A customer of ours has just purchased CQ5 and would like to externalize all of its security. We'd like to use an STS server for SSO and then leverage a custom authorization/attribute provider instead of the CQ5 repository. Ultimately, we do not want to use LDAP in any way.
Here is how we envision this (some pieces already working):
User browses to CQ5 Dispatcher running in Apache
Apache filter redirects user to STS site where login is completed.
User is redirected back to Apache with SAML Claims.
User ID token is placed as cookie into browser. (everything is working up to here)
CQ5 captures that cookie based on the SSO configuration (working)
Problem starts here: From here, we want to call a custom authorization provider for the user's attributes, roles, groups etc...
We have tried to figure out how to do this and can't seem to find the missing link.
Do we need to create a custom login module? Do we need to create a custom principal provider? Do we somehow use the existing LDAP capability in CQ5 but have it call a custom class which leverages the external auth source?
If anyone here has any idea how to do this, their karma quotient would be full for the year if they could share it. I'm not sure if this is a basic thing you do with JAAS or even where to put my classes after I've created them.
We've worked really hard on this so far and seem to be close, but we keep hitting dead-ends.
Thanks so much if you have an idea where to begin!!
-joe
Recent versions of AEM now include the SAMLAuthenticationHandler which allows you to:
Redirect users to SSO to simulate IDP initiated login, or
Allow AEM to perform SP initiated login with IDP
Specify attributes to take from the SAML Assertion and add to the user's profile node (not sure if you can use this for groups)
Specify which groups users should be added to
Set a cookie called request-path that will store the URL the user arrived at, and then redirect them to that location when they're authenticated (ie. deep linking)
This makes relying on the SAMLAuthenticationHandler better than using Apache to redirect. The current version of the handler bundled with AEM 6.2 does not properly set the cookie when using the redirect method, but Adobe does have an updated version that they can provide that will fix that problem.
I normally recommend that clients do not have their own authentication handlers developed inside AEM.
When not using LDAP, this does create an issue where users will not exist until they've logged in. Additionally, when your architecture includes more than one load balanced publisher, it is possible that a user may exist on one server user synchronization.
Try searching the google group for SSO details. Here's one useful post:
http://groups.google.com/group/day-communique/browse_thread/thread/72c235c83a501252/fba4d08a90487156?lnk=gst&q=SSO#fba4d08a90487156
It seems that you will have to implement a custom LoginModule, more information here: http://dev.day.com/docs/en/crx/current/deploying/custom-login-modules.html
Related
I wanted to capture user attributes coming from SAP IDP(Identity & Authentication tenant service like department,salutation ,company etc ,via UserAccessor SDK api,but although those attributes are set and has value in IDP user and all the integration with IDP and sub account is in place post authentication ,user attributes object is empty ,i am only able to retrieve specific attributes like first names ,last name,email address ,user groups etc via JWT and UserAccessor api ,but no luck with other attributes ,in IDP i have mentioned these attributes as well under assertion attributes in SAP Identity authentication tenant .
Please guide and help in this matter .
Thanks Siddharth
Update: As we have now identified the problem, I will update my answer to reflect that. The original answer below is outdated:
Okay so the problem is that you haven't mapped any additional user attributes from your Identity Provider (IdP) to your JWT. As far as I'm aware there are three things you will need to do:
You need to create attributes in your xs-security.json (the file you used to configure your XSUAA service instance). This documentation should explain how to do that.
You need to configure which attributes are exposed by your IdP (in your case the SAP Identity & Authentication service. This documentation looks like a good place to start looking).
You need to map the attributes exposed by your IdP to the attributes defined in your xs-security.json. You will probably need to reconfigure (i.e. delete, recreate and rebind) your XSUAA service instance with the updated config, before you can do this step. Then, navigate to your application in the Cloud Platform Cockpit, from the left toolbar click "Security > Roles" and create your mapping.
Let me know if this works for you!
Original Answer:
As far as I'm aware the default IdP does not support SAML. Without SAML, I'm not sure whether you can propagate any attributes from your IdP into the JWT.
Please also check out this discussion for more information.
I'm just starting a new project. The result will be an API server and a progressive web app. The API server is implemented with TypeScript and the NestJS framework, the client with Angular 6.
I've been flirting with keycloak for some time. Still, I'm not quite sure it's right for me yet. But I don't want to worry about things like token renewal anymore and find it sexy that Keycloak tells me how to create user roles.
What bothers me, is the following - integration. For my use case it is necessary that the login and all features like password reset and so on are part of my application. That means I want to create forms myself in order to be able to do this perfectly in my own design and not have a second translation process, etc. Keycloak themes are not an option. So is it possible to hide keycloak in such a way, or is it so complex that I shouldn't use Keyloak in the first place? Afaik there is already an issue with password resets - I can't request it from the user side but have to make an REST call to the admin endpoint - which is okay but not ideal since it requires me to do more server side logic ( and that is not why I want to use Keycloak).
In addition, Keycloak is too much about the GUI - which makes it difficult for me, especially during development. Because I also want to provide my team with a local instance of keycloak during development. But what is the concept to import the initial data into realms, apps and also users into Keycloak? I found some JSON imports - but so far only for realms and apps. Is there also a function to import a whole dumb?
So that my team builds on a pre-built setup and has a user for each role. A reproducible setup with Vagrant or Docker which contains the import of initial data - that would be the goal.
So in short my questions:
Is it still worth the effort using Keycloak if I want to use everything via the API or should I simply use Passport and JWT?
Can I have a reproducible setup during my development that includes realms, apps, users, user roles, etc?
So, the question asked few months ago, but I also faces with that question, and I want to answer on it.
I think that you don't need Keycloak, it is fairly enough for you to use OAuth2 and JWT.
Let's justify my answer:
You have just one client - Angular application. Keycloak useful, when you have many clients (web-js, mobile platforms) and you want to create and manage them dynamically. But, I think that, in your case, you create your client once without modification in the future.
Also, Keycloak very useful, when you have a lot of integration with third part systems (Google, Fb, Twitter and etc) because Keycloak has them out-of-box. Or you need to integrate with some SAML or LDAP provider.
You may use Keycloak, if you need some Identity and User management platform, and when you have complicated user access flow.
In the end, you could consider Keycloak, if you need SSO (Single Sign On) feature. Once logged-in to Keycloak, users don't have to login again to access a different application. But, by your description, you have just one application.
Keycloak offers features such as Single-Sign-On (SSO), Identity Brokering and Social Login, User Federation, Client Adapters, an Admin Console, and an Account Management Console.
It's an out of box solution for rapid security layer development of application.You could have single common security layer for multiple application .
You can implement you security mechanism without using keycloak.
I need integrate Liferay (version 6.2) with another service which stores information about users. Communication with service occurs through SOAP.
Is it possible use users from service to authenticate to Liferay?
Liferay integrates with external systems through LDAP already. If you use that interface, you're set. If you need a proprietary API to access user information, you will have some work in front of you.
It might be worth examining the SSO implementation and intercept newly authenticated users on this level: With the user's identity, create or update a Liferay user account on the fly through LIferay's API. To me this looks like the most promising approach from an effort/maintenance point of view, with the little information I have about your situation.
Alternatively you could batch-update all (Liferay-) user accounts from time to time, based on updates in your external system.
Let me see if I understand what need:
1- Step 1: User prompted with A login page.
2- Step 2: The credentials entered by the user are checked against a web service (could be any service)
3- Step 3: The user is either logged in or an auth error displayed to the user.
If that's what you need, then create an autologin hook. The code that call the webs service shall live in the autologin hook.
May seem intimidating, but it is trivial: likely liferay comes with a bunch of them: (take one of them as a template)
auto.login.hooks=com.liferay.portal.security.auth.CASAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.FacebookAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.NtlmAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.OpenIdAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.OpenSSOAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.RememberMeAutoLogin,com.liferay.portal.security.auth.SiteMinderAutoLogin
Let me preface this by admitting that this is my first webapp and first experience with JSF, so I've probably made some poor design decisions.
Here's what I'm trying to do:
I have a webapp using JSF 2.0, which is accessible through a Facebook canvas. This webapp allows a user to view/manipulate data from a database of sensor readings. On the very first time the Facebook user accesses my app, I ask the user to enter login credentials for the database, then send the user to the home page. Thereafter, the user should always go straight to the home page, since I associate the user's FB id with the database user profile.
Current implementation:
I have the Facebook canvas URL going to a servlet. This servlet checks the signed_request parameter passed by Facebook to get the user ID, and then looks in the database to see if the user has already completed the provisioning process. If the user has done so, he is redirected to the application home page.
The problem:
Most of my logic to do these checks currently exists within a managed bean (session-scoped). To use the bean within the servlet, I'm manually instantiating the bean and adding it to the session, since the JSF framework hasn't had a chance to create it yet. As my system is getting more complicated, this is causing problems due to dependencies between the various beans. Also, it seems like a generally bad approach to the problem.
Solutions? From my web searching, it sounds like there might be several ways to do this. One way would be to set the canvas to a JSF landing page, where a managed bean would grab the signed_request parameter and validate that the user has completed the provisioning step. From there, the bean would forward to the proper page. Another possibility might be to have an eager bean that does the same thing, but this seems "wrong".
What's the best way to resolve this and adhere to "proper" JSF paradigms?
Thanks in advance!
There are a number of different ways that this can be handled. The JSF landing page is one idea and the eager bean are some ways that this can be handled.
If you ignore the fact that you are integrating with Facebook then ultimately you are trying to solve an authentication and authorization problem. Facebook is handling your authentication, and telling your web application what the identity of a user is, and it is your web app's job to remember that person's identity throughout the session, and authorize this person to visit the requested page.
I have implemented it before where I had all of my managed beans extend a BaseBean class that on creation and initialization checked for the existence of a specific SessionScoped bean that contained the user identitification information. If this bean did not exist or was not authorized to access this bean then I would redirect. The problem with this approach was that it authorized only the use of managed beans, and not pages.
Another approach I had was to utilize a servlet filter that would essentially check every page request and look for the session scoped bean that contained the currently authenticated user. If this wasn't found then I would look for the specific request parameters and authenticate and create the session bean, and if that didn't exist would redirect to an Unauthorized page.
This approach worked well until I realized that Authentication and Authorization of Java web applications is a well understood and near universal problem. After a little bit of looking and research I discovered that security frameworks like Spring Security 3 can indeed be integrated into JSF and handle nearly all of the complexity of complex authentication and authorization. You could very easily integrate a custom Facebook authentication handler for Spring Security and control access by user role to the individual page level, all from XML configuration. It is highly worth looking into if you have the time to learn something new.
I have a GWT app to deploy to Tomcat on a Windows server, with the following requirements:
1- The app should work fully, whether the user is in the Windows domain or not;
2- If the user happens to be in the domain, the app should be able to identify the user in some manner. Presumably, this should be via getThreadLocalRequest().getRemoteUser(), but any other alternative is fine...
3- If the user happens to be in the domain, the app should be able to access the MS Exchange server in that domain, without requiring the user to enter their password.
I've scoured the web high and low for this, but unfortunately, it seems there's no way to get authentication without forcing authentication. There are many examples of exclusions for, say, a login form or other "public" resources, but that won't work for us, since all the resources in a GWT app are packed into the same "page".
Maybe it's my limited understanding that's making me fail in some basic way, but I've tried to look at JCIFS, Jespa, Waffle and SPNEGO, and I just can't seem to get working the way I want to...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
J.
How about putting a Javascript on your front page and have a Kerberos/SPNEGO protected page. The javascript will attempt to request a protected page, if the user is on the domain you will get the correct result from the page otherwise you will get 401 access denied. In the former case you can redirect your browser to exchange page, or have another AJAX call to retrieve things from exchange server in the later case you either show a log-in form or a generic anonymous page.
What about using JNI to call the Win32Api function LogonUser?
By doing impersonation at the thread level you will have the NTLM token added to the current thread and you would be able to call exchange with no issues