I am using the AFNetworking framework to make several JSON web request.
During development if I fail to provide a required parameters or the Service developers have broken something :-) i receive a 500 error
The Error block of AFJSONRequestOperation is correctly catching it. However i cannot see the page body because AfNetworking is cancelling the request as soon as the error code in the head is received.
Is there some work around. I would like to spit out the response body to the log.
Use the responseData or responseString property from the operation that's passed into the failure block.
You'll need to add the http Code 500 to the acceptable status codes and filter it on the success callback. There you will have a responseObject.
Related
Is it possible to intercept the request going through Charles and immediately return 500 error code without sending this request to the server?
Can't find any information on this. All resources suggest to wait for the response and then change HTTP response code to 500.
I assume you have already tried adding a rewrite rule to make the request to be returned with the 500 status. Have you tried combining this with a map local, to an empty file on your disk, for instance? It may work.
If this doesn't work too, I think I would do a Map Remote to another path on my localhost (for instance: http://localhost:8081/exected-response-500) and make that URL to return the 500 status error (in my case I would use a basic Spring Boot app to achieve this).
Hi I have a REST web service.
The service method throws java.lang.Exception but the client always receive Http Code 200 which is success.
Shouldn't the rest service return other code than 200?
Probably yes. 200 OK would imply that the request would have succeeded. It sounds like this was not a success so it should have been something else.
If your code is throwing an Exception, it's supposed to be broken and not delivering whatever your request wanted. That indeed should not return a "200 OK" response.
Here's a few things to do:
Don't throw java.lang.Exception. Try to be more specific about the exceptions on your code so it's easier to identify the problem when something crashes.
Determine WHAT is happening that is throwing that exception.
In most cases, send a 400 Bad Request when something is wrong and the client is guilt for that. If it's a server-side problem, it's usually a 500 Internal Server Error response. Do a little research on HTTP codes here.
Make sure to document any rules that need to be followed so this problem don't occur in the future.
My payment endpoint which accepts a POST should deny requests when the user does not have any payment methods configured. What is the correct HTTP status code in this case?
What is the correct HTTP status code to be raised when the system itself cannot reach the state asked for by the request and another request (creating a payment method) must be completed first?
I looked at 428 Precondition Required, but that seems to have more to do with the headers than the state of the system.
I would go simply with 400 Bad Request. If you need more specific instructions or hints in the response, you can return a body, which will indicate the exact nature of the error.
You don't need to assign a specific HTTP error code to all your internal business-related error cases. Indeed this is probably not possible anyway.
The specification on 400: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231#section-6.5.1
Relevant quotes from there:
indicates that the server cannot or will not process the request due to something that is perceived to be a client error
And about the 4xx codes in general:
the server SHOULD send a representation containing an explanation of the error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent condition
Did you look into error 424 Failed_Dependency? I think this could bethe one you want.
See
http://www.restpatterns.org/HTTP_Status_Codes/424_-_Failed_Dependency
I am using PostMan as a REST client to test this API method Cisco ACL Analysis API. specifically POST /acl/trace or getAClTracksStd (first go to Policy Analysis)
Here is my PostMan HTTP test call
Does anyone who is familiar with PostMan understand why I am getting this "Request method 'GET' is not supported" error from the server? I am making a POST HTTP request, not GET.(Selected from Drop down menu) It make more sense for me to get a input invalid parameter error or something.
Just to show that the endpoint url works, heres a HTTP test request that works
(same link, host->host API -> GET /host/{startIndex}/{recordsToReturn}
There's two issues that I'm seeing with your REST call. First, the error you're seeing is because the call needs to be preceded by "https://". Second, remove the interface IDs parameter and values. You should get a response with data after making these changes.
Your json looks erronuous (comma after the destIp) - and the server probably always responds with a default confusing error message in this case. (Postman is very well tested and it sends POST).
I've been looking at examples of REST API's like Netflix http://developer.netflix.com/docs/REST_API_Reference#0_59705 and Twitter and they seem to place error messages in the statusText header response instead of the responseText. We're developing an internal RESTful api and I am arguing for sending custom statusText messages and ignoring the responseText.
For the scope of our app, we're returning error 400 when the user has tried doing something they aren't supposed to, and the only error messages that will be updated in the UI for the user will be delivered with 400. I am of the belief that the message should be sent as a modified statusText but one of the engineers (who knows a bit less about REST than me) is arguing for sending it in the responseText.
What's the best way to go?
HTTP defines that you should put a descriptive error message in the response entity body, aka responseText.
statusText is not rendered or processed by any client.
I'd use the status text for the error message type, aka 400 Client Error, and the body for a description of the problem that can be rendered to the user, in whatever the format the client may be able to process.
Edit: Note that since then, a new standardised format exists to communicate in a standard fashion error details back to the client, which you can find at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7807 and which I would recommend.
I think you're right, the general approach is use the existing error mechanism built into HTTP.
In general, try to map your errors to existing HTTP errors, for example if they request something they don't have permission to, return a 403 error.
If they request something that doesn't exist, return a 404.
Alex
According to the HTTP specification (rfc2616): "HTTP status codes are extensible"
However I don't think that creating new statuses for every different error message is the correct approach:
I would say choose HTTP Status appropriately (HTTP Status Code Definitions) if you can't find any category which matches your requirement create a custom one (but I'm sure you will) and put error messages in the HTTP response body.
Picking appropriate status code for your responses is extremely important as it is a key enabler of self-descriptive messages.
The entity body should be a representation of the resource's state and ideally contain hyperlinks to available next states in your application
Http Status Codes are pretty self explanatory and should be used as such. Returning 200 OK with validation errors is pretty Soap-y and misleading. Any REST Client implementation 4xx and 5xx errors go into a error block and it really depends on case to case basis if you really want to use the response body for non 2xx responses.