Im very new to git ingeneral, egit and github.
The problem:
Lets say I have a project for eclipse in c:/username/workspace name "Test". So I versioned it and pushed it up to github.
Now I can see all my Files in github under the directory "Test" in github. In example /src. The "Test" directory is not versioned. only the name of the repository is "Test".
My next step was to delete my local files and fetch my project again(For testing). After that I had to import my project again (but I had to use the new project wizard) over the egit view. Unluckily also the wrong scala version was detected. (Was a play framework project). So I had a big exclamation mark on the project view.
My questions:
What is the best practice to oush a project to github so everyone can participate? Everything under the project folder? Obviously some information got lost through the process.
How can I prevent to generate a new project every time someone clones the repository?
What about best practices for using git inside the workspace. Eclipse warned not to put the project inside the workspace.
Im coming from a subversion background :/. Maybe a general missunderstanding.
Thanks in advance
Switching from SVN to Git in an Eclipse environment can take some getting use to. (I'm still getting accustomed to it myself.) Keep in mind the difference between the role of the .git folder and the .svn folders for Git and SVN respectively. There is a .svn folder at every folder level in the working copy. There is no .svn folder in the traditional Eclipse workspace root. The "source controlled things" are subdirectories of the workspace, not the workspace itself. This is generally good because the workspace contains desktop specific settings that one generally doesn't want shared (much of it in the .metadata directory).
With Git, there is only one .git folder that contains everything. The first impulse is to do a
git init
at the workspace level. This would make the subfolders (the Eclipse projects) eligible for source control. But wait, so is .metadata. Of course you can ignore it. But you may have to ignore lots of other folders (projects) that you do not want source controlled. Of course, the .gitignore should be included. But others will have different files to ignore.
It turns out that its easier to use Git with Eclipse if you place the .git folder and its sibling source controlled folders (Eclipse projects) someplace else besides the workspace root. Your view in Eclipse doesn't change. You still see all your projects, both the Git-controlled and the SVN controlled and ones not shared at all. But underneath in the filesystem, the Git-controlled folders will be somewhere else. This is what EGit prefers.
On my desktop, I have a workspaces directory for most of my Eclipse workspaces. Now that I use EGit, I also have an egit directory where I keep the local EGit repositories. The Eclipse workspaces that share using EGit reference a subdirectory of egit. It's from these local Git repositories that one pushes and pulls from GitHub.
Sorry for the length. I got a bit carried away.
Related
I'm more or less a git newbie, trying to get a good Setup to work in Eclipse with egit. I'm running Kepler with latest updates.
Originally I Setup the structure inside the Workspace Directory.
+Workspace/.git
+Workspace/TheProject
Using this Setup (admittedly with Juno) commits were taking forever. For this and other reasons I'd like to move git outside the Workspace Directory, outside eclipse in a parallel Directory.
+OtherDirectory/.git
+Workspace/TheProject
But I'm not getting very far. There seems to be no easy way to split the EXISTING git to another Location without having the Project move there too(!?)
I've tried e.g. Cloning the existing git (in the git repository perspective) and having it Import the Project in the same move.
I've tried just Cloning the existing git, without selection of "Import Project" at the same time.
Then I right clicked the cloned repository and went through the Import Existing Project dialog. I don't get a Chance to say where the Project should be loaded to.
In both cases the Project Ends up in the same Directory as the .git Directory (now outside the Workspace)
+OtherDirectory/.git
+OtherDirectory/TheProject
and not as I wish - to have the Project in the Workspace Directory.
This must be possible (?), but how?
Simply copy the .classpath and .project from Workspace/TheProject or OtherDirectory/TheProject, to otherDirectory (where the .git folder is).
Then import your project into the workspace, as in "Eclipse - Import an existing project?"
Everything will remain in OtherDirectory/ (outside your Eclipse workspace folder), but will be visible in your Eclipse workspace.
I'm developing a Symfony applicatoin and I'm trying to set up a Git workflow on Eclipse. The workspace (where the project files lies) are located on /home/sfprojects/testing/ and the Git repository is located on /var/git/testing.
Reading over and over all the Git resources I've could found (including "Pro Git" by Scott Chacón, and the EGit user guide (http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/User_Guide, among others), it's easy to understand why the Git repository and the Eclipse workspace should not share the same directory, now my big confusion is that I can not see a method to keep both things separated from each other.
Once I've created the Git repository through the wizard, all the project files are moved automatically from the Eclipse workspace to the working directory on /var/git/testing/testing/. For my big surprise, the new created Git repository became into the new project workplace on Eclipse with .git directory in the parent directory. It is not a obvious contradiction?. If I let the mouse pointer over the option "Use or create repository in parent folder of project" a very clear help tag with the following text:
When checked, this wizard will try to find or create a repository in the parent folder hierarchy of the selected projects.
Typically, newly created projects are located in the Eclipse workspace, thus repositories created this way would also end up in the Eclipse workspace.
This is not recommended for several reasons explained in the EGit user guide.
So, after some research, my logical conclusion is to create a Git bare repository and then link it to the project located in the workspace... wrong! bare repositories are not available to a Eclipse project.
I need a serious explanation on this.
Seems that I went wrong about what I thought was a contradiction in the EGit User Guide and the EGit behaviour about moving the project directory to the Git repository.
When the project files are moved as a working directory of the Git repository (with a Git metadata folder at the same level), they're still under the Eclipse control, as Eclipse workspace. But as EGit User Guide says (http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/User_Guide#Eclipse_Workspace_and_Repository_working_directory), the .git metadata folder should NOT be into the workspace... well that's when I was wrong, cause it is a Eclipse project/Git working folder... but it IS NOT an Eclipse workspace by any means, so the Git metadata folder is not editable, as any other source project file, just for Git (and the EGit Eclipse plugin, of course).
When sharing a project as git and trying to make the Eclipse project folder as the git repository, Eclipse says that it is not recommended to do so and that it should be outside the Eclipse workspace.
Why is that?
From Eclipse EGit help pages,
It is probably not a good idea to make a project the root folder of your Repository
The reason is that you will never be able to add another project to this Repository, as the .project file will occupy the root folder; you could still add projects as sub-folders, but this kind of project nesting is known to cause lots of problems all over the place. In order to add another project, you would have to move the project to a sub-folder in the Repository and add the second project as another sub-folder before you could commit this change.
Some more information
It is a good idea to keep your Repository outside of your Eclipse Workspace
There are several reasons for this:
The new Repository will consider the complete folder structure of the Eclipse workspace as (potential) content. This can result in performance issues, for example when calculating the changes before committing (which will scan the complete .metadata folder, for example); more often than not, the workspace will contain dead folders (e.g. deleted projects) which semantically are not relevant for EGit but can not be excluded easily.
The metadata (.git-) folder will be a child of the Eclipse Workspace. It is unclear whether this might cause unwanted folder traversals by Eclipse.
You can easily destroy your Repository by destroying your Eclipse Workspace
While I agree about keeping the repository outside the Eclipse workspace, and I would still make a git repo within an Eclipse project root directory (like in this answer).
Unless your program is composed of lots of little inter-dependent projects, I would limit one git repo to one Eclipse project.
A git repo is about recording the content of a tree structure, and if that tree represents one project, it is easier to manage, tag, branch, merge (as a coherent set of files).
If it represents multiple project, you are not sure anymore about what a tag like "1.0" represents for each of the projects in that Git repo.
Plus, I like to add the .project, .classpath and .settings to the Git repo (as "Does git exclude eclipse project files from a new repo by default?")
I am migrating from Eclipse/SVN to Eclipse/Git and I am unsure what the best directory layout would be. I have looked at the Vogel/a guide, the Eclipse Wiki as well as the following threads: Is it better to keep Git repository inside or outside of Eclipse workspace? Should I store git repository in Home or Eclipse Workspace?
I am used to setting up eclipse like so:
~/projectA/workspace/.metadata
~/projectA/workspace/subproj1/.project
~/projectA/workspace/subproj2/.project
~/projectA/subproj1/.svn
~/projectA/subproj1/file1
~/projectA/subproj2/.svn
~/projectA/subproj2/file2
So the project holds all project related files i need. The workspace folder holds relatively little data like the local revision info, project descriptions and specific eclipse settings.
The subproj folder(s) hold all the source code but also the subversion meta info.
The subprojects are more (or less..) related but they all contribute to projectA.
The eclipse working directory is ~/projectA/subproj1, ~/projectA/subproj2, etc.
I am not completely sure if i could use a more or less similar layout with Git. Biggest difference would be the 'repo' dir.
~/projectA/workspace/.metadata
~/projectA/workspace/subproj1/.project
~/projectA/workspace/subproj2/.project
~/projectA/subproj1/.git
~/projectA/subproj1/file1
~/projectA/subproj2/.git
~/projectA/subproj1/file2
~/projectA/repo/subproj1
~/projectA/repo/subproj2
If i set it up like the following, do I still comply with the best practices as mentioned in the Wiki?
#eugener I would assume the following layout complies with the Egit manual?:
~/projectA/workspace/.metadata
~/projectA/workspace/subproj1/.project
~/projectA/workspace/subproj2/.project
~/projectA/subproj1/.git
~/projectA/subproj1/file1
~/projectA/subproj2/.git
~/projectA/subproj1/file2
I would suggest to comply with EGit Wiki simply because the the way Git works.
The main point of Git is fast branching and merging, which is accomplished in repository's workspace, location of which is fixed in the folder where your repo is. Actual repository is located one level down in .git folder.
When project in Eclipse is "shared" with Git all the files are automatically moved from Eclipse workspace where the project was created to the location of the git repo it was shared with. So project in Eclipse is just a shortcut. Branch switching replaces the files in Git workspace which is automatically reflected in Eclipse.
Issue
After importing an Eclipse project from a cloned git repository, I make some changes and commit - and wtf? I get a ".git" folder added to the project, the whole shebang with the heads and refs and worst of all the whole object database gets added to the project, all files/folders having that little question-mark icon signaling that the files have not been added / are not yet tracked by git. This .git folder exists in the actual Working Directory (how does that even make sense?). You can imagine what an annoyance this causes when trying to use the "Synchronize" tool/view (which is supposed to make life easier for committing, you can see all the changes and changed files and diffs).
Question (tl;dr)
How to correctly import an Eclipse project from a cloned git repository? I don't want a .git folder showing up in "Team > Synchronize" when I commit, let the .git folder reside somewhere else outside of my project.
Additional Info
I'm on Windows 7 using Eclipse Indigo and Egit.
I am using Egit to clone a git repo from http://git.apache.org/ (the ofbiz project, to be exact) and in the wizard I choose the option to import an existing project from this newly cloned repo.
Yes I am aware of how little I may expect from Egit. In fact, if there are any alternative ways (external git tool? command line git for windows? other?) to use a git-tracked project in Eclipse which keeps the actual .git stuff out of the project, i'd gladly abandon Egit.
When you clone a git repository, the default behavior is to create a .git folder inside the root of the local clone. You can change the default behavior by setting the GIT_DIR variable:
Git docs says:
"GIT_DIR
If the GIT_DIR environment variable is set then it specifies a path to use instead of the default .git for the base of the repository."
Depending on which terminal you use, you could set it using setenv or export.
For example in a bash terminal:
export GIT_DIR='[path_to_git_directory]'
After setting the variable, you should be able to clone and the .git directory should show up at the specified directory.
I totally agree - I can't imagine it would ever be anyones intent to commit the .git folder!
And git/EGit knows that this is the repository folder of the project, so it should be easy to implement the appropriate exception - so that this folder does not become part of the synchronization.
I know the following does not solve your problem, but in cases where you control the way files are layed out in the repository, you could choose to have the Eclipse project folder not be the root folder of the repository, but rather a sub-folder.
This also allows you to have stuff in the repository that should not show up in Eclipse, or even have multiple Eclipse projects grouped in one repository (if you should wish to do so).