I have class that implements some interface:
[DataContract]
public class ScriptState : IScriptState
{
<...>
}
I have simple helper class
public class Serializer
{
string Serialize<T>(T obj)
{
MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream();
DataContractSerializer ser = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
ser.WriteObject(ms, obj);
<...>
}
}
the problem is that I have loose coupled application and I get ScriptState object something like this:
IScriptstate ss = ServiceLocator.Resolve<IScriptState>();
i.e. variable has type of interface, and it is being processed by serializer:
Serializer.Serialize(ss);
and because of this DataContracrSerializer is instantiated with type of interface IScriptState, but real type of object is ScriptState, which leads to error, that type ScriptState is not expected.
Standard workaround should be adding knowntype ScriptState to interface IScriptState, but I can't do this obviously:
[KnownType(typeof(Scriptstate))]
IScriptState
{}
because assembly with interface has no reference to assembly with class.
Is there another solution??
I think I've found solution. In helper class use obj.GetType() instead of typeof(T) :
DataContractSerializer ser = new DataContractSerializer(obj.GetType());
Related
I work on a project based on Vertx the following line:
vertx.eventBus().send(MyClass.ADDRESS, requestBody, new Handler<Message<Object>>() {
....
}
public class MyClass implements Handler<Message<JsonObject>> {
public static final String ADDRESS = "coupons.api.manager";
...
#Override
public void handle(Message<JsonObject> msg) {
...
}
}
Whereas MyClass.ADDRESS is a static field of type string in the class MyClass, I found out that the line vertx.eventBus(...) creates an object of MyClass and then runs the handle() function.
My question is why? MyClass.ADDRESS is a string, and a static one. How does vertx "know" that it has to create an object from a class that this string is an attribute of?
I looked at the documentation of the send() function: http://vertx.io/docs/apidocs/io/vertx/core/eventbus/EventBus.html#send-java.lang.String-java.lang.Object-io.vertx.core.eventbus.DeliveryOptions-io.vertx.core.Handler-
and it says that the first argument in the function is "the address to send it to". OK. But, who said that the address means instantiating this class?
I made a small research, and yes. Vertx, behind the curtains, connects all the classes that implement Handler> to the string value they have in the attribute ClassName.ADDRESS.
When the statement:
vertx.eventBus().send(MyClass.ADDRESS, requestBody, new Handler<Message<Object>>() {
....
}
is invoked, a new thread is created and runs the handle method in the class MyClass.
Is there any sample Scala code available for creating stored procedures in Neo4j-3.0.3 ?
I have been trying to create one simple Scala based stored procedure. Below is the Error message I get when I copy my scala-jar file to the neo4j-plugins directory and start the neo4j server :
=================
Caused by: org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifecycleException: Component 'org.neo4j.kernel.impl.proc.Procedures#1ac0223' was successfully initialized, but failed to start. Please see attached cause exception.
at org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifeSupport$LifecycleInstance.start(LifeSupport.java:444)
at org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifeSupport.start(LifeSupport.java:107)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.factory.GraphDatabaseFacadeFactory.newFacade(GraphDatabaseFacadeFactory.java:140)
... 10 more
Caused by: org.neo4j.kernel.api.exceptions.ProcedureException: Unable to find a usable public no-argument constructor in the class `neoscala`. Please add a valid, public constructor, recompile the class and try again.
=================
The scala class that I have used is :
package neoproc
import org.neo4j.graphdb.GraphDatabaseService
import org.neo4j.procedure.Procedure;
import javax.ws.rs.core.{Context, Response}
class neoscala(#Context db: GraphDatabaseService) {
#Procedure
def alice():String = {
String.valueOf(db.execute( "MATCH (n:User) return n" ));
}
}
Your Scala class declares a constructor with a GraphDatabaseService argument, and the exception tells you that it only wants a no-argument constructor.
It's documented in both
the user documentation:
Only static fields and #Context-annotated fields are allowed in Procedure classes.
the Javadoc:
The procedure method itself can contain arbitrary Java code - but in order to work with the underlying graph, it must have access to the graph API. This is done by declaring fields in the procedure class, and annotating them with the Context annotation. Fields declared this way are automatically injected with the requested resource. This is how procedures gain access to APIs to do work with.
All fields in the class containing the procedure declaration must either be static; or it must be public, non-final and annotated with Context.
Apparently it's not possible to create a class with a public field in Scala, so you'll have to create a parent Java class with the public field, and extend it with your Scala class:
// ProcedureAdapter.java
public abstract class ScalaProcedureAdapter {
#Context
public GraphDatabaseService db;
}
// neoscala.scala
class neoscala extends ScalaProcedureAdapter {
// ...
}
Here is the solution for this :
We will create Class in scala :
class FullTextIndex extends JavaHelper {
#Procedure("example.search")
#PerformsWrites
def search(#Name("label") label: String,
#Name("query") query: String): Stream[SearchHit] = {
//declare your method
}
val nodes: Stream[Node] = db.index.forNodes(index).query(query).stream
val newFunction: java.util.function.Function[Node, SearchHit] = (node: Node) => new SearchHit(node)
nodes.map {
newFunction
}
}
private def indexName(label: String): String = {
"label-" + label
}
}
Procedure in Neo4j always return result in Stream and it is a latest feature in Java8 so we will also used Java Class for return the final result and For defining the public variable.
We will create Java class for result :
public class JavaHelper {
#Context
public GraphDatabaseService db;
#Context
public Log log;
public static class SearchHit {
//your result code here
}
You can refer knoldus blog for Neo4j User Defined Procedure for creating and storing Neo4j Procedure with Scala. Here you will also find sample code with git hub repository.
I'm using Spring AOP to intercept a method execution.
I have an interface that looks like the following:
public interface MyAwesomeService {
public Response doThings(int id, #AwesomeAnnotation SomeClass instance);
}
Here is the implementation of the interface:
public class MyAwesomeServiceImpl implements MyAwesomeService {
public Response doThings(int id, SomeClass instance) {
// do something.
}
}
Now i would like any method which has a parameter annotated with #AwesomeAnnotation should be captured by Spring AOP.
So I wrote the following aspect which works.
#Aspect
#Component
public class MyAwesomeAspect {
#Around("myPointcut()")
public Object doAwesomeStuff(final ProceedingJoinPoint proceedingJoinPoint) {
final MethodSignature methodSignature = (MethodSignature) proceedingJoinPoint.getSignature();
Annotation[][] annotationMatrix = methodSignature.getMethod().getParameterAnnotations();
// annotationMatrix is empty.
}
#Pointcut("execution(public * *(.., #package.AwesomeAnnotation (package.SomeClass), ..))")
public void myPointcut() {}
}
However when I try to find the parameter annotations I don't get any annotations back. As mentioned above, the annotationMatrix is empty.
So here are my questions:
Why is the annotationMatrix empty? Probably because parameter annotations are not inherited from an interface.
Why I'm able to capture the method execution. Since Spring AOP is able match the pointcut, Spring somehow is able to see the method's parameter annotations but when I try to see that using methodSignature.getMethod().getParameterAnnotations() it doesn't work.
I also faced this issue with one of my parameter annotations. I was able to fix the same by making sure that the parameter annotation definition had RetentionPolicy as RUNTIME and Target as PARAMETER
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.PARAMETER)
public #interface Param {
public String name();
}
The answers to your questions:
Parameter annotations are not inherited from interfaces to implementing methods. In fact, annotations are almost never inherited, only from class (not interface!) to subclass if the annotation type itself is annotated by #Inherited, see JDK API documentation.
Update: Because I have answered this question several times before, I have just documented the problem and also a workaround in Emulate annotation inheritance for interfaces and methods with AspectJ.
Because during compile or weave time AspectJ can match your pointcut against the interface method and thus sees the annotation.
You can fix the situation by adding the annotation to the parameter in your interface implementation, e.g. like this:
#Override
public Response doThings(int id, #AwesomeAnnotation SomeClass instance) {
// ...
}
Then with an aspect like this...
#Aspect
#Component
public class MyAwesomeAspect {
#Pointcut("execution(public * *..MyAwesomeService.*(*, #*..AwesomeAnnotation (*), ..)) && args(*, instance, ..)")
static void myPointcut(SomeClass instance) {}
#Around("myPointcut(instance)")
public Object doAwesomeStuff(Object instance, ProceedingJoinPoint proceedingJoinPoint) {
System.out.println(proceedingJoinPoint);
System.out.println(" instance = " + instance);
MethodSignature methodSignature = (MethodSignature) proceedingJoinPoint.getSignature();
Annotation[][] annotationMatrix = methodSignature.getMethod().getParameterAnnotations();
for (Annotation[] annotations : annotationMatrix) {
for (Annotation annotation : annotations) {
System.out.println(" annotation = " + annotation);
}
}
return proceedingJoinPoint.proceed();
}
}
... you get a console log similar to this:
execution(Response de.scrum_master.app.MyAwesomeServiceImpl.doThings(int, SomeClass))
instance = de.scrum_master.app.SomeClass#23fc625e
annotation = #de.scrum_master.app.AwesomeAnnotation()
I'm loading a .NET assembly dinamically via reflection and I'm getting all the classes that it contains (at the moment one). After this, I'm trying to cast the class to an interface that I'm 100% sure the class implements but I receive this exception: Unable to cast object of type System.RuntimeType to the type MyInterface
MyDLL.dll
public interface MyInterface
{
void MyMethod();
}
MyOtherDLL.dll
public class MyClass : MyInterface
{
public void MyMethod()
{
...
}
}
public class MyLoader
{
Assembly myAssembly = Assembly.LoadFile("MyDLL.dll");
IEnumerable<Type> types = extension.GetTypes().Where(x => x.IsClass);
foreach (Type type in types)
{
((MyInterface)type).MyMethod();
}
}
I have stripped out all the code that is not necessary. This is basically what I do. I saw in this question that Andi answered with a problem that seems the same mine but I cannot anyway fix it.
You are trying to cast a .NET framework object of type Type to an interface that you created. The Type object does not implement your interface, so it can't be cast. You should first create a specific instance of your object, such as through using an Activator like this:
// this goes inside your for loop
MyInterface myInterface = (MyInterface)Activator.CreateInstance(type, false);
myInterface.MyMethod();
The CreateInstance method has other overloades that may fit your needs.
I have an interface written in C#, but when implementing it in F#, I noticed some oddities.
The F# class has to be cast to the interface before C# can consume it
After casting, WPF can't read it's properties (Bindings failed and SNOOP was unable to reflect on it)
I can wrap the object in C# code and everything works fine.
the interface
public interface IInterpret {
public string Name {get;}
public IEnumberable<Project> Interpret(string text);
}
The F# Class
type Interpreter()=
interface IInterpret with
member x.Name = "FParsec Based"
member x.Interpret(str) = Seq.empty
The code below fails to compile
The error is about Interpreter not implementing IInterpert
public ViewModel(){
IInterpret i = new FSharpLib.Interperter();
}
This is my current workaround
public class MyProxy: IInterpret{
private IInterpret _cover;
public MyProxy() {
_cover = new FSharpLib.Interperter() as IInterpret;
}
public string Name { get { return _cover.Name; } }
public IEnumerable<Project> Interpret(string text){
return _cover.Interpret(text);
}
}
Is there something I'm doing wrong with my F# class def, or is the proxy needed? I'm using the current VS2010 f#, not an out of band drop.
F# implements all interfaces explicitly. This means you must explicitly cast to the interface type.
I don't know a ton about WPF binding to explicit interfaces, but see if these
http://leecampbell.blogspot.com/2008/09/generic-binding-in-wpf-through-explicit.html
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/92a2a3ba-74a6-4c79-9c75-f42d232a4dbf
help? (I just found them Bing-ing for "wpf binding explicit interfaces".)
(Another alternative may be to do something like
type Interpreter()=
member x.Name = "FParsec Based"
member x.Interpret(str:string) = Seq.empty
interface IInterpret with
member x.Name = x.Name
member x.Interpret(str) = x.Interpret(str)
where you "explicitly implement the interface implicitly", if you pardon the confusing terminology.)