How to consume a complex object from a sproc using WCF Data Services / OData? - entity-framework

Using WCF Data Services (and the latest Entity Framework), I want to return data from a stored procedure. The returned sproc fields do not match 1:1 any entity in my db, so I create a new complex type for it in the edmx model (rather than attaching an existing entity):
Right-click the *.edmx model / Add / Function Import
Select the sproc (returns three fields) - GetData
Click Get Column Information
Add the Function Import Name: GetData
Click Create new Complex Type - GetData_Result
In the service, I define:
[WebGet]
public List<GetData_Result> GetDataSproc()
{
PrimaryDBContext context = new PrimaryDBContext();
return context.GetData().ToList();
}
I created a quick console app to test, and added a reference to System.Data.Services and System.Data.Services.Client - this after running Install-Package EntityFramework -Pre, but the versions on the libraries are 4.0 and not 5.x.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Data.Services.Client;
using ConsoleApplication1.PrimaryDBService;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
DataServiceContext context = new DataServiceContext(new Uri("http://localhost:50100/PrimaryDataService1.svc/"));
IEnumerable<GetData_Result> result = context.Execute<GetData_Result>(new Uri("http://localhost:50100/PrimaryDataService1.svc/GetDataSproc"));
foreach (GetData_Result w in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(w.ID + "\t" + w.WHO_TYPE_NAME + "\t" + w.CREATED_DATE);
}
Console.Read();
}
}
}
I didn't use the UriKind.Relative or anything else to complicate this.
When I navigate in the browser to the URL, I see data, but when I consume it in my console app, I get nothing at all.
Adding tracing to the mix:
<system.diagnostics>
<sources>
<source name="System.ServiceModel" switchValue="Information, ActivityTracing" propagateActivity="true">
<listeners>
<add name="traceListener" type="System.Diagnostics.XmlWriterTraceListener" initializeData="c:\temp\WebWCFDataService.svclog" />
</listeners>
</source>
</sources>
</system.diagnostics>
... and opening using the Microsoft Service Trace Viewer, I see two idential warnings:
Configuration evaluation context not found.
<E2ETraceEvent xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2004/06/E2ETraceEvent">
<System xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2004/06/windows/eventlog/system">
<EventID>524312</EventID>
<Type>3</Type>
<SubType Name="Warning">0</SubType>
<Level>4</Level>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-04-03T14:50:11.8355955Z" />
<Source Name="System.ServiceModel" />
<Correlation ActivityID="{66f1a241-2613-43dd-be0c-341149e37d30}" />
<Execution ProcessName="WebDev.WebServer40" ProcessID="5176" ThreadID="10" />
<Channel />
<Computer>MyComputer</Computer>
</System>
<ApplicationData>
<TraceData>
<DataItem>
<TraceRecord xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2004/10/E2ETraceEvent/TraceRecord" Severity="Warning">
<TraceIdentifier>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/System.ServiceModel.EvaluationContextNotFound.aspx</TraceIdentifier>
<Description>Configuration evaluation context not found.</Description>
<AppDomain>fd28c9cc-1-129779382115645955</AppDomain>
</TraceRecord>
</DataItem>
</TraceData>
</ApplicationData>
</E2ETraceEvent>
So why am I able to see data from the browser, but not when consumed in my app?
-- UPDATE --
I downloaded the Microsoft WCF Data Services October 2011 CTP which exposed DataServiceProtocolVersion.V3, created a new host and client and referenced Microsoft.Data.Services.Client (v4.99.2.0). Now getting the following error on the client when trying iterate in the foreach loop:
There is a type mismatch between the client and the service. Type
'ConsoleApplication1.WcfDataServiceOctCTP1.GetDataSproc_Result' is an
entity type, but the type in the response payload does not represent
an entity type. Please ensure that types defined on the client match
the data model of the service, or update the service reference on the
client.
I tried the same thing by referencing the actual entity - works fine, so same issue.

Recap: I want to create a high-performing WCF service DAL (data access layer) that returns strongly-typed stored procedures. I initially used a "WCF Data Services" project to accomplish this. It seems as though it has its limitations, and after reviewing performance metrics of different ORM's, I ended up using Dapper for the data access inside a basic WCF Service.
I first created the *.edmx model and created the POCO for my sproc.
Next, I created a base BaseRepository and MiscDataRepository:
namespace WcfDataService.Repositories
{
public abstract class BaseRepository
{
protected static void SetIdentity<T>(IDbConnection connection, Action<T> setId)
{
dynamic identity = connection.Query("SELECT ##IDENTITY AS Id").Single();
T newId = (T)identity.Id;
setId(newId);
}
protected static IDbConnection OpenConnection()
{
IDbConnection connection = new SqlConnection(WebConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["PrimaryDBConnectionString"].ConnectionString);
connection.Open();
return connection;
}
}
}
namespace WcfDataService.Repositories
{
public class MiscDataRepository : BaseRepository
{
public IEnumerable<GetData_Result> SelectAllData()
{
using (IDbConnection connection = OpenConnection())
{
var theData = connection.Query<GetData_Result>("sprocs_GetData",
commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);
return theData;
}
}
}
}
The service class:
namespace WcfDataService
{
public class Service1 : IService1
{
private MiscDataRepository miscDataRepository;
public Service1()
: this(new MiscDataRepository())
{
}
public Service1(MiscDataRepository miscDataRepository)
{
this.miscDataRepository = miscDataRepository;
}
public IEnumerable<GetData_Result> GetData()
{
return miscDataRepository.SelectAllData();
}
}
}
... and then created a simple console application to display the data:
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Service1Client client = new Service1Client();
IEnumerable<GetData_Result> result = client.GetData();
foreach (GetData_Result d in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(d.ID + "\t" + d.WHO_TYPE_NAME + "\t" + d.CREATED_DATE);
}
Console.Read();
}
}
}
I also accomplished this using PetaPOCO, which took much less time to setup than Dapper - a few lines of code:
namespace PetaPocoWcfDataService
{
// NOTE: You can use the "Rename" command on the "Refactor" menu to change the class name "Service1" in code, svc and config file together.
public class Service1 : IService1
{
public IEnumerable<GetData_Result> GetData()
{
var databaseContext = new PetaPoco.Database("PrimaryDBContext"); // using PetaPOCO for data access
databaseContext.EnableAutoSelect = false; // use the sproc to create the select statement
return databaseContext.Query<GetData_Result>("exec sproc_GetData");
}
}
}
I like how quick and simple it was to setup PetaPOCO, but using the repository pattern with Dapper will scale much better for an enterprise project.
It was also quite simple to create complex objects directly from the EDMX - for any stored procedure, then consume them.
For example, I created complex type return type called ProfileDetailsByID_Result based on the sq_mobile_profile_get_by_id sproc.
public ProfileDetailsByID_Result GetAllProfileDetailsByID(int profileID)
{
using (IDbConnection connection = OpenConnection("DatabaseConnectionString"))
{
try
{
var profile = connection.Query<ProfileDetailsByID_Result>("sq_mobile_profile_get_by_id",
new { profileid = profileID },
commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure).FirstOrDefault();
return profile;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ErrorLogging.Instance.Fatal(ex); // use singleton for logging
return null;
}
}
}
So using Dapper along with some EDMX entities seems to be a nice quick way to get things going. I may be mistaken, but I'm not sure why Microsoft didn't think this all the way through - no support for complex types with OData.
--- UPDATE ---
So I finally got a response from Microsoft, when I raised the issue over a month ago:
We have done research on this and we have found that the Odata client
library doesn’t support complex types. Therefore, I regret to inform
you that there is not much that we can do to solve it.
*Optional: In order to obtain a solution for this issue, you have to use a Xml to Linq kind of approach to get the complex types.
Thank you very much for your understanding in this matter. Please let
me know if you have any questions. If we can be of any further
assistance, please let us know.
Best regards,
Seems odd.

Related

Is it possible to use one database to dynamically define the ConnectionString of another?

I've reached a bit of a brick-wall with my current project.
I have three normalised databases, one of which I want to dynamically connect to; these are:
Accounts: For secure account information, spanning clients
Configuration: For managing our clients
Client: Which will be atomic for each of our clients & hold all of their information
I need to use data stored in the "Configuration" database to modify the ConnectionString that will be used to connect to the "Client" database, but this is the bit I'm getting stuck on.
So far I've generated the entities from the databases into a project by hooking up EntityFrameWorkCore Tools and using the "Scaffold-DbContext" command & can do simple look-ups to make sure that the databases are being connected to okay.
Now I'm trying to register the databases by adding them to the ServiceCollection, I have them added in the StartUp class as follows:
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to add services to the container.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvc();
services.Configure<MvcOptions>(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add(new RequireHttpsAttribute());
});
services.AddDbContext<Accounts>( options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("Accounts"))
);
services.AddDbContext<Support>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("Configuration"))
);
// Erm?
SelectClientDatabase(services);
}
Obviously the next stage is to dip into the "Configuration" database, so I've been trying to keep that contained in "SelectClientDatabase()", which just takes the IServiceCollection as a parameter and is for all intents and purposes empty for now. Over the last few days I've found some excellent write-ups on EFC and I'm currently exploring a CustomConfigurationProvider as a possible route, but I must admit I'm a little lost on starting out in ASP.Net Core.
Is it possible to hook into the freshly added DbContext within the ConfigureServices method? Or can/must I add this database to the service collection at a later point?
Thanks!
Edit 1:
I just found this post, which mentions that a DbContext cannot be used within OnConfiguring as it's still being configured; which makes a lot of sense. I'm now wondering if I can push all three DbContexts into a custom middleware to encapsulate, configure and make the connections available; something new to research.
Edit 2:
I've found another post, describing how to "Inject DbContext when database name is only know when the controller action is called" which looks like a promising starting point; however this is for an older version of ASP.Net Core, according to https://learn.microsoft.com "DbContextFactory" has been renamed so I'm now working to update the example given into a possible solution.
So, I've finally worked it all out. I gave up on the factory idea as I'm not comfortable enough with asp.net-core-2.0 to spend time working it out & I'm rushing head-long into a deadline so the faster options are now the better ones and I can always find time to refactor the code later (lol).
My appsettings.json file currently just contains the following (the relevant bit of appsettings.Developments.json is identical):
{
"ConnectionStrings" : {
"Accounts": "Server=testserver;Database=Accounts;Trusted_Connection=True;",
"Client": "Server=testserver;Database={CLIENT_DB};Trusted_Connection=True;",
"Configuration": "Server=testserver;Database=Configuration;Trusted_Connection=True;"
},
"Logging": {
"IncludeScopes": false,
"Debug": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"Console": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
}
}
}
I've opted to configure the two static databases in the ConfigureServices method of StartUp, these should be configured and ready to use by the time the application gets around to having to do anything. The code there is nice & clean.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvc();
services.Configure<MvcOptions>(options =>
{
//options.Filters.Add(new RequireHttpsAttribute());
});
services.AddDbContext<AccountsContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("Accounts"))
);
services.AddDbContext<ConfigContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("Configuration"))
);
services.AddSingleton(
Configuration.GetSection("ConnectionStrings").Get<ConnectionStrings>()
);
}
It turns out that one can be spoilt for choice in how to go about accessing configuration options set in the appsettings.json, I'm currently trying to work out how I've managed to get it to switch to the release version instead of the development one. I can't think what I've done to toggle that...
To get the placeholder config setting I'm using a singleton to hold the string value. This is just dipping into the "ConnectionStrings" group and stuffing that Json into the "ClientConnection" object (detailed below).
services.AddSingleton(
Configuration.GetSection("ConnectionStrings").Get<ClientConnection>()
);
Which populates the following structure (that I've just bunged off in its own file):
[DataContract(Name = "ConnectionStrings")]
public class ClientConnection
{
[DataMember]
public string Client { get; set; }
}
I only want this holding the connection string for the dynamically assigned database, so it's not too jazzy. The "Client" DataMember is what is selecting the correct key in the Json, if I wanted a different named node in the Json I'd rename it to "Accounts", for instance.
Another couple of options I tested, before settling on the Singleton option, are:
services.Configure<ConnectionStrings>(Configuration.GetSection("ConnectionStrings"));
and
var derp = Configuration.GetSection("ConnectionStrings:Client");
Which I discounted, but it's worth knowing other options (they'll probably be useful for loading other configuration options later).
I'm not keen on the way the Controller dependencies work in ASP.Net Core 2, I was hoping I'd be able to hide them in a BaseController so they wouldn't have to be specified in every single Controller I knock out, but I've not found a way to do this yes. The dependencies needed in the Controllers are passed in the constructor, these weirded me out for a while because they're auto-magically injected.
My BaseController is set up as follows:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Internal;
using ServiceLayer.Entities;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace ServiceLayer.Controllers
{
public class BaseController : Controller
{
private readonly ClientConnection connectionStrings;
private readonly AccountsContext accountsContext;
private readonly ConfigurationContext configContext;
public ClientTemplateContext clientContext;
private DbContextServices DbContextServices { get; set; }
public BaseController(AccountsContext accounts, ConfigContext config, ClientConnection connection) : base()
{
accountsContext = accounts;
configContext = config;
connectionStrings = connection;
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
base.OnActionExecuting(context);
}
}
}
The code for selecting the database then goes in the "OnActionExecuting()" method; this proved to be a bit of a pain as well, trying to ensure that the dbcontext was set up properly, in the end I settled on:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace ServiceLayer.Controllers
{
public class BaseController : Controller
{
private readonly ClientConnection connectionStrings;
private readonly AccountsContext accountsContext;
private readonly ConfigurationContext configContext;
public ClientTemplateContext clientContext;
private DbContextServices DbContextServices { get; set; }
public BaseController(AccountsContext accounts, ConfigurationContext config, ClientConnection connection) : base()
{
accountsContext = accounts;
configContext= config;
connectionStrings = connection;
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
// Temporary selection identifier for the company
Guid cack = Guid.Parse("827F79C5-821B-4819-ABB8-819CBD76372F");
var dataSource = (from c in configContext.Clients
where c.Cack == cack
join ds in configContext.DataStorage on c.CompanyId equals ds.CompanyId
select ds.Name).FirstOrDefault();
// Proto-connection string
var cs = connectionStrings.Client;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(cs) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(dataSource))
{
// Populated ConnectionString
cs = cs.Replace("{CLIENT_DB}", dataSource);
clientContext = new ClientTemplateContext().Initialise(cs);
}
base.OnActionExecuting(context);
}
}
}
new ClientTemplateContext().Initialise() is a bit messy but I'll clean it up when I refactor everything else. "ClientTemplateContext" is the entity-framework-core generated class that ties together all the entities it generated, I've added the following code to that class (I did try putting it in a separate file but couldn't get that working, so it's staying in there for the moment)...
public ClientTemplateContext() {}
private ClientTemplateContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options) {}
public ClientTemplateContext Initialise(string connectionString)
{
return new ClientTemplateContext().CreateDbContext(new[] { connectionString });
}
public ClientTemplateContext CreateDbContext(string[] args)
{
if (args == null && !args.Any())
{
//Log error.
return null;
}
var optionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<ClientTemplateContext>();
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer(args[0]);
return new ClientTemplateContext(optionsBuilder.Options);
}
I also included using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design; and added the IDesignTimeDbContextFactory<ClientTemplateContext> interface to the class. So it looks like this:
public partial class ClientTemplateContext : DbContext, IDesignTimeDbContextFactory<ClientTemplateContext>
This is where the CreateDbContext(string[] args) comes from & it allows us to create a new instance of a derived context at design-time.
Finally, the code for my test controller is as follows:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using ServiceLayer.Entities;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace ServiceLayer.Controllers
{
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class ValuesController : BaseController
{
public ValuesController(
AccountsContext accounts,
ConfigurationContext config,
ClientConnection connection
) : base(accounts, config, connection) {}
// GET api/values
[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
var herp = (from c in clientContext.Usage
select c).FirstOrDefault();
return new string[] {
herp.TimeStamp.ToString(),
herp.Request,
herp.Payload
};
}
}
}
This successfully yields data from the database dynamically selected from the DataSource table within the Configuration database!
["01/01/2017 00:00:00","derp","derp"]
If anyone can suggest improvements to my solution I'd love to see them, my solution is mashed together as it stands & I want to refactor it as soon as I feel I'm competent enough to do so.

Servicestack (rest) incorrect WSDL with mono

I've written a simple self-hosted (in a ConsoleApplication) rest service with service stack 3.9.70.
using System;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
// service stack support
using ServiceStack.ServiceHost;
using ServiceStack.WebHost.Endpoints;
namespace HelloWorldConsole
{
namespace DTO
{
[DataContract(Namespace = "http://localhost:8080/types")]
[Route("/hello/{Name}")]
class Hello : IReturn<HelloResponse>
{
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[DataContract(Namespace = "http://localhost:8080/types")]
class HelloResponse
{
[DataMember]
public string Response { get; set; }
}
}
class HelloService : IService
{
public Object Any(DTO.Hello request)
{
return new DTO.HelloResponse { Response = "Hello " + request.Name };
}
}
public class HelloHost : AppHostHttpListenerBase
{
public HelloHost()
: base("Hello Service Self-Host",
typeof(HelloService).Assembly)
{ }
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container)
{
SetConfig(new EndpointHostConfig
{
DebugMode = true,
WsdlServiceNamespace = "http://localhost:8080/",
WsdlSoapActionNamespace = "http://localhost:8080/",
SoapServiceName = "HelloService"
});
}
}
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
string listenOn = "http://localhost:8080/";
HelloHost host = new HelloHost ();
host.Init ();
host.Start (listenOn);
Console.WriteLine ("AppHost created at {0} on {1}",
DateTime.Now, listenOn);
Console.ReadKey ();
}
}
}
Under Windows the generated WSDL is good, and if I try to create a client application and add a web reference to the soap service on localhost, I'm able to call Hello.
If I run the same code under Linux using Mono, the generated WSDL does not contain the types defined inside the DTO namespace. If I try to add a web service reference on a client, I'm not able to exploit hello method.
At this link I've read that by default the same ServiceStack Console app binary runs on both Windows/.NET and Mono/Linux as-is. I've tried to launch the binary under windows; the service runs but the generated WSDL is incorrect (without types defined in DTO namespace).
I use mono 2.10.8.1.
Does anyone have any suggestion?
I also have another question. If I use new version Servicestack last release (4.0.33) I'm not able to exploit soap endpoint.
At this link I've read that SOAP endpoints are not available when hosted on a HttpListener Host. Is it a feature introduced with new version 4.0?
Isn't there the posbility to exploit soap endpoints with servicestack releases higher than 3.9?
Any help is appreciated.
Mono has a weak and partial WCF/SOAP support which will fail to generate WSDLs for many non-trivial Service definitions. This situation may improve in the near future now that Microsoft has Open Sourced .NET server libraries, but in the interim I recommend avoiding Mono if you want to use SOAP.

Custom Logic and Proxy Classes in ADO.NET Data Services

I've just read "Injecting Custom Logic in ADO.NET Data Services" and my next question is, How do you get your [WebGet] method to show up in the client-side proxy classes? Sure, I can call this directly (RESTfully) with, say, WebClient but I thought the strong typing features in ADO.NET Data Services would "hide" this from me auto-magically.
So here we have:
public class MyService : DataService<MyDataSource>
{
// This method is called only once to initialize service-wide policies.
public static void InitializeService(IDataServiceConfiguration config)
{
config.SetEntitySetAccessRule("Customers", EntitySetRights.AllRead);
config.SetServiceOperationAccessRule("CustomersInCity", ServiceOperationRights.All);
}
[WebGet]
public IQueryable<MyDataSource.Customers> CustomersInCity(string city)
{
return from c in this.CurrentDataSource.Customers
where c.City == city
select c;
}
}
How can I get CustomersInCity() to show up in my client-side class defintions?
When you see your Odata in browser, you will see link ...
e.g. http://localhost:1234/odataService.svc
just write your method name after the link
for your method it will be something like this...
http://localhost:1234/odataService.svc/CustomersInCity?city="London"

RIA Services EntitySet does not support 'Edit' operation

Making my first steps in RIA Services (VS2010Beta2) and i encountered this problem:
created an EF Model (no POCOs), generic repository on top of it and a RIA Service(hosted in an ASP.NET MVC application) and tried to get data from within the ASP.NET MVC application: worked well.
Next step: Silverlight client. Got a reference to the RIAService (through its context), queried for all the records of the repository and got them into the SL application as well (using this code sample):
private ObservableCollection<Culture> _cultures = new ObservableCollection<Culture>();
public ObservableCollection<Culture> cultures
{
get { return _cultures; }
set
{
_cultures = value;
RaisePropertyChanged("cultures");
}
}
....
//Get cultures
EntityQuery<Culture> queryCultures = from cu in dsCtxt.GetAllCulturesQuery()
select cu;
loCultures = dsCtxt.Load(queryCultures);
loCultures.Completed += new EventHandler(lo_Completed);
....
void loAnyCulture_Completed(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
ObservableCollection<Culture> temp=
new ObservableCollection<Culture>loAnyCulture.Entities);
AnyCulture = temp[0];
}
The problem is this: whenever i try to edit some data of a record (in this example the first record) i get this error:
This EntitySet of type 'Culture' does not support the 'Edit' operation.
I thought that i did something weird and tried to create an object of type Culture and assign a value to it: it worked well!
What am i missing? Do i have to declare an EntitySet? Do i have to mark it? Do i have to...what?
Thanks in advance
It turns out that in the DomainService class one has to implement (or at least to mark "placeholder methods") as "Edit", "Delete",... eg
[Delete]
public void DeleteCulture(Culture currentCulture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException("UpdateCulture not Implemented yet");
}
[Insert]
public void InsertCulture(Culture newCulture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException("InsertCulture not Implemented yet");
}
This way the OrganizationDomainContextEntityContainer class creates an EntitySet with parameter EntitySetOperations.All (meaning that all the CUD operations are available).
Hope it's useful for someone in the future!

MEF Contrib Provider Model Not Importing Parts

I have been trying to use the configurable provider model for handling my MEF imports and exports from MEF Contrib (link). I've read the Codeplex documentation and Code Junkie's blog post (link); however, I can't seem to get the container to create the parts. Where am I going wrong?
Program.cs
namespace MEFTest
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Program p = new Program();
p.Run();
}
// [ImportMany("command", typeof(IHelp))]
public IEnumerable<IHelp> Commands { get; set; }
void Run()
{
Compose();
foreach(IHelp cmd in Commands)
{
Console.WriteLine(cmd.HelpText);
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
void Compose()
{
var provider = new ConfigurableDefinitionProvider("mef.configuration");
var catalog = new DefinitionProviderPartCatalog<ConfigurableDefinitionProvider>(provider);
var container = new CompositionContainer(catalog);
container.ComposeParts(this);
}
}
}
TestCommand.cs
namespace MEFTest
{
//[Export("command", typeof(IHelp))]
public class TestCommand : IHelp
{
private string _helpText = "This is a test.";
public string CommandName
{
get { return "Test"; }
}
public string HelpText
{
get { return _helpText; }
}
}
}
App.Config section:
<mef.configuration>
<parts>
<part type="MEFTest.TestCommand, MEFTest">
<exports>
<export contract="IHelp" />
</exports>
</part>
<part type="MEFTest.Program, MEFTest">
<imports>
<import member="Commands" contract="IHelp" />
</imports>
</part>
</parts>
</mef.configuration>
I don't get any build errors and it runs fine if I switch to the typical attribute-based system that is part of the MEF core (with the appropriate catalog too). Program.Commands is always NULL in the above example. I tried to just use a singular property instead of a collection and get the same results.
When I debug I can get the provider.Parts collection so I know it's accessing the configuration information correctly; however, I get an InvalidOperationException whenever I debug and try to drill into catalog.Parts.
Anyone have any experience as to where I'm going wrong here?
As documented here, you also need this in your config file:
<configSections>
<section
name="mef.configuration"
type="MefContrib.Models.Provider.Definitions.Configurable.PartCatalogConfigurationSection, MefContrib.Models.Provider" />
</configSections>
If you already have that, then it might be interesting to show us the stack trace of the InvalidOperationException that you get when accessing provider.Parts.
I had the same problems and could not get it to work, but here are some details:
It seems that ComposeParts() does not work as expected (at least in the version I used) because it uses static methods, based on Reflection to find all required Imports (so it seems that this part cannot be changed from outside of MEF). Unfortunately we want to use xml configuration and not the MEF attributes.
It works if you add [Import] attributes to the members of the class you you use with ComposeParts(). In your case this would be "Programm". In this case all exports defined in the configuration file will be found.
I could not find any documentation or examples on the MEF Contrib page relating to that problem. Also there is no unittest in the MEF contrib projekt that uses ComposeParts().
A workaround would be to use container.GetExportedValues() to retrieve the values, but in this case you have to set the classes members manually.
Hope that helps.