as a not Perl programmer, i would like to be sure i had well understood a construct that i am going to port to Python,
when using :
if (s/^([$PChar])(.)/$2/) {
print $1,"\n";
$finished = 0;
}
$1, $2 etc. are matching regular expression
s/search for/replace with/
what i am really not sure is does the matching/replacement is done before the print $1 ? and is it done "inplace" inside current buffer (which is $F, that is $_ line by line readed, splitted on its space character), that is changing it (so if i understand well, the ([$PChar]) when # beginning of a string is totally striped off/lost in the above statment) ?
EDIT : no maybe it is not lost, first parenthesis part is captured, and then printed as $1 + new line character and then... no, do not understand what become $2... may be buffer change to second parenthesis part ? /END OF EDIT.
also is there any environnement or what is the best environnement that permit to do some step-by-step debugging on Win platform ? i'm aware that having this, i will not have asked this question. And i do not need to learn Perl, just only to be able to read and adapt this script.
here is the englobing part :
#F = split;
for( $j=0; $j<=$#F; $j++) {
my $suffix="";
$_ = $F[$j];
# separate punctuation and parentheses from words
do {
$finished = 1;
# cut off preceding punctuation
if (s/^([$PChar])(.)/$2/) {
print $1,"\n";
$finished = 0;
}
# cut off trailing punctuation
if (s/(.)([$FChar])$/$1/) {
$suffix = "$2\n$suffix";
$finished = 0;
}
whole script tokenize.pl can be seen here while original tar.bz if from here
best regards
# try to delete the first character from the string contained in
# $_ if that character is one of the characters contained in
# the string $PChar. The deletion is done by replace the first and
# second character by only the second character.
if (s/^([$PChar])(.)/$2/) {
# if the replacement was successful, print the deleted character.
print $1,"\n";
$finished = 0;
}
Related
$text = "I like apples more than oranges\n";
#words = split /” “/, $text;
foreach (#words) [1..] {
if $words "AEIOUaeiou";
$words =~ tr/A E I O U a e i o u//d;
}
print "$words\n";
"I like apples more than oranges" will become "I lk appls mr thn orngs". "I" in "I", "a" in "appls" and "o" in "orngs" will stay because they are the first letter in the word.
This is my research assignment as a first year student. I am allowed to ask questions and later cite them. Please don't be mean.
I know you say you are not allowed to use a regex, but for everyone else that shows up here I'll show the use of proper tools. But, then I'll do something just as useful with tr///.
One of the tricks of programming (and mathematics) decomposing what look like hard problems into easier problems, especially if you already have solutions for the easy problems. (Read about Parnas decomposition, for example).
So, the question is "How can I remove all the vowels unless they are in word beginnings?" (after I made your title a bit shorter). This led the answers to think about words, so they split up the input, did some work to ensure they weren't working on the first character, and then reassembled the result.
But, another way to frame the problem is "How do I remove all the vowels that come after another letter?". The only letter that doesn't come after another letter is the first letter of a word.
The regex for a vowel that comes after another letter is simple (but I'll stick to ASCII here, although it is just as simple for any Unicode letter):
[a-z][aeiou]
That only matches when there is a vowel after the first letter. Now you want to replace all of those with nothing. Use the substitution operator, s///. The /g flag makes all global substitutions and the /i makes it case insensitive:
s/[a-z][aeiou]//gi;
But, there's a problem. It also replaces that leading letter. That's easy enough to fix. The \K in a substitution says to ignore the part of the pattern before it in the replacement. Anything before the \K is not replaced. So, this only replaces the vowels:
s/[a-z]\K[aeiou]//gi;
But, maybe there are vowels next to each other, so throw in the + quantifier for "one or more" of the preceding item:
s/[a-z]\K[aeiou]+//gi;
You don't need to care about words at all.
Some other ways
Saying that a letter must follow another letter has a special zero-width assertion: the non-word boundary, \B (although that also counts digits and underscore as "letters"):
s/\B[aeiou]+//gi;
The \K was introduced v5.10 and was really a nifty trick to have a variable-width lookbehind. But, the lookbehind here is fixed width: it's one character:
s/(?<=[a-z])[aeiou]+//gi;
But, caring about words
Suppose you need to handle each word separately, for some other requirement. It looks like you've mixed a little Python-ish sort of code, and it would be nice if Perl could do that :). The problem doesn't change that much because you can do the same thing for each individual word.
foreach my $word ( split /\s+/, $x ) {
.... # same thing for each word
}
But, here's an interesting twist? How do you put it all back together? The other solutions just use a single space assuming that's the separator. Maybe there should be two spaces, or tabs, or whatever. The split has a special "separator retention mode" that can keep whatever was between the pieces. When you have captures in the split pattern, those capture values are part of the output list:
my #words_and_separators = split /(\s+)/, $x;
Since you know that none of the separators will have vowels, you can make substitutions on them knowing they won't change. This means you can treat them just like the words (that is, there is no special case, which is another thing to think about as you decompose problems). To get your final string with the original spacing, join on the empty string:
my $ending_string = join '', #words_and_separators;
So, here's how that might all look put together. I'll add the /r flag on the substitution so it returns the modified copy instead of working on the original (don't modify the control variable!):
my #words;
foreach my $word ( split /(\s+)/, $x ) {
push #words, $word =~ s/\B[aeiou]+//gr;
}
my $ending_string = join '', #words;
But, that foreach is a bit annoying. This list pipeline is the same, and it's easier to read these bottom to top. Each thing produces a list that flows into the thing above it. This is how I'd probably express it in real code:
my $ending_string =
join '',
map { s/\B[aeiou]+//gr } # each item is in $_
split /(\s+)/, $x;
Now, here's the grand finale. What if we didn't split thing up on whitespace but on whitespace and the first letter of each word? With separator retention mode we know that we only have to affect every other item, so we count them as we do the map:
my $n = 0;
my $ending_string =
join '',
map { ++$n % 2 ? tr/aeiouAEIOU//dr : $_ }
split /((?:^|\s+)[a-z])/i, $x;
But, I wouldn't write this technique in this way because someone would ultimately find me and exact their revenge. Instead, that foreach I found annoying before may soothe the angry masses:
my $n = 0;
foreach ( split /((?:^|\s+)[a-z])/i, $x ) {
print ++$n % 2 ? tr/aeiouAEIOU//dr : $_;
}
This now remembers the actual separators from the original string and leaves alone the first character of the "word" because it's not in the element we will modify.
The code in the foreach doesn't need to use the conditional operator, ?: or some of the other features. The important part is skipping every other element. That split pattern is a bit of a puzzler if you haven't seen it before, but that's what you get with those sorts of requirements. I think modifying a portion of the substring is just as likely to trip up people on a first read.
I mean, if they are going to make you do it the wrong way in the homework, strike back with something that will take up a bit of their time. :)
Oh, this is fun
I had another idea, because tr/// has another task beyond transliteration. It also counts. Because it returns the number of replacements, if you replace anything with itself, you get a count of the occurrences of that thing. You can count vowels, for instance:
my $has_vowels = $string =~ tr/aeiou/aeiou/; # counts vowels
But, with a string of one letter, that means you have a way to tell if it is a vowel:
my $is_vowel = substr( $string, $i, 1 ) =~ tr/aeiou/aeiou/;
You also can know things about the previous character:
my $is_letter = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 ) =~ tr/a-zA-Z/a-zA-Z/;
Put that together and you can look at any position and know if it's a vowel that follows a letter. If so, you skip that letter. Otherwise, you add that letter to the output:
use v5.10;
$x = "I like apples more than oranges oooooranges\n";
my $output = substr $x, 0, 1; # avoid the -1 trap (end of string!)
for( my $i = 1; $i < length $x; $i++ ) {
if( substr( $x, $i, 1 ) =~ tr/aeiou/aeiou/ ) { # is a vowel
next if substr( $x, $i - 1, 1 ) =~ tr/a-zA-Z/a-zA-Z/;
}
$output .= substr $x, $i, 1;
}
say $output;
This has the fun consequence of using the recommended operator but completely bypassing the intent. But, this is a proper and intended use of tr///.
It appears that you need to put a little more effort into learning Perl before taking on challenges like this. Your example contains a lot of code that simply isn't valid Perl.
$x = "I like apples more than oranges\n"; #the original sentence
foreach $i in #x[1..] {
You assign your text to the scalar variable $x, but then try to use the array variable #x. In Perl, these are two completely separate variables that have no connection whatsoever. Also, in Perl, the range operator (..) needs values at both ends.
If you had an array called #x (and you don't, you have a scalar) then you could do what you're trying to do here with foreach $i (#x)
if $i "AEIOUaeiou";
I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. I guess the nearest useful Perl expression I can see would be something like:
if ($i =~ /^[AEIOUaeiou]$/)
Which would test if $i is a vowel. But that's a regex, so you're not allowed to use it.
Obviously, I'd solve this problem with a regex, but as those are banned, I've reached for some slightly more obscure Perl features in my code below (that's so your teacher won't believe this is your solution if you just cut and paste it):
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use feature 'say';
my $text = "I like apples more than oranges\n";
# Split the string into an array of words
my #words = split /\s+/, $text;
# For each word...
for (#words) {
# Get a substring that omits the first character
# and use tr/// to remove vowels from that substring
substr($_, 1) =~ tr/AEIOUaeiou//d;
}
# Join the array back together
$text = join ' ', #words;
say $text;
Update: Oh, and notice that I've used tr/AEIUOaeiou//d where you have tr/A E I O U a e i o u//d. It probably won't make any difference here (depending on your approach - but you'll probably be applying it to strings that don't contain spaces) but it's good practice to only include the characters that you want to remove.
We can go over the input string from the end and remove any vowel that's not preceded by a space. We go from right to left so we don't have to adjust the position after each deletion. We don't need to check the very first letter, it shouldn't be ever removed. To remove a vowel, we can use tr///d on the substr of the original string.
for my $i (reverse 1 .. length $x) {
substr($x, $i, 1) =~ tr/aeiouAEIOU//d
if substr($x, $i - 1, 1) ne ' ';
}
Firstly your if statement is wrong.
Secondly this is not a Perl code.
Here is a piece of code that will work, but there is a better way to do it
my $x = "I like apples more than oranges\n";
my $new = "";
my #arr;
foreach my $word (split(' ', $x)) {
#arr = split('', $word);
foreach (my $i; $i<scalar #arr; $i++){
if ($i == 0){
$new .= $arr[$i];
}
elsif (index("AEIOUaeiou", $arr[$i]) == -1) {
$new .= $arr[$i];
}
}
$new .= " ";
}
print "$new\n";
Here I am splitting the string in order to get an array, then I am checking if the given char is a vowel, if it's not, I am appending it to a new string.
Always include
use strict;
use warnings;
on top of your code.
Clearly this is an exercise in lvalues. Obviously. Indubitably!
#!/usr/bin/env perl
# any old perl will do
use 5.010;
use strict;
use warnings;
# This is not idomatic nor fantastic code. Idiotastic?
$_='I am yclept Azure-Orange, queueing to close a query. How are YOU?';
# My little paws typed "local pos" and got
# "Useless localization of match position" :(
# so a busy $b keeps/restores that value
while (/\b./g) {
substr($_,$b=pos,/\b/g && -$b+pos)
# Suggestion to use tr is poetic, not pragmatic,
# ~ tr is sometimes y and y is sometimes a vowel
=~ y/aeiouAEIOU//d;
pos=$b;
}
say
# "say" is the last word.
Was there an embargo against using s/// substitution, or against using all regex? For some reason I thought matching was OK, just not substitution. If matches are OK, I have an idea that "improves" upon this by removing $b through pattern matching side effects. Will see if it pans out. If not, should be pretty easy to replace /\b/ and pos with index and variables, though the definition of word boundary over-simplifies in that case.
(edit) here it is a little more legible with nary a regex
my $text="YO you are the one! The-only-person- asking about double spaces.
Unfortunate about newlines...";
for (my $end=length $text;
$end > 0 && (my $start = rindex $text,' ',$end);
$end = $start-1) {
# y is a beautiful letter, using it for vowels is poetry.
substr($text,2+$start,$end-$start) =~ y/aeiouUOIEA//d;
}
say $text;
Maybe more devious minds will succeed with vec, unpack, open, fork?
You can learn about some of these techniques via
perldoc -f substr
perldoc -f pos
perldoc re
As for my own implementer notes, the least important thing is ending without punctuation so nothing can go after
I'm looking for a way to read from a file handle line by line (and then execute a function on each line) with the following twist: what I want to treat as a "line" shall be terminated by varying characters and not just a single character that I define as $/. I now that $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR or $/ do not support regular expressions or passing a list of characters to be treated as line terminators and this is where my problem lies.
My file handle comes from stdout of a process. Thus, I cannot seek inside the file handle and the full content is not available immediately but is produced bit by bit as the process is executed. I want to be able to attach things like a timestamp to each "line" the process produces using a function that I called handler in my examples. Each line should be handled as soon as it gets produced by the program.
Unfortunately, I can only come up with a way that either executes the handler function immediately but seems horribly inefficient or a way that uses a buffer but will only lead to "grouped" calls of the handler function and thus, for example, produce wrong timestamps.
In fact, in my specific case, my regex would even be very simple and just read /\n|\r/. So for this particular problem I don't even need full regex support but just the possibility to treat more than one character as the line terminator. But $/ doesn't support this.
Is there an efficient way to solve this problem in Perl?
Here is some quick pseudo-perl code to demonstrate my two approaches:
read the input file handle byte-by-byte
This would look like this:
my $acc = "";
while (read($fd, my $b, 1)) {
$acc .= $b;
if ($acc =~ /someregex$/) {
handler($acc);
$acc = "";
}
}
The advantage here is, that handler gets immediately dispatched once enough bytes are read. The disadvantage is, that we do string appending and check the regex for every single byte we read from $fd.
read the input file handle with blocks of X-byte at a time
This would look like this:
my $acc = "";
while (read($fd, my $b, $bufsize)) {
if ($b =~ /someregex/) {
my #parts = split /someregex/, $b;
# for brevity lets assume we always get more than 2 parts...
my $first = shift #parts;
handler(acc . $first);
my $last = pop #parts;
foreach my $part (#parts) {
handler($part);
}
$acc = $last;
}
}
The advantage here is, that we are more efficient as we only check every $bufsize bytes. The disadvantage is, that the execution of handler has to wait until $bufsize bytes have been read.
Setting $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR to a regex wouldn't help, because Perl's readline uses buffered IO, too. The trick is to use your second approach but with unbuffered sysread instead of read. If you sysread from a pipe, the call will return as soon as data is available, even if the whole buffer couldn't be filled (at least on Unix).
The suggestion by nwellnhof allowed me to implement a solution to this problem:
my $acc = "";
while (1) {
my $ret = sysread($fh, my $buf, 1000);
if ($ret == 0) {
last;
}
# we split with a capturing group so that we also retain which line
# terminator was used
# a negative limit is used to also produce trailing empty fields if
# required
my #parts = split /(\r|\n)/, $buf, -1;
my $numparts = scalar #parts;
if ($numparts == 1) {
# line terminator was not found
$acc .= $buf;
} elsif ($numparts >= 3) {
# first match needs special treatment as it needs to be
# concatenated with $acc
my $first = shift #parts;
my $term = shift #parts;
handler($acc . $first . $term);
my $last = pop #parts;
for (my $i = 0; $i < $numparts - 3; $i+=2) {
handler($parts[$i] . $parts[$i+1]);
}
# the last part is put into the accumulator. This might
# just be the empty string if $buf ended in a line
# terminator
$acc = $last;
}
}
# if the output didn't end with a linebreak, handle the rest
if ($acc ne "") {
handler($acc);
}
My tests show that indeed sysread will return even before having read 1000 characters if there is a pause in the input stream. The code above takes care to concatenate multiple messages of length 1000 and split messages with a lesser length or multiple terminators correctly.
Please shout if you see any bug in above code.
Yesterday, I got stuck in a perl script. Let me simplify it, suppose there is a string (say ABCDEABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCD), first I've to break it at every position where "E" comes, and secondly, break it specifically where the user wants to be at. But, the condition is, program should not cut at those sites where E is followed by P. For example there are 6 Es in this sequence, so one should get 7 fragments, but as 2 Es are followed by P one will get 5 only fragments in the output.
I need help regarding the second case. Suppose user doesn't wants to cut this sequence at, say 5th and 10th positions of E in the sequence, then what should be the corresponding script to let program skip these two sites only? My script for first case is:
my $otext = 'ABCDEABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCD';
$otext=~ s/([E])/$1=/g; #Main cut rule.
$otext=~ s/=P/P/g;
#output = split( /\=/, $otext);
print "#output";
Please do help!
To split on "E" except where it's followed by "P", you should use Negative look-ahead assertions.
From perldoc perlre "Look-Around Assertions" section:
(?!pattern)
A zero-width negative look-ahead assertion.
For example /foo(?!bar)/ matches any occurrence of "foo" that isn't followed by "bar".
my $otext = 'ABCDEABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCD';
# E E EP E EP E
my #output=split(/E(?!P)/, $otext);
use Data::Dumper; print Data::Dumper->Dump([\#output]);"
$VAR1 = [
'ABCD',
'ABCD',
'ABCDEPABCD',
'ABCDEPABCD',
'ABCD'
];
Now, in order to NOT cut at occurences #2 and #4, you can do 2 things:
Concoct a really fancy regex that automatically fails to match on given occurence. I will leave that to someone else to attempt in an answer for completeness sake.
Simply stitch together the correct fragments.
I'm too brain-dead to come up with a good idiomatic way of doing it, but the simple and dirty way is either:
my %no_cuts = map { ($_=>1) } (2,4); # Do not cut in positions 2,4
my #output_final;
for(my $i=0; $i < #output; $i++) {
if ($no_cuts{$i}) {
$output_final[-1] .= $output[$i];
} else {
push #output_final, $output[$i];
}
}
print Data::Dumper->Dump([\#output_final];
$VAR1 = [
'ABCD',
'ABCDABCDEPABCD',
'ABCDEPABCDABCD'
];
Or, simpler:
my %no_cuts = map { ($_=>1) } (2,4); # Do not cut in positions 2,4
for(my $i=0; $i < #output; $i++) {
$output[$i-1] .= $output[$i];
$output[$i]=undef; # Make the slot empty
}
my #output_final = grep {$_} #output; # Skip empty slots
print Data::Dumper->Dump([\#output_final];
$VAR1 = [
'ABCD',
'ABCDABCDEPABCD',
'ABCDEPABCDABCD'
];
Here's a dirty trick that exploits two facts:
normal text strings never contain null bytes (if you don't know what a null byte is, you should as a programmer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_character, and nb. it is not the same thing as the number 0 or the character 0).
perl strings can contain null bytes if you put them there, but be careful, as this may screw up some perl internal functions.
The "be careful" is just a point to be aware of. Anyway, the idea is to substitute a null byte at the point where you don't want breaks:
my $s = "ABCDEABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCD";
my #nobreak = (4,9);
foreach (#nobreak) {
substr($s, $_, 1) = "\0";
}
"\0" is an escape sequence representing a null byte like "\t" is a tab. Again: it is not the character 0. I used 4 and 9 because there were E's in those positions. If you print the string now it looks like:
ABCDABCDABCDEPABCDEABCDEPABCDEABCD
Because null bytes don't display, but they are there, and we are going to swap them back out later. First the split:
my #a = split(/E(?!P)/, $s);
Then swap the zero bytes back:
$_ =~ s/\0/E/g foreach (#a);
If you print #a now, you get:
ABCDEABCDEABCDEPABCD
ABCDEPABCD
ABCD
Which is exactly what you want. Note that split removes the delimiter (in this case, the E); if you intended to keep those you can tack them back on again afterward. If the delimiter is from a more dynamic regex it is slightly more complicated, see here:
http://perlmeme.org/howtos/perlfunc/split_function.html
"Example 9. Keeping the delimiter"
If there is some possibility that the #nobreak positions are not E's, then you must also keep track of those when you swap them out to make sure you replace with the correct character again.
I am having quite a bit of trouble with a Perl script I am writing. I want to compare an element of an array to a variable I have to see if they are true. For some reason I cannot seem to get the comparison operation to work correctly. It will either evaluate at true all the time (even when outputting both strings clearly shows they are not the same), or it will always be false and never evaluate (even if they are the same). I have found an example of just this kind of comparison operation on another website, but when I use it it doesn't work. Am I missing something? Is the variable type I take from the file not a string? (Can't be an integer as far as I can tell as it is an IP address).
$ipaddress = '192.43.2.130'
if ($address[0] == ' ')
{
open (FH, "serverips.txt") or die "Crossroads could not find a list of backend servers";
#address = <FH>;
close(FH);
print $address[0];
print $address[1];
}
for ($i = 0; $i < #address; $i++)
{
print "hello";
if ($address[$i] eq $ipaddress)
{print $address[$i];
$file = "server_$i";
print "I got here first";
goto SENDING;}
}
SENDING:
print " I am here";
I am pretty weak in Perl, so forgive me for any rookie mistakes/assumptions I may have made in my very meager bit of code. Thank you for you time.
if ($address[0] == ' ')
{
open (FH, "serverips.txt") or die "Crossroads could not find a list of backend servers";
#address = <FH>;
close(FH);
You have several issues with this code here. First you should use strict because it would tell you that #address is being used before it's defined and you're also using numeric comparison on a string.
Secondly you aren't creating an array of the address in the file. You need to loop through the lines of the file to add each address:
my #address = ();
while( my $addr = <FH> ) {
chomp($addr); # removes the newline character
push(#address, $addr);
}
However you really don't need to push into an array at all. Just loop through the file and find the IP. Also don't use goto. That's what last is for.
while( my $addr = <FH> ) {
chomp($addr);
if( $addr eq $ipaddress ) {
$file = "server_$i";
print $addr,"\n";
print "I got here first"; # not sure what this means
last; # breaks out of the loop
}
}
When you're reading in from a file like that, you should use chomp() when doing a comparison with that line. When you do:
print $address[0];
print $address[1];
The output is on two separate lines, even though you haven't explicitly printed a newline. That's because $address[$i] contains a newline at the end. chomp removes this.
if ($address[$i] eq $ipaddress)
could read
my $currentIP = $address[$i];
chomp($currentIP);
if ($currentIP eq $ipaddress)
Once you're familiar with chomp, you could even use:
chomp(my $currentIP = $address[$i]);
if ($currentIP eq $ipaddress)
Also, please replace the goto with a last statement. That's perl's equivalent of C's break.
Also, from your comment on Jack's answer:
Here's some code you can use for finding how long it's been since a file was modified:
my $secondsSinceUpdate = time() - stat('filename.txt')->mtime;
You probably are having an issue with newlines. Try using chomp($address[$i]).
First of all, please don't use goto. Every time you use goto, the baby Jesus cries while killing a kitten.
Secondly, your code is a bit confusing in that you seem to be populating #address after starting the if($address[0] == '') statement (not to mention that that if should be if($address[0] eq '')).
If you're trying to compare each element of #address with $ipaddress for equality, you can do something like the following
Note: This code assumes that you've populated #address.
my $num_matches=0;
foreach(#address)
{
$num_matches++ if $_ eq $ipaddress;
}
if($num_matches)
{
#You've got a match! Do something.
}
else
{
#You don't have any matches. This may or may not be bad. Do something else.
}
Alternatively, you can use the grep operator to get any and all matches from #address:
my #matches=grep{$_ eq $ipaddress}#address;
if(#matches)
{
#You've got matches.
}
else
{
#Sorry, no matches.
}
Finally, if you're using a version of Perl that is 5.10 or higher, you can use the smart match operator (ie ~~):
if($ipaddress~~#address)
{
#You've got a match!
}
else
{
#Nope, no matches.
}
When you read from a file like that you include the end-of-line character (generally \n) in each element. Use chomp #address; to get rid of it.
Also, use last; to exit the loop; goto is practically never needed.
Here's a rather idiomatic rewrite of your code. I'm excluding some of your logic that you might need, but isn't clear why:
$ipaddress = '192.43.2.130'
open (FH, "serverips.txt") or die "Crossroads could not find a list of backend servers";
while (<FH>) { # loop over the file, using the default input space
chomp; # remove end-of-line
last if ($_ eq $ipaddress); # a RE could easily be used here also, but keep the exact match
}
close(FH);
$file = "server_$."; # $. is the line number - it's not necessary to keep track yourself
print "The file is $file\n";
Some people dislike using perl's implicit variables (like $_ and $.) but they're not that hard to keep track of. perldoc perlvar lists all these variables and explains their usage.
Regarding the exact match vs. "RE" (regular expression, or regexp - see perldoc perlre for lots of gory details) -- the syntax for testing a RE against the default input space ($_) is very simple. Instead of
last if ($_ eq $ipaddress);
you could use
last if (/$ipaddress/);
Although treating an ip address as a regular expression (where . has a special meaning) is probably not a good idea.
Please how can i use regular expression to check if word starts or ends with a symbol character, also how to can i process the text within the symbol.
Example:
(text) or te-xt, or tex't. or text?
change it to
(<t>text</t>) or <t>te-xt</t>, or <t>tex't</t>. or <t>text</t>?
help me out?
Thanks
I assume that "word" means alphanumeric characters from your example? If you have a list of permitted characters which constitute a valid word, then this is enough:
my $string = "x1 .text1; 'text2 \"text3;\"";
$string =~ s/([a-zA-Z0-9]+)/<t>$1<\/t>/g;
# Add more to character class [a-zA-Z0-9] if needed
print "$string\n";
# OUTPUT: <t>x1</t> .<t>text1</t>; '<t>text2</t> "<t>text3</t>;"
UPDATE
Based on your example you seem to want to DELETE dashes and apostrophes, if you want to delete them globally (e.g. whether they are inside the word or not), before the first regex, you do
$string =~ s/['-]//g;
I am using DVK's approach here, but with a slight modification. The difference is that her/his code would also put the tags around all words that don't contain/are next to a symbol, which (according to the example given in the question) is not desired.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
sub modify {
my $input = shift;
my $text_char = 'a-zA-Z0-9\-\''; # characters that are considered text
# if there is no symbol, don't change anything
if ($input =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$/) {
return $input;
}
else {
$input =~ s/([$text_char]+)/<t>$1<\/t>/g;
return $input;
}
}
my $initial_string = "(text) or te-xt, or tex't. or text?";
my $expected_string = "(<t>text</t>) or <t>te-xt</t>, or <t>tex't</t>. or <t>text</t>?";
# version BEFORE edit 1:
#my #aux;
# take the initial string apart and process it one word at a time
#my #string_list = split/\s+/, $initial_string;
#
#foreach my $string (#string_list) {
# $string = modify($string);
# push #aux, $string;
#}
#
# put the string together again
#my $final_string = join(' ', #aux);
# ************ EDIT 1 version ************
my $final_string = join ' ', map { modify($_) } split/\s+/, $initial_string;
if ($final_string eq $expected_string) {
print "it worked\n";
}
This strikes me as a somewhat long-winded way of doing it, but it seemed quicker than drawing up a more sophisticated regex...
EDIT 1: I have incorporated the changes suggested by DVK (using map instead of foreach). Now the syntax highlighting is looking even worse than before; I hope it doesn't obscure anything...
This takes standard input and processes it to and prints on Standard output.
while (<>) {
s {
( [a-zA-z]+ ) # word
(?= [,.)?] ) # a symbol
}
{<t>$1</t>}gx ;
print ;
}
You might need to change the bit to match the concept of word.
I have use the x modifeid to allow the regexx to be spaced over more than one line.
If the input is in a Perl variable, try
$string =~ s{
( [a-zA-z]+ ) # word
(?= [,.)?] ) # a symbol
}
{<t>$1</t>}gx ;