When i try to send a request that uses a ValueProxy params i'm getting this 'Unforzen bean' exception. I don't know if this exception is because a bug with RF using JsonDialect or i'm doing something wrong... ¿Some help?
java.lang.AssertionError: Unfrozen bean with null RequestContext
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.checkStreamsNotCrossed(AbstractRequestContext.java:981)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.editProxy(AbstractRequestContext.java:509)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.edit(AbstractRequestContext.java:502)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.retainArg(AbstractRequestContext.java:1230)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.access$2(AbstractRequestContext.java:1223)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext$JsonRpcPayloadDialect.addInvocation(AbstractRequestContext.java:202)
at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.impl.AbstractRequestContext.addInvocation(AbstractRequestContext.java:661)
at es.xxxx.taller.client.Taller_SomeRequestContextImpl.SomeCall(Taller_SomeRequestContextImpl.java:29)
at es.xxxx.taller.client.Taller.onModuleLoad(Taller.java:417)
public class SomeEntryPoint implements EntryPoint {
#JsonRpcProxy
public interface SomeProxy extends ValueProxy {
String getSomeProperty();
void setSomeProperty(String value);
}
#JsonRpcProxy
public interface VoidProxy extends ValueProxy {
}
public interface SomeAutoBeanFactory extends AutoBeanFactory {
SomeAutoBeanFactory INSTANCE = GWT.create(SomeAutoBeanFactory.class);
AutoBean<SomeProxy> someProxy();
}
public interface SomeRequestFactory extends RequestFactory {
SomeRequestFactory INSTANCE = GWT.create(SomeRequestFactory.class);
SomeRequestContext context();
}
#JsonRpcService
public interface SomeRequestContext extends RequestContext {
SomeCall SomeCall(SomeProxy proxy);
#JsonRpcWireName(value = "SomeCall")
public interface SomeCall extends Request<VoidProxy> {
}
}
public void onModuleLoad() {
SomeProxy someProxy = SomeAutoBeanFactory.INSTANCE.someProxy().as();
someProxy.setSomeProperty("someValue");
SomeRequestFactory.INSTANCE.context().SomeCall(someProxy).fire();
}
}
Proxies should be created by a RequestContext, not an AutoBeanFactory! Using the JsonRpc dialect doesn't change how you use RequestFactory.
public void onModuleLoad() {
SomeRequestContext ctx = SomeRequestFactory.INSTANCE.context();
SomeProxy someProxy = ctx.create(SomeProxy.class);
someProxy.setSomeProperty("someValue");
ctx.SomeCall(someProxy).fire();
}
Related
I saw a method of using #inject annotation with parameter constructor. I found no use in #module in all parts of the project. I don't understand how this code injects or provides parameters in the constructor.
Can you help me analyze it?
Where is the datamanager provided?
In the whole project, #module + #provide is not used to provide datamanager. I only know that #inject can only annotate the parameterless constructor. I don't know where to instantiate the parameterless datamanager object. Thank you for your help
application:
public class Scallop extends Application {
private ApplicationComponent applicationComponent;
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
applicationComponent = DaggerApplicationComponent.builder()
.applicationModule(new ApplicationModule(this))
.build();
}
public ApplicationComponent getApplicationComponent() {
return applicationComponent;
}
}
application module:
#Module
public class ApplicationModule {
private Scallop application;
public ApplicationModule(Scallop application) { // 提供类的构造器，传入Applicaton
this.application = application;
}
#Provides
#Singleton
Application provideApplication() {
return application;
}
#Provides
#ApplicationContext
Context provideContext() {
return application;
}
#Provides
#Singleton
Retrofit provideRetrofit() {
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl(Constants.BASE_URL)
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.addCallAdapterFactory(RxJava2CallAdapterFactory.create())
.build();
return retrofit;
}
#Provides
#Singleton
GankIOService provideGankIOService(Retrofit retrofit) {
return retrofit.create(GankIOService.class);
}
}
#Singleton
#Component(modules = ApplicationModule.class)
public interface ApplicationComponent {
Application getApplication();
DataManager getDataManager();
}
```
one class:
#Singleton
public class DataManager {
private GankIOService gankIOService;
private PreferencesHelper preferencesHelper;
#Inject
public DataManager(GankIOService gankIOService, PreferencesHelper preferencesHelper) {
this.gankIOService = gankIOService;
this.preferencesHelper = preferencesHelper;
}
}
fragment module:
#FragmentScope
#Component(modules = FragmentModule.class, dependencies = ApplicationComponent.class)
public interface FragmentComponent {
void inject(HomeFragment homeFragment);
void inject(GanHuoPageFragment pageFragment);
void inject(XianDuFragment xianDuFragment);
void inject(XianDuPageFragment xianDuPageFragment);
void inject(PicturesFragment picturesFragment);
void inject(MoreFragment moreFragment);
}
#FragmentScope
#Documented
#Scope
#Retention(value = RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface FragmentScope {
}
```
here Can't understand constructor with parameter is #inject
public class GanHuoPagePresenter extends BasePresenter<GanHuoPageContract.View>
implements GanHuoPageContract.Presenter {
private DataManager dataManager;
private Disposable disposable;
#Inject
public GanHuoPagePresenter(DataManager dataManager) { // here here
this.dataManager = dataManager;
}
#Override
public void detachView() {
super.detachView();
if (disposable != null) {
disposable.dispose();
}
}
#Override
public void getGanHuo(String category, final int page) {
final List<GanHuo> ganHuoList = new ArrayList<>();
Observable<BaseResponse<GanHuo>> observable = dataManager.getGanHuo(category, page);
disposable = observable.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.concatMap(new Function<BaseResponse<GanHuo>, ObservableSource<GanHuo>>() {
#Override
public ObservableSource<GanHuo> apply(#NonNull BaseResponse<GanHuo> ganHuoBaseResponse)
throws Exception {
return Observable.fromIterable(ganHuoBaseResponse.getResults());
}
}).filter(new Predicate<GanHuo>() {
#Override
public boolean test(#NonNull GanHuo ganHuo) throws Exception {
return !ganHuo.getType().equals("福利");
}
}).subscribe(new Consumer<GanHuo>() {
#Override
public void accept(GanHuo ganHuo) throws Exception {
ganHuoList.add(ganHuo);
}
}, new Consumer<Throwable>() {
#Override
public void accept(Throwable throwable) throws Exception {
getView().showError(throwable.getMessage());
}
}, new Action() {
#Override`enter code here`
public void run() throws Exception {
getView().showList(ganHuoList, page);
}
});
}
}
This is how it is used in V in MVP mode：
#Inject GanHuoPagePresenter presenter
That's constructor injection. By marking a constructor with #Inject Dagger knows about the object and can create it when needed. There's no need for modules, e.g. the following is a valid Dagger setup to create some Foo.
public class Foo {
#Inject
public Foo() {}
}
#Component
interface MyComponent {
Foo getFoo();
}
That's not true that #Inject can only annotate the parameterless constructor. From documentation
Injectable constructors are annotated with #Inject and accept zero or more dependencies as arguments.
I found "your" project on Github so let's see where dependencies for GanHuoPagePresenter come from.
#Inject
public GanHuoPagePresenter(DataManager dataManager) {
this.dataManager = dataManager;
}
#Inject
public DataManager(GankIOService gankIOService,PreferencesHelper preferencesHelper){
// gankIOService is provided by ApplicationModule and preferencesHelper uses constructor injection
this.gankIOService = gankIOService;
this.preferencesHelper = preferencesHelper;
}
#Inject
public PreferencesHelper(#ApplicationContext Context context){
// context is provided again by ApplicationModule
sharedPreferences = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(context);
}
I have a chain of Features. I would like to bind some beans inside ConfigFeature and then get them inside the MongoDBFeature. What methods should I use for that?
public final class IoCBinder extends AbstractBinder {
#Override
protected void configure() {
ConfigFeature.configureIoC(this);
MongoDBFeature.configureIoC(this);
}
}
Put some bean here:
public class ConfigFeature {
public static void configureIoC(AbstractBinder binder) {
// ....
binder.bind(configProvider).to(ConfigurationProvider.class).in(Singleton.class).named("configProvider");
}
}
And I would like to get configProvider bean here:
public class MongoDBFeature {
public static void configureIoC(AbstractBinder binder) {
// ?? get configProvider here ??
}
}
You can bind your bean to the ServiceLocator as shown in below example.
Service
public class TestService{
}
Binder
public static TestBinder extends AbstractBinder{
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(new TestService()).to(TestService.class);
}
}
Feature 1
public class Feature1 implements Feature{
#Inject
private ServiceLocator locator;
#Override
public boolean configure(FeatureContext context) {
org.glassfish.hk2.utilities.ServiceLocatorUtilities.bind(locator,new TestBinder());
return true;
}
}
Note that a ServiceLocator instance is injected to Feature1 and the binder is bound to this locator instance.
Feature 2
public class Feature2 implements Feature{
#Inject
private TestService testService;
#Override
public boolean configure(FeatureContext context) {
return true;
}
}
Application/ResourceConfig class
public class TestConfig extends ResourceConfig {
register(Feature1.class);
// Need to make sure Feature1 is registered before Feature2.
// Another option is to register Feature2 in configure() method of Feature1 class.
register(Feature2.class);
}
The goal is to attach some data from security context using RequestInterceptor, but the problem, that the calling SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication() always returns null even though it is not null (I am sure 100%).
As I understand that's because the Interceptor is created and is being run in other thread.
How could I solve this problem and get actual data from security context?
My service:
#FeignClient(value = "api", configuration = { FeignConfig.class })
public interface DocumentService {
#RequestMapping(value = "/list", method = RequestMethod.GET)
DocumentListOperation list();
}
My FeignConfig class:
#Bean
public RequestInterceptor requestInterceptor() {
return new HeaderInterceptor(userService);
}
public class HeaderInterceptor implements RequestInterceptor {
private UserService userService;
public HeaderInterceptor(UserService userService) {
this.userService = userService;
}
#Override
public void apply(RequestTemplate requestTemplate) {
Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication()
requestTemplate.header("authentication", a.toString());
}
}
I managed to figure it out, thanks to the article I found here
Firstly you need to initiliaze HystrixRequestContext HystrixRequestContext.initializeContext();.
You have to create your own Context in which you will store information you need to pass to Hystrix child threads.
Here is example:
public class UserHystrixRequestContext {
private static final HystrixRequestVariableDefault<User> userContextVariable = new HystrixRequestVariableDefault<>();
private UserHystrixRequestContext() {}
public static HystrixRequestVariableDefault<User> getInstance() {
return userContextVariable;
}
}
You have to register new concurrency strategy that would wrap Callable interface
#Component
public class CustomHystrixConcurrencyStrategy extends HystrixConcurrencyStrategy {
public CustomHystrixConcurrencyStrategy() {
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerConcurrencyStrategy(this);
}
#Override
public <T> Callable<T> wrapCallable(Callable<T> callable) {
return new HystrixContextWrapper<T>(callable);
}
public static class HystrixContextWrapper<V> implements Callable<V> {
private HystrixRequestContext hystrixRequestContext;
private Callable<V> delegate;
public HystrixContextWrapper(Callable<V> delegate) {
this.hystrixRequestContext = HystrixRequestContext.getContextForCurrentThread();
this.delegate = delegate;
}
#Override
public V call() throws Exception {
HystrixRequestContext existingState = HystrixRequestContext.getContextForCurrentThread();
try {
HystrixRequestContext.setContextOnCurrentThread(this.hystrixRequestContext);
return this.delegate.call();
} finally {
HystrixRequestContext.setContextOnCurrentThread(existingState);
}
}
}
}
So before calling Callable object we set new thread's Context to parent's context.
After that is done you should be able to access your new defined context inside Hystrix child threads
User = UserHystrixRequestContext.getInstance().get();
Hope that will help someone.
I have a problem with #IocProvider (), annotation does not work.
The code is very similar to https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ERRAI/Container+Wiring
public interface Test {
String getGreeting();
}
#ApplicationScoped
public class TestImpl implements Test {
public String getGreeting() {
return "Hello:)";
}
}
#IOCProvider
#Singleton
public class TestProvider implements Provider<Test> {
#Override
public Test get() {
return new TestImpl();
}
}
Then I want use DI in my broadcast service (errai-bus).
#Service
public class BroadcastService implements MessageCallback {
#Inject
Test test;
#Inject
MessageBus bus;
#Inject
public BroadcastService(MessageBus bus) {
this.bus = bus;
}
public void callback(Message message) {
MessageBuilder.createMessage()
.toSubject("BroadcastReceiver")
.with("BroadcastText", test.getGreeting()).errorsHandledBy(new ErrorCallback() {
#Override
public boolean error(Message message, Throwable throwable) {
return true;
}
}).sendNowWith(bus);
}
}
I get a error:
1) No implementation for com.gwtplatform.samples.basic.server.Test was bound.
while locating com.gwtplatform.samples.basic.server.Test
for field at com.gwtplatform.samples.basic.server.BroadcastService.test(BroadcastService.java:32)
at org.jboss.errai.bus.server.service.ServiceProcessor$1.configure(ServiceProcessor.java:118)
If I change the code to
#Inject
TestImpl test;
It works, but I need the provider. Do you have some idea?
Because you're trying to use #IOCProvider in server-side code. Errai IOC is completely client-side.
I want to call a method on a Service with a ValueProxy param - if I do personProxy.setName("test") and then request.callFn(personProxy).fire(), the name property doesn't get passed to server.
Should I do a request.edit(personProxy) before setting the name or something else?
This is the implementation I'm using:
//somewhere in MyActivity.java ...
PersonProxy cp = requestFactory.myRequest().create(PersonProxy.class);
cp.setName("John Doe");
requestFactory.myRequest().doSomething(cp,"extra_param_value").fire(new Receiver<List<PersonProxy>>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(List<PersonProxy> response) {
//response from server...
}
});
//------------------------
public interface MyRequestFactory extends RequestFactory {
MyRequest myRequest();
}
//------------------------
#ServiceName(value="com.server.MyService", locator="com.server.MyServiceLocator")
public interface MyRequest extends RequestContext {
public Request<Integer> doSomething(PersonProxy param, String extraParam);
}
//------------------------
public class MyServiceLocator implements ServiceLocator {
public Object getInstance(Class<?> clazz) {
return new MyService();
}
}
//------------------------
public class MyService {
public Integer doSomething(Person param, String extraParam) {
System.out.println("person.name="+param.getName()); ---> prints NULL!!! why?
return 0;
}
}
//------------------------
#ProxyForName(value="com.server.Person")
public interface PersonProxy extends ValueProxy {
String getName();
void setName(String name);
}
//-----------------------
public class Person {
public Person() {
super();
}
protected String name;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
Thanks.
The PersonProxy is being created by one instance of a RequestContext and used in another. Turns out there's a bug in AbstractRequestContext.retainArg() that should have thrown an exception to tell you about the API mis-use. Editable proxies aren't supposed to be usable between different RequestContext instances.
TreeRequest ctx = factory.treeRequest();
PersonProxy person = ctx.create(PersonProxy.class);
person.setName("John Doe");
ctx.doSomething(person, "more stuff");
As discussed on IRC, the -Dgwt.rpc.dumpPayload=true JVM flag can be turned on when trying to diagnose where data is going (or isn't).