this is then only be displayed to crawlers and people with Javascript disabled.
This all works nicely using the Graph API call (https://graph.facebook.com/comments/?ids=MY_URL), parsing the JSON result and displaying it on the page. The problem is that the <fb:comments> approach filters our results based on a blacklist we have set up on one of our Facebook Apps. The AppId with the relevant blacklist is stored on the page using metadata (<meta property="fb:app_id" content="APP_ID"/>) which the <fb:comments> control obviously must somehow use to filter the comments.
The problem is the Graph API method does not filter any results as I guess no blacklist (or App Id containing a blacklist) is specified. Does anyone know how to specify a Facebook App ID to the API call URL or of another way to not fetch commnents back that violate the terms of the blacklist?
On a side note, I know the debate about filtering content in comments rages on but it is a management decision to implement the blacklist, and one that I have no influence in changing - just incase anyone felt the need to explain the reasons why content filtering is or isn't a good idea!
Any thoughts on a solution?
Unfortunately there's no way to access a filtered list of comments using the API - it might be a reasonably request to have this in the API - you should file a wishlist item in Facebook's bug tracker
Otherwise, the only solution I can think of is to implement your own filter on your side when retrieving and displaying the comments from the API.
According to the Comments plugin documentation the filter on Facebook's side is implemented as a simple substring match, so it should be trivial to implement.
A fairly simple regular expression match should be able to check each comment against a relatively long list quickly.
(Unfortunately, the tradeoff here is that implementing a filter is easy, but you'd also need to write an interface so that whoever's updating the list of disallowed words can maintain the list for both the Facebook plugin, and your own filtering.)
Quote from docs:
The comment is checked via substring matching. This means if you blacklist the
word 'at', if the comment contains the sequence 'a' 't' anywhere it will be
marked with limited visibility; e.g. if the comment contained the words 'bat',
'hat', 'attend', etc it would be caught.
Pretty sure there is no current way of doing this from the graph API, the only thing I can suggest is taking the blacklist and build your own filter
This is my first time posting - I greatly appreciate any and all guidance on this subject.
Background: I am building a Real Estate web site. I would like to use the free IDX data provided by my local MLS board. The MLS board does not allow me the option of displaying a predefined search and only provides me with a link to the search field. after filling out the search field, I am able to view the results.
Goal: I would like to bypass this step and frame the results page into a GoDaddy website I am building, which supports HTML.
Here is a link to the search page:
http://fgcmls.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Fortmyers&PRGNAME=MLSLogin&ARGUMENT=vBSJvLQtMcbg7F0O0KnXDiggv%2F12B0S6Ss9wv4510QA%3D&KeyRid=1
I am trying to only show the listings that appear in my neighborhood. Options include:
1. Property Type - Residential
2. GEO Area - FM11
3. Developments: Fiddlesticks Country Club
Once this criteria is entered, I have the page needed to make this project work.
Thank all of you for taking the time to read this and for the time you spend helping me out.
Best regards,
Chris
Without looking at the page itself, it's probably doing a "POST" operation to give the form to the website. You should be able to use javascript (maybe jquery or some other ajax framework) to do this for you in the frame and have it display the results.
-Adam
So long as this is a POST form and they aren't doing a lot of strict referrer checking, the following should work:
Replicate the form on your own site.
Make a few minor changes to automate a few of the fields to better serve your geographic area/company.
Ensure everything is a full path and not relative to the server handling the query.
You will probably end up changing a lot of the text/select fields to hidden fields with pre-set values to keep it simple for end-users. The server handling the request won't know the kind of field it came from, just the value and name.
I took a look at the page HTML, the form posts is defined thusly:
<FORM action="/scripts/mgrqispi.dll" method="POST" name="InputForm" />
you may be able to create your own form defined like this:
<FORM action="http://fgcmls.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll" method="POST" name="InputForm">
</FORM>
You will have to go through the HTML on the page you provided to get the appropriate ID's and Name's of the form elements you are interested in. Its possible their processing page checks to ensure its their form that is submitting to it, in which case this wouldn't work.
good luck.