It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
Can we disable the ipad fully? I have heard that its not possible. I have searched for it and it shows that the above cannot be done and if its done then the app will be rejected. But still for an accurate answer i'm posting this. Can any one provide me with the correct response?
No, you cannot do this without rooting the iPad (thereby invalidating its warrantee) and installing what most users would consider malware. (You may well have a reasonable use case — loaning them out or something — I'm just saying, that's how most users would see it.)
Related
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
I am using kamcord framework that helps me record my game play on the app im developing. Is it possible for my stuff to get stolen? What are some good ways to improve security?
Since your final application is compiled, it is not really possible to have your exact code stolen. Assets can be retrieved from the .app file of your application, though. If you're recording a video of your application, none of the above is possible.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
Can someone explain IPhone architecture in detail.
What happens when we click on a button, how hardware responds to that event.
Thanks
Jithendra
Check this How the iPhone Works, especially how the touch works part. It has detailed information on how everything is handled including the touch/multiple touch etc. Cannot add all the information here, so posting as a link alone.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 11 years ago.
Is it really possible? i have seen lots of my friends sending me big emoticons via facebook chat messages. How they do this??
Yes it is possible. go to http://apps.facebook.com/big-emo-creator , select an image and wait few seconds till the app process your image and give you the code.
But these emoticons are not much useful as you have to remember a huge code to use this emos. However you can give it a try.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 11 years ago.
Normally, this can't be done. I have written a class which wraps around the usual Storekit functionality and will allow an app to behave (while running on the simulator) as if the Storekit transaction had succeeded.
I have written a blog post about the design decisions behind the code, which can be read here and includes a download link:
http://code-evolution.blogspot.com/2010/05/evolved-code-example-1-simplestore-for.html
Or you can just grab the sample project from this location:
simplestoreevolved.googlecode.com/files/SimpleStoreEvolved.zip
Enjoy
T.
Looks like there was a parallel solution, developed in the same timeframe:
https://github.com/millenomi/simstorekit
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
is that new in 3.1?
Yes, in 3.1, the behavior of the tel: call changed back to the way it was in 2.x. AFAIK, 3.0 is the only version that asks the user for confirmation.
Just tried it in an another app and it placed the call without asking me first. Guess you could file a bug report if Apple if you don't think it should behave this way (personally I'm OK with it).