Hi I have the 3D matrix daily_renewables_excess which I am trying to plot a 3D bar graph for the x y and z dimensions in axis.
The size(daily_renewables_excess) is 11,7,10. So I am trying to get a 3D bar chart with 11 x intervals of x, 7 of y and 10 of z.
However when i try
figure;
bar3(daily_renewables_excess(:,:,:))
I get an error saying "Error using bar3 (line 39)
Inputs must be 2-D."
From my understanding of the documentation, the bar3 function will plot a 3D bar as above.
Do I need to rearrange the matrices somehow?
thank you
Since you have a 3D matrix (volume) you cannot simultaneously show 3 intervals (3 axis) + a scale value for the bars (4th variable). This would amount to plotting a 4D diagram (e.g. using color to color-code the 4-th dimension, bar size to size-code it, or even vertical stacking).
For example, the following volume D is of size [11x10x7] and you can get 7 bar3 plots by indexing in the 3rd (z) dimension
% random 3D input
D = randi(10, [11, 10, 7]);
[m,n,l] = size(D);
% plot bar for first z-
figure; bar3(D(:,:,1));
What you can do instead is reshape in either x- or y- dimesions, sort (in order to keep the notion of ordered intervals (in x- or y- respectively) and plot with bar3 the resulting matrices.
% reshape to x
Dx = reshape(D, m*l, n);
Dx = sort(Dx, 1, 'descend');
figure; bar3(Dx)
% reshape to y
Dy = reshape(D, m, n*l);
Dy = sort(Dy, 2, 'descend');
figure; bar3(Dy)
Related
I am plotting (for example three) different datasets using scatter or plot with the hold on function consecutively. This generates a scatter plot with the last layer overlapping with all the other ones.
Is there a (plotting) function that can randomly disperse the layers?
One way you could achieve this is via a 3d plot.
Create a depth vector of the same length as your x & y vector with random numbers and plot using plot3 (instead of plot).
You can then use the command view(2) to change the viewpoint you will get the effect you are after.
Example
f1=figure;
f2=figure;
nValues = 2000;
for dataSet=1:3
r1 = rand(nValues,1);
r2 = rand(nValues,1);
r3 = rand(nValues,1);
t = r1 * pi * 2;
x = r2 .* cos(t) + r1(1);
y = r2 .* sin(t) + r2(1);
depth = r3;
set(0,'CurrentFigure',f1)
plot(x,y,'.', 'MarkerSize',25)
hold all
set(0,'CurrentFigure',f2)
plot3(x,y,depth,'.', 'MarkerSize',25)
hold all
end
% Change viewpoint
view(2)
Data plotted with plot command (distinct layers)
Data plotted with plot3 command using a random value for z (depth)
if the function F is available it is easy to draw surf plot i.e.
x=1:0.1:4;
y=1:0.1:4;
[X,Y]=meshgrid(x,y);
Z=sin(X).^2+cos(Y).^2;
surf(X,Y,Z);
view(2) ;
in my case I calculated F function using least square:
for example I have x and y vectors
x = [0 9.8312 77.1256 117.9810 99.9979];
y = [0 2754.5 4043.3 5376.3 5050.4];
the linear function of these two vector is define by
F= [1149.73 , 37.63];
therefore the estimation is equal to
z= [ones(5,1) x']*F';
which is
z = [1149.73 1519.67 4051.96 5589.35 4912.65];
and if it is plotted
plot(x,y,'b.');
hold on;plot(x,y,'b-');
hold on; plot(x,z,'-r');
The linear z ( red line) is showing correctly. Now I want to plot it for all possible combination of x and y using grid and I need to have a mesh for all inputs
[X,Y] = meshgrid(x,y);
but how to make the Z matrix to show the intensity plot of function Z? The Z suppose to have high intensity close to z value and less value far from it. I should suppose to get something like this
Thanks
P.S: the F is calculated using pinv (least square).
You have to interpolate the scattered data to plot it on grid. Here is a simple example for your x, y and z vectors
xi=linspace(min(x),max(x),100)
yi=linspace(min(y),max(y),100)
[XI YI]=meshgrid(xi,yi);
ZI = griddata(x,y,z,XI,YI);
contourf(XI,YI,ZI)
Solution posted below function to plot bar 3 with separate x, y values and separate width and height values
bar3(x,y,z,xWidth,yWidth)
We are currently working on a project that allow one to visualize the area under a 3d function, f(x,y). The purpose of this is to demonstrate how the bars cut a 3d surface. Indirectly to visualize the desired integral.
We wish to have the bars match up with the intervals of the surface grid.
Below is a rough demonstration of the idea.
bar3 only has input for the x-values bar3(x,z), where as surf has a input for both the x and y surf(x,y,z)
Unfortunately this is what we are getting. - this is because bar3 cant be in terms of x and y
CODE:
clc;
cla;
d=eval(get(handles.edtOuterUpperB,'string'));
c=eval(get(handles.edtOuterLowerB,'string'));
b=eval(get(handles.edtInnerUpperB,'string'));
a=eval(get(handles.edtInnerLowerB,'string'));
n=eval(get(handles.edtInnerInterval,'string'));
m=eval(get(handles.edtOuterInterval,'string'));
h=(b-a)/n;
k=(d-c)/m;
[x,y] = meshgrid(a:h:b, c:k:d);
f=eval(get(handles.edtFunc,'string'));
surf(x,y,f);
hold on
bar3(f,1);
If you look closely, you will see that the XData and YData are different from the mesh to the 3D bar plot. This is because your mesh uses "real" x and y values while the bar plot uses indexes for the x and y values.
To fix this, you will want to change one or the other. For your case, the easiest one to change is going to be the surface. You can actually just omit the x and y inputs and the indexed x and y values will be used instead by default when generating the surface.
surf(f);
From the documentation for surf:
surf(Z) creates a three-dimensional shaded surface from the z components in matrix Z, using x = 1:n and y = 1:m, where [m,n] = size(Z). The height, Z, is a single-valued function defined over a geometrically rectangular grid. Z specifies the color data, as well as surface height, so color is proportional to surface height.
Update
If you want to keep the non-indexed values on the x and y axes, you will want to convert the bar3 plot instead. Unfortunately, MATLAB provides a way to specify the x axis bot not the y axis. You can take one of two approaches.
Change the XData
You can get the XData property of the resulting bar objects and change them to the data you want.
x = a:h:b;
y = c:k:d;
%// Anonymous function to scale things for us
scaler = #(vals)x(1) + ((vals-1) * (x(end) - x(1)) / (numel(x) - 1));
%// Create the bar plot
bars = bar3(y, f);
%// Change the XData
xdata = get(bars, 'XData');
xdata = cellfun(scaler, xdata, 'uni', 0);
set(bars, {'XData'}, xdata);
set(gca, 'xtick', x)
%// Now plot the surface
surf(x,y,f);
And just to demonstrate what this does:
x = linspace(0.5, 1.5, 5);
y = linspace(2.5, 4.5, 4);
f = rand(4,5);
scaler = #(vals)x(1) + ((vals-1) * (x(end) - x(1)) / (numel(x) - 1));
bars = bar3(y, f);
set(bars, {'XData'}, cellfun(scaler, get(bars, 'XData'), 'uni', 0))
set(gca, 'xtick', x)
axis tight
Change the XTickLabels
Instead of changing the actual data, you could simply change the values that are displayed to be what you want them to be rather than the indexed values.
x = a:h:b;
y = c:k:d;
labels = arrayfun(#(x)sprintf('%.2f', x), x, 'uni', 0);
bar3(y, f);
set(gca, 'xtick', 1:numel(x), 'xticklabels', labels);
hold on
%// Make sure to use the INDEX values for the x variable
surf(1:numel(x), y, f);
We found a user contributed function scatterbar3, which does what we want, in a different way than what bar3 uses:
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/1420-scatterbar3
There was however a slight hiccup that we had to correct:
hold on
scatterbar3(x,y,f,h);
scatterbar3 does not have separate inputs for the width and height of the bars, thus large gaps occur when the intervals do not equal one another. Demonstrated below.
We thus edited the scatterbar3 function in order to take both the width and height of the bars as inputs:
Edited scatterbar3 function:
function scatterbar3(X,Y,Z,widthx,widthy)
[r,c]=size(Z);
for j=1:r,
for k=1:c,
if ~isnan(Z(j,k))
drawbar(X(j,k),Y(j,k),Z(j,k),widthx/2,widthy/2)
end
end
end
zlim=[min(Z(:)) max(Z(:))];
if zlim(1)>0,zlim(1)=0;end
if zlim(2)<0,zlim(2)=0;end
axis([min(X(:))-widthx max(X(:))+widthx min(Y(:))-widthy max(Y(:))+widthy zlim])
caxis([min(Z(:)) max(Z(:))])
function drawbar(x,y,z,widthx,widthy)
h(1)=patch([-widthx -widthx widthx widthx]+x,[-widthy widthy widthy -widthy]+y,[0 0 0 0],'b');
h(2)=patch(widthx.*[-1 -1 1 1]+x,widthy.*[-1 -1 -1 -1]+y,z.*[0 1 1 0],'b');
h(3)=patch(widthx.*[-1 -1 -1 -1]+x,widthy.*[-1 -1 1 1]+y,z.*[0 1 1 0],'b');
h(4)=patch([-widthx -widthx widthx widthx]+x,[-widthy widthy widthy -widthy]+y,[z z z z],'b');
h(5)=patch(widthx.*[-1 -1 1 1]+x,widthy.*[1 1 1 1]+y,z.*[0 1 1 0],'b');
h(6)=patch(widthx.*[1 1 1 1]+x,widthy.*[-1 -1 1 1]+y,z.*[0 1 1 0],'b');
set(h,'facecolor','flat','FaceVertexCData',z)
Finally the working solution in action:
hold on
scatterbar3(x,y,f,h,k);
I have 3 vectors of data, X (position), Y (position) both of which are not regularly spaced, and Z(value of interest at each location). I tried contourf, which doesn't work because it needs a matrix for Z input.
You can also use griddata.
%Generate random data
x = rand(30,1);
y = rand(30,1);
z = rand(30,1);
%Create regular grid across data space
[X,Y] = meshgrid(linspace(min(x),max(x),n), linspace(min(y),max(y),n))
%create contour plot
contour(X,Y,griddata(x,y,z,X,Y))
%mark original data points
hold on;scatter(x,y,'o');hold off
For a contour plot you actually need either a matrix of z values, or a set (vector) of z-values evaluated on a grid. You cannot define contours using isolated Z values at (X,Y) points on the grid (i.e. what you claim you have).
You need to have the generating process (or function) provide values for a grid of (x,y) points.
If not, then you can create a surface from nonuniform data as #nate correctly pointed out, and then draw the contours on that surface.
Consider the following (random) example:
N = 64; % point set
x = -2 + 4*rand(N,1); % random x vector in[-2,2]
y = -2 + 4*rand(N,1); % random y vector in[-2,2]
% analytic function, or z-vector
z = x.*exp(-x.^2-y.^2);
% construct the interpolant function
F = TriScatteredInterp(x,y,z);
t = -2:.25:2; % sample uniformly the surface for matrices (qx, qy, qz)
[qx, qy] = meshgrid(t, t);
qz = F(qx, qy);
contour(qx, qy, qz); hold on;
plot(x,y,'bo'); hold off
The circles correspond to the original vector points with values (x,y,z) per point, the contours on the contours of the interpolant surface.
I have a function which takes a voxel representation of a 3D landscape and can plot a X-Y section to show the middle of the landscape. The voxel representation is stored in a 3 dimensional matrix with a number that represents something important. Obviously the matrix is
1,1,1
2,2,2
in terms of accessing the elements but the actual 3D locations are found in the following method:
(index-1)*resolution+0.5*resolution+minPos;
where resolution is the grid size :
resolution
<-->
__ __ __
|__|__|__|
<- Min pos
and minPos is where the grid starts.
Now in terms of the actual question, i would like to extract a single X-Y section of this voxel representation and display it as a surf. This can be done by just doing this:
surf(voxel(:, :, section))
however then you get this:
The obvious problem is that the grid will start at 0 because that is how the matrix representation is. How can i set the minimum and cell size for surf, ie so that the grid will start at the minimum (shown above) and will have the grid spacing of resolution (shown above).
Read the documentation of surf, you can also provide x and y coordinates corresponding to your data points.
surf(X,Y,Z)
X and Y can be either vectors or matrices:
surf(X,Y,Z) uses Z for the color data and surface height. X and Y are vectors or matrices defining the x and y components of a surface. If X and Y are vectors, length(X) = n and length(Y) = m, where [m,n] = size(Z). In this case, the vertices of the surface faces are (X(j), Y(i), Z(i,j)) triples. To create X and Y matrices for arbitrary domains, use the meshgrid function
Example
Z=[ 0 1 2 3;
7 6 5 4;
8 9 10 11];
x=[-1 0 1 2];
y=[-2 0 2];
surf(x,y,Z);
Of course you have to match Z, x and y matrices/vectors as clearly described in the doc^^
Just remember that elements in columns of Z are surf'ed as values along the y-axis, elements in rows of Z are surf'ed as values along the x-axis. This is clearly to be seen in the example picture.
Solution
I think you switched the x and y-axis around, which you can fix by just transposing z:
s = size(voxel);
xi = (minPosX:resolution:(minPosX+resolution*s(1)-1));
yi = (minPosY:resolution:(minPosY+resolution*s(2)-1));
z = (voxel(:,:,section));
surf(xi, yi, z');
or that you're picking the wrong numbers for constructing xi and yi and it should be this instead:
xi = (minPosX:resolution:(minPosX+resolution*s(2)-1));
yi = (minPosY:resolution:(minPosY+resolution*s(1)-1));
z = (voxel(:,:,section));
surf(xi, yi, z);
So it was easy enough to do:
lets say we have a 3D matrix "voxel";
s = size(voxel);
xi = (minPosX:resolution:(minPosX+resolution*s(1)-1));
yi = (minPosY:resolution:(minPosY+resolution*s(2)-1));
z = (voxel(:,:,section));
[x y] = meshgrid(xi, yi);
x = x';
y = y';
surf(x, y, z);
Provides the following plot:
This is rotated which is annoying, I cant seem to get it to rotate back (I could just visualise around the other way but that's ok)