SELECT id,icon,type,cnt
FROM capability
JOIN (
SELECT s0_.capability_id AS capability_id0 ,
count(capability_id) as cnt
FROM service_offer_capability s0_
INNER JOIN service_offer s1_ ON s0_.service_offer_id = s1_.id
WHERE s0_.value <> 'i:0;' AND s1_.service_id = 2
GROUP BY s0_.capability_id
) af
ON af.capability_id0=id;
All i want to do is to have a max(cnt) as an extra column. I know that you can order by cnt and get the first but i am looking for an alternative..Is it possible or i have to run multiple queries?
This should do it:
SELECT id,
icon,
type,
cnt,
max(cnt) over () as max_cnt
FROM capability
JOIN (
SELECT s0_.capability_id AS capability_id0 ,
count(capability_id) as cnt
FROM service_offer_capability s0_
INNER JOIN service_offer s1_ ON s0_.service_offer_id = s1_.id
WHERE s0_.value <> 'i:0;' AND s1_.service_id = 2
GROUP BY s0_.capability_id
) af
ON af.capability_id0=id;
Related
I have the following query:
SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT p.id) AS price_ids,
array_agg(p.name) AS price_names
FROM items
LEFT JOIN prices p on p.item_id = id
LEFT JOIN third_table t3 on third_table.item_id = id
WHERE id = 1;
When I LEFT JOIN the third_table all my prices are duplicated.
I'm using DISTINCT inside ARRAY_AGG() to get the ids without dups, but I want the names without dups aswell.
If I use array_agg(DISTINCT p.name) AS price_names, it will return distinct values based on the name, not the id.
I want to do something similar to array_agg(DISTINCT ON (p.id) p.name) AS price_names, but it is invalid.
How can I use DISTINCT ON inside ARRAY_AGG()?
Aggregate first, then join:
SELECT p.price_ids,
p.price_names,
t3.*
FROM items
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT pr.item_id,
array_agg(pr.id) AS price_ids,
array_agg(pr.name) AS price_names
FROM prices pr
GROUP BY pr.item_id
) p on p.item_id = items.id
LEFT JOIN third_table t3 on third_table.item_id = id
WHERE items.id = 1;
Using a lateral join might be faster if you only pick a single item:
SELECT p.price_ids,
p.price_names,
t3.*
FROM items
LEFT JOIN LATERAL (
SELECT array_agg(pr.id) AS price_ids,
array_agg(pr.name) AS price_names
FROM prices pr
WHERE pr.item_id = items.id
) p on true
LEFT JOIN third_table t3 on third_table.item_id = id
WHERE items.id = 1;
We created a view in Postgres and I am getting strange result.
View Name: event_puchase_product_overview
When I try to get records with *, I get the correct result. but when I try to get specific fields, I get wrong values.
I hope the screens attached here can explain the problem well.
select *
from event_purchase_product_overview
where id = 15065;
select id, departure_id
from event_puchase_product_overview
where id = 15065;
VIEW definition:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW public.event_puchase_product_overview AS
SELECT row_number() OVER () AS id,
e.id AS departure_id,
e.type AS event_type,
e.name,
p.id AS product_id,
pc.name AS product_type,
product_date.attribute AS option,
p.upcomming_date AS supply_date,
pr.date_end AS bid_deadline,
CASE
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_hotel'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_rooms
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_flight'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_seats
WHEN (pt.categ_id IN ( SELECT unnest(tt.category_ids) AS unnest
FROM ( SELECT string_to_array(btrim(ir_config_parameter.value, '[]'::text), ', '::text)::integer[] AS category_ids
FROM ir_config_parameter
WHERE ir_config_parameter.key::text = 'trip_product_flight.product_category_bike'::text) tt)) THEN e.maximum_bikes
ELSE e.maximum_seats
END AS departure_qty,
CASE
WHEN now()::date > pr.date_end AND po.state::text = 'draft'::text THEN true
ELSE false
END AS is_deadline,
pl.product_qty::integer AS purchased_qty,
pl.comments,
pl.price_unit AS unit_price,
rp.id AS supplier,
po.id AS po_ref,
po.state AS po_state,
po.date_order AS po_date,
po.user_id AS operator,
pl.po_state_line AS line_status
FROM event_event e
LEFT JOIN product_product p ON p.related_departure = e.id
LEFT JOIN product_template pt ON pt.id = p.product_tmpl_id
LEFT JOIN product_category pc ON pc.id = pt.categ_id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order_line pl ON pl.product_id = p.id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order po ON po.id = pl.order_id
LEFT JOIN purchase_order_purchase_requisition_rel prr ON prr.purchase_order_id = po.id
LEFT JOIN purchase_requisition pr ON pr.id = prr.purchase_requisition_id
LEFT JOIN res_partner rp ON rp.id = po.partner_id
LEFT JOIN ( SELECT p_1.id AS product_id,
pav.name AS attribute
FROM product_product p_1
LEFT JOIN product_attribute_value_product_product_rel pa ON pa.prod_id = p_1.id
LEFT JOIN product_attribute_value pav ON pav.id = pa.att_id
LEFT JOIN product_attribute pat ON pat.id = pav.attribute_id
WHERE pat.name::text <> ALL (ARRAY['Date'::character varying, 'Departure'::character varying]::text[])) product_date ON product_date.product_id = p.id
WHERE (p.id IN ( SELECT DISTINCT mrp_bom_line.product_id
FROM mrp_bom_line)) AND p.active
ORDER BY e.id, pt.categ_id, p.id;
If I add new event_event or new product_product I'll get a new definition of row_number in my view, then the column ID of my view is not stable.
at least you can't use row_number as Id of the view,
If you insist to use row_number, you can use the Order By "creation DATE" by this way all new records will be as last lines in the view and this will not change the correspondency between ID (row_number) and other columns.
Hope that helps !
Very likely the execution plan of your query depends on the columns you select. Compare the execution plans!
Your id is generated using the row_number window function. Now window functions are executed before the ORDER BY clause, so the order will depend on the execution plan and hence on the columns you select.
Using row_number without an explicit ordering doesn't make any sense.
To fix that, don't use
row_number() OVER ()
but
row_number() OVER (ORDER BY e.id, pt.categ_id, p.id)
so that you have a reliable ordering.
In addition, you should omit the ORDER BY clause at the end.
My query is below:
select
u.Id,
STRING_AGG(sf.Naziv, ', ') as 'Ustrojstvena jedinica',
ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar(200), (STRING_AGG(TRIM(p.Naziv), ', ')), 121), '')
as 'Partner',
from Ugovor as u
left join VezaUgovorPartner as vup
on vup.UgovorId = u.Id AND vup.IsDeleted = 'false'
left join [TEST_MaticniPodaci2].dbo.Partner as p
on p.PartnerID = vup.PartnerId
left join [dbo].[VezaUgovorUstrojstvenaJedinica] as vuu
on vuu.UgovorId = u.Id
left join [TEST_MaticniPodaci2].hcphs.SifZavod as sf
on sf.Id = vuu.UstrojstvenaJedinicaId
left join [dbo].[SifVrstaUgovora] as vu
on u.VrstaUgovoraId = vu.Id
group by u.Id, sf.Naziv
My problem is that I can have more sf.Naziv and also only one sf.Naziv so I have to check if there is one and then show only one result and if there is two or more to show more results. But for now the problem is when I have only one sf.Naziv, query returns two sf.Naziv with the same name because in first STRING_AGG i have more records about p.Naziv.
I have no idea how to implement DISTINCT into STRING_AGG function
Any other solutions are welcome, but I think it should work with DISTINCT function.
It looks like distinct won't work, so what you should do is put your whole query in a subquery, remove the duplicates there, then do STRING_AGG on the data that has no duplicates.
SELECT STRING_AGG(data)
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT FROM ...
)
I like this format for distinct values:
(d is required but you can use any variable name there)
SELECT STRING_AGG(LoadNumber, ',') as LoadNumbers FROM (SELECT DISTINCT LoadNumber FROM [ASN]) d
A sample query to remove duplicates while using STRING_AGG().
WITH cte AS (
SELECT DISTINCT product
FROM activities
)
SELECT STRING_AGG(product, ',') products
FROM cte;
Or you can use the following query. The result is same -
SELECT STRING_AGG(product, ',') as products
from (
SELECT product
FROM Activities
GROUP BY product
) as _ ;
Below sample query is a part of my main query. I found SORT operator in below query is consuming 30% of the cost.
To avoid SORT, there is need of creation of Indexes. Is there any other way to optimize this code.
SELECT TOP 1 CONVERT( DATE, T_Date) AS T_Date
FROM TableA
WHERE ID = r.ID
AND Status = 3
AND TableA_ID >ISNULL((
SELECT TOP 1 TableA_ID
FROM TableA
WHERE ID = r.ID
AND Status <> 3
ORDER BY T_Date DESC
), 0)
ORDER BY T_Date ASC
Looks like you can use not exists rather than the sorts. I think you'll probably get a better performance boost by use a CTE or derived table instead of the a scalar subquery.
select *
from r ... left outer join
(
select ID, min(t_date) as min_date from TableA t1
where status = 3 and not exists (
select 1 from TableA t2
where t2.ID = t1.ID
and t2.status <> 3 and t2.t_date > t1.t_date
)
group by ID
) as md on md.ID = r.ID ...
or
select *
from r ... left outer join
(
select t1.ID, min(t1.t_date) as min_date
from TableA t1 left outer join TableA t2
on t2.ID = t1.ID and t2.status <> 3
where t1.status = 3 and t1.t_date < t2.t_date
group by t1.ID
having count(t2.ID) = 0
) as md on md.ID = r.ID ...
It also appears that you're relying on an identity column but it's not clear what those values mean. I'm basically ignoring it and using the date column instead.
Try this:
SELECT TOP 1 CONVERT( DATE, T_Date) AS T_Date
FROM TableA a1
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT ID, MAX(TableA_ID) AS MaxAID
FROM TableA
WHERE Status <> 3
GROUP BY ID
) a2 ON a2.ID = a1.ID AND a1.TableA_ID > coalesce(a2.MAXAID,0)
WHERE a1.ID = r.ID AND a1.Status = 3
ORDER BY T_Date ASC
The use of TOP 1 in combination with the unexplained r alias concern me. There's almost certainly a MUCH better way to get this data into your results that doesn't involve doing this in a sub query (unless this is for an APPLY operation).
I have the below problem. Seems to be a simple query, but I couldn't figure it out after spending so much time.
Table
-----
project
mission
craft
project can have many missions, for each mission, it can use multiple air crafts. I want to identify the crafts that was involved with all the missions.
For eg if there are 10 missions, mission 1 can use craft 1 and 2. If there is any craft that used for all the 10 missions (mission 1 -10), that should be output.
I wrote,
select craft,count(mission) from table group by craft
After this I don't know how can I match this value to the total missions. Any help would be highly appreciated.
If you need this for single project you need filter number of craft's missions by total number of missions:
select c.id from (
select c.id, count(mission_id) cnt
from craft c inner join mission m on (m.id = c.mission_id)
where m.project_id = <project_id>
group by c.id
) as c
where c.cnt = (select count(*) from mission where project_id = <project_id>)
If you need this for all projects:
select c.project_id, c.id from (
select m.project_id, c.id, count(mission_id) cnt
from craft c inner join mission m on (m.id = c.mission_id)
group by m.project_id, c.id
) as c inner join (
select project_id, count(*) cnt
from mission
group by project_id
) as m on (m.project_id = c.project_id)
where c.cnt = m.cnt
with mission as (
select distinct mission
from craft
), craft_missions as (
select craft, count(*) as total_missions
from
craft c
inner join
mission m on m.mission = c.mission
group by craft
)
select craft
from craft_missions
where total_missions = (select count(*) from mission)