I have a "search" layout, which has several object boxes for the user to type in search queries. I have Set Tab Order... which works great. However, rather confusingly, pressing enter/return also has the same effect as pressing tab.
I have looked in the Inspector > Go to next object using and see that both the return and enter are unchecked.
What/where else could be causing this behaviour? Ideally I would like the return/enter key to perform a script/act like a button, is this possible?
Note: I am in Find Mode.
If there's no script trigger, try to double check that the enter/return is really off for the field in question. Maybe there are two or more fields stacked on top of each other (sometimes developers do that) and you checked the wrong one.
I was having the same issue. I checked the fields and there were no hidden scripts, triggers, conditional formatting or anything like that; however, the fields were either a drop-down list or a drop-down calendar so after selecting the criteria, the cursor would go to the next field.
I noticed that if I enter the finding criteria and double click the same field (to avoid going to any other field) and then click the return or enter keys, it works. So stay in the field when you click return or enter and it will perform the find.
Are you positive that you're in find mode when you're doing this? The default behavior in find mode is that the return key executes the find.
If the field you've selected has a dropdown list then CLICKING ON IT ONCE will bring the list down but not place the cursor in the field. Selecting the field a second time will place the cursor in the field. Once the cursor is actually visible in the field you will find that the TAB key works as you expect.
Otherwise, with the dropdown list down and the cursor not in the field, the RETURN key will move to the next field when in Find mode. This default behaviour sort of makes sense to me because the RETURN key can't act on the field until the cursor is actually in the field.
I had the same problem as you and it stumped me for a while too.
Related
Have a study of Material-UI's Autocomplete with the playground on https://material-ui.com/components/autocomplete/, I really cannot see any difference with/without includeInputInList property? The document says 'If true, the highlight can move to the input.' I tried it, highlight never move to the input field.
The includeInputInList has 2 associated unit tests.
The description of the tests says:
it considers the textbox the predessor of the first option when pressing Up
it considers the textbox the successor of the last option when pressing Down
This means that with includeInputInList, when you have the focus on the component and you press key up, if it's the first item, the focus will go to the textbox (the input element), before continuing on the items. And if you press down and it's the last item, the focus will also go to the textbox.
Without that option the focus stays on the displayed items and never goes to the textbox, it jumps from the first to the last item (key up), and from the last to the first (key down) while you have the focus on them and just press key up or key down.
You can try on the example provided on the Material UI docs: press tab until you are on the MUI component, and then play with key up or down, with and without the includeInputInList prop on the Autocomplete component.
So I am having a problem. This is what I can create on one of my laptop:
On another, when I created something that has {TC} in it, the whole field code disappeared.
For the example above, if on the other computer, both are running Office 2010,
I can input the code to create the table of content from:
{TOC \f \h \z \f 1\t "Heading 1,1,Heading 2,2,Heading 3,3,Title,1}
to
{TC}
The moment I type in TC, the whole {} disappears.
Other field codes work just fine, except for {TC}. So my question is how do I get {TC} to show on my other laptop?
Thank you for your time.
Apparently, I found my answer.
When I searched google for my answer, most sites give this as a solution:
For Word 2010, go to File->Options->Advanced
Under Show document contents: Select "Show field code instead of their values"
This is the equivalent of pressing Alt+F9, which DID NOT solve my problem.
Apparently, the solution to get {TC} to show in your document is in:
go to File->Options->Display
and check to always show HIDDEN TEXT.
I hope this helps someone in the future.
Yeah, the disappearing TC code is annoying at first -- seems like it's broken. Other codes work, but why does that disappear, even if entering manually? Word instantly sets TC code to Hidden, even the field code itself.
To temporarily toggle this visible without permanently changing your display to show Hidden Text, you can use the normal Ctrl-Shift-8, which toggles display of spaces, paragraph marks, tabs, and Hidden Text, on and off. This is a good keyboard shortcut to have in your standard back of tricks anyway. It is frequent in Word that you need to toggle paragraph marks on and off, because paragraph formatting is attached to the Paragraph mark, and when they're hidden, it can be tricky to fix various formatting issues.
The original post was a few years ago, but I fear things have gotten worse since then, not better. I am using Word 365 v2201, which should be up to date. The other day, I wasted hours on trying to resolve this issue with TC field codes.
First I tried entering them using Insert > Quick Parts > Field. Word creates what looks like a field code, but it behaves as normal text. Messing around with the various controls to toggle field display and hidden text etc etc, has absolutely no effect. It is basically a faux field. And of course, it is completely ignored when compiling the TOC.
Next, I tried entering it manually, by using Ctrl + F9 to either create a blank field or convert some existing text into a field. Same result as above.
As with the original post, this seems to afflict only the TC field code. Other codes work fine, including TOC. And if I create a TOC field, then edit the code to TC, it immediately loses its properties as a field. If I then put the O back in, it immediately behaves as a field once again. Unlike in the original post, adjusting the settings for field display and/or hidden text, have no impact.
In the end, the only solution was to create the field using Alt + Shift + o to open the Mark Table of Contents Entry dialog box. And finally, this works!
How do I search for a pushed value in IDA?
I have a value that is pushed into a certain function.
I want to search for it like:
push 420
How do I that?
Make sure you have closed all remaining search result windows. Such windows are titled with "Occurences of: ...". This is necessary to get the right window.
Hit "Alt+t" to open a new text search window.
In the search field, enter 'push 420' without the '.
NB: You have to get the number of spaces right. I got them like this: I searched for "push" only at first. Then I right clicked on the result, copied it and inserted it into my new search. This gives you the right number of spaces.
Make sure you have selected "Find all occurences". Make sure you have not selected any Parameters (e.g. "Regular expression", ...)
Hit OK
I'm trying to use find and replace to change the value of a Field Name.
1_FirstName
1_LastName
Find and replace 1_ with 2_
2_FirstName
2_LastName
When I do this and click edit field, then the value is still 1_FirstName and 1_LastName yet it shows 2_FirstName and 2_LastName.
If these are MERGEFIELD fields, roughly speaking, what gets replaced depends on what is visible when you do the Find/Replace. There's the underlying code, e.g.
{ MERGEFIELD 1_FirstName }
and the "chevron" version , e.g. <<1_FirstName>> (except with real chevrons rather than doubled-up < and >)
If you're seeing the chevron version and do the find/replace, the chevron version will change, but nothing useful has changed. If you select the field codes and F9 to update them, the "chevron name" will revert.
If you're seeing the { MERGEFIELD } version and do the find/replace, the field codes will be changed correctly , but the chevron display won't change until you select and update the fields (or perhaps move 1 record backwards/forwards in the preview or some such - OTTOMH I can't remember).
FOUND IT! Select the mergefields, turn on 'TOGGLE FIELD CODES', run the find/replace, switch back 'TOGGLE FIELD CODES' and click 'UPDATE FIELDS'. Works like a charm baby! :)
I have a row in a tablex that I want to hide based on a condition. I can do this with the visibility property and also using CanShrink as well is an option.
I've tried both of these and the best I can do is hide the row (make it invisible), but it keeps the whitespace it takes up - I need to remove the whitespace too so if it is not shown that it doesn't take up paper/viewing space.
I have also made the height of the row very small and put cangrow=true so that that if i populate the field with data based on an expression it will grow to the right size but this is not ideal because there is still 0.03125in of space for the row that is always shown (minimim height) and if it grows it grows to fit the text but not neccessarily the set size I want.
I thought I had done this before in an older version of RS but I can't seem to get it to work correctly in this version (2008).
Any ideas?
Try to set the Hidden property of the Static Row Group under the Details Group, in this case the whole row will disappear instead of the content of the textboxes.
If you are using Report Builder, you need to switch to Advanced Mode (make sure that the Properties and the Grouping windows are displayed, go to the upper right side of the Grouping window and press the black triangle):
Click on the second "Static" item under the "(Details)" group and you can set the Hidden property on the Properties window.
Link to MSDN sample
A simpler way to get to this option for hiding a row is to right-click on the row header and select "Row Visibility". From there you will get a dialog where to can enter an expression.
I was able to make the rows go away by setting the following 2 properties
textbox.CanShrink
row.Hidden
I played w/ row.HideIfNoRows and it seems to have no effect in accomplishing the desired outcome described by op.
Click on textbox, these one is in the properties of the textbox
(if there are multiple columns, I assume you will have to make this setting for each cell/textbox, in my case, I only had 1 column)
CanShrink=false
For the next property, you have to go into ADVANCED MODE by clicking the down arrow at the right side of the Row Groups/Column Groups pane.
Click on the Row containing the line you would like to hide.
The Hidden property can be found in properties pane...
This is an alternate way to set Hidden, as opposed to right clicking the Row Header in the actual Tablix.
Hidden= <expression describing when you want the row hidden hidden>
One other note - If you right click the Row Header and choose 'Row Visibility' you get a dialgue. the Row Property dialog has a caption "Show or Hide Based on an expression".
The actual behaviour is It will HIDE the row if the expression evaluates to TRUE.
IMHO - this is misleading, at best ambiguous.
Once you understand the property you are actually setting is called HIDDEN, then this makes sense. Until then, I certainly assumed I was setting a property called Visisble... FWIW....
On the empty row you want to hide, go to the text box properties and go to expressions -> visibility, then show or hide based on an expression and use
=iif(first(Fields!.Value = ""),true,false)
Setting row visibility logic is important, but I've learned that sometimes a blank row will still appear, even though its contents are hidden. To solve this, I had to do the following non-intuitive steps, but I did in fact succeed in completely suppressing unwanted white space.
In the cell in the tablix region, use the Insert > Rectangle menu option.
In the rectangle, use the Insert > Textbox menu option. Resize as needed.
In the textbox, right-click and enter a placeholder.
Set the value of the placeholder expression to whatever you need.