I am using SSMS 2008 R2 and am trying to figure out the SQL select statement to select all records where two or more of the values are found.
These are the four possible values I am looking for. If two or more of these values (SubstanceAbuse, BehaviorEmotion, SexualAbuse, DomesticViolence) are met, I want to set a new field to 1. How do I do this?
case when qav.[test_setup_details_caption] in ('Substance Abuse / Drug Use','Caregiver monitor youth for drug alcohol use') then 1 else 0 end SubstanceAbuse,
case when qav.[test_setup_details_caption] in ('Physical Aggression','Firesetting','Gang Involvement','Runaway Behavior') then 1 else 0 end BehaviorEmotion,
case when qav.[test_setup_details_caption] = 'Problem Sexual Behavior' then 1 else 0 end SexualAbuse,
case when qav.[test_setup_details_caption] LIKE '%Domestic%' then 1 else 0 end DomesticViolence,
My suggestion would be to take the above statement and make it a virtual table in a new SELECT statement. Then you can do a SUM on the ones (since they are calculated already) in your WHERE statement and display only
where (Sub + Beh + Sex + Dom) > 1
It would look something like this (pseudo-code):
SELECT t.*
FROM (SELECT sub case, Beh case, etc.
FROM yourtable) t
WHERE (t.sub + t.Beh + t.Sex + t.Dom) > 1
It seems like all you need is this WHERE clause:
WHERE SubstanceAbuse + BehaviorEmotion + SexualAbuse + DomesticViolence > 1
update myTable set myField = 1 where 2 <= (select SubstanceAbuse + BehaviorEmotion + SexualAbuse + DomesticViolence from ...)
Of course, this is just a template for your query, but you get the idea. If the answer is still unclear then I kindly ask you to give me more details.
Best regards,
Lajos Arpad.
Related
I am trying to normalize my tables to make the db more efficient.
To do this I have removed several columns from a table that I was updating several columns on.
Here is the original query when all the columns were in the table:
UPDATE myActDataBaselDataTable
set [Correct Arrears 2]=(case when [Maturity Date]='' then 0 else datediff(d,convert(datetime,#DataDate, 102),convert(datetime,[Maturity Date],102)) end)
from myActDataBaselDataTable
Now I have removed [Maturity Date] from the table myActDataBaselDataTable and it's necessary to retrieve that column from the base reference table ACTData, where it is called Mat.
In my table myActDataBaselDataTable the Account number field is a concatenation of 3 fields in ACTData, thus
myActDataBaselDataTable.[Account No]=ac.[Unit] + ' ' + ac.[ACNo] + ' ' + ac.[Suffix]
(where ac is the alias for ACTData)
So, having looked at the answers given elsewhere on SO (such as 1604091: update-a-table-using-join-in-sql-server), I tried to modify this particular update statement as below, but I cannot get it right:
UPDATE myActDataBaselDataTable
set dt.[Correct Arrears 2]=(
case when ac.[Mat]=''
then 0
else datediff(d,convert(datetime,'2014-04-30', 102),convert(datetime,ac.[Mat],102))
end)
from ACTData ac
inner join myActDataBaselDataTable dt
ON dt.[Account No]=ac.[Unit] + ' ' + ac.[ACNo] + ' ' + ac.[Suffix]
I either get an Incorrect syntax near 'From' error, or The multi-part identifier "dt.Correct Arrears 2" could not be bound.
I'd be grateful for any guidance on how to get this right, or suugestiopns about how to do it better.
thanks
EDIT:
BTW, when I run the below as a SELECT it returns data with no errors:
select case when [ac].[Mat]=''
then 0
else datediff(d,convert(datetime,'2014-04-30', 102),convert(datetime,[ac].[Mat],102))
end
from ACTData ac
inner join myActDataBaselDataTable dt
ON dt.[Account No]=ac.[Unit] + ' ' + ac.[ACNo] + ' ' + ac.[Suffix]
In a join update, update the alias
update dt
What is confusing is that in later versions of SQL you don't need to use the alias in the update line
Here's a simple query we do for ad hoc requests from our Marketing department on the leads we received in the last 90 days.
SELECT ID
,FIRST_NAME
,LAST_NAME
,ADDRESS_1
,ADDRESS_2
,CITY
,STATE
,ZIP
,HOME_PHONE
,MOBILE_PHONE
,EMAIL_ADDRESS
,ROW_ADDED_DTM
FROM WEB_LEADS
WHERE ROW_ADDED_DTM BETWEEN #START AND #END
They are asking for more derived columns to be added that show the number of previous occurences of ADDRESS_1 where the EMAIL_ADDRESS matches. But they want is for different date ranges.
So the derived columns would look like this:
,COUNT_ADDRESS_1_LAST_1_DAYS,
,COUNT_ADDRESS_1_LAST_7_DAYS
,COUNT_ADDRESS_1_LAST_14_DAYS
etc.
I've manually filled these derived columns using update statements when there was just a few. The above query is really just a sample of a much larger query with many more columns. The actual request has blossomed into 6 date ranges for 13 columns. I'm asking if there's a better way then using 78 additional update statements.
I think you will have a hard time writing a query that includes all of these 78 metrics per e-mail address without actually creating a query that hard-codes the different choices. However you can generate such a pivot query with dynamic SQL, which will save you some keystrokes and will adjust dynamically as you add more columns to the table.
The result you want to end up with will look something like this (but of course you won't want to type it):
;WITH y AS
(
SELECT
EMAIL_ADDRESS,
/* aggregation portion */
[ADDRESS_1] = COUNT(DISTINCT [ADDRESS_1]),
[ADDRESS_2] = COUNT(DISTINCT [ADDRESS_2]),
... other columns
/* end agg portion */
FROM dbo.WEB_LEADS AS wl
WHERE ROW_ADDED_DTM >= /* one of 6 past dates */
GROUP BY wl.EMAIL_ADDRESS
)
SELECT EMAIL_ADDRESS,
/* pivot portion */
COUNT_ADDRESS_1_LAST_1_DAYS = *count address 1 from 1 day ago*,
COUNT_ADDRESS_1_LAST_7_DAYS = *count address 1 from 7 days ago*,
... other date ranges ...
COUNT_ADDRESS_2_LAST_1_DAYS = *count address 2 from 1 day ago*,
COUNT_ADDRESS_2_LAST_7_DAYS = *count address 2 from 7 days ago*,
... other date ranges ...
... repeat for 11 more columns ...
/* end pivot portion */
FROM y
GROUP BY EMAIL_ADDRESS
ORDER BY EMAIL_ADDRESS;
This is a little involved, and it should all be run as one script, but I'm going to break it up into chunks to intersperse comments on how the above portions are populated without typing them. (And before long #Bluefeet will probably come along with a much better PIVOT alternative.) I'll enclose my interspersed comments in /* */ so that you can still copy the bulk of this answer into Management Studio and run it with the comments intact.
Code/comments to copy follows:
/*
First, let's build a table of dates that can be used both to derive labels for pivoting and to assist with aggregation. I've added the three ranges you've mentioned and guessed at a fourth, but hopefully it is clear how to add more:
*/
DECLARE #d DATE = SYSDATETIME();
CREATE TABLE #L(label NVARCHAR(15), d DATE);
INSERT #L(label, d) VALUES
(N'LAST_1_DAYS', DATEADD(DAY, -1, #d)),
(N'LAST_7_DAYS', DATEADD(DAY, -8, #d)),
(N'LAST_14_DAYS', DATEADD(DAY, -15, #d)),
(N'LAST_MONTH', DATEADD(MONTH, -1, #d));
/*
Next, let's build the portions of the query that are repeated per column name. First, the aggregation portion is just in the format col = COUNT(DISTINCT col). We're going to go to the catalog views to dynamically derive the list of column names (except ID, EMAIL_ADDRESS and ROW_ADDED_DTM) and stuff them into a #temp table for re-use.
*/
SELECT name INTO #N FROM sys.columns
WHERE [object_id] = OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.WEB_LEADS')
AND name NOT IN (N'ID', N'EMAIL_ADDRESS', N'ROW_ADDED_DTM');
DECLARE #agg NVARCHAR(MAX) = N'', #piv NVARCHAR(MAX) = N'';
SELECT #agg += ',
' + QUOTENAME(name) + ' = COUNT(DISTINCT '
+ QUOTENAME(name) + ')' FROM #N;
PRINT #agg;
/*
Next we'll build the "pivot" portion (even though I am angling for the poor man's pivot - a bunch of CASE expressions). For each column name we need a conditional against each range, so we can accomplish this by cross joining the list of column names against our labels table. (And we'll use this exact technique again in the query later to make the /* one of past 6 dates */ portion work.
*/
SELECT #piv += ',
COUNT_' + n.name + '_' + l.label
+ ' = MAX(CASE WHEN label = N''' + l.label
+ ''' THEN ' + QUOTENAME(n.name) + ' END)'
FROM #N as n CROSS JOIN #L AS l;
PRINT #piv;
/*
Now, with those two portions populated as we'd like them, we can build a dynamic SQL statement that fills out the rest:
*/
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(MAX) = N';WITH y AS
(
SELECT
EMAIL_ADDRESS, l.label' + #agg + '
FROM dbo.WEB_LEADS AS wl
CROSS JOIN #L AS l
WHERE wl.ROW_ADDED_DTM >= l.d
GROUP BY wl.EMAIL_ADDRESS, l.label
)
SELECT EMAIL_ADDRESS' + #piv + '
FROM y
GROUP BY EMAIL_ADDRESS
ORDER BY EMAIL_ADDRESS;';
PRINT #sql;
EXEC sp_executesql #sql;
GO
DROP TABLE #N, #L;
/*
Now again, this is a pretty complex piece of code, and perhaps it can be made easier with PIVOT. But I think even #Bluefeet will write a version of PIVOT that uses dynamic SQL because there is just way too much to hard-code here IMHO.
*/
Can anyone tell me how to translate the following T-SQL statement:
SELECT fileld1 = CASE
WHEN T.option1 THEN -1
ELSE
CASE WHEN T.option2 THEN 0
ELSE 1
END
END
FROM Table1 AS T
The point is I need to validate two different options from the table for a single field in the select statement..
I have tried to do somthing with an IF statement in pl/sql, but it just doesnt work for me:
SELECT IF T.option1 THEN -1
ELSE IF T.option2 THEN 0
ELSE 1
END
FROM Table1 AS T
I am not actually sure how to write IF statement inside the SELECT statement..
And also, I need to do it INSIDE the select statement because I am constructing a view.
Use:
SELECT CASE
WHEN T.option1 = ? THEN -1
WHEN T.option2 = ? THEN 0
ELSE 1
END AS field1
FROM Table1 AS T
I can't get your original TSQL to work - I get:
Msg 4145, Level 15, State 1, Line 4
An expression of non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected, near 'THEN'.
...because there's no value evaluation. If you're checking if the columns are null, you'll need to use:
SELECT CASE
WHEN T.option1 IS NULL THEN -1
WHEN T.option2 IS NULL THEN 0
ELSE 1
END AS field1
FROM Table1 AS T
...or if you need when they are not null:
SELECT CASE
WHEN T.option1 IS NOT NULL THEN -1
WHEN T.option2 IS NOT NULL THEN 0
ELSE 1
END AS field1
FROM Table1 AS T
CASE expressions shortcircuit - if the first WHEN matches, it returns the value & exits handling for that row - so the options afterwards aren't considered.
If I remember correctly, PL/SQL also supports the case. You just would have to move the column alias from "field1=" before the expression to "AS filed1" after the expression.
I am trying to total by account, the expenses & income per account. There are multiples of both the income & the expenses per account. I am struggling with this as am still learning SQL and thought that someone else likely has already addressed this? I sure would appreciate the help!
I know that this SQL server code is not correct but it at least gives a bit clearer picture of what I am attempting to do.
IF(SELECT(OBJECT_ID('TEMPDB..#Total'))) IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Total
declare #Expenses decimal(13,2),
#income decimal(13,2)
set #expenses = sum(EXP_CHILD_CARE_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_FOOD_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_LIFE_INSURANCE_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_TRANSPORTATION_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_TUITION_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_USER_2_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_USER_3_AMOUNT)
+ sum(EXP_UTILITIES_AMOUNT)
set #income = (sum(NET_PAY_AMOUNT)
+ sum(OTHER_INCOME_AMOUNT)
SELECT F.LOAN_NUMBER, #Income, #Expenses
INTO #Total
FROM OPENQUERY(SvrLink, '
SELECT F.Account, #Income, #Expenses
FROM finances F
inner join account a on(a.Account = f.Account)
where a.balance > 0
FETCH ONLY WITH UR ')
...ok, assuming that some fields are grouped into the same table (if not you'll just have to write the joins), you just need 1 query. (I wish all languages were as concise...)
#AccountId is your desired account id.
SELECT l.LOAN_NUMBER, l.AccountId,
(SELECT sum(EXP_CHILD_CARE_AMOUNT) + sum(EXP_FOOD_AMOUNT) +
sum(EXP_LIFE_INSURANCE_AMOUNT) + sum(EXP_TRANSPORTATION_AMOUNT) +
sum(EXP_TUITION_AMOUNT) + sum(EXP_USER_2_AMOUNT) +
sum(EXP_USER_3_AMOUNT) + sum(EXP_UTILITIES_AMOUNT)
as ExpenseTotal FROM Expenses_Guessing_The_Table_Name
WHERE AccountId = #AccountId) as ExpenseTotal,
(SELECT sum(NET_PAY_AMOUNT) + sum(OTHER_INCOME_AMOUNT) as IncomeTotal
FROM Income_Guessing_The_Table_Name
WHERE AccountId = #AccountId) as IncomeTotal
FROM Loans l
WHERE l.AccountId = #AccountId AND l.Balance > 0
OK, the umpteenth conditional column question:
I'm writing a stored proc that takes an input parameter that's mapped to one of several flag columns. What's the best way to filter on the requested column? I'm currently on SQL2000, but about to move to SQL2008, so I'll take a contemporary solution if one's available.
The table queried in the sproc looks like
ID ... fooFlag barFlag bazFlag quuxFlag
-- ------- ------- ------- --------
01 1 0 0 1
02 0 1 0 0
03 0 0 1 1
04 1 0 0 0
and I want to do something like
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where (colname like #flag + 'Flag') = 1
so if I call the sproc like exec uspMyProc #flag = 'foo' I'd get back rows 1 and 4.
I know I can't do the part in parens directly in SQL. In order to do dynamic SQL, I'll have to stuff the entire query into a string, concatenate the #flag param in the WHERE clause and then exec the string. Aside from the dirty feeling I get when doing dynamic SQL, my query is fairly large (I'm selecting a couple dozen fields, joining 5 tables, calling a couple of functions), so it's a big giant string all because of a single line in a 3-line WHERE filter.
Alternately, I could have 4 copies of the query and select among them in a CASE statement. This leaves the SQL code directly executable (and subject to syntax hilighting, etc.) but at the cost of repeating big chunks of code, since I can't use the CASE on just the WHERE clause.
Are there any other options? Any tricky joins or logical operations that can be applied? Or should I just get over it and exec the dynamic SQL?
There are a few ways to do this:
You can do this with a case statement.
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where CASE
WHEN #flag = 'foo' then fooFlag
WHEN #flag = 'bar' then barFlag
END = 1
You can use IF.
IF (#flag = 'foo') BEGIN
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where fooFlag = 1
END ELSE IF (#flag = 'bar') BEGIN
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where barFlag = 1
END
....
You can have a complicated where clause with a lot of parentheses.
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where (#flag = 'foo' and fooFlag = 1)
OR (#flag = 'bar' and barFlag = 1) OR ...
You can do this with dynamic sql:
DECLARE #SQL nvarchar(4000)
SELECT #SQL = N'select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where (colname like ''' + #flag + 'Flag'') = 1'
EXECUTE sp_ExecuteSQL #SQL, N''
There are more, but I think one of these will get you going.
"Alternately, I could have 4 copies of the query and select among them in a CASE statement."
You don't need to copy your entire query 4 times, just add all the possibilities into the where clauses in your single copy of the query:
select ID, name, description, ...
from myTable
where (#flag = 'foo' and fooFlag = 1) OR (#flag = 'bar' and barFlag = 1) OR ...
What I would do is CASE some variables at the beginning. Example:
DECLARE
#fooFlag int,
#barFlag int,
#bazFlag int,
#quuxFlag int
SET #fooFlag = CASE WHEN #flag = 'foo' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END
SET #barFlag = CASE WHEN #flag = 'bar' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END
SET #bazFlag = CASE WHEN #flag = 'baz' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END
SET #quuxFlag = CASE WHEN #flag = 'quux' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END
SELECT ID, name, description, ...
FROM myTable
WHERE (fooFlag >= ISNULL(#fooFlag, 0) AND fooFlag <= ISNULL(#fooFlag, 1))
AND (barFlag >= ISNULL(#barFlag, 0) AND barFlag <= ISNULL(#barFlag, 1))
AND (bazFlag >= ISNULL(#bazFlag, 0) AND bazFlag <= ISNULL(#bazFlag, 1))
AND (quuxFlag >= ISNULL(#quuxFlag, 0) AND quuxFlag <= ISNULL(#quuxFlag, 1))
The good thing about this query is that, because the possible values for "flags" are bounded, you can calculate all your conditionals as prerequisites instead of wrapping columns in them. This guarantees a high-performance index seek on whichever columns are indexed, and doesn't require writing any dynamic SQL. And it's better than writing 4 separate queries for obvious reasons.
You could have a parameter for each possible flag column, then check if the parameter is null or the value in the column is equal to the parameter. Then you pass in a 1 for the flags that you want to check and leave the others null.
select id, name, description, ...
from myTable
where (#fooFlag is null or fooFlag = #fooFlag) AND
(#barFlag is null or barFlag = #barFlag) AND
...
Honestly, though, this seems like an ideal candidate for building a dynamic LINQ query and skipping the SPROC once you get to SQL2008.
int should be accepted as varchar value
declare #CompanyID as varchar(10) = '' -- or anyother value
select * from EmployeeChatTbl chat
where chat.ConversationDetails like '%'+#searchKey+'%'
and
(
(0 = CASE WHEN (#CompanyID = '' ) THEN 0 ELSE 1 END)
or
(chat.CompanyID = #CompanyID)
)
working
when the companyID is present , then filtration based on it is done, other wise , filtration is skipped.
where
case when #value<>0 then Field else 1 end
=
case when #value<>0 then #value else 1 end