My app project contains several helper classes that serve all kind
of different purposes (eg time/date/calculation, db access, ..).
Initiating these classes is quit expensive since they contain some
properties that need to be filled up from the database or need to be
recalculated each time an new instance is created. To avoid performance
problems I tend to initiate each of these classes in the application delegate
and pass these on from viewController to viewController.
This has worked for me for some time but I'm finding now that the more
complicated the app is getting the more problems I'm bumping into.
Mostly problems related to classes getting entangled in a circular reference.
I would want to know how I could solve this properly, I alread thought about
turning each helper class into a singleton, and use the singleton instead of
passing a class instance around. But since some helper classes are depended on
each other I'll have singletons that call other singletons, I can't seem to
figure out if this would lead to other problems in the end.
Anyone any advice on this?
The problem with singletons is that they make it harder to mock and unit test your application. You should decouple your dependencies; and if you do somehow need a singleton (which should be very, very rare) then consider having the singleton implement an interface that you can mock for testing purposes.
Whenever I'm tempted to use a singleton, I re-read Global Variables are Bad and consider whether the convenience is really worth putting up with this (slightly) paraphrased list of problems:
Non-locality of methods and variables
No access control or constraint checking
Implicit coupling
Concurrency issues
Namespace pollution
Memory allocation issues
Unduly Complicated Testing
Singletons are basically global variables, and it's a bad idea to create a global variable just to avoid passing things around. Then again, often the right thing to do is simply to pass objects around from one class to another. The trick is figuring out the minimum amount of data you can pass to minimize the coupling. This is where well-designed classes are important. For example, you rarely need to pass an NSManagedObjectContext because you can get it from any NSManagedObject.
Now, let me address the specific case of your expensive-to-create objects. You might try pooling those objects instead of creating them every time one is needed. Database access is a good example of this. Rather than allocating a database connection every time you ask for one, you grab one out of a cache. Of course, when the cache is empty, you need to allocate one. And, for memory reasons, you should be willing and able to empty out the cache when the system asks you to.
That the object is expensive to create shouldn't matter to the user. That's an implementation detail, but it's one that you can design around. You do have to be careful because only objects that don't have mutable state can be handled this way, so you may have to rethink the design of your classes if you want to go this route.
Why don't you just make your app delegate a factory for the expensive-to-create instances? Each time a view controller needs an instance of the helper class it ask the appDelegate for it.
Personally, I usually using singleton.
In my opinion, it make the code cleaner...
And I am sure that class instance is unique.
I use it to have single point access to resource
Edit : Seems I'm wrong !
what about the flexible implementation ?
static Singleton *sharedSingleton = nil;
+ (Singleton*)sharedManager
{
if (sharedSingleton == nil) {
sharedSingleton = [[super alloc] init];
}
return sharedSingleton;
}
Note: I know exactly what a property is. This question is about performance.
Using self.fooBar for READ access seems a waste of time for me. Unnecessary Objective-C messaging is going on. The getters typically simply pass along the ivar, so as long as it's pretty sure there will be no reasonable getter method written, I think it's perfectly fine to bypass this heavy guy.
Objective-C messaging is about 20 times slower than direct calls. So if there is some high-performance-high-frequency code with hundreds of properties in use, maybe it does help a lot to avoid unnessessary objective-c messaging?
Or am I wasting my time thinking about this?
This kind of premature optimization should really be postponed until you actually notice or measure (with Instruments.app) a real problem.
No offence, but you're probably wasting your time thinking about it. Unless you have code that accesses that property thousands of times a second, then you're not going to see any performance differences.
The two aren't really interchangeable (ok some of the times they are). Access the ivar directly when that is what you need and use the accessor methods when that is what you need. It will probably depend on the the class hierarchy, the implementation of the class, is the code thread safe etc, etc.
All things that are largely upto you if it's your code. Might someone want to subclass this class and write a custom implementation of -foobar that always returned #"BOO" but they find that the superClass method -printFooBar now prints #"hello darling" because it prints out the value of the variable foobar instead of the value returned from self.foobar ?
Calling the accessor method does have more overhead than using the variable directly, but there are more things to consider than performance. Personally i find the position "always use the accessor method" just as ridiculous as saying "never use the accessor methods" - which would clearly be ridiculous.
Yes using property getters are much slower than direct access. A property getter is useful outside of the self class (and categories) for encapsulation, but I see no benefits using a self.ivar getter, unless you have overridden the getter to something else.
(And why are you using self.ivar in the first place?)
The only cases where self.ivar will be different from self->ivar are:
The property is atomic, so self.ivar will be similar to
spin_lock(&ivar_lock);
id retval = [ivar retain];
spin_unlock(&ivar_lock);
return [retval autorelease];
for an id property, and
spin_lock(&ivar_lock);
spin_lock(&destination_lock);
memcpy(&destination, &ivar, sizeof(ivar));
spin_unlock(&ivar_lock);
spin_unlock(&destination_lock);
for a struct. There is no difference between the two when the property is nonatomic.
When the class is not final. A category of the class or a subclass can override the property getter to something else. But I think overriding a concrete property is not a good style.
Like what the others have said, unless you have tested that the getter is a hot spot, changing it back to direct ivar access won't help much.
Some may disagree, but I happen to like accessing the ivar directly and bypassing the whole messaging business where possible. I think it makes my intentions clearer, since if I ever need to message the getter (for memory management or the like), then I will.
It's a tiny bit less efficient, but you still should generally not make your object state public. Although public members are considered bad in most OO languages, there's actually a pragmatic reason why in Objective-C: The framework uses your "getter" and "setter" methods to make certain things automatic, such as memory management and KVO notifications. With ivars accessed from multiple places, every piece of client code needs to fully understand all the responsibilities that the accessor methods were taking on and perform those duties in the exact same way itself.
So it's no "absolutely don't access your own ivars," but just make sure you fully understand what it entails in a given situation.
I know that there are functions in the objective-c runtime that allow you to create objects directly, such as class_createInstance. What I would like to know is if anything actually uses these functions other than the root classes' (NSObject) alloc method. I think things like KVC bindings might, but those aren't present on the iPhone OS (to my knowledge, correct me if I'm wrong), so is there anything that would do this?
In case you're wondering/it matters, I'm looking to allocate the size of an instance in a way that circumvents the objc runtime by declaring no ivars on a class, but overriding the +alloc method and calling class_createInstance(self, numberofbytesofmyivars).
Thanks
EDIT
I think I need to be more specific. I am adding classes to the runtime at runtime, and possibly unload and reload an altered version of the same class. I've worked around most of the issues so far, due to things like class_addMethod, but there's no equivalent for ivars after the class has been registered. The two solutions I can think of are having no actual ivars as far as the runtime is concerned, but overriding alloc to make sure I have enough room for them through extraBytes, or alternatively declaring an ivar which is a pointer to all of my actual ivars, which I can then obviously do whatever I want with. I would prefer to use the former strategy but there are a number of things that can go wrong, like if something allocates an instance of my object without going through my overloaded alloc method. Does anyone know of one of these things?
I'm not sure if you're trying to change the behavior of existing classes, which is not safe, or trying to do something for custom classes you own that are direct subclasses of NSObject, which probably is.
Almost all NSStrings you see in practice are instances of a private subclass, and that subclass allocates space for the string inline with the object. Like, instead of containing a pointer to a char*, the character data comes right after the ivars in the object. The extraBytes parameter in NSAllocateObject(Class aClass, NSUInteger extraBytes, NSZone *zone) is there for purposes such as this.
So on the one hand, yes, you can pull tricks like that. On the other, you need to know you're doing it with your stuff. If you try to do something like that with the private subclass of NSString (which is private, so you're only going to interact with through runtime introspection), you're probably going to conflict.
There are a few public cocoa classes that also do stuff like this, so you're best off if your classes inherit directly from NSObject. NSLock is one. The layout in memory for a custom subclass of NSLock looks like { isa, <ivars of NSLock> <ivars of subclass of NSLock> <more NSLock stuff, space reserved using the extraBytes parameter> }.
Also, just for the heck of it, note that +alloc calls +allocWithZone:, and +allocWithZone: is the more common override point.
I'm not sure why you'd want to do what you're suggesting--I don't see any reason you couldn't do it, but according to this post, there's usually no reason to use class_createInstance directly (I don't know of anything that uses it specifically). class_createInstance also doesn't take into account memory zones or other possible optimizations used by alloc. If you're just trying to hide your ivars, there are better ways.
EDIT: I think you're looking for the class_addIvar function, which (as the name suggests) dynamically adds an ivar to a class. It only works with the new runtime, so it won't work on the simulator, but it will work on the iPhone.
EDIT 2: Just to be totally clear (in case it wasn't already), you can definitely rely on allocWithZone always being called. Fundamental Cocoa classes, such as NSString and NSArray, override allocWithZone. class_createInstance is almost never used except at the runtime level, so you don't have to worry about any parts of Cocoa using it on your classes. So the answer to the original question is "no" (or more specifically, objects are sometimes created without alloc, but not without allocWithZone, at least as far as I know).
Well there is nothing technically to stop you from overriding alloc. Just create a method in your class called +alloc. I just can't imagine any reason why you would need to.
Sounds like you are trying too hard to manage memory. Let the OS dynamically allocate memory when you create an object. If you are using too much, the OS will send a notification that you are getting close to the limit. At that point you can dealloc stuff you don't need anymore.
If you need so much memory that you have to use tricks, your implementation may need rethinking at the core level instead of trying to fit your square design into the round hole of the iPhone OS.
Just my opinion based on the info you provided.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I know about the HIG (which is quite handy!), but what programming practices do you use when writing Objective-C, and more specifically when using Cocoa (or CocoaTouch).
There are a few things I have started to do that I do not think are standard:
1) With the advent of properties, I no longer use "_" to prefix "private" class variables. After all, if a variable can be accessed by other classes shouldn't there be a property for it? I always disliked the "_" prefix for making code uglier, and now I can leave it out.
2) Speaking of private things, I prefer to place private method definitions within the .m file in a class extension like so:
#import "MyClass.h"
#interface MyClass ()
- (void) someMethod;
- (void) someOtherMethod;
#end
#implementation MyClass
Why clutter up the .h file with things outsiders should not care about? The empty () works for private categories in the .m file, and issues compile warnings if you do not implement the methods declared.
3) I have taken to putting dealloc at the top of the .m file, just below the #synthesize directives. Shouldn't what you dealloc be at the top of the list of things you want to think about in a class? That is especially true in an environment like the iPhone.
3.5) In table cells, make every element (including the cell itself) opaque for performance. That means setting the appropriate background color in everything.
3.6) When using an NSURLConnection, as a rule you may well want to implement the delegate method:
- (NSCachedURLResponse *)connection:(NSURLConnection *)connection
willCacheResponse:(NSCachedURLResponse *)cachedResponse
{
return nil;
}
I find most web calls are very singular and it's more the exception than the rule you'll be wanting responses cached, especially for web service calls. Implementing the method as shown disables caching of responses.
Also of interest, are some good iPhone specific tips from Joseph Mattiello (received in an iPhone mailing list). There are more, but these were the most generally useful I thought (note that a few bits have now been slightly edited from the original to include details offered in responses):
4) Only use double precision if you have to, such as when working with CoreLocation. Make sure you end your constants in 'f' to make gcc store them as floats.
float val = someFloat * 2.2f;
This is mostly important when someFloat may actually be a double, you don't need the mixed-mode math, since you're losing precision in 'val' on storage. While floating-point numbers are supported in hardware on iPhones, it may still take more time to do double-precision arithmetic as opposed to single precision. References:
Double vs float on the iPhone
iPhone/iPad double precision math
On the older phones supposedly calculations operate at the same speed but you can have more single precision components in registers than doubles, so for many calculations single precision will end up being faster.
5) Set your properties as nonatomic. They're atomic by default and upon synthesis, semaphore code will be created to prevent multi-threading problems. 99% of you probably don't need to worry about this and the code is much less bloated and more memory-efficient when set to nonatomic.
6) SQLite can be a very, very fast way to cache large data sets. A map application for instance can cache its tiles into SQLite files. The most expensive part is disk I/O. Avoid many small writes by sending BEGIN; and COMMIT; between large blocks. We use a 2 second timer for instance that resets on each new submit. When it expires, we send COMMIT; , which causes all your writes to go in one large chunk. SQLite stores transaction data to disk and doing this Begin/End wrapping avoids creation of many transaction files, grouping all of the transactions into one file.
Also, SQL will block your GUI if it's on your main thread. If you have a very long query, It's a good idea to store your queries as static objects, and run your SQL on a separate thread. Make sure to wrap anything that modifies the database for query strings in #synchronize() {} blocks. For short queries just leave things on the main thread for easier convenience.
More SQLite optimization tips are here, though the document appears out of date many of the points are probably still good;
http://web.utk.edu/~jplyon/sqlite/SQLite_optimization_FAQ.html
Don't use unknown strings as format strings
When methods or functions take a format string argument, you should make sure that you have control over the content of the format string.
For example, when logging strings, it is tempting to pass the string variable as the sole argument to NSLog:
NSString *aString = // get a string from somewhere;
NSLog(aString);
The problem with this is that the string may contain characters that are interpreted as format strings. This can lead to erroneous output, crashes, and security problems. Instead, you should substitute the string variable into a format string:
NSLog(#"%#", aString);
Use standard Cocoa naming and formatting conventions and terminology rather than whatever you're used to from another environment. There are lots of Cocoa developers out there, and when another one of them starts working with your code, it'll be much more approachable if it looks and feels similar to other Cocoa code.
Examples of what to do and what not to do:
Don't declare id m_something; in an object's interface and call it a member variable or field; use something or _something for its name and call it an instance variable.
Don't name a getter -getSomething; the proper Cocoa name is just -something.
Don't name a setter -something:; it should be -setSomething:
The method name is interspersed with the arguments and includes colons; it's -[NSObject performSelector:withObject:], not NSObject::performSelector.
Use inter-caps (CamelCase) in method names, parameters, variables, class names, etc. rather than underbars (underscores).
Class names start with an upper-case letter, variable and method names with lower-case.
Whatever else you do, don't use Win16/Win32-style Hungarian notation. Even Microsoft gave up on that with the move to the .NET platform.
IBOutlets
Historically, memory management of outlets has been poor.
Current best practice is to declare outlets as properties:
#interface MyClass :NSObject {
NSTextField *textField;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) IBOutlet NSTextField *textField;
#end
Using properties makes the memory management semantics clear; it also provides a consistent pattern if you use instance variable synthesis.
Use the LLVM/Clang Static Analyzer
NOTE: Under Xcode 4 this is now built into the IDE.
You use the Clang Static Analyzer to -- unsurprisingly -- analyse your C and Objective-C code (no C++ yet) on Mac OS X 10.5. It's trivial to install and use:
Download the latest version from this page.
From the command-line, cd to your project directory.
Execute scan-build -k -V xcodebuild.
(There are some additional constraints etc., in particular you should analyze a project in its "Debug" configuration -- see http://clang.llvm.org/StaticAnalysisUsage.html for details -- the but that's more-or-less what it boils down to.)
The analyser then produces a set of web pages for you that shows likely memory management and other basic problems that the compiler is unable to detect.
This is subtle one but handy one. If you're passing yourself as a delegate to another object, reset that object's delegate before you dealloc.
- (void)dealloc
{
self.someObject.delegate = NULL;
self.someObject = NULL;
//
[super dealloc];
}
By doing this you're ensuring that no more delegate methods will get sent. As you're about to dealloc and disappear into the ether you want to make sure that nothing can send you any more messages by accident. Remember self.someObject could be retained by another object (it could be a singleton or on the autorelease pool or whatever) and until you tell it "stop sending me messages!", it thinks your just-about-to-be-dealloced object is fair game.
Getting into this habit will save you from lots of weird crashes that are a pain to debug.
The same principal applies to Key Value Observation, and NSNotifications too.
Edit:
Even more defensive, change:
self.someObject.delegate = NULL;
into:
if (self.someObject.delegate == self)
self.someObject.delegate = NULL;
#kendell
Instead of:
#interface MyClass (private)
- (void) someMethod
- (void) someOtherMethod
#end
Use:
#interface MyClass ()
- (void) someMethod
- (void) someOtherMethod
#end
New in Objective-C 2.0.
Class extensions are described in Apple's Objective-C 2.0 Reference.
"Class extensions allow you to declare additional required API for a class in locations other than within the primary class #interface block"
So they're part of the actual class - and NOT a (private) category in addition to the class. Subtle but important difference.
Avoid autorelease
Since you typically(1) don't have direct control over their lifetime, autoreleased objects can persist for a comparatively long time and unnecessarily increase the memory footprint of your application. Whilst on the desktop this may be of little consequence, on more constrained platforms this can be a significant issue. On all platforms, therefore, and especially on more constrained platforms, it is considered best practice to avoid using methods that would lead to autoreleased objects and instead you are encouraged to use the alloc/init pattern.
Thus, rather than:
aVariable = [AClass convenienceMethod];
where able, you should instead use:
aVariable = [[AClass alloc] init];
// do things with aVariable
[aVariable release];
When you're writing your own methods that return a newly-created object, you can take advantage of Cocoa's naming convention to flag to the receiver that it must be released by prepending the method name with "new".
Thus, instead of:
- (MyClass *)convenienceMethod {
MyClass *instance = [[[self alloc] init] autorelease];
// configure instance
return instance;
}
you could write:
- (MyClass *)newInstance {
MyClass *instance = [[self alloc] init];
// configure instance
return instance;
}
Since the method name begins with "new", consumers of your API know that they're responsible for releasing the received object (see, for example, NSObjectController's newObject method).
(1) You can take control by using your own local autorelease pools. For more on this, see Autorelease Pools.
Some of these have already been mentioned, but here's what I can think of off the top of my head:
Follow KVO naming rules. Even if you don't use KVO now, in my experience often times it's still beneficial in the future. And if you are using KVO or bindings, you need to know things are going work the way they are supposed to. This covers not just accessor methods and instance variables, but to-many relationships, validation, auto-notifying dependent keys, and so on.
Put private methods in a category. Not just the interface, but the implementation as well. It's good to have some distance conceptually between private and non-private methods. I include everything in my .m file.
Put background thread methods in a category. Same as above. I've found it's good to keep a clear conceptual barrier when you're thinking about what's on the main thread and what's not.
Use #pragma mark [section]. Usually I group by my own methods, each subclass's overrides, and any information or formal protocols. This makes it a lot easier to jump to exactly what I'm looking for. On the same topic, group similar methods (like a table view's delegate methods) together, don't just stick them anywhere.
Prefix private methods & ivars with _. I like the way it looks, and I'm less likely to use an ivar when I mean a property by accident.
Don't use mutator methods / properties in init & dealloc. I've never had anything bad happen because of it, but I can see the logic if you change the method to do something that depends on the state of your object.
Put IBOutlets in properties. I actually just read this one here, but I'm going to start doing it. Regardless of any memory benefits, it seems better stylistically (at least to me).
Avoid writing code you don't absolutely need. This really covers a lot of things, like making ivars when a #define will do, or caching an array instead of sorting it each time the data is needed. There's a lot I could say about this, but the bottom line is don't write code until you need it, or the profiler tells you to. It makes things a lot easier to maintain in the long run.
Finish what you start. Having a lot of half-finished, buggy code is the fastest way to kill a project dead. If you need a stub method that's fine, just indicate it by putting NSLog( #"stub" ) inside, or however you want to keep track of things.
Write unit tests. You can test a lot of things in Cocoa that might be harder in other frameworks. For example, with UI code, you can generally verify that things are connected as they should be and trust that they'll work when used. And you can set up state & invoke delegate methods easily to test them.
You also don't have public vs. protected vs. private method visibility getting in the way of writing tests for your internals.
Golden Rule: If you alloc then you release!
UPDATE: Unless you are using ARC
Don't write Objective-C as if it were Java/C#/C++/etc.
I once saw a team used to writing Java EE web applications try to write a Cocoa desktop application. As if it was a Java EE web application. There was a lot of AbstractFooFactory and FooFactory and IFoo and Foo flying around when all they really needed was a Foo class and possibly a Fooable protocol.
Part of ensuring you don't do this is truly understanding the differences in the language. For example, you don't need the abstract factory and factory classes above because Objective-C class methods are dispatched just as dynamically as instance methods, and can be overridden in subclasses.
Make sure you bookmark the Debugging Magic page. This should be your first stop when banging your head against a wall while trying to find the source of a Cocoa bug.
For example, it will tell you how to find the method where you first allocated memory that later is causing crashes (like during app termination).
Try to avoid what I have now decided to call Newbiecategoryaholism. When newcomers to Objective-C discover categories they often go hog wild, adding useful little categories to every class in existence ("What? i can add a method to convert a number to roman numerals to NSNumber rock on!").
Don't do this.
Your code will be more portable and easier to understand with out dozens of little category methods sprinkled on top of two dozen foundation classes.
Most of the time when you really think you need a category method to help streamline some code you'll find you never end up reusing the method.
There are other dangers too, unless you're namespacing your category methods (and who besides the utterly insane ddribin is?) there is a chance that Apple, or a plugin, or something else running in your address space will also define the same category method with the same name with a slightly different side effect....
OK. Now that you've been warned, ignore the "don't do this part". But exercise extreme restraint.
Resist subclassing the world. In Cocoa a lot is done through delegation and use of the underlying runtime that in other frameworks is done through subclassing.
For example, in Java you use instances of anonymous *Listener subclasses a lot and in .NET you use your EventArgs subclasses a lot. In Cocoa, you don't do either — the target-action is used instead.
Sort strings as the user wants
When you sort strings to present to the user, you should not use the simple compare: method. Instead, you should always use localized comparison methods such as localizedCompare: or localizedCaseInsensitiveCompare:.
For more details, see Searching, Comparing, and Sorting Strings.
Declared Properties
You should typically use the Objective-C 2.0 Declared Properties feature for all your properties. If they are not public, add them in a class extension. Using declared properties makes the memory management semantics immediately clear, and makes it easier for you to check your dealloc method -- if you group your property declarations together you can quickly scan them and compare with the implementation of your dealloc method.
You should think hard before not marking properties as 'nonatomic'. As The Objective C Programming Language Guide notes, properties are atomic by default, and incur considerable overhead. Moreover, simply making all your properties atomic does not make your application thread-safe. Also note, of course, that if you don't specify 'nonatomic' and implement your own accessor methods (rather than synthesising them), you must implement them in an atomic fashion.
Think about nil values
As this question notes, messages to nil are valid in Objective-C. Whilst this is frequently an advantage -- leading to cleaner and more natural code -- the feature can occasionally lead to peculiar and difficult-to-track-down bugs if you get a nil value when you weren't expecting it.
Use NSAssert and friends.
I use nil as valid object all the time ... especially sending messages to nil is perfectly valid in Obj-C.
However if I really want to make sure about the state of a variable, I use NSAssert and NSParameterAssert, which helps to track down problems easily.
Simple but oft-forgotten one. According to spec:
In general, methods in different
classes that have the same selector
(the same name) must also share the
same return and argument types. This
constraint is imposed by the compiler
to allow dynamic binding.
in which case all the same named selectors, even if in different classes, will be regarded as to have identical return/argument types. Here is a simple example.
#interface FooInt:NSObject{}
-(int) print;
#end
#implementation FooInt
-(int) print{
return 5;
}
#end
#interface FooFloat:NSObject{}
-(float) print;
#end
#implementation FooFloat
-(float) print{
return 3.3;
}
#end
int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
id f1=[[FooFloat alloc]init];
//prints 0, runtime considers [f1 print] to return int, as f1's type is "id" and FooInt precedes FooBar
NSLog(#"%f",[f1 print]);
FooFloat* f2=[[FooFloat alloc]init];
//prints 3.3 expectedly as the static type is FooFloat
NSLog(#"%f",[f2 print]);
[f1 release];
[f2 release]
[pool drain];
return 0;
}
If you're using Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) or later, you can use the Instruments application to find and track memory leaks. After building your program in Xcode, select Run > Start with Performance Tool > Leaks.
Even if your app doesn't show any leaks, you may be keeping objects around too long. In Instruments, you can use the ObjectAlloc instrument for this. Select the ObjectAlloc instrument in your Instruments document, and bring up the instrument's detail (if it isn't already showing) by choosing View > Detail (it should have a check mark next to it). Under "Allocation Lifespan" in the ObjectAlloc detail, make sure you choose the radio button next to "Created & Still Living".
Now whenever you stop recording your application, selecting the ObjectAlloc tool will show you how many references there are to each still-living object in your application in the "# Net" column. Make sure you not only look at your own classes, but also the classes of your NIB files' top-level objects. For example, if you have no windows on the screen, and you see references to a still-living NSWindow, you may have not released it in your code.
Clean up in dealloc.
This is one of the easiest things to forget - esp. when coding at 150mph. Always, always, always clean up your attributes/member variables in dealloc.
I like to use Objc 2 attributes - with the new dot notation - so this makes the cleanup painless. Often as simple as:
- (void)dealloc
{
self.someAttribute = NULL;
[super dealloc];
}
This will take care of the release for you and set the attribute to NULL (which I consider defensive programming - in case another method further down in dealloc accesses the member variable again - rare but could happen).
With GC turned on in 10.5, this isn't needed so much any more - but you might still need to clean up others resources you create, you can do that in the finalize method instead.
All these comments are great, but I'm really surprised nobody mentioned Google's Objective-C Style Guide that was published a while back. I think they have done a very thorough job.
Also, semi-related topic (with room for more responses!):
What are those little Xcode tips & tricks you wish you knew about 2 years ago?.
Don't forget that NSWindowController and NSViewController will release the top-level objects of the NIB files they govern.
If you manually load a NIB file, you are responsible for releasing that NIB's top-level objects when you are done with them.
One rather obvious one for a beginner to use: utilize Xcode's auto-indentation feature for your code. Even if you are copy/pasting from another source, once you have pasted the code, you can select the entire block of code, right click on it, and then choose the option to re-indent everything within that block.
Xcode will actually parse through that section and indent it based on brackets, loops, etc. It's a lot more efficient than hitting the space bar or tab key for each and every line.
I know I overlooked this when first getting into Cocoa programming.
Make sure you understand memory management responsibilities regarding NIB files. You are responsible for releasing the top-level objects in any NIB file you load. Read Apple's Documentation on the subject.
Turn on all GCC warnings, then turn off those that are regularly caused by Apple's headers to reduce noise.
Also run Clang static analysis frequently; you can enable it for all builds via the "Run Static Analyzer" build setting.
Write unit tests and run them with each build.
Variables and properties
1/ Keeping your headers clean, hiding implementation
Don't include instance variables in your header. Private variables put into class continuation as properties. Public variables declare as public properties in your header.
If it should be only read, declare it as readonly and overwrite it as readwrite in class continutation.
Basically I am not using variables at all, only properties.
2/ Give your properties a non-default variable name, example:
#synthesize property = property_;
Reason 1: You will catch errors caused by forgetting "self." when assigning the property.
Reason 2: From my experiments, Leak Analyzer in Instruments has problems to detect leaking property with default name.
3/ Never use retain or release directly on properties (or only in very exceptional situations). In your dealloc just assign them a nil. Retain properties are meant to handle retain/release by themselves. You never know if a setter is not, for example, adding or removing observers. You should use the variable directly only inside its setter and getter.
Views
1/ Put every view definition into a xib, if you can (the exception is usually dynamic content and layer settings). It saves time (it's easier than writing code), it's easy to change and it keeps your code clean.
2/ Don't try to optimize views by decreasing the number of views. Don't create UIImageView in your code instead of xib just because you want to add subviews into it. Use UIImageView as background instead. The view framework can handle hundreds of views without problems.
3/ IBOutlets don't have to be always retained (or strong). Note that most of your IBOutlets are part of your view hierarchy and thus implicitly retained.
4/ Release all IBOutlets in viewDidUnload
5/ Call viewDidUnload from your dealloc method. It is not implicitly called.
Memory
1/ Autorelease objects when you create them. Many bugs are caused by moving your release call into one if-else branch or after a return statement. Release instead of autorelease should be used only in exceptional situations - e.g. when you are waiting for a runloop and you don't want your object to be autoreleased too early.
2/ Even if you are using Authomatic Reference Counting, you have to understand perfectly how retain-release methods work. Using retain-release manually is not more complicated than ARC, in both cases you have to thing about leaks and retain-cycles.
Consider using retain-release manually on big projects or complicated object hierarchies.
Comments
1/ Make your code autodocumented.
Every variable name and method name should tell what it is doing. If code is written correctly (you need a lot of practice in this), you won't need any code comments (not the same as documentation comments). Algorithms can be complicated but the code should be always simple.
2/ Sometimes, you'll need a comment. Usually to describe a non apparent code behavior or hack. If you feel you have to write a comment, first try to rewrite the code to be simpler and without the need of comments.
Indentation
1/ Don't increase indentation too much.
Most of your method code should be indented on the method level. Nested blocks (if, for etc.) decrease readability. If you have three nested blocks, you should try to put the inner blocks into a separate method. Four or more nested blocks should be never used.
If most of your method code is inside of an if, negate the if condition, example:
if (self) {
//... long initialization code ...
}
return self;
if (!self) {
return nil;
}
//... long initialization code ...
return self;
Understand C code, mainly C structs
Note that Obj-C is only a light OOP layer over C language. You should understand how basic code structures in C work (enums, structs, arrays, pointers etc).
Example:
view.frame = CGRectMake(view.frame.origin.x, view.frame.origin.y, view.frame.size.width, view.frame.size.height + 20);
is the same as:
CGRect frame = view.frame;
frame.size.height += 20;
view.frame = frame;
And many more
Mantain your own coding standards document and update it often. Try to learn from your bugs. Understand why a bug was created and try to avoid it using coding standards.
Our coding standards have currently about 20 pages, a mix of Java Coding Standards, Google Obj-C/C++ Standards and our own addings. Document your code, use standard standard indentation, white spaces and blank lines on the right places etc.
Be more functional.
Objective-C is object-oriented language, but Cocoa framework functional-style aware, and is designed functional style in many cases.
There is separation of mutability. Use immutable classes as primary, and mutable object as secondary. For instance, use NSArray primarily, and use NSMutableArray only when you need.
There is pure functions. Not so many, buy many of framework APIs are designed like pure function. Look at functions such as CGRectMake() or CGAffineTransformMake(). Obviously pointer form looks more efficient. However indirect argument with pointers can't offer side-effect-free. Design structures purely as much as possible.
Separate even state objects. Use -copy instead of -retain when passing a value to other object. Because shared state can influence mutation to value in other object silently. So can't be side-effect-free. If you have a value from external from object, copy it. So it's also important designing shared state as minimal as possible.
However don't be afraid of using impure functions too.
There is lazy evaluation. See something like -[UIViewController view] property. The view won't be created when the object is created. It'll be created when caller reading view property at first time. UIImage will not be loaded until it actually being drawn. There are many implementation like this design. This kind of designs are very helpful for resource management, but if you don't know the concept of lazy evaluation, it's not easy to understand behavior of them.
There is closure. Use C-blocks as much as possible. This will simplify your life greatly. But read once more about block-memory-management before using it.
There is semi-auto GC. NSAutoreleasePool. Use -autorelease primary. Use manual -retain/-release secondary when you really need. (ex: memory optimization, explicit resource deletion)