OWASP ZAP Tool is not tracing in IE8 [closed] - sql-injection

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Currently I'm working on penetration testing particularly SQL Injection, for that I'm using OWASP ZAP tool, after configuration I can able to trace my web application into that ZAP tool, but the thing is I can't able to trace my web application that I'm running in my IE8. Actually in manual clearly they mentioned it will support for IE8, but I can't. Please provide me some suggestions regarding this.
Thanks in advance.
Kesavakumar V

Yes, ZAP will support IE8 - I've tested it myself.
I'm assuming that you have configured ZAP as IE8's proxy as per: http://code.google.com/p/zaproxy/wiki/HelpStartProxies
Is you target app on the same machine? IE can be a pain when talking to local apps and will often ignore the proxy settings.
If so make sure 'Bypass proxy server for local addresses' is unchecked.
Whether you are targetting a local app or not make sure that the target host name is not in the IE8 Proxy Settings 'Exceptions' list - in IE8 / Internet Options / 'Local Area Network (LAN) Settings' dialog click on the 'Advanced' button.
If the target host is in the Exceptions list then remove it.
Hopefully that will do the trick.
This is likely to be an 'IE' issue rather than a ZAP one. If you configure IE to use ZAP and nothing appears in ZAP then close ZAP and keep trying to use IE. If it carries on working then it is ignoring the proxy settings :)
Let me know if this works or not.
Simon (ZAP Project Lead).
PS we also have a user group, which you may well get faster answers on ;)

Related

How can I work on the same code with my friend in vs code? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I and my friend want to create a website. We're using Vs code. How we can work on the same code in vs code? I'm looking for something that lets me edit on the code at any time I want and the same thing for him.
Use GitHub
GitHub is a development platform inspired by the way you work. From open source to business, you can host and review code, manage projects, and build software alongside 50 million developers.
Github is a web-based platform used for version control. Git simplifies the process of working with other people and makes it easy to collaborate on projects. Team members can work on files and easily merge their changes.
You should definitely make your account on github as a developer as it helps alot.
Check it out here: https://github.com
You can use https://github.com/. Once you are done doing your code you have to upload it on github. Same as your friend can do. And the important thing is you can see/undo your previous code if you do anything wrong.
This is an opinionated question and answer, but since you are using VsCode, I would recommend Microsoft's Live Share . Since Microsoft is the creator of VsCode, I would guess this is going to be your best option to stay within the editor.
Visual Studio Live Share enables you to collaboratively edit and debug with others in real time, regardless what programming languages you're using or app types you're building. It allows you to instantly (and securely) share your current project, and then as needed, share debugging sessions, terminal instances, localhost web apps, voice calls, and more! Developers that join your sessions receive all of their editor context from your environment (e.g. language services, debugging), which ensures they can start productively collaborating immediately, without needing to clone any repos or install any SDKs.
Additionally, unlike traditional pair programming, Visual Studio Live Share allows developers to work together, while retaining their personal editor preferences (e.g. theme, keybindings), as well as having their own cursor. This allows you to seamlessly transition between following one another, and being able to explore ideas/tasks on your own. In practice, this ability to work together and independently provides a collaboration experience that is potentially more natural for many common use cases.
Well, I would recommend GitHub, is a great tool. If you like to learn from video, I would recommend this video. Or read this article.
The best way is live share
Live Share is an extension for VS Code that enables real-time collaboration between developers. It gives users the ability to share a session with someone else, allowing them to edit code as well as share a sever and debugging session

What's the best way to work on a website with a team collaboratively? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on a website with a group of friends. The problem that we are having is that when any one of us wants to make a change in the code, we have to send the project back to one main person, who uploads it online.
Is there a tool available that would allow multiple team members to login from different locations and make changes to the website directly so that the website would be updated immediately after editing?
Thanks!
There are multiple different ways to address this issue.
To answer your question directly, Yes. There are tools that allow you to edit the website directly on the server, this depends a lot on where the website is hosted and how you can get access to it. If your server supports FTP or SFTP all you have to do is find an FTP client and get the correct credentials for your server to log in.
There are many editors out there that allow you to edit files over FTP or SFTP so it feels very much like you are just editing a file on your local machine. Personally I use Coda 2 which is on the Mac Platform, but there are many other choices.
Even though you can do this, its not usually the best way to go about creating a website with multiple developers. Here are some potential issues:
Working on the same file at the same time: If you and a friend are working on the same file at the same time, its very easy to overwrite each others changes. If your friend saves to the sever and you don't get his changes before you save, you'll overwrite everything he just did.
Users are affected: Once you launch your site, making live changes on the site creates a bad experience for users. Its way to easy to break stuff and you don't want users finding their way to a partially completed feature.
To solve these issues you'll want to look into some type of version control system like Git http://git-scm.com. and get a local development environment setup so you can run the site on your computer.
With git you can edit a specific part of the site on your local computer, push those changes anywhere you want like a staging server, your friends local site or even the production server if you want. git handles merging your changes in with your friends changes and much more. This way you can build full features locally then only push them up to the server when they are complete.

How to do REST calls from Google Chrome [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any plugins for Google Chrome to make REST calls?
Like the Poster plugin for firefox.
I have tried chrome-poster, but it seems it still is on early development
You should also give a try to Postman REST Client (Packaged App), which is a fork from Simple REST Client. (There is also a lite version that runs in an ordinary Chrome tab and will suggest upgrading to the Packaged App version).
This extension is also open sourced on github.
Here is a short of its features:
Compact layout
HTTP requests with file upload support
Formatted API responses for JSON and XML
HATEOS support
Image previews
Request history
Basic Auth and OAuth 1.0 helpers
Autocomplete for URL and header values
Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.
Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.
Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity
Did you try this extension: REST Console?
You should try: cREST Client.
I would wholeheartedly recommend Advanced Rest Client:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hgmloofddffdnphfgcellkdfbfbjeloo
It was the only one that made POSTing form content really easy.
And here is one more: DHC by Restlet
I tried a lot of them and this is the best one I've used so far.
I used this DHC by Restlet. We can pass the session values as well as param in very well manner.
I this extension: Simple REST Client.

running my own jabber/xmpp server [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Can I make my own jabber server.So
that if I run my website xyz then
people should be be able to get
their jabber id from my website by
registering on my website.
Is there any open source
implementation of jabber server that
I can use?
I use Openfire to run my Jabber server and am quite happy with it. Probably higher-overhead than some of the other options (jabberd, ejabberd, etc.), but it's easy to install and has a great web-based admin UI.
As far as adding users via a web application - I don't know how you would go about doing that with Openfire, but it should be possible. It can plug in to many databases, and you might be able to give your web application an admin account that it can use to create users.
Alternatively, the Jabber/XMPP protocol supports creating a new account when you first connect to a server, if that's good enough for you. OpenFire supports that feature (as do most Jabber servers, I believe).
Update: The User Service Plugin for Openfire exposes an HTTP API for performing user administration actions. That's probably exactly what you need.
Can i make my own jabber server.So
that if i run my website xyz then
people should be be able to get theri
jabber id from my website by
registering on my website.
It depends on what kind of hosting you have. I think you should at least have VPS hosting to install the software. Basic hosting for a couple of bucks does not allow you to run jabber server.
Is there any open source implementation of jabber server that i can use?
I myself really like lua's prosody. It is easy to install / configure
You might like ejabberd, it is fairly friendly to new users:
http://www.process-one.net/en/ejabberd/
For you first question:
You might want to look at the XEP-0077 extension for in-band registration.
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0077.html#intro
What language are you coding in? You might want to check and see if that language has a XMPP library that can handle this extension.
I've tried most of them and can agree on ejabberd. The only problem is that in order to change it, you need to program in Erlang. Openfire looks great, but I could not get the certificate to load properly: there is a bug with the implementation, so TLS will not work. I couldn't get Soapbox to access a local MySQL database, so that was out too.
As for client-side, you can use Miranda.

Simple GWT hosting [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have designed a website with the GWT, This is purely a static site and it doesnt have any servlet or any rpc part involved in it. Its just a plain static pages in GWT .I have compiled with the GWT and there are all related html ,.js files are present in the public folder. Now i want to host the same in any of the web host.
Good web host to host this web site.
Procedure to upload the GWT compiler output files into the web host.
Note:- I tried with the google app engine but it had issues as i have couple of video files that needs to be uploaded which is embedded in the webpage.
Thank you
I think this is not really a "GWT hosting" problem, but rather a "hosting" problem. Finding a good host is not that problematic though. I suggest you to look up webhosting in your own language and country, which makes it easier to contact the hosting company in case of problems.
I don't suggest a free hosting, unless you really can't afford a payed host. Your site being static, would require a cheap host. Free hosts have always got some problems and some advertising attached to your content in some way (frames and popups).
For the uploading part, you usually get a (s)ftp account which you can use to upload your files to the server with a (s)ftp client. Good companies provide detailed description of this process for their server, and as being a paying customer, you will usually get technical support as well.
It's good to know that a host alone doesn't include a domain. To have a yourcompany.com address, you need to register it, and you will have to pay a (low) registration fee. Some compaines offer the domain as part of the hosting service.
I host a few small GWT (client-only) apps on the same site I host my blog. There's no problem. In the end GWT is just javascript with a couple of html files, and thats all thats really being hosted.
Ummmmm...why not host it on Google App Engine?
It's free and deployment is easy if you're using Eclipse.