I am newbie with filemaker. I am trying to set search function but something wrong and it returns No records match the request even if it is present there. Here is code
public function get_row($table, $search='')
{
$layout_object = $this->fm->getLayout($table);
if (FileMaker::isError($layout_object)) {
return array();
}
$request = $this->fm->newFindCommand($table);
if ($search)
{
$request->addFindCriterion($search['key'], 'hh#kkk.nn'); // hardcoded.
}
$result = $request->execute();
if (FileMaker::isError($result)) {
echo $result->getErrorString();
}
//.....Result: No records match the request
}
what I am doing wrong?
You need to escape the # symbol as it's a special character in Find mode to match any one character, so try this:
$request->addFindCriterion($search['key'], 'hh\#kkk.nn'); // hardcoded.
Related
I am trying to build up a queryOr based on a comma separated list that is passed in by the user that I will loop over and add the values.
So far I got this which just builds it:
$query = new SugarQuery();
$query->from(BeanFactory::getBean('rdwrk_Request'));
$skills = $query->join('rdwrk_request_skills_rdwrk_request', array('alias' => 'skills'))->joinName();
$query->select(array(array('name', 'requestName'), array('skills.name', 'skillName')));
if($args["requestName"])
{
$requestName = $args["requestName"];
if(strpos($requestName, ',') !== false)
{
$requestNames = explode(",", $requestName);
foreach($requestNames as $name)
{
$query->where()->queryOr()->contains('name', $name);
}
}
else
{
$query->where()->contains('name', $requestName);
}
}
if($args["skillName"])
{
$query->where()->contains('skills.name', args["skillName"]);
}
$results = $query->execute();
Is there any way to build it so all the values I loop over go into the same queryOr?
You can set the current SugarQuery object into its own variable, and then feed it through your loop as follows:
$currentQuery = $query->where()->queryOr();
foreach($requestNames as $name)
{
$currentQuery->contains('name', $name);
}
This calls the contains function on the same query object with the queryOr established. Since the $currentQuery variable references the same SugarQuery object, running $query->execute() later on will include the parameters.
I've tried to implement a new module that catches the keys written in the default search form and displays other results than the default search result page. With these other results I will make an external query, which is put in a special block.
Any idea on how to do this?
I've tried to use a custom module making a "hook_alter_form " with no success.
In other words :
I have a function like this:
function my_function_name_form_alter(&$form,&$form_state,$form_id){
switch($form_id){
case 'search-block-form':
//Here i want to catch the text that i wrote in the search box
break;
}
}
Thank u!
You can alter the search query in order to show other results:
function mymodule_query_alter(QueryAlterableInterface $query){
$is_search = FALSE;
foreach ($query->getTables() as $table) {
if ($table['table'] == 'search_index') {
$is_search = TRUE;
}
}
if ($is_search) {
global $language;
$db_or = db_or();
$db_or->condition('n.type', 'event', '=');
$db_or->condition('n.type', 'real_sitio', '=');
$query->condition($db_or);
$query->condition('n.language' , $language->language, '=');
}
}
This is a bit performance killer so there's a patch for drupal at http://drupal.org/node/1435834 that adds a hook for making the alter directly in the search query:
So finally it would look like:
function mymodule_search_query_search_node_alter(&$query) {
$query->condition('n.type', 'article', '=');
}
I am working with Zend and I needed to check whether a row in the DB already exists (A simple solution to get rid of the duplicate key error I was getting). I tried several things but nothing seemed to work... (for example the Zend_Validate_Db_NoRecordExists method)
So I wrote the following the code and I was wondering if this is a valid way to do it, or if I should do things differently:
In the model:
$where = $condition = array(
'user_id = ' . $user_id,
'page_id = ' . $page_id
);
$check = $this->fetchRow($where);
if(count($check) > 0) {
return null;
}else{
// Here I create a new row, fill it with data, save and return it.
}
And then in my view:
if($this->result != null) { /* do stuff */ }else{ /* do other stuff */ }
It does work but it does seem to take more time (duh, because of the extra query) and I am a bit unsure whether I should stick with this..
Any recommendation is welcome :)
Assuming you have coded your function in your controller
$row = $this->fetchRow($where); //If no row is found then $row is null .
if(!$row)
{
$row = $dbTb->createNew($insert); //$insert an associative array where it keys map cols of table
$row->save();
$this->view->row_not_found = true;
}
return $row;
In your view you can do this
if($this->row_not_found)
{
}else {
}
I get a really anoying error when I try to edit an entry from a table, in tutorial they always use getTable()->find(), but I need to verify that the person logged in is the owner of that entry here what I did:
In the action:
public function executeEdit(sfWebRequest $request)
{
$id = $request->getParameter('id');
$userid = $this->getUser()->getGuardUser()->getId();
$ad = Doctrine_Core::getTable('BambinbazarArticles')->getMyAd($id, $userid);
$this->forward404Unless($ad, sprintf('Object bambinbazar_articles does not exist (%s).', $request->getParameter('id')));
$this->form = new BambinbazarArticlesForm($ad);
}
In the model:
public function getMyAd($id, $userid)
{
$q = $this->createQuery('c')
->where('c.id = ? ', $id)
->addWhere('c.userid = ? ', $userid);
return $q->execute();
}
I tried it with and without the ->execute(), did doctrine clean, cleared cache, rebuilded model,
Always get the same error 'The "%s" form only accepts a "%s" object.
If I use the Doctrine_Core::getTable('BambinbazarArticles')->find() it work, but of course, i need more than that..
I am becoming crazy over this.
execute() can return multiple rows; effectively you're getting a recordset back, rather than the individual object that your form is expecting. Try fetching a single object, using, e.g.:
return $q->execute()->getFirst();
or
return $q->fetchOne();
Its probably because your query is returning a Doctrine_Collection, not the actual Doctrine_Record youre expecting. Instead of execute use fetchOne.
public function getMyAd($id, $userid)
{
$q = $this->createQuery('c')
->where('c.id = ? ', $id)
->addWhere('c.userid = ? ', $userid)
->limit(1);
return $q->fetchOne();
}
I have a situation where I want a set of users (employees) to be able to create a node, but to replace the uid (user ID) with that of the users profile currently displayed.
In other words, I have a block that that calls a form for a content type. If an employee (uid = 20) goes to a clients page (uid =105), and fills out the form, I want the uid associated with the form to be the client's(105), not the employee's.
I'm using arg(1) to grab the Client's uid - here is what I have..
<?php
function addSR_form_service_request_node_form_alter(&$form, $form_state) {
if (arg(0) == 'user' && is_numeric(arg(1))) {
$form['#submit'][] = 'addSR_submit_function';
}
}
function addSR_submit_function($form, $form_state) {
$account = user_load(arg(1));
$form_state['values']['uid'] = $account->uid;
$form_state['values']['name'] = $account->name;
}
?>
The form is loading in the block, but when submitted, is still showing the employee uid. I don't want to use hook_form_alter because I don't want to modify the actual form, because clients can fill out the form directly, in this case, I don't want to modify the form at all.
I'm also ashamed that I'm putting this in a block, but I couldn't think of a way to put this in a module, so any suggestions on that would also be appreciated...
To create your form in a block, you could use the formblock module. Especially if you are not used to use the Drupal API. Then all that's left if to add your own submit handler to the form. This is a piece of code that is run, when the form is submitted. You only want to do this on clients pages so you would do that using the hook_form_alter function.
/**
* Hooks are placed in your module and are named modulename_hookname().
* So if a made a module that I called pony (the folder would then be called
* pony and it would need a pony.info and pony.module file I would create this function
*/
function pony_form_service_request_node_form_alter(&$form, $form_state) {
// Only affect the form, if it is submitted on the client/id url
if (arg(0) == 'client' && is_numeric(arg(1))) {
$form['#submit'][] = 'pony_my_own_submit_function';
}
}
function pony_my_own_submit_function($form, &$form_state) {
$account = user_load(arg(1));
$form_state['values']['uid'] = $account->uid;
$form_state['values']['name'] = $account->name;
}
The idea behind this code, is to only alter the form when the condition is met - that it is submitted on a client page. I guessed that the arg(0) would be client so if it's something else you would need to change that of cause. We only need to add a submit function, since what we want is to change the values if the form has passed validation.
Then if that is the case our 2nd function is run, which does that actual alteration of the values.
PHP blocks are bad. You can put them in a module.
function hook_block($op, $delta = 0) {
// Fill in $op = 'list';
if ($op == 'view' && $delta = 'whatever') {
$account = user_load(arg(1));
$node = array('uid' => $account->uid, 'name' => $account->name, 'type' => 'service_request', 'language' => '', '_service_request_client' => $account->uid);
$output = drupal_get_form('service_request_node_form', $node);
// Return properly formatted array.
}
}
Additionally, you want a form_alter just to enforce the values. It's ugly but it works.
function hook_form_service_request_node_form_alter(&$form, $form_state) {
if (isset($form_state['node']['_service_request_client'])) {
$form['buttons']['submit']['#submit'] = array('yourmodule_node_form_submit', 'node_form_submit');
}
}
function yourmodule_node_form_submit($form, &$form_state) {
$account = user_load($form_state['node']['_service_request_cilent'])l
$form_state['values']['uid'] = $account->uid;
$form_state['values']['name'] = $account->name;
}