Drawing bifurcation diagram for 1D system is clear but if I have 2D system on the following form
dx/dt=f(x,y,r),
dy/dt=g(x,y,r)
And I want to generate a bifurcation diagram in MATLAB for x versus r.
What is the main idea to do that or any hints which could help me?
You first have to do some math:
Setting each of the functions to zero gives you two functions y(x) (called the nullclines), which you can plot in a phase diagram. Where the two lines intersect are the fixed-points (equilibria) of your system.
Now, you have to take the jacobian of your system and plug each of those fixed-points in, which will give you the linear stability analysis of the system.
The location of the fixed points and the stability of each point can now be computed as a you vary r (the bifurcation parameter).
For the programming:
-use newton's method (fsolve in MATLAB) to find where the equations are zero
-eig will help you find the eigenvalues of the system.
However
It depends on your system.
If you're supposed to be looking for limit cycles or chaos or something, you'll have to use one of the ode solvers and then the analysis becomes more tricky. I suppose you could develop a poincare-bendixson algorithm, but that would be involved and details would depend on your system.
I don't think MATLAB has anything built in that would give you a bifurcation diagram. There is this third-party solution:
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/8382
Related
I know a Gaussian Process Regression model is mainly specified by its covariance matrix and the free hyper-parameters act as the 'weights'of the model. But could anyone explain what do the 2 hyper-parameters (length-scale & amplitude) in the covariance matrix represent (since they are not 'real' parameters)? I'm a little confused on the 'actual' meaning of these 2 parameters.
Thank you for your help in advance. :)
First off I would like to point out that there are infinite number of kernels that could be used in a gaussian process. One of the most common however is the RBF (also referred to as squared exponential, the expodentiated quadratic, etc). This kernel is of the following form:
The above equation is of course for the simple 1D case. Here l is the length scale and sigma is the variance parameter (note they go under different names depending on the source). Effectively the length scale controls how two points appear to be similar as it simply magnifies the distance between x and x'. The variance parameter controls how smooth the function is. These are related but not the same.
The Kernel Cookbook give a nice little description and compares RBF kernels to other commonly used kernels.
Can anyone explain to me in a easy and less mathematical way what is a Hessian and how does it work in practice when optimizing the learning process for a neural network ?
To understand the Hessian you first need to understand Jacobian, and to understand a Jacobian you need to understand the derivative
Derivative is the measure of how fast function value changes withe the change of the argument. So if you have the function f(x)=x^2 you can compute its derivative and obtain a knowledge how fast f(x+t) changes with small enough t. This gives you knowledge about basic dynamics of the function
Gradient shows you in multidimensional functions the direction of the biggest value change (which is based on the directional derivatives) so given a function ie. g(x,y)=-x+y^2 you will know, that it is better to minimize the value of x, while strongly maximize the vlaue of y. This is a base of gradient based methods, like steepest descent technique (used in the traditional backpropagation methods).
Jacobian is yet another generalization, as your function might have many values, like g(x,y)=(x+1, xy, x-z), thus you now have 23 partial derivatives, one gradient per each output value (each of 2 values) thus forming together a matrix of 2*3=6 values.
Now, derivative shows you the dynamics of the function itself. But you can go one step further, if you can use this dynamics to find the optimum of the function, maybe you can do even better if you find out the dynamics of this dynamics, and so - compute derivatives of second order? This is exactly what Hessian is, it is a matrix of second order derivatives of your function. It captures the dynamics of the derivatives, so how fast (in what direction) does the change change. It may seem a bit complex at the first sight, but if you think about it for a while it becomes quite clear. You want to go in the direction of the gradient, but you do not know "how far" (what is the correct step size). And so you define new, smaller optimization problem, where you are asking "ok, I have this gradient, how can I tell where to go?" and solve it analogously, using derivatives (and derivatives of the derivatives form the Hessian).
You may also look at this in the geometrical way - gradient based optimization approximates your function with the line. You simply try to find a line which is closest to your function in a current point, and so it defines a direction of change. Now, lines are quite primitive, maybe we could use some more complex shapes like.... parabolas? Second derivative, hessian methods are just trying to fit the parabola (quadratic function, f(x)=ax^2+bx+c) to your current position. And based on this approximation - chose the valid step.
I have a mechanical oscillation system defined by a n x n matrix with transfer functions tf( ... ).
W = minreal( [ tf( ... ) ... tf(...) ; ... ; tf( ... ) ... tf(...) ];
In the following picture you can see some selected frequency responses. It shows various irregularites at high frequencies.
As I combine this system in Simulink with other high-order systems, the required step-size has to be extremely low or my system is not stable. The simulation time then is tremendously high, which makes it impossible to validate the general funcionality of my model.
For this reason I'd like to apply a low-pass filter on my fransfer matrix, so I could use bigger steps for a faster simulation time. Is there a way to implement this either in my matlab code or within Simulink?
Finally I would like to adjust the threshold frequency depending on how much time I have and which accuracy is required.
I already did some research for appropriate solvers, without success. Any advice regarding solvers would help me as well.
This is the meager list of toolboxes I have available:
Control System Toolbox Version 9.3 (R2012a)
Simulink Control Design Version 3.5 (R2012a)
System Identification Toolbox Version 8.0 (R2012a)
Thank you in advance!
Edit: picture to illustrate the suggestion of #am304
Bode diagram for reduced system from 18th to 4th order, low-pass in my case not required anymore.
As suggested in the comments, convert your matrix of transfer functions to a state-space system and use the state-space block from Simulink, I suspect it will be more efficient (certainly much more readable if n is large).
Also, maybe look at reducing the order of your system (n) (see Model Simplification in the documentation for more details - in particular look for balred and balreal)
I have just started understanding modeling techniques based on regression models and was going through MATLAB curve fitting toolbox and the SO. I have fundamental doubts and unable to proceed further. I have a single vector set with k=100 data points which I want to fit into an AR model,MA model,ARMA model successively to see which is better suited.Starting with an AR(p) model of the form y(k+1)=a*y(k)+ b*y(k-1)The command
coeff = polyfit(x,y,d)
will fit a polynomial of degree say d=1 with p number of coefficients indicating the order of the model (AR(p)). But I just have 1 set of data which is the recording of the angular moment.So,what will go as the first parameter (x) of the function signature i.e what will be x,y?Then, what if the linear models are not good enough so I may have to select the nonlinear models.Can somebody please guide with code snippets what are the steps in fitting,checking for overfitting,residual calculation etc.
x is likely to be k (index of y). And the whole code:
c =polyfit(1:length(y), y, d).
Matlab has a curve fitting toolbox. You could use it to check different nonlinear fitting in GUI to get some intuition.
If you want steps there's a great Coursera Machine Learning course. The beginning of this course is related to linear regression and I recommend you to spend some hours at least on that beginning.
I have a problem where I am fitting a high-order polynomial to (not very) noisy data using linear least squares. Currently I'm using polynomial orders around 15 - 25, which work surprisingly well: The dependence is very nearly linear, but the accuracy of modelling the 'very nearly' is critical. I'm using Matlab's polyfit() function, and (obviously) normalising the x-data. This generally works fine, but I have come across an issue with some recent datasets. The fitted polynomial has extrema within the x-data interval. For the application I'm working on this is a non-no. The polynomial model must have no stationary points over the x-interval.
So I need to add a constraint to the least-squares problem: the derivative of the fitted polynomial must be strictly positive over a known x-range (or strictly negative - this depends on the data but a simple linear fit will quickly tell me which it is.) I have had a quick look at the available optimisation toolbox functions, but I admit I'm at a loss to know how to go about this. Does anyone have any suggestions?
[I appreciate there are probably better models than polynomials for this data, but in the short term it isn't feasible to change the form of the model]
[A closing note: I have finally got the go-ahead to replace this awful polynomial model! I am going to adopt a nonparametric approach, spline smoothing, using the excellent SPLINEFIT code by Jonas Lundgren. This has the advantage that I'm already using a spline model in the end-user application, so I already have C# code available to evaluate a spline model]
You could use cftool and use the exclude data points option.