I have two xmpp server instances: mydomain.com and node1.mydomain.com,
if I send a message from user1#mydomain.com to user2#node1.mydomain.com then
mydomain.com server thinks that node1 is a so called component part of the jabber id
and doesn't send it.
How can I tell my xmpp server that I want to send message to the remote user?
Is there any possibility to do so in xmpp standard or it is only implementation dependent?
I don't think that it is valid to make one server a subdomain of another. I think you should rename the server to node2.mydomain.com.
I found out that it is my xmpp server bug (I use Openfire), there is a patch fixing it here.
The best practice for any xmpp server is to check if such component is registered, and if not to consider packet as being sent to a remote xmpp server.
Related
Honestly, I think I have a fundamental gap in understanding how SMTP works. I can't seem to find a good explanation of what is happening behind the scenes and I think this is preventing me from being able to do what I am attempting to do.
To explain, I'm trying to setup an application which sends notifications to users by connecting to an SMTP server. Fair enough. I figure, since I'm using my own domain, I have SPF/DKIM/DMARC configured, I can add an MX record for the host I set the application up on (my SPF record has the mx keyword to authorize any hosts in my MX records to send/receive mails). Then, I can have that same host run a super lightweight SMTP server that can accept mails from the application, and send them on to recipients.
Almost crucially, I want this server to basically just run on localhost so that only this application can connect and send mails through it, but so that it can't really "receive" mails sent to my domain (I have set the MX priority very low (well, a high number) for this app server). I figure since I'm running my own SMTP server, that I don't really need to authenticate against it (it's running on localhost), just take in any mail and send it on to recipient domains.
When sending on to recipient domains... does the SMTP server need to authenticate to say, the gmail SMTP server as a user in order to send mails over there? That seems weird, since it's not a user logging into gmail to send mails, it's an SMTP server that is authorized within SPF sending mail from my domain (From address from my domain as well) to where ever the app server user's email is based (in this example, the user would be e.g., some_user#gmail.com).
I tried using python's aiosmtpd command-line and telnet to send a mail from test#MY_DOMAIN.TLD to test#MY_DOMAIN.TLD and it didn't seem to deliver the message; I figured aiosmtpd would connect to the preferred MX servers for my domain (my "real" MX's) to transfer the message, which would then put it in my inbox. That didn't seem to be the case, and I'm not sure why.
Exact repro steps, where example.com is my domain, and terminals are running on a box with a hostname listed in my MX records.
Terminal A:
$ aiosmtpd -n
Terminal B:
$ telnet localhost 8025
EHLO <example.com>
MAIL FROM: test#example.com
RCPT TO: test#example.com
DATA
FROM: Application Notifications <test#example.com>
TO: User Name <test#example.com>
SUBJECT: App Notify Test
This is a test!
.
QUIT
How do SMTP servers normally send mail between each other? Do they each get some login to each other's SMTP servers to authenticate with, and since I'm not doing that, this is a problem? Can I run a SMTP server on localhost and have it send mail out of the network without receiving mails (a no-reply service)? Is there something obvious that I'm just missing here that solves all my problems?
Thanks
It sounds like you want to run a mail transfer agent (MTA) that relays email to remote SMTP servers. An MTA will typically act as an SMTP server to receive messages, and then it will act as an SMTP client when it relays the messages to remote hosts.
MTAs generally operate in two different modes: (1) They will relay messages from authenticated users to remote hosts, and (2) they will receive messages from remote hosts to its users and store them somehow. The combination of those two modes - where the MTA will accept messages from remote hosts and relay them to different remote hosts - is called an open relay and is sure to attract spammers and place your server on spam blacklists.
aiosmtpd is not an MTA or an email relay out of the box - it is merely an SMTP server that will receive messages and do whatever with the messages you program it to do. By default it will do nothing - that is, it will receive the messages and throw them away. If you want to implement an email relay in aiosmtpd, then you need to implement the SMTP client portion of the MTA, e.g. by implementing an aiosmtpd handler that instantiates smtplib.SMTP to connect to remote hosts.
However, if all you want is an email relay, then you most likely don't need aiosmtpd at all - postfix is probably a better choice.
aiosmtpd can be a good choice if you need to implement mailing list software or perform some automation tasks based on incoming emails from e.g. cameras or scanners.
If you want to implement an email relay in aiosmtpd, then you need to ensure that both the software and your server are configured in a way that you don't relay unauthenticated messages from the outside internet.
See also: Python aiosmtpd - what is missing for an Mail-Transfer-Agent (MTA)?
So, I actually figured out what was missing here.
I need to run an SMTP server, yes, but I also needed to write code to parse the "to" domain (the recipient domain), perform a DNS request for the MX server(s) of the recipient domain, and then use the smtplib client to then send mail over to the recipient domain. Authentication is not needed to relay that message to the recipient server, authentication is only required for reading from a given inbox or authenticating a sender to send on behalf of a domain (I trust myself and myself only to send mail). I can do all this while also only listening for mail on localhost so that only my local server can use the local SMTP server for relaying messages/emails off to recipient domains.
Additionally, I don't need to have my external IP listed as an MX server since it's not accepting mail for the domain, only sending. I do need an SPF record for it though so that it is an authorized relay/sender for email from my domain.
Is there anyway in which I can check if a server supports XMPP protocol or not?
I am very new to XMPP, and I am dealing with a shared server. I am supposed to use XMPP to create a chatting system. But as I read about XMPP, I am supposed to install openfire and I have no access to the server itself.
So I want to check if the server supports xmpp or not.
Here's the XMPP RFC which includes recommended port numbers:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3920#section-15.9
So you could try connecting to port 5222 on a server (with a proper XMPP client, a plain socket in C, the telnet program, or whatever). Note also that port 5223 is used by some XMPP servers for SSL/TLS (as noted in appendix D.1. of the RFC).
I currently have issues with SIP User Agents behind a symmetric NAT connecting to my SIP client, which is an IVR voice service.
I read that Asterisk has a solution for this in the sip.conf, where I can set attribute
nat=yes
and this will ignore the IP and Port in the SIP headers and use the one for the SIP request and also waits for an incoming RTP stream to reply to.
I'd like to make use of this feature as we already have an Asterix server installed for AIX requests.
What would be the minimum configuration required for Asterix to act as the man in the middle on a new port as 5060 will still be used to connect directly to the SIP client? I don't care about authentication etc. I just need the Asterix to act as a SIP relay.
Thanks
K
You may also need to have "canreinvite=no" in the [general] section of your sip.conf.
That setting keeps Asterisk in the call path, otherwise voice traffic may be sent directly from one endpoint to the other.
I want to write some email scanning software and don't understand how to setup my server. I have a hosted web server running Windows 2003 Server. It is running the Default SMTP Virtual Server with a fully-qualified domain name of abcdef.com (example). DNS is pointing abcdef.com to my server. If I spoof an email from my desktop pc so that it appears to come from info#abcdef.com, and I send the email to a 'non-existant' email address then the bounceback does arrive on my web server and is stored in C:\inetpub\mailroot\Queue on the server - great! (I can scan it and handle the bounceback). However, if I simply send an email straight to info#abcdef.com then it does not seem to get placed anywhere on the server. I don't understand why bouncebacks get stored but other incoming email doesn't. I'm keen to avoid having to install any 'email server software' on the server, as I want to keep things as clean as possible. All I really want is some way of telling the server to accept all incoming messages to abcdef.com so that I can process them myself, and to place the .eml files in a known directory that I can scan. I'll then write an eml file parser to process the files.
Thanks very much.
A possible reason for the lack of delivery is that your domain has a DNS A record, but no DNS MX record. MX records are used for delivery of mail. Historically, if no MX record was present for a domain, mail servers were supposed to fall back to looking for a domain's A record.
In your case, I'd guess that your local mail-sending software is looking for an MX record and then stopping if it doesn't find one, whereas the remote system sending you the bounce is looking for the MX record and then looking for an A record when it can't find one.
The Wikipedia article on MX records has more details.
SMTP is a message transfer agent (MTA), responsible only for handling the transfer of mail from one point (the client, perhaps) to another (the mailbox server, such as a POP or IMAP server). SMTP servers aren't the right tool for ultimately handling mail coming INTO a domain -- they only handle transferring the mail coming into a domain to another app, such as the aforementioned POP or IMAP server, which then know how to sort and store that mail.
In short, the Default SMTP Virtual Server isn't the tool you're looking for for your project.
From this other StackOverflow question, it looks like there are a few SMTP servers which are intended for development use but which might serve the purpose you seek -- they accept incoming messages and then write them to files (in some manner, and with some tweaking).
Ok, working now. Issues were as follows:
There was no MX record, so external email wasn't being directed to the server. The .EML file that existed on the server was indeed placed there by an outbound email process.
The firewall was blocking port 25 - now opened.
It is necessary to have some sort of inbound email service running on the server. Windows Server has a lightweight POP3 service which you can configure to place all incoming email into a single 'catch-all' mailbox. This fills with .EML files, which can then be scanned by our custom service.
Many thanks to delfuego & Jon.
I want to create a mail server, but my ISP does not allow reverse-IP record, so I ordered a VPS with such function. But I want use VPS only as a relaying server and my own server as an actual mail server (so it should have things like web-mail, and some other). I did not find any guides, but looks like VPS will be called a "smart-host". So I installed Axigen on my server, but it requires login and password for connecting to a smart-host. I tried to use postfix for relaying but I did non figure out how to properly configure it. What are my options?
Thank you!
To securely enable postfix as a mail forwarding server, you'll have to enable and configure SASL authentication. The postfix SASL README has all the details. I suggest dovecot as the backend, as it's the simplest to setup. After that, just create a new system user (adduser mail-forwarding) and configure Axigen to use that user for forwarding.
If I understand correctly, your goal is to forward outgoing mail from your local server to the VPS while incoming mail should be stored on the local server. This is possible, but not necessarily simple. Mail needs to be handled differently depending on how it reaches your local server, otherwise you might end up with a mail loop, with your servers playing pingping using mail sent back and forth.