Thought this would be pretty straight forward, but my value is remaining the same (0).
What I'd like to do is increment my UnreadMessages field when the user receives a message they haven't read and then decrement it when they have. So I thought code like this would work:
var userHelper = new MongoHelper<User>();
//increment
userHelper.Collection.Update(Query.EQ("Id", userId.ToId()), Update.Inc("UnreadMessages", 1));
//decrement
userHelper.Collection.Update(Query.EQ("Id", userId.ToId()), Update.Inc("UnreadMessages", -1));
After running these no errors are thrown but the value doesn't change either. And no I'm not running one after the other as the code above could be interpreted :)
Update
Here's my helper class:
public class MongoHelper<T> : Sandbox.Services.IMongoHelper<T> where T : class
{
public MongoCollection<T> Collection { get; private set; }
public MongoHelper()
{
var con = new MongoConnectionStringBuilder(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["MongoDB"].ConnectionString);
var server = MongoServer.Create(con);
var db = server.GetDatabase(con.DatabaseName);
Collection = db.GetCollection<T>(typeof(T).Name.ToLower());
}
}
and thanks to Travis' answer I was able to pull this off:
MongoHelper<UserDocument> userHelper = new MongoHelper<UserDocument>();
var user = userHelper.Collection.FindAndModify(Query.EQ("Username", "a"), SortBy.Null, Update.Inc("MessageCount", 1), true).GetModifiedDocumentAs<UserDocument>();
Not sure what your helper does. Here is a working snippet I use:
var query = Query.And(Query.EQ("_id", keyName));
var sortBy = SortBy.Null;
var update = Update.Inc("KeyValue", adjustmentAmount);
var result = collection.FindAndModify(query, sortBy, update, true);
So, "query" finds the document, update does the increment, and FindAndModify puts them together and actually hits the database.
Related
I have a console program that moves Data between two different servers (DatabaseA and DatabaseB).
Database B is a Postgres-Server.
It calls a lot of stored procedures and other raw queries.
I use ExecuteSqlRaw a lot.
I also use NpsqlBulk.EfCore.
The program uses the same context instance for DatabaseB during the whole run it takes to finish.
Somehow i get locks on some of my tables on DatabaseB that never get released.
This happens always on my table mytable_fromdatabase_import.
The code run on that is the following:
protected override void AddIdsNew()
{
var toAdd = IdsNotInDatabaseB();
var newObjectsToAdd = GetByIds(toAdd).Select(Converter.ConvertAToB);
DatabaseBContext.Database.ExecuteSqlRaw("truncate mytable_fromdatabase_import; ");
var uploader = new NpgsqlBulkUploader(DatabaseBContext);
uploader.Insert(newObjectsToAdd); // inserts data into mytable_fromdatabase_import
DatabaseBContext.Database.ExecuteSqlRaw("call insert_myTable_from_importTable();");
}
After i run it the whole table is not accessable annymore and when i query the locks on the server i can see there is a process holding it.
How can i make sure this process always closes and releases its locks on tables?
I thought ef-core would do that automaticaly.
-----------Edit-----------
I just wanted to add that this is not a temporary problem during the run of the console. When i run this code and it is finished my table is still locked and nothing can access it. My understanding was that the ef-core context would release everything after it is disposed (if by error or by being finished)
The problem had nothing to do with ef core but with a wrong configured backupscript. The program is running now with no changes to it and it works fine
For concrete task you need right tools. Probably you have locks when retrieve Ids and also when trying to do not load already imported records. These steps are slow!
I would suggest to use linq2db (disclaimer, I'm co-author of this library)
Create two projects with models from different databases:
Source.Model.csproj - install linq2db.SQLServer
Destination.Model.csproj - install linq2db.PostgreSQL
Follow instructions in T4 templates how to generate model from two databases. It is easy and you can ask questions on linq2db`s github site.
I'll post helper class which I've used for transferring tables on my previous project. It additionally uses library CodeJam for mapping, but in your project, for sure, you can use Automapper.
public class DataImporter
{
private readonly DataConnection _source;
private readonly DataConnection _destination;
public DataImporter(DataConnection source, DataConnection destination)
{
_source = source;
_destination = destination;
}
private long ImportDataPrepared<TSource, TDest>(IOrderedQueryable<TSource> source, Expression<Func<TSource, TDest>> projection) where TDest : class
{
var destination = _destination.GetTable<TDest>();
var tableName = destination.TableName;
var sourceCount = source.Count();
if (sourceCount == 0)
return 0;
var currentCount = destination.Count();
if (currentCount > sourceCount)
throw new Exception($"'{tableName}' what happened here?.");
if (currentCount >= sourceCount)
return 0;
IQueryable<TSource> sourceQuery = source;
if (currentCount > 0)
sourceQuery = sourceQuery.Skip(currentCount);
var projected = sourceQuery.Select(projection);
var copied =
_destination.BulkCopy(
new BulkCopyOptions
{
BulkCopyType = BulkCopyType.MultipleRows,
RowsCopiedCallback = (obj) => RowsCopiedCallback(obj, currentCount, sourceCount, tableName)
}, projected);
return copied.RowsCopied;
}
private void RowsCopiedCallback(BulkCopyRowsCopied obj, int currentRows, int totalRows, string tableName)
{
var percent = (currentRows + obj.RowsCopied) / (double)totalRows * 100;
Console.WriteLine($"Copied {percent:N2}% \tto {tableName}");
}
public class ImporterHelper<TSource>
{
private readonly DataImporter _improrter;
private readonly IOrderedQueryable<TSource> _sourceQuery;
public ImporterHelper(DataImporter improrter, IOrderedQueryable<TSource> sourceQuery)
{
_improrter = improrter;
_sourceQuery = sourceQuery;
}
public long To<TDest>() where TDest : class
{
var mapperBuilder = new MapperBuilder<TSource, TDest>();
return _improrter.ImportDataPrepared(_sourceQuery, mapperBuilder.GetMapper().GetMapperExpressionEx());
}
public long To<TDest>(Expression<Func<TSource, TDest>> projection) where TDest : class
{
return _improrter.ImportDataPrepared(_sourceQuery, projection);
}
}
public ImporterHelper<TSource> ImprortData<TSource>(IOrderedQueryable<TSource> source)
{
return new ImporterHelper<TSource>(this, source);
}
}
So begin transferring. Note that I have used OrderBy/ThenBy to specify Id order to do not import already transferred records - important order fields should be Unique Key combination. So this sample is reentrant and can be re-run again when connection is lost.
var sourceBuilder = new LinqToDbConnectionOptionsBuilder();
sourceBuilder.UseSqlServer(SourceConnectionString);
var destinationBuilder = new LinqToDbConnectionOptionsBuilder();
destinationBuilder.UsePostgreSQL(DestinationConnectionString);
using (var source = new DataConnection(sourceBuilder.Build()))
using (var destination = new DataConnection(destinationBuilder.Build()))
{
var dataImporter = new DataImporter(source, destination);
dataImporter.ImprortData(source.GetTable<Source.Model.FirstTable>()
.OrderBy(e => e.Id1)
.ThenBy(e => e.Id2))
.To<Dest.Model.FirstTable>();
dataImporter.ImprortData(source.GetTable<Source.Model.SecondTable>().OrderBy(e => e.Id))
.To<Dest.Model.SecondTable>();
}
For sure boring part with OrderBy can be generated automatically, but this will explode this already not a short answer.
Also play with BulkCopyOptions. Native Npgsql COPY may fail and Multi-Line variant should be used.
I want to log new and modified records. This code works just fine for Modified Records.
But with Added records, there is an issue. Since it is new to the Database, there is not yet a primary key for it. So there is no way to log which record was added.
However, if I try to log the records after the save, the EntityState is no longer Added. So I don't know what was added.
The only solution I have been able to come up with is to save a list of the new records, and then after the save, then Log the changes. But that seems like a workaround.
Is there some way to resolve this?
private List<Event> LogChanges(EntityEntry entityEntry, Enums.TableNames tableName)
{
List<Event> result = new List<Event>();
var databaseValues = entityEntry.GetDatabaseValues();
foreach (var property in entityEntry.CurrentValues.Properties.Where(a=> a.Name !="TenantId"))
{
string original = databaseValues[property]?.ToString();
string current = entityEntry.CurrentValues[property]?.ToString();
if(!object.Equals(original,current))
{
result.Add(
new Event()
{
AppUserId = this._appUserProvider.CurrentAppUserId,
EventDate = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
EventTypeId = (int)Enums.EventTypes.Modified,
TenantId = databaseValues.GetValue<int>("TenantId"),
RecordId = databaseValues.GetValue<int>("Id"),
ColumnName = property.Name,
OriginalValue = original,
NewValue = current,
TableId = (int)tableName
});
}
}
return result;
}
This library adds triggers to EntityFrameworkCore. Using the Triggers it provides is a much cleaner way to accomplish the above.
I have an object with several really large string properties. In addition, it has a simple timestamp property.
What I trying to achieve is to update only timestamp property without getting the whole huge object to the server.
Eventually, I would like to use EF and to do in the most performant way something equivalent to this:
update [...]
set [...] = [...]
where [...]
Using the following, you can update a single column:
var yourEntity = new YourEntity() { Id = id, DateProp = dateTime };
using (var db = new MyEfContextName())
{
db.YourEntities.Attach(yourEntity);
db.Entry(yourEntity).Property(x => x.DateProp).IsModified = true;
db.SaveChanges();
}
OK, I managed to handle this. The solution is the same as proposed by Seany84, with the only addition of disabling validation, in order to overcome issue with required fields. Basically, I had to add the following line just before 'SaveChanges():
db.Configuration.ValidateOnSaveEnabled = false;
So, the complete solution is:
var yourEntity = new YourEntity() { Id = id, DateProp = dateTime };
using (var db = new MyEfContextName())
{
db.YourEntities.Attach(yourEntity);
db.Entry(yourEntity).Property(x => x.DateProp).IsModified = true;
db.Configuration.ValidateOnSaveEnabled = false;
db.SaveChanges();
}
SO follow this example
example and how make a fake DBContex For test my test using just this work fine
[Test]
public void CiudadIndex()
{
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>
{
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 1, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Santa Cruz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 2, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="La Paz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 3, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Cochabamba", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1}
};
//// Create mock unit of work
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
// Setup controller
var homeController = new CiudadController(mockData.Object);
// Invoke
var viewResult = homeController.Index();
var ciudades_de_la_vista = (IEnumerable<Ciudad>)viewResult.Model;
// Assert..
}
Iam tryign now to use Autofixture-Moq
to create "ciudades" but I cant. I try this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades = fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>();
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I get this error
Cant convert System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable(FakeDbSet(Ciudad)) to System.Data.Entity.IDbSet(Ciudad)
cant put "<>" so I replace with "()" in the error message
Implementation of IContext and FakeDbSet
public interface IContext
{
IDbSet<Ciudad> Ciudades { get; }
}
public class FakeDbSet<T> : IDbSet<T> where T : class
how can make this to work?
A minor point... In stuff like:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
The second type arg is unnecessary and should be:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany();
I really understand why you need a FakeDbSet and the article is a bit TL;DR... In general, I try to avoid faking and mucking with ORM bits and instead dealing with interfaces returning POCOs to the max degree possible.
That aside... The reason the normal syntax for initialising the list works is that there is an Add (and IEnumerable) in DBFixture. AutoFixture doesn't have a story for that pattern directly (after all it is compiler syntactic sugar and not particularly amenable to reflection or in line with any other conventions) but you can use AddManyTo as long as there is an ICollection in play. Luckily, within the impl of FakeDbSet as in the article, the following gives us an in:-
public ObservableCollection<T> Local
{
get { return _data; }
}
As ObservableCollection<T> derives from ICollection<T>, you should be able to:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Cuidad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades.Local);
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
It's possible to wire up a customization to make this prettier, but at least you have a way to manage it. The other option is to have something implement ICollection (or add a prop with a setter taking IEnumerable<T> and have AF generate the parent object, causing said collection to be filled in.
Long superseded side note: In your initial question, you effectively have:
fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany()
The problem becomes clearer then - you are asking AF to generate Many FakeDbSet<Ciudad>s, which is not what you want.
I haven't used AutoFixture in a while, but shouldn't it be:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades);
for the moment I end doing this, I will keep reading about how use automoq, cause I'm new in this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
foreach (var item in ciudades_fixture)
{
ciudades.Add(item);
}
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
fixture.Create<Mock<IContext>>();
mockData.Setup(r => r.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I am trying to index into a document a field with one term that has a payload.
Since the only constructor of Field that can work for me takes a TokenStream, I decided to inherit from this class and give the most basic implementation for what I need:
public class MyTokenStream : TokenStream
{
TermAttribute termAtt;
PayloadAttribute payloadAtt;
bool moreTokens = true;
public MyTokenStream()
{
termAtt = (TermAttribute)GetAttribute(typeof(TermAttribute));
payloadAtt = (PayloadAttribute)GetAttribute(typeof(PayloadAttribute));
}
public override bool IncrementToken()
{
if (moreTokens)
{
termAtt.SetTermBuffer("my_val");
payloadAtt.SetPayload(new Payload(/*bye[] data*/));
moreTokens = false;
}
return false;
}
}
The code which was used while indexing:
IndexWriter writer = //init tndex writer...
Document d = new Document();
d.Add(new Field("field_name", new MyTokenStream()));
writer.AddDocument(d);
writer.Commit();
And the code that was used during the search:
IndexSearcher searcher = //init index searcher
Query query = new TermQuery(new Term("field_name", "my_val"));
TopDocs result = searcher.Search(query, null, 10);
I used the debugger to verify that call to IncrementToken() actually sets the TermBuffer.
My problem is that the returned TopDocs instance returns no documents, and I cant understand why... Actually I started from TermPositions (which gives me approach to the Payload...), but it also gave me no results.
Can someone explain to me what am I doing wrong?
I am currently using Lucene .NET 2.9.2
After you set the TermBuffer you need to return true from IncrementToken, you return false when you have nothing to feed the TermBuffer with anymore